24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 5 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,834
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,834
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Theeck
Right. So they don't get the step up in basis without actually paying the tax. Still, having to pay capital gains is likely only 15%. It sucks (and I don't agree with it for a variety of reasons) but I don't think it will force many people to sell that would otherwise hold onto the land.


Let’s say you inherit 600 acres of prime Iowa farmland. Your dad bought it 40 years ago at $900 an acre. It’s worth about $9k an acre now. You want to farm and make a living doing so, so you have no plans to sell any of it. In fact you really can’t sell any of it because 600 acres is pretty marginal for making a living. Under the rules as they are now, you get a step up in basis and no taxes of any kind if you don’t sell. Under what might happen and is being talked about, you get no step up in basis and owe capital gains tax upon transfer. Your dad got the property for $540k. It is now worth $5.4 million. You owe taxes on $4.86 million. At 15% that is $729,000. At the talked about 39% the Biden administration is possibly proposing $1.53 million. Either sum would force most people to sell at least a portion of the farm which would make it non-viable as a way to make a living. May as well sell it all then.


This is absolutely true, but it clearly shows how horrible farming is as a use of capital. Were someone to sell and invest that $5.4 million at the average rate for the last 100 years (which is over 11%), it would create an income of more than $500,000 per year. Few, if any, farms realize that net, or come even close to half that, meaning the farmers, in effect, are paying $300,000 or more per year for the privilege to farm.

I know, I know, that's an over simplification, ignoring value gains of the farms among others, but it's still too close to the truth to be comfortable.


Sic Semper Tyrannis
GB1

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,496
I
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
I
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,496
I won't go into the details because they're very complex. Here's a summary.

At present a married couple can exclude $23.5MM from gift and inheritance taxes due to very favorable laws passed by Republican congresses in recent years, before Trump. BUT the most favorable law expires in 2026.

Biden has proposed (openly, for about a year) drastically reducing this.

So you don't have $23.5MM?

Biden has also proposed changing the law, in part as the OP noted, to greatly increase the taxes on the lower amount remaining of the exclusion.

The result is the .gov will get a lot more of your money and your kids won't get it. We're talking about them taking stuff you already own, not stuff you earn. And they want to take the new inheritance taxes each year, even before you die.

This is in addition to any income tax increase, which the Dems have also proposed. Where do you think they can get the money for the $1.9 trillion "Covid bill?" They're borrowing it and will need to pay back the "loan."

So what can you do about it?

If you have any appreciable amount of assets, go see your lawyer. Ask him about trusts in general and a SLAT in particular. Don't wait. Estate lawyers were very busy in the last half of 2020 setting up trusts to shield assets in case the Bolsheviks won.

Just do it.


Don't blame me. I voted for Trump.

Democrats would burn this country to the ground, if they could rule over the ashes.
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,209
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,209
Originally Posted by Gus
why would a loyal demo want most of the land area of the us owned by the loyal repubs?



Redistribution of wealth. There will be special concessions on taxes and financing for the women and minorities farming start-ups. The women and minorities will be allowed/required to lease land from Massa' Gates and his ilk, "cuz he gwine treat y'all jist fine'!

At least that was the plan in South Africa after Apartheid...and look how well that has turned out.


“My horn is full and my pouch is stocked with ball and patch. There is a new, sharp flint in my lock and my rifle and I are ready. It is sighted true and my eyes can still aim.”
Kaywoodie
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,795
J
JoeBob Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,795
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
This might be the place to remind y'all that President Trump nixed the Inheritance Tax. This is just making things "right" for the elites again. Getting back on schedule.


Come again?

The current stepped up basis tax treatment applies not only to real property, but also to other assets subject to capital gains tax, such as company stock. If you bought Amazon at $20 and will it to your kids, THEIR basis for capital gains tax when they sell it is the price at the time of inheritance, avoiding capital gains tax on 90% or more of it's value.

Last I checked, it's the "elite" and not Joe and Suzy with the 7 year car note that own stocks..........



