Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Texas home shoot video

He might walk.


He’s still a huge [bleep] vagina.

Hard to say at this point, a lot it of will depend on the evidence. If he does get charged it may come down to whether not he not he has a good attorney and how competent and effective the prosecution is.

Amen. Wonder how he's sleeping at night. Great future there. "Sorry son, i killed your dad."

Carruth just signed a big contract with the Tiger King producers.

He'd posted on fckbook bout Chad "Fckin" Read.

Not when he’s carrying…..when he’s armed he’s a tough guy. 😉

Ex-wife Read works as admin asst for Carruth. Do we know that she was having an affair with the little fella?

That’s what’s being reported, whatever that’s worth.

Evidently Reading Comprehension is not your strong suit.
Let me make it crystal clear for ya. I highlighted the pertinent Statue in Bold Letters for ya. To make it easy for ya.

This was a case where a verbal argument turned into murder.
Where Little Man brought a gun to a verbal altercation, and by doing so, provoked the man he murdered.
Texas Penal Code is very specific If you can’t read and comprehend those statues, as provided by TX Law, there’s probably no help for you. Kinda like ElkTurdBurglar.
And another little clue for ya. It’s not LEGAL to fire a “warning shot” either. Either your Justified in use of Deadly Force or Not.
Not to mention the fact that it was none of the Little Man’s business to began with.
He and the Whore planned on provoking the Father that was there legally at the Court Appointed Time & Place to pick up his Child. Why else was the Rifle so readily available. The Whore set Little Man up to Murder her Ex. As in Premeditated.

Texas Penal Code: Justification For Use Of Deadly Force:
Subchapter C. Protection of Persons:

Sec. 9.31. SELF-DEFENSE.
(a) Except as provided in Subsection (b), a person is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force. The actor's belief that the force was immediately necessary as described by this subsection is presumed to be reasonable if the actor:
(1) knew or had reason to believe that the person against whom the force was used:
(A) unlawfully and with force entered, or was attempting to enter unlawfully and with force, the actor's occupied habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment;
(B) unlawfully and with force removed, or was attempting to remove unlawfully and with force, the actor from the actor's habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment; or
(C) was committing or attempting to commit aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated robbery;
(2) did not provoke the person against whom the force was used; and
(3) was not otherwise engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic at the time the force was used.
(b) The use of force against another is not justified:
(1) in response to verbal provocation alone;

Wrong-O

If they subpoena a witness whom he spoke to, and they say, Carruth said to me he was going to shoot Read. That’s admissible.

🦫

Damn Brown shirt…😜

You couldn't make anything clear you are a blithering idiot

I think it’s pretty clear when the situation was escalated .

I’m still impressed with the stop-drop capabilities of that 9mm round from the Ruger carbine.

147 grainer???

Maybe that evil Winchester Black Talon stuff from the 90’s.

🦫

Not clear in the video, head shot? Two quick shots tho, maybe spine. Neither video is clear If he was coming forward. Defense says he raised his left leg to approach, I don’t see it.

Not sure, either.

I would certainly think a spine shot would drop a guy like yesterday.

🦫

LOL !
Well then you must be ELKTURDBURGLAR’s Retarded Illegitimate window licking son.
Hopefully, neither one of y’all own any thing other than a Red Ryder B.B. Gun.

Like a said, evidently reading comprehension is beyond your skill set. Texas Law is pretty specific on Justification of Deadly Force. Little Man lost Justification when he brought a rifle to a verbal argument. Period.
Not to mention the Fact that he was illegally engaged in denying a Father Court Appointed visitation rights.
Which would also void any Justification he might have thought he had for Use of Deadly Force.
But evidently that’s beyond your level of Comprehension.
If ya want, I’ll get some crayons and draw you a picture. 😜

Comprehension isn't your strong suit, be sure and inform us when you are correct. If that ever happens.

Then that's not hearsay. saying I heard he told so and so, is hearsay.

That’s listed in Jennifer Reads lawsuit.

Then it’s admissible.

Little Man’s is gonna be a Broke Dick Jail Bird. And Big Black Bubba’s Bitch too. I sure hope it was worth it.

When the Jury views the shooting footage, including where he goes inside and retrieved the rifle, he’s Fuqked anyways.
And Prosecuting Attourney Worth his salt will easily convict his dumbass.