24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 6 of 72 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 71 72
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,125
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,125
If she’s living with him then it’s her home too. That’s a BS argument.


~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
GB1

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,104
Likes: 6
M
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
M
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,104
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by Kenneth
Curious what the near future holds for the remaining players,

The X still be with the current flavor of the month?

Kids all messed up from this?

The shooter regretting ever dicking that chic?

Relationships with kids are hard,

Relationships with step kids are a whole nother level of difficulty,

Now add in courts and lawyer fees, loss of child support,

Way too much baggage here,

I'd say all of their lives took a huge down stoke from this.


Not to mention, relationships with step kids, whose father you just killed.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,104
Likes: 6
M
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
M
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,104
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by SandBilly
If she’s living with him then it’s her home too. That’s a BS argument.



From what I gather, it's the woman's house, new dude moved in.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,240
Likes: 14
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,240
Likes: 14
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by smokepole
Looked to me like the guy who got shot had partial custody of his kid, showed up at the appointed time to pick him up, and his wife would not produce the kid.

If that's true, I don't blame the "trespasser" for getting pissed and not leaving. And I wonder how that would change the culpability of the wife. If she was denying him his visitation, she had to know that would set him off.

If all that's true, and it may well be, then his solution was to report it to the courts and arrange to have Sheriff's Deputies with him every time he comes to pick up his kid till his wife starts cooperating with the court orders. Getting in the face of a guy who comes out of his home with a gun and demands you leave isn't the right move.


Quite obviously, at this point in time.



A wise man is frequently humbled.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,985
Likes: 7
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,985
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by fburgtx
Originally Posted by Squidge
This say the incident occurred at the ex-wife's house, does that make a difference?

https://www.lubbockonline.com/story...ock-judge-case-investigation/8765295002/

Quote
Chad Read, a 54-year-old Lubbock father, was fatally shot in South Lubbock outside his ex-wife's house after a confrontation between the former couple and the woman's boyfriend on Nov. 5.


Yes, but did Dad have legal right to be there on the porch to pick up kids??

Castle Doctrine in Texas says you DON’T have to retreat, but then again, it doesn’t really give you the right to ADVANCE (ie: OPEN a locked door/physical barrier, go OUTSIDE, ESCALATE the argument, THEN shoot a guy when argument goes south). There WAS physical separation. Call the cops and wait for them to remove him.


https://www.texasobserver.org/joe-horn-and-castle-doctrine-shootings-in-texas/


Joe Horn shot both in the back in broad daylight because they were stealing from his neighbor and he walked

This is in Texad and Texas law



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
IC B2

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,106
Likes: 1
N
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
N
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,106
Likes: 1
Hope she has a marketable skill. Alimony gone, man of the house potentially headed to prison. Kids to care for.

Feel for the children.


“Factio democratica delenda est"
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,514
Likes: 1
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,514
Likes: 1
i hope the shooter walks.

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,125
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,125
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Originally Posted by SandBilly
If she’s living with him then it’s her home too. That’s a BS argument.



From what I gather, it's the woman's house, new dude moved in.


She moved in with him but it’s still her residence.

I hope little man gets it broke off in his ass.


~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 28,422
Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 28,422
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by visalia6mm
Unless it is a cns (which is not the case he went to his knees hunched over with his own power)...

Where are you seeing that? I've watched the video in the OP and the other one posted and all you see is the shooter firing, then a second later the other guy lying on the porch. I haven't seen anything that shows the shootee's immediate reaction to the shot, just standing one second, lying down a couple of seconds later.

Not arguing over your post, just curious if there is another video on the web that shows the whole scene.


Gunnery, gunnery, gunnery.
Hit the target, all else is twaddle!
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,240
Likes: 14
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,240
Likes: 14
Originally Posted by nyrifleman
Hope she has a marketable skill. Alimony gone, man of the house potentially headed to prison. Kids to care for.

Feel for the children.



This. Even if they'd de-escalated the situation, I would feel sorry for those kids.



A wise man is frequently humbled.

IC B3

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,985
Likes: 7
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,985
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by SandBilly
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Originally Posted by SandBilly
If she’s living with him then it’s her home too. That’s a BS argument.



From what I gather, it's the woman's house, new dude moved in.


She moved in with him but it’s still her residence.

I hope little man gets it broke off in his ass.




The little guy walks



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 4
F
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
F
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by smokepole
Looked to me like the guy who got shot had partial custody of his kid, showed up at the appointed time to pick him up, and his wife would not produce the kid.

If that's true, I don't blame the "trespasser" for getting pissed and not leaving. And I wonder how that would change the culpability of the wife. If she was denying him his visitation, she had to know that would set him off.

If all that's true, and it may well be, then his solution was to report it to the courts and arrange to have Sheriff's Deputies with him every time he comes to pick up his kid till his wife starts cooperating with the court orders. Getting in the face of a guy who comes out of his home with a gun and demands you leave isn't the right move.


Yeah, but did the boyfriend ever really have the “right” to go on the lawn with a gun, in the FIRST PLACE. Unless the Dad was threatening to physically harm the ex-wife, or stealing something, “deadly force” wasn’t an option.

Did Dad have right to be there to get his kids? Likely yes.