Been under rock for twenty years? Most people have a 401k or IRA.



Come again?

Care to explain how capital gains and stepped up basis treatment applies to 401 (K), 403 (B) and IRA held assets?

Answer: they don't, AND all withdrawals are taxed as INCOME, not as capital gains. So your precious 401 (K) tax treatment can cause an increase in tax obligation by converting capital gains income from the cap. gains rate to the income tax rate, resulting in an increased tax rate as high as 25% of withdrawals. But, it's your money.....


True, but plenty of people own stocks and that was the point. And besides IRAs plenty of people are in mutual funds and regular stocks and more so every single day. Why? Because the stock market is the only place one can get a return.

Last edited by JoeBob; 02/25/21.
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 760
E
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
E
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 760
family trust business going to go thru the roof

IC B2

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,795
J
JoeBob Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,795
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Theeck
Right. So they don't get the step up in basis without actually paying the tax. Still, having to pay capital gains is likely only 15%. It sucks (and I don't agree with it for a variety of reasons) but I don't think it will force many people to sell that would otherwise hold onto the land.


Let’s say you inherit 600 acres of prime Iowa farmland. Your dad bought it 40 years ago at $900 an acre. It’s worth about $9k an acre now. You want to farm and make a living doing so, so you have no plans to sell any of it. In fact you really can’t sell any of it because 600 acres is pretty marginal for making a living. Under the rules as they are now, you get a step up in basis and no taxes of any kind if you don’t sell. Under what might happen and is being talked about, you get no step up in basis and owe capital gains tax upon transfer. Your dad got the property for $540k. It is now worth $5.4 million. You owe taxes on $4.86 million. At 15% that is $729,000. At the talked about 39% the Biden administration is possibly proposing $1.53 million. Either sum would force most people to sell at least a portion of the farm which would make it non-viable as a way to make a living. May as well sell it all then.


This is absolutely true, but it clearly shows how horrible farming is as a use of capital. Were someone to sell and invest that $5.4 million at the average rate for the last 100 years (which is over 11%), it would create an income of more than $500,000 per year. Few, if any, farms realize that net, or come even close to half that, meaning the farmers, in effect, are paying $300,000 or more per year for the privilege to farm.

I know, I know, that's an over simplification, ignoring value gains of the farms among others, but it's still too close to the truth to be comfortable.


Not really. Why? Because it IS a return and it is less risky than the market. Can’t stick money in the bank and get a return in the last thirty years. The market is always risky.

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 760
E
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
E
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 760
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Theeck
Right. So they don't get the step up in basis without actually paying the tax. Still, having to pay capital gains is likely only 15%. It sucks (and I don't agree with it for a variety of reasons) but I don't think it will force many people to sell that would otherwise hold onto the land.


Let’s say you inherit 600 acres of prime Iowa farmland. Your dad bought it 40 years ago at $900 an acre. It’s worth about $9k an acre now. You want to farm and make a living doing so, so you have no plans to sell any of it. In fact you really can’t sell any of it because 600 acres is pretty marginal for making a living. Under the rules as they are now, you get a step up in basis and no taxes of any kind if you don’t sell. Under what might happen and is being talked about, you get no step up in basis and owe capital gains tax upon transfer. Your dad got the property for $540k. It is now worth $5.4 million. You owe taxes on $4.86 million. At 15% that is $729,000. At the talked about 39% the Biden administration is possibly proposing $1.53 million. Either sum would force most people to sell at least a portion of the farm which would make it non-viable as a way to make a living. May as well sell it all then.


This is absolutely true, but it clearly shows how horrible farming is as a use of capital. Were someone to sell and invest that $5.4 million at the average rate for the last 100 years (which is over 11%), it would create an income of more than $500,000 per year. Few, if any, farms realize that net, or come even close to half that, meaning the farmers, in effect, are paying $300,000 or more per year for the privilege to farm.

I know, I know, that's an over simplification, ignoring value gains of the farms among others, but it's still too close to the truth to be comfortable.



