|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,164
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,164 |
Hello All
I am going to be loading for a friends M1A in .308. Is they any precautions loading for it such as pressure consideration and powder choices like for the M1 Garand?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,053
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,053 |
Shooting Times, May 2021 has an article on just that: "Handloading tips for M1 Garand Shooters" I haven't read it yet.
Last edited by Hancock27; 03/18/21. Reason: typing goofs
And these zombies line up and eat from the media’s trough
Cowards CANNOT be free. Nor should they be.
~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 14,682
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 14,682 |
Yes, stick to medium burn rates and lower pressures than a bolt gun.
Politics is War by Other Means
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,164
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,164 |
Shooting Times, May 2021 has an article on just that: "Handloading tips for M1 Garand Shooters" I haven't read it yet. Does it mention the M1A in the article?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,164
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,164 |
Yes, stick to medium burn rates and lower pressures than a bolt gun. Thanks. Do you have suggestions on what powders to use?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 14,682
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 14,682 |
Yes, I like Varget, N140, Re15, AR Comp, 4895 and 4064. Basically, anything you'd use in a .223.
Politics is War by Other Means
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,164
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,164 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,856
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,856 |
The Lake City Match M852 load was supposedly 41.5gr of 4895 behind a 168 SMK. By "supposedly", I don't question it, it's just that's what matched it and everyone used back in the old days.
Last edited by UPhiker; 03/18/21.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,164
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,164 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,819
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,819 |
You'll want to use heavy duty brass like Lake City. IMR4895 is a very good powder for this application. With a 168 grain match bullet you'll probably hit a good spot in the range of 41.5 to 41.8 grains depending on the powder lot.
The spec for M852 match was 42.2 grains but 41.5 grains shot better in the M852 brass I reloaded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,450
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,450 |
I am going to be loading for a friends M1A in .308. Is they any precautions loading for it such as pressure consideration and powder choices like for the M1 Garand? They're a little more forgiving than the M1 Garand because the M14 design uses a gas piston that cuts off gas as it moves that isn't part of a long op rod. That said, the powder recommendations I grew up with were identical for both. 3031 on the faster end and 4064 on the slower end. Tyrone's advice of any powder you'd use for the 223 is good advice. I'd add a couple of cautions; I'd be careful using any VV high energy powders (N530, N540) and MR2000 not because I've heard anything negative, but part because they're often giving higher than normal velocities and the M14 has the baggage of a maximum port pressure 12kpsi +/i a couple thousand psi, and part because I'm a cautious guy. The spec for M852 match was 42.2 grains but 41.5 grains shot better in the M852 brass I reloaded. I'm not a fan of advising off a spec from a TM because the arsenals loaded to a pressure spec. Each lot was tested for pressure and the charge adjusted depending...thus TM spec is a very fuzzy number. As always prudent, reduce and work your way up in your own rifle. To the OP...with all that said, if you're looking for something that should just work, go with IMR 4895. IMR 4064 is a good choice as well, but in our experience resulted in more brass stretch and thus shorter brass life.
Last edited by ChrisF; 03/18/21.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 17,108
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 17,108 |
The first time I loaded for mine I used some Federal brass that I got from a game warden. I don’t recall the powder, but the bullets were Hornady 165 BTSP’s.
Anyway that brass was crap. Primers were falling out.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,474
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,474 |
I am going to be loading for a friends M1A in .308. Is they any precautions loading for it such as pressure consideration and powder choices like for the M1 Garand? They're a little more forgiving than the M1 Garand because the M14 design uses a gas piston that cuts off gas as it moves that isn't part of a long op rod. That said, the powder recommendations I grew up with were identical for both. 3031 on the faster end and 4064 on the slower end. Tyrone's advice of any powder you'd use for the 223 is good advice. I'd add a couple of cautions; I'd be careful using any VV high energy powders (N530, N540) and MR2000 not because I've heard anything negative, but part because they're often giving higher than normal velocities and the M14 has the baggage of a maximum port pressure 12kpsi +/i a couple thousand psi, and part because I'm a cautious guy. The spec for M852 match was 42.2 grains but 41.5 grains shot better in the M852 brass I reloaded. I'm not a fan of advising off a spec from a TM because the arsenals loaded to a pressure spec. Each lot was tested for pressure and the charge adjusted depending...thus TM spec is a very fuzzy number. As always prudent, reduce and work your way up in your own rifle. To the OP...with all that said, if you're looking for something that should just work, go with IMR 4895. IMR 4064 is a good choice as well, but in our experience resulted in more brass stretch and thus shorter brass life. IMR 4895 is about as safe as it gets IMHO. We used that and then moved to surplus powder that worked just fine for years but IMR 4895 is the way to go unless you understand all the issues and are careful
We can keep Larry Root and all his idiotic blabber and user names on here, but we can't get Ralph back..... Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,164
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,164 |
Thanks all for the advice. I haven't seen IMR 4895 in months, but do have pound of 4064 and some Varget.
Last edited by Just a Hunter; 03/20/21.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,668
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,668 |
I have two M1A's. Have been loading for them 4-5 yrs. now. The literature that comes with the rifles says the M1A is cleared for all factory .308 ammo except the "high energy" style stuff. And one should not use bullet weights over 180 grs. either. That said, I've found the best accuracy to be on the light side. With military weight brass, my Squad Scout, will put four Sierra 125 gr. PH bullets into just under an inch at 100 yds. That's with 46.1 grains of TAC, and a CCI 34 primer. Much lighter than normal loads cycle just fine. Like 39 grs. of TAC with a 150 gr. FMJ. That's because the rifles are "over gassed" to make sure they function reliably with crappy ammo. E
Last edited by Oheremicus; 03/21/21.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 734
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 734 |
I have two M1A's. Have been loading for them 4-5 yrs. now. The literature that comes with the rifles says the M1A is cleared for all factory .308 ammo except the "high energy" style stuff. And one should not use bullet weights over 180 grs. either. That said, I've found the best accuracy to be on the light side. With military weight brass, my Squad Scout, will put four Sierra 125 gr. PH bullets into just under an inch at 100 yds. That's with 46.1 grains of TAC, and a CCI 34 primer. Much lighter than normal loads cycle just fine. Like 39 grs. of TAC with a 150 gr. FMJ. That's because the rifles are "over gassed" to make sure they function reliably with crappy ammo. E I use the same bullet, they really shoot nice. I use 44.8 H-4895 or same amount IMR 4895. H measures a lot better. The Pro Hunters have worked great on whitetails for me.
I would have got him too but a Dad Blam snow flake hit me in da eye....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 788
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 788 |
Zediker's website appears down or defunct. He used to offer a free pdf download of "Reloading for the Match M14". It was a section from one of his books, and informative.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 13,234
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 13,234 |
Glen Zediker died last October. Midsouth Shooters still has his Shot Report articles available, you might look there for his articles.
Let's Go Brandon! FJB
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 788
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 788 |
Sorry to hear of Glen's demise. Midsouth does have his blog up. Thanks for the info!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 14,682
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 14,682 |
Zediker's website appears down or defunct. He used to offer a free pdf download of "Reloading for the Match M14". It was a section from one of his books, and informative. I have a copy if anyone wants it. Thanks for reminding me of it.
Politics is War by Other Means
|
|
|
|
564 members (11point, 16penny, 10gaugeman, 160user, 1936M71, 10ring1, 68 invisible),
2,955
guests, and
1,328
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,383
Posts18,469,596
Members73,931
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|