Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunting Rifles The .270

I'm not sure about that, dont know the difference in case capacity. To he honest, I'd be perfectly happy with a garden variety .280, and the animals would be just as dead.

Or maybe I'm wrong about that, they might be deader if I shot 'em with a WSM, what with the 1/2 inch shorter action and all.

You seem to get such joy criticizing people and calling them names on the internet anonymously. So brave of you. Are you that brave face to face? I doubt it. Not only have you done it throughout this thread, but you do it on other threads. Yesterday I had a look at the thread on .308's and guess what, you'd been there too calling everyone clowns and saying how silly the .30-06 was and also the .308. And what did you advocate? The .308 Ackley Improved...a cartridge that Ackley himself said there was no point in doing because of insignificant improvement. Yet they named it after him in an attempt to somehow give it status. Why is there no significant improvement when you improve the .308? It's not just the fact that the body taper is already just about right, it's also that as you go up in bore size to .308, if you want to headspace an unimproved round in the improved chamber, you have to bring the shoulder back and thus reduce capacity...negligible gain. Also improving the .308 still doesn't give it enough capacity to run the large amounts of slower powders with the heavy bullets. So why don't you stop being an idiot like the other idiot with a severe problem, and start being courteous to people?

Calling bob a retard is uncalled for and a huge insult.

To retards everywhere.

Guys, I apologize for the rudeness of some who intrude on other's threads with discussion & argument on another
'subject'. We recognize the inability of the underdeveloped to conceive they are off topic.

Now, in the interest of 270 Win users and fans here are the FIRST of some actual 270 s and its victims.



This buck was killed while running AWAY from the 270 W in 2007.....he lost !




This horny guy was chasing a Doe and nearly ran over me. I yelled HEY! he stopped and I Dropped him
TWENTY TWO steps from where I was standing.
Frontal entry--- you can see the EXIT.

I wish I had tried to measure the distance of bullet travel.......Miserable performance for a deer rifle. (for those who can't read
icons that is SARCASM !!! )

Jerry

Sometimes, it's called for.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sadly, he has company !!

Jerry

To Continue ON topic




Not only do some people hate the 270......Deer Hate It Too.




Man, it's a Pain in the NECK


Jerry

Man 73 pages.........27,702 views..... people are disinterested.


Jerry

LOL. Jerry, you might want to take a peek at the OP..........

Smokey
You ought to peek at the majority content.

It’s on topic.

Jerry

If we don’t feed the trolls they get bored and go somewhere else.

We should not toy nor encourage the mentally handicapped. They can’t
stay inside the lines.

Jerry

Jwall, that second pic would be outstanding in greyscale with just the eye in color.

Found your problem - you bought a [bleep] rifle, got [bleep] results. Blaming the store frankly seems ridiculous as you got exactly what you really wanted

Hadn’t thot of that. I think it would too.

Thnx

Jerry

Yep, blaming the store would have been ridiculous. Which is why I didn't blame the store.

You're not very bright.

Were you expecting to buy a [bleep] rifle and somehow get something other than [bleep]? Seriously, who does that?

It is of course possible to make a rifle in any cartridge that does not work. That does not represent a problem with the cartridge, but rather with the buyer for buying a known [bleep] rifle from a known [bleep] company.

Remingtons are good. Accurate, light, strong, inexpensive, easy to upgrade on everything if you want. Ideal for a .270 or .280.

Shhhhhh.........don't tell bob.

Smokey, how long has it taken you to figure that one ?

Why do you think I’ve been calling him
Lame Brain ? Huh ?

jwall...I said that.

WW, Norma, and Hornady. The WW brass is actually quite good, surprisingly.