The problem with this is that the cost of land is going up faster than that and they ain't making any more land. Already have to be filthy rich to buy land in a lot of areas now. Soon only the super rich will be able to buy land.

Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 306
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 306
I just read up a little on it and have a few questions because I am not very familiar with how US tax calculation works in practice.
So I the Internet told me that this tax is due when the investment is sold, how would this affect someone who now owns a farming business and would not want to sell it? Would he need to pay anything?
Also read that incomes under $1 Million will still pay the same capital gains tax as before. But, when talking about farms, is this income the profit or just the proceeds without production costs?


They don't make 'em like they used to

Don't tread on me

Nothing runs like a Deere
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,795
J
JoeBob Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,795
No, I know. Super rich can buy land to play on or as a source of income. And like I said in an earlier post, it IS a return. There just aren’t many places anyone can get a nice steady and relatively safe return. A rich guy or a corporation that has $50 million sitting around not doing anything can take than money and put it to work. The return is not huge, but there is one and it’s safer than lots of other things. That of course, drives up the prices and prices the little man out of the market.

Apartment buildings are hot hot hot right now for the same reason.

Last edited by JoeBob; 02/25/21.
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,684
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,684
Originally Posted by Dutch


This is absolutely true, but it clearly shows how horrible farming is as a use of capital. Were someone to sell and invest that $5.4 million at the average rate for the last 100 years (which is over 11%), it would create an income of more than $500,000 per year. Few, if any, farms realize that net, or come even close to half that, meaning the farmers, in effect, are paying $300,000 or more per year for the privilege to farm.

I know, I know, that's an over simplification, ignoring value gains of the farms among others, but it's still too close to the truth to be comfortable.


It's going to be less than $5.4 million after taxes. But, what you're saying is what is happening in some places, especially where towns are expanding out to swallow up farms for housing. Even then, a lot of farmers run the money through 1031 exchanges and buy more farm land farther out in order to avoid the tax bite.

If you buy a stock, do you expect the dividends to pay for it? No. Part of the calculation is the expected appreciation of the stock price. Same with land, be it farm, timberland, or your house and lot. Also, land is somewhat like gold, a store of value. In JoeBob's example, the land went from $900 to $9,000 in 40 years. That's about a 6% return without taking into account the annual income from the farm.


The biggest problem our country has is not systemic racism, it's systemic stupidity.
IC B3

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,411
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,411
Originally Posted by There_Ya_Go
Originally Posted by Dutch


This is absolutely true, but it clearly shows how horrible farming is as a use of capital. Were someone to sell and invest that $5.4 million at the average rate for the last 100 years (which is over 11%), it would create an income of more than $500,000 per year. Few, if any, farms realize that net, or come even close to half that, meaning the farmers, in effect, are paying $300,000 or more per year for the privilege to farm.

I know, I know, that's an over simplification, ignoring value gains of the farms among others, but it's still too close to the truth to be comfortable.


It's going to be less than $5.4 million after taxes. But, what you're saying is what is happening in some places, especially where towns are expanding out to swallow up farms for housing. Even then, a lot of farmers run the money through 1031 exchanges and buy more farm land farther out in order to avoid the tax bite.

If you buy a stock, do you expect the dividends to pay for it? No. Part of the calculation is the expected appreciation of the stock price. Same with land, be it farm, timberland, or your house and lot. Also, land is somewhat like gold, a store of value. In JoeBob's example, the land went from $900 to $9,000 in 40 years. That's about a 6% return without taking into account the annual income from the farm.



Annual income from the farm is quite an assumption. There’s also the distinct possibility of annual losses,


The degree of my privacy is no business of yours.

What we've learned from history is that we haven't learned from it.
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,522
K
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
K
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,522
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by chris_c


My understanding is.
The way it is now if I die my kids inherit my place at present value. New plan if I bought it 30 years ago at 10,000 and its worth 500,000 they pay tax on 490,000.


