Attorney…CEO…CPA…physician…financial advisor…golf pro. Guess which personality came to dinner tonight?
Well, he’s got a cast of at least a 100 different ones in that pointy little window licking head.
Wonder if his Psychologist charged him buy the hour or by the personality ?
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
Go read the ad to see who bought it. You'll also see where chl came back to drool "again" over the gun he couldn't afford.
LOL. Nobody bought it Dumbass. But at least I’m qualified to buy it if I choose to spend more than I allow myself to every month on actual real guns. Doubt you’d even qualify to buy a B.B. Gun with all your mental illnesses, though. Still waiting for you to prove us all wrong. Liar.
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
I have never in my life seen supposed adults act so childish with name-calling and petty verbal sparring as is happening right now in this thread. What the hell is wrong with you folks!?
I have never in my life seen supposed adults act so childish with name-calling and petty verbal sparring as is happening right now in this thread. What the hell is wrong with you folks!?
It's probably the same person arguing with himself.
I have never in my life seen supposed adults act so childish with name-calling and petty verbal sparring as is happening right now in this thread. What the hell is wrong with you folks!?
The only thing funnier than grown men bitching at each other on the internet is another grown man bitching about them bitching at each other.
Attorney…CEO…CPA…physician…financial advisor…golf pro...PROFESSIONAL ELK GUIDE Guess which personality came to dinner tonight?
.
PROFESSIONAL ELK GUIDE ?
🦫
LMAO !!!
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
Attorney…CEO…CPA…physician…financial advisor…golf pro...PROFESSIONAL ELK GUIDE Guess which personality came to dinner tonight?
.
Professional Elk Guide!
Show us pictures of the elk your clients killed then.
We all know That’s never gonna happen.
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
I have never in my life seen supposed adults act so childish with name-calling and petty verbal sparring as is happening right now in this thread. What the hell is wrong with you folks!?
Truth.
Ecc 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
Evidently Reading Comprehension is not your strong suit. Let me make it crystal clear for ya. I highlighted the pertinent Statue in Bold Letters for ya. To make it easy for ya.
Texas Penal Code: Justification For Use Of Deadly Force: Subchapter C. Protection of Persons:
Sec. 9.31. SELF-DEFENSE. (a) Except as provided in Subsection (b), a person is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force. The actor's belief that the force was immediately necessary as described by this subsection is presumed to be reasonable if the actor: (1) knew or had reason to believe that the person against whom the force was used: (A) unlawfully and with force entered, or was attempting to enter unlawfully and with force, the actor's occupied habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment; (B) unlawfully and with force removed, or was attempting to remove unlawfully and with force, the actor from the actor's habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment; or (C) was committing or attempting to commit aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated robbery; (2) did not provoke the person against whom the force was used; and (3) was not otherwise engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic at the time the force was used. (b) The use of force against another is not justified: (1) in response to verbal provocation alone;
Why did you ignore the law that applies to the facts of the case, and bold the law that only supports the lies the closet commies are spreading all over the internet?
I pointed out the correct laws from the above statute 10 PAGES BACK:
Quote
Sec. 9.31. SELF-DEFENSE. (a) Except as provided in Subsection (b), a person is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force. The actor's belief that the force was immediately necessary as described by this subsection is presumed to be reasonable if the actor:
(1) knew or had reason to believe that the person against whom the force was used:
(A) unlawfully and with force entered, or was attempting to enter unlawfully and with force, the actor's occupied habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment;
61 years old, and you purposely lie, and ignore the facts of the case.
That is what closet commies do, they protect THEIR FELLOW COMMIEs like Chad Reid, who was a FELON with multiple crimes including assaults, and his ex wife was also a FELON.
Democrats like you always protect the felons, and they always twist the law to fit their needs, just like you are doing here.
Reid unlawfully ENTERED Carruths domicile and place of business WITH FORCE and removed Carruth from his domicile and place of business WITH FORCE.
That IS the law that applies, not your lying provocation / argument BS.
Brandishing a weapon is not provocation. Go learn the actual law in Texas.
Last edited by ElkSlayer91; 12/02/21.
"He is far from Stupid"
”person, who happens to have an above-average level of intelligence”
Elky now claims to be a professional Elk Hunting Guide.
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
He’s a Professional Liar for sure.
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
Evidently Reading Comprehension is not your strong suit. Let me make it crystal clear for ya. I highlighted the pertinent Statue in Bold Letters for ya. To make it easy for ya.
Texas Penal Code: Justification For Use Of Deadly Force: Subchapter C. Protection of Persons:
Sec. 9.31. SELF-DEFENSE. (a) Except as provided in Subsection (b), a person is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force. The actor's belief that the force was immediately necessary as described by this subsection is presumed to be reasonable if the actor: (1) knew or had reason to believe that the person against whom the force was used: (A) unlawfully and with force entered, or was attempting to enter unlawfully and with force, the actor's occupied habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment; (B) unlawfully and with force removed, or was attempting to remove unlawfully and with force, the actor from the actor's habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment; or (C) was committing or attempting to commit aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated robbery; (2) did not provoke the person against whom the force was used; and (3) was not otherwise engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic at the time the force was used. (b) The use of force against another is not justified: (1) in response to verbal provocation alone;
Why did you ignore the law that applies to the facts of the case, and bold the law that only supports the lies the closet commies are spreading all