Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Texas home shoot video

The father was a threat when he tried to take the gun, however after Kyle Carruth got away from him he had the choice not to shoot Read. I wouldn't have done it.

Certainly include the prosecution team.

I know a kids dad was killed without the killer having gone indoors, locked the door and called the cops.

All lowyers are on the same team. The mean green money team, like pro wrestlers. They made the laws, for a judicial system, not a justice system.

How much money did they make off a Rittenhouse who, in a Justice system, would have never been charged?

Yep

And if he had done that and dead dad had punched the ex. everyone would be calling him a puzzy and not being a man!!!!!

That justifies killing a kids dad?

Then the charge would have been against the dad, wouldnt it?

Why would she be out there instead of indoors and calling the cops?

Why didnt she have the kid ready to go with his dad?

Answer to both questions? Being a no good recalcitrant, hard headed, my way or the highway biotch.

You’re an idiot.

Says the idiot. I've never gone hunting wid da wong bullet.

I would have never brought the gun out. The mother was playing games over visitation. The BF should have realized it and let them argue on the porch or told her to come inside while waiting for the police that the father had called. If it got to the point of physical assault (unlikely IMO and being brought on by the mother not having the child their to play games and inflame things) than have the gun at the ready. The BF was legal in the shoot but it was his c u n t GF egging it on and he let his ego get involved.

Big deal. Instead he murdered a Dad who just wanted to pick up his kid at the Court Appointed Time & Place.
At a house that wasn’t his, over a manipulative scheming C U N T who set them both up for Failure.
Now he’s going to be broke from Lawyer Fees and a possible Civil Suit. Not to mention the possibility of spending life in jail.

NO! I think it sucks all around, for all of them on some level........

But I think that when he stepped onto the porch, bowed up, and started 'chesting' him around, then threw him off the porch, he bought what came next................. I'm not sure that the first was a 'warning' shot. I tend to think he was trying to put one in his foot................ IDK for sure.

As to 'justifies'...... fine line there. Justified?? again, NO. Legal?? I think he walks........

But I may be wrong.....

BF was playing DeFlave and trying to impress for another POA.

We agree there.

It is written, essentially: Take it to the offending party. If that doesnt work, take it to the courts.

Like i said, its a judicial system

Was he trespassing if the court order allowed him to pick up his kids at a specific time? You consider that guy dangerous???

You’ve never gone hunting in your life.

You two can read really well.

LOL

She could have been just a stupid bitch. Lots of them out there. As for not having the kid ready to go and causing the incident that got Read killed stupid bitches are dangerous.

Ex played him up to be a real asswhole, new little man bought it hook, line and sinker. Told her he would deal with it in his best little man voice.

You see what happened.

He’s a pussy that got played by a woman. Now he can deal with the consequences.

Possibly if he had called first he could have picked up the kid, does the court order specify where the kid had to be picked up? None of that matters, he attacked a guy armed with a rifle. This has historically never ended well.