Right now, if you inherit property under the Federal inheritance Tax limit (which was just raised, and is way higher than I need to worry about), the kids receive the property free and clear AND they receive a "stepped up basis", meaning THEIR basis for future capital gains taxes is reset to the value of the property at the time of inheritance.

It's a very favorable tax treatment for inheritances, and many people fugg it up by deeding property to their children before they die, in effect screwing their kids and setting them up to have to pay tens of thousands in capital gains taxes to avoid a few thousand in state probate taxes.



Its a gamble, in Ga, if you go into a nursing home, like a lot of older folks do, state can go back as far as 10 years after your property. In Ga, pretty much everyone gets it to their kids as soon as they can to prepare for this in case it happens.

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,411
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,411
Originally Posted by killerv
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by chris_c


My understanding is.
The way it is now if I die my kids inherit my place at present value. New plan if I bought it 30 years ago at 10,000 and its worth 500,000 they pay tax on 490,000.


Right now, if you inherit property under the Federal inheritance Tax limit (which was just raised, and is way higher than I need to worry about), the kids receive the property free and clear AND they receive a "stepped up basis", meaning THEIR basis for future capital gains taxes is reset to the value of the property at the time of inheritance.

It's a very favorable tax treatment for inheritances, and many people fugg it up by deeding property to their children before they die, in effect screwing their kids and setting them up to have to pay tens of thousands in capital gains taxes to avoid a few thousand in state probate taxes.



Its a gamble, in Ga, if you go into a nursing home, like a lot of older folks do, state can go back as far as 10 years after your property. In Ga, pretty much everyone gets it to their kids as soon as they can to prepare for this in case it happens.



Trusts ?


The degree of my privacy is no business of yours.

What we've learned from history is that we haven't learned from it.
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,401
R
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
R
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,401
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by There_Ya_Go
Originally Posted by Dutch


This is absolutely true, but it clearly shows how horrible farming is as a use of capital. Were someone to sell and invest that $5.4 million at the average rate for the last 100 years (which is over 11%), it would create an income of more than $500,000 per year. Few, if any, farms realize that net, or come even close to half that, meaning the farmers, in effect, are paying $300,000 or more per year for the privilege to farm.

I know, I know, that's an over simplification, ignoring value gains of the farms among others, but it's still too close to the truth to be comfortable.


It's going to be less than $5.4 million after taxes. But, what you're saying is what is happening in some places, especially where towns are expanding out to swallow up farms for housing. Even then, a lot of farmers run the money through 1031 exchanges and buy more farm land farther out in order to avoid the tax bite.

If you buy a stock, do you expect the dividends to pay for it? No. Part of the calculation is the expected appreciation of the stock price. Same with land, be it farm, timberland, or your house and lot. Also, land is somewhat like gold, a store of value. In JoeBob's example, the land went from $900 to $9,000 in 40 years. That's about a 6% return without taking into account the annual income from the farm.



Annual income from the farm is quite an assumption. There’s also the distinct possibility of annual losses,


Boy that is a fact! With unstable fuel prices and a broken crystal ball how are you going to make a budget. My Uncle who eventually became wealthy farming dryland wheat felt breaking even was a hell of a task.


Dog I rescued in January

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]



Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,520
K
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
K
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,520
Originally Posted by dvnv
Originally Posted by Theeck
Right. So they don't get the step up in basis without actually paying the tax. Still, having to pay capital gains is likely only 15%. It sucks (and I don't agree with it for a variety of reasons) but I don't think it will force many people to sell that would otherwise hold onto the land.


Capital gains isn't going to stay at 15-20% (see link below). Most working farms/ranches are worth way more than $500K and don't generate much cash flow.

https://protect-eu.mimecast.com/s/ZJRuC27DiRqVJzECnx_5v?domain=app.greenrope.com




It's been a while since I looked at Biden's tax plan but one of his points was drastically raising the capital gains up to the 40 % neighborhood, he also had a provision in there that I took to really limit business deductions for sole proprietorships/S corps where only a fraction of the actual business expenses would be deductibe (something like 25% of the real expense) that's going to hurt a lot of farmers and other small businesses.

