...In defense of your own life or anothers, deadly force is justified.
If his life had been in danger, absolutely. But it wasn't.
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
Originally Posted by Taco2fiddy7
Wow, he's standing on his porch. That's justification to kill him? An unarmed guy who is now a safe distance away.
How many times does a property owner have to let an illegal trespasser physically assault him before it is OK to use deadly force, mind you, the property owner had already been physically assaulted twice, and your position is the property owner does not have a right yet.
So, one number. How many times does a victim need to be attacked before he/she can use deadly force?
Real simple question Limp Brain Commie.
Answer the question.....
So by your thinking, won't refer to it as logic as it isn't, if a little old lady attacks you, you can shoot her? No, sorry son, doesn't work that way. An "attack" in itself doesn't necessarily justify deadly force.
Means, motive, opportunity. You demonstrate those, you're justified.
Did the dead guy have the means to kill the shooter? Nope. Motive, sure tensions were high and both clearly weren't thinking straight. Opportunity? Nope, he was unarmed while standing on the porch while the shooter was a safe distance away.
What danger was the shooter in the moment he fired? Answer that.
You lose the debate when you refuse to provide one simple number requested, and continue with your obfuscation of the facts.
I notated the cold hard facts as they happened, and not one single commie has successfully quoted, and proven any of the facts I posted wrong, from my CASE FACTS posting a few pages back.
Nothing but steady lies, and ignoring the actual truths from you commie clowns working hard to destroy gun rights.
You lost it long ago and continually refuse to address what I said, and still continue to avoid it. Keep up the good work with baseless insults. Little tip: in order for insults and accusations to be effective there has to be at least some truth to them.
Keep posting your false negative lies. The intelligent people are enjoying your ignorance, while they also enjoy and appreciate my posting of the pure facts.
You accuse me of refusing to answer a question when you refuse to answer how many times does a person have to be physically assaulted before it is OK for the property owner to use deadly force to defend himself from physical assault.
Enter Number:________
Still don't get it? There isn't a number. It varies by each situation, hence my reference to means, motive and opportunity.
What danger was the shooter in the moment he took the shot? None.
Little man already went inside, he was in no danger. He escalated the situation. He shot an unarmed man who was a safe distance away.
So once again, with all your intelligence, what danger was the shooter in when he fired? He wasn't.
Now go ahead, let's hear more off base commie/liberal/anti gun insults. Come on, you can do it.
You accuse me of refusing to answer a question when you refuse to answer how many times does a person have to be physically assaulted before it is OK for the property owner to use deadly force to defend himself from physical assault.
Enter Number:________
Ok, I'll play: zero. Infinity. It doesn't matter. No number is correct because being physically assaulted does not give you the legal green light to use deadly force.
Being in what a reasonable person would consider fear of grave bodily harm or death, now that does.
Still waiting Liar. Post them up. Liar. Doubt you’ve ever seen an Elk. Much less own a gun. And I’m guessing your also a Convicted Felon who can’t own a gun.
Beautiful. FULL TILT always is.
Ignores the Rule of LAW, and ignores the facts.
That's your standard closet commie debating skills for you.
"He is far from Stupid"
”person, who happens to have an above-average level of intelligence”
Too bad he's not only wrong (as usual) but he's still posted less killed critter pics than my niece.
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
LOL !
Here’s ole ElkTurdBurglar all spun up. And off his Meds :
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
Too bad he's not only wrong (as usual) but he's still posted less killed critter pics than my niece.
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Makes you wonder if there is some history he is running from.
Guaranteed!!!
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
Still waiting Liar. Post them up. Liar. Doubt you’ve ever seen an Elk. Much less own a gun. And I’m guessing your also a Convicted Felon who can’t own a gun.
Beautiful. FULL TILT always is.
Ignores the Rule of LAW, and ignores the facts.
That's your standard closet commie debating skills for you.
So another words, you’ve NEVER killed an Elk. Or own ANY Guns. Convicted Felon too.
Prove me wrong. Liar.
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
Still waiting Liar. Post them up. Liar. Doubt you’ve ever seen an Elk. Much less own a gun. And I’m guessing your also a Convicted Felon who can’t own a gun.
Beautiful. FULL TILT always is.
Ignores the Rule of LAW, and ignores the facts.
That's your standard closet commie debating skills for you.
Dude, you said you could drive a golf ball 300+ yards easily, then backed off a bet to back up your assertion.
You said guys driving deer were "tiring them out" and said a two man post and drive wasn't fair chase.
You said I endangered my family by transporting a deer in my minivan because of ticks.
Look at these commies coming out of the woodwork. Like cockroaches. Coming out to support each other attacking a freedom loving patriot exposing them for the masquerading commies they are, live.
Their position is a property owner has no right to defend themselves from being physically attacked, even after being physically attacked twice, and the attacker is inside their circle ready to attack again and can reach them in less than a second.
But....but.....can't shoot, still.
Now, who thinks that way?
Commies?
You are correct.
"He is far from Stupid"
”person, who happens to have an above-average level of intelligence”
Look at these commies coming out of the woodwork. Like cockroaches. Coming out to support each other attacking a freedom loving patriot exposing them for the masquerading commies they are, live.
Their position is a property owner has no right to defend themselves from being physically attacked, even after being physically attacked twice, and the attacker is inside their circle ready to attack again and can reach them in less than a second.
But....but.....can't shoot, still.
Now, who thinks that way?
Commies?
You are correct.
Nice, now who is running and won't answer a question? You, son. Still. All night long. That's the cowards way out, just like little man who grabbed his gun and shot an unarmed man.
Still waiting Liar. Post them up. Liar. Doubt you’ve ever seen an Elk. Much less own a gun. And I’m guessing your also a Convicted Felon who can’t own a gun.
Beautiful. FULL TILT always is.
Ignores the Rule of LAW, and ignores the facts.
That's your standard closet commie debating skills for you.
So another words, you’ve NEVER killed an Elk. Or own ANY Guns. Convicted Felon too.
Prove me wrong. Liar.
FULL TILT.
100% incapable of disputing the cold hard facts as I outlined in "chronological" order as they happened.
Voir Dire, we release idiots like you from your duty.
"He is far from Stupid"
”person, who happens to have an above-average level of intelligence”
Look at these commies coming out of the woodwork. Like cockroaches. Coming out to support each other attacking a freedom loving patriot exposing them for the masquerading commies they are, live.
Their position is a property owner has no right to defend themselves from being physically attacked, even after being physically attacked twice, and the attacker is inside their circle ready to attack again and can reach them in less than a second.
But....but.....can't shoot, still.
Now, who thinks that way?
Commies?
You are correct.
Nice, now who is running and won't answer a question? You, son.
He’s never answered a question. Or a request for pictures or proof of all his so called “hunting excursions”
All you get is “Commie”. It’s his go to response. All he’s got. But it’s never not entertaining to wound his lying ass up. This is all you get:
ElkTurdBurglar:
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
Look at these commies coming out of the woodwork. Like cockroaches. Coming out to support each other attacking a freedom loving patriot exposing them for the masquerading commies they are, live.
Their position is a property owner has no right to defend themselves from being physically attacked, even after being physically attacked twice, and the attacker is inside their circle ready to attack again and can reach them in less than a second.
But....but.....can't shoot, still.
Now, who thinks that way?
Commies You are correct.
What do you want? Permission? Kill all the trashy [bleep] you can.
The only thing worse than a liberal is a liberal that thinks they're a conservative.
Still waiting Liar. Post them up. Liar. Doubt you’ve ever seen an Elk. Much less own a gun. And I’m guessing your also a Convicted Felon who can’t own a gun.
Beautiful. FULL TILT always is.
Ignores the Rule of LAW, and ignores the facts.
That's your standard closet commie debating skills for you.
So another words, you’ve NEVER killed an Elk. Or own ANY Guns. Convicted Felon too.
Prove me wrong. Liar.
FULL TILT.
100% incapable of disputing the cold hard facts as I outlined in "chronological" order as they happened.
Voir Dire, we release idiots like you from your duty.
LMAO
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
Ok, I'll play: zero. Infinity. It doesn't matter. No number is correct because being physically assaulted does not give you the legal green light to use deadly force.
Being in what a reasonable person would consider fear of grave bodily harm or death, now that does.
But, you're too stupid to realize the difference.
Unbelievable stupidity.
"He is far from Stupid"
”person, who happens to have an above-average level of intelligence”
Look at these commies coming out of the woodwork. Like cockroaches. Coming out to support each other attacking a freedom loving patriot exposing them for the masquerading commies they are, live.
Their position is a property owner has no right to defend themselves from being physically attacked, even after being physically attacked twice, and the attacker is inside their circle ready to attack again and can reach them in less than a second.
But....but.....can't shoot, still.
Now, who thinks that way?
Commies?
You are correct.
Kid...you gotta get another job.
The only thing worse than a liberal is a liberal that thinks they're a conservative.
Since so many feel this is an open and shut case with Carruth being guilty of homicide, answer this question
"Why hasn't Carruth being arrested, or charged with a crime?
Case was handed over to state AG. There was a conflict of interest. Pretty normal.
Not filing charges or arresting isn't normal. A man from my home town shot and killed a man in Texas and was charged with murder and charged immediately. 50 thousand dollars attorney fees latter charges were dropped
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