Did Mom have legal obligation to have kids there, ready to go? Yes

Was Mom violating court order/breaking law/ “kidnapping” kids? Possibly

Was there a REASON for mom and ex-boyfriend to go OUTSIDE and “escalate” argument?? No

Does boyfriend have “right” to take gun outside to chase off trespasser (when there was INITIALLY a physical barrier between them)?? No

Should Dad have walked back to his car, called cops, and had them sort it out?? Yes

Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 5,569
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 5,569
Sad situation all around. But like others stated, the victim was refusing to leave and was verbally confrontational, then became physically confrontational after the gun was introduced going so far as to grabbing for the gun.

Bottom line, IMHO and not being a legal scholar, all of this could have been prevented simply by not letting emotion to override common sense:

1. If you are unarmed and an armed person tells you to leave their property then LEAVE!
2. If you are having a custody situation then it's a matter for the COURTS.
3. Never ever ever use hostility to confront a person on their property.
4. The victim was hostile sure, but not being physical so the property owner should probably have had his wife/girlfriend wait in the house until police arrive.

With all that said and done, I'm hot headed and probably would have done the same thing as the home owner. I would not have put up with that loudmouth POS on my property either!


ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,741
Likes: 36
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,741
Likes: 36
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
When the little guy introduced a firearm to an argument, I would have to say it was the big guy who was suddenly in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily harm.


He should have been if he wasn't... (and should have immediately left the premises.)

The other guy wasn't fuggin' around.


Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla!
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 28,422
Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 28,422
Likes: 6
The lady taking the video has an interesting reaction. Instead of reacting in horror or fear at seeing another person shot, apparently someone she came with and has a personal interest in, she just starts throwing blame. "I have it on video, Kyle, you did it, not him." Perhaps I'm misunderstanding her level of compassion for a dying man?


Gunnery, gunnery, gunnery.
Hit the target, all else is twaddle!
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,125
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,125
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by SandBilly
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Originally Posted by SandBilly
If she’s living with him then it’s her home too. That’s a BS argument.



From what I gather, it's the woman's house, new dude moved in.


She moved in with him but it’s still her residence.

I hope little man gets it broke off in his ass.




The little guy walks




I’m sure he will.

His ex-wife is a judge. He probably knows a thing or two about Texas law.


~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 4
F
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
F
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by fburgtx
Originally Posted by Squidge
This say the incident occurred at the ex-wife's house, does that make a difference?

https://www.lubbockonline.com/story...ock-judge-case-investigation/8765295002/

Quote
Chad Read, a 54-year-old Lubbock father, was fatally shot in South Lubbock outside his ex-wife's house after a confrontation between the former couple and the woman's boyfriend on Nov. 5.


Yes, but did Dad have legal right to be there on the porch to pick up kids??

Castle Doctrine in Texas says you DON’T have to retreat, but then again, it doesn’t really give you the right to ADVANCE (ie: OPEN a locked door/physical barrier, go OUTSIDE, ESCALATE the argument, THEN shoot a guy when argument goes south). There WAS physical separation. Call the cops and wait for them to remove him.


https://www.texasobserver.org/joe-horn-and-castle-doctrine-shootings-in-texas/


Joe Horn shot both in the back in broad daylight because they were stealing from his neighbor and he walked

This is in Texad and Texas law




STEALING. All the Dad was doing, initially, after being asked to leave, was TRESPASSING. The Mom and boyfriend had a right to “defend their castle” (home), but do they have a right to go OUTSIDE (around physical barrier) to ESCALATE the situation??

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,985
Likes: 7
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,985
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by fburgtx
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by smokepole
Looked to me like the guy who got shot had partial custody of his kid, showed up at the appointed time to pick him up, and his wife would not produce the kid.

If that's true, I don't blame the "trespasser" for getting pissed and not leaving. And I wonder how that would change the culpability of the wife. If she was denying him his visitation, she had to know that would set him off.

If all that's true, and it may well be, then his solution was to report it to the courts and arrange to have Sheriff's Deputies with him every time he comes to pick up his kid till his wife starts cooperating with the court orders. Getting in the face of a guy who comes out of his home with a gun and demands you leave isn't the right move.


Yeah, but did the boyfriend ever really have the “right” to go on the lawn with a gun, in the FIRST PLACE. Unless the Dad was threatening to physically harm the ex-wife, or stealing something, “deadly force” wasn’t an option.

Did Dad have right to be there to get his kids? Likely yes.

Did Mom have legal obligation to have kids there, ready to go? Yes

Was Mom violating court order/breaking law/ “kidnapping” kids? Possibly

Was there a REASON for mom and ex-boyfriend to go OUTSIDE and “escalate” argument?? No

Does boyfriend have “right” to take gun outside to chase off trespasser (when there was INITIALLY a physical barrier between them)?? No

Should Dad have walked back to his car, called cops, and had them sort it out?? Yes



Boyfriend was on the porch until deceased slung him into the yards and then he was shot



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,125
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,125
Originally Posted by SandBilly
Little man is a huge vagina, plain and simple.


I’m sticking with that.


~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,741
Likes: 36
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,741
Likes: 36
Originally Posted by fburgtx
do they have a right to go OUTSIDE (around physical barrier) to ESCALATE the situation??


Who the eyes of the law sees as the "aggressor" is the real question.

Even in Texas. Even with the Castle Doctrine.


Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla!
Page 6 of 72 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 71 72

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

215 members (320090T, 17CalFan, 1OntarioJim, 30incher, 22 invisible), 1,229 guests, and 989 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,980
Posts18,519,942
Members74,020
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.108s Queries: 55 (0.030s) Memory: 0.9411 MB (Peak: 1.0645 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-18 11:11:33 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS