Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire There Is No Federal Mandate for Employers of >100

Print Thread

Hop To

Page 3 of 3

Re: There Is No Federal Mandate for Employers of >100 MontanaMan #16509011 10/08/21
Joined: Jun 2020 Posts: 10,840 USA B BobBrown Campfire Outfitter
BobBrown Campfire Outfitter B Joined: Jun 2020 Posts: 10,840 USA	Fugk the Communists. Period Ballz is gonna war with ‘em. FUGK CCP It’s time to WAKE UP GOD BLESS THE USA WWG1WGA THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES

Re: There Is No Federal Mandate for Employers of >100 deflave #16509170 10/08/21
Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 23,643 MontanaMan OP Campfire Ranger
OP MontanaMan Campfire Ranger Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 23,643	Originally Posted by deflave It doesn’t matter if it’s a federal mandate or not. If your employer tells you you’re fired, you’re fired. Any company worth a fugk isn’t going to mandate anything until the law is in writing. Exactly, & so far, the courts have either upheld or allowed employer requirements for the jab as a condition for employment to stand. Their business, their rules, like it or not.....................so far. But I don't see it changing. MM

Re: There Is No Federal Mandate for Employers of >100 MontanaMan #16509184 10/08/21
Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 17,527 Colorado D dogcatcher223 Campfire Ranger
dogcatcher223 Campfire Ranger D Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 17,527 Colorado	You guys are dreaming. Companies don't care if they're understaffed, management gets paid regardless. The pressure falls on the workers to pick up the slack. Ive worked for understaffed companies several times, and they won't even up the wage to lure in new workers .

Re: There Is No Federal Mandate for Employers of >100 MontanaMan #16509194 10/08/21
Joined: Jun 2020 Posts: 10,840 USA B BobBrown Campfire Outfitter
BobBrown Campfire Outfitter B Joined: Jun 2020 Posts: 10,840 USA	You’re dreaming if you think private sector managers will keep their high paying jobs if their subordinates don’t produce FUGK CCP It’s time to WAKE UP GOD BLESS THE USA WWG1WGA THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES

Re: There Is No Federal Mandate for Employers of >100 MontanaMan #16509275 10/08/21
Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 17,527 Colorado D dogcatcher223 Campfire Ranger
dogcatcher223 Campfire Ranger D Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 17,527 Colorado	I work in accounting. I've seen management get bonuses even if we were in the red. The 1% lives in their own world . Wages are often a company's largest expense. Less workers means a bump in net income.

IC B2

Re: There Is No Federal Mandate for Employers of >100 MontanaMan #16510143 10/08/21
Joined: Sep 2020 Posts: 600 W Western_Juniper Campfire Regular
Western_Juniper Campfire Regular W Joined: Sep 2020 Posts: 600	unless they're sales people

Re: There Is No Federal Mandate for Employers of >100 MontanaMan #16510173 10/08/21
Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 34,268 Likes: 4 MN S steve4102 Campfire 'Bwana
steve4102 Campfire 'Bwana S Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 34,268 Likes: 4 MN	Originally Posted by MontanaMan Originally Posted by deflave It doesn’t matter if it’s a federal mandate or not. If your employer tells you you’re fired, you’re fired. Any company worth a fugk isn’t going to mandate anything until the law is in writing. Exactly, & so far, the courts have either upheld or allowed employer requirements for the jab as a condition for employment to stand. Their business, their rules, like it or not.....................so far. But I don't see it changing. MM “Their” rules isn’t what this is about, this is about a Federal Mandate requiring the jab, or else. The issue is that far to many business owners are to f*cken stupid to know the difference between a Federal law, requirement, or mandate and a Press Conference. Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.

Re: There Is No Federal Mandate for Employers of >100 MontanaMan #16510335 10/08/21
Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 23,643 MontanaMan OP Campfire Ranger
OP MontanaMan Campfire Ranger Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 23,643	No they're stupid. They re virtue signaling & they think they are protecting themselves for more problems in the future; they are also betting that the mandates will eventually become law. They know exactly what they're doing. MM

Re: There Is No Federal Mandate for Employers of >100 steve4102 #16510485 10/08/21
Joined: Jan 2016 Posts: 95,723 Likes: 2 J jaguartx Campfire Oracle
jaguartx Campfire Oracle J Joined: Jan 2016 Posts: 95,723 Likes: 2	Originally Posted by steve4102 Originally Posted by MontanaMan Originally Posted by deflave It doesn’t matter if it’s a federal mandate or not. If your employer tells you you’re fired, you’re fired. Any company worth a fugk isn’t going to mandate anything until the law is in writing. Exactly, & so far, the courts have either upheld or allowed employer requirements for the jab as a condition for employment to stand. Their business, their rules, like it or not.....................so far. But I don't see it changing. MM “Their” rules isn’t what this is about, this is about a Federal Mandate requiring the jab, or else. The issue is that far to many business owners are to f*cken stupid to know the difference between a Federal law, requirement, or mandate and a Press Conference. This, or they are willing patsies, like Christians lining up for the jab. Ecc 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left. A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind. "The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan". I Dindo Nuffin

Re: There Is No Federal Mandate for Employers of >100 dogcatcher223 #16510509 10/08/21
Joined: Feb 2009 Posts: 16,248 A add Campfire Ranger
add Campfire Ranger A Joined: Feb 2009 Posts: 16,248	Originally Posted by dogcatcher223 I work in accounting. I've seen management get bonuses even if we were in the red. The 1% lives in their own world . Wages are often a company's largest expense. Less workers means a bump in net income. Management is extremely expendable and IS not the 1%. What line of work is your company in? Epstein didn't kill himself. "Play Cinnamon Girl you Sonuvabitch!" Biden didn't win the election.

IC B3

Re: There Is No Federal Mandate for Employers of >100 jaguartx #16510811 10/08/21
Joined: Sep 2020 Posts: 600 W Western_Juniper Campfire Regular
Western_Juniper Campfire Regular W Joined: Sep 2020 Posts: 600	Originally Posted by jaguartx Originally Posted by steve4102 Originally Posted by MontanaMan Originally Posted by deflave It doesn’t matter if it’s a federal mandate or not. If your employer tells you you’re fired, you’re fired. Any company worth a fugk isn’t going to mandate anything until the law is in writing. Exactly, & so far, the courts have either upheld or allowed employer requirements for the jab as a condition for employment to stand. Their business, their rules, like it or not.....................so far. But I don't see it changing. MM “Their” rules isn’t what this is about, this is about a Federal Mandate requiring the jab, or else. The issue is that far to many business owners are to f*cken stupid to know the difference between a Federal law, requirement, or mandate and a Press Conference. This, or they are willing patsies, like Christians lining up for the jab. What's un-Christian about receiving the jab? Does it cost you your salvation? Is it sinful? Does Jesus hate it?

Page 3 of 3

Moderated by RickBin

Link Copied to Clipboard

AX24

258 members (01Foreman400, 338reddog, 160user, 2UP, 257 mag, 35, 22 invisible), 1,795 guests, and 923 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

May
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Forum Statistics

Forums81

Topics1,192,505

Posts18,490,628

Members73,972

Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023