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,684
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,684
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by There_Ya_Go
Originally Posted by Dutch


This is absolutely true, but it clearly shows how horrible farming is as a use of capital. Were someone to sell and invest that $5.4 million at the average rate for the last 100 years (which is over 11%), it would create an income of more than $500,000 per year. Few, if any, farms realize that net, or come even close to half that, meaning the farmers, in effect, are paying $300,000 or more per year for the privilege to farm.

I know, I know, that's an over simplification, ignoring value gains of the farms among others, but it's still too close to the truth to be comfortable.


It's going to be less than $5.4 million after taxes. But, what you're saying is what is happening in some places, especially where towns are expanding out to swallow up farms for housing. Even then, a lot of farmers run the money through 1031 exchanges and buy more farm land farther out in order to avoid the tax bite.

If you buy a stock, do you expect the dividends to pay for it? No. Part of the calculation is the expected appreciation of the stock price. Same with land, be it farm, timberland, or your house and lot. Also, land is somewhat like gold, a store of value. In JoeBob's example, the land went from $900 to $9,000 in 40 years. That's about a 6% return without taking into account the annual income from the farm.



Annual income from the farm is quite an assumption. There’s also the distinct possibility of annual losses,


The farm entity might not show a profit, but the farmer draws a salary and that salary is part of the farm's operating expense. As a purchaser of farm land, around here you can get anywhere from $80 to $100 per acre, sometimes more, per acre per year in cash rent, payable at the beginning of the year. So $90 an acre cash rent on $3,000 per acre land is a 3% return annually.


The biggest problem our country has is not systemic racism, it's systemic stupidity.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,478
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,478
A member here posted this on the Hunter’s Campfire forum over 8 years ago...

Anything that happens to you can end in only two ways: It will kill you, in which case all your problems are over. Or, it will not kill you, in which case it wasn't really a problem. The lesson is that there is no such thing as a problem.

That applies to whoever gets elected, what laws that get passed, the taxes they say you owe, the killer asteroid headed our way, what the dog with the lifted leg does to your pants, or whatever.

You will live through all of those - or you won't. Not a problem.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,337
G
Gus Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
G
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,337
Originally Posted by Johnny Dollar
Originally Posted by Gus
why would a loyal demo want most of the land area of the us owned by the loyal repubs?



Redistribution of wealth. There will be special concessions on taxes and financing for the women and minorities farming start-ups. The women and minorities will be allowed/required to lease land from Massa' Gates and his ilk, "cuz he gwine treat y'all jist fine'!

At least that was the plan in South Africa after Apartheid...and look how well that has turned out.



in a large sense, this is true. it's wealth that belongs to the opposition. so why not pass laws that enable one to better take it?

the demo's live in the big cities, the repubs live in the rural areas of the nation.

so, where's the "equity" in all of that?


Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,834
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,834
Originally Posted by JoeBob


Not really. Why? Because it IS a return and it is less risky than the market. Can’t stick money in the bank and get a return in the last thirty years. The market is always risky.


Since we are talking about generational wealth here, there is simply no risk in investing in the stock market. Nobody has ever lost money with a well diversified stock portfolio over a period of decades. Short term, sure. Over a period of one or more generations? The risk vanishes and returns approach the average.

Moreover, as 2008 has shown us, there is most certainly short term risks in real estate as well.

There is no flies on real estate as an investment, but over long periods of time, it is no less risky than stocks, and has some strong negative aspects, including poor liquidity, difficulty diversifying, and transaction costs.


Sic Semper Tyrannis
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 3,734
E
ERK Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
E
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 3,734
Antlers you better subtract land taxes and insurance from your figure and also loss of any other interest you might have gotte. Edk

Page 5 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

166 members (1eyedmule, 160user, 2UP, 44mc, 3333vl, 308ld, 13 invisible), 1,564 guests, and 956 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,387
Posts18,469,772
Members73,931
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.100s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9199 MB (Peak: 1.1076 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-26 10:13:18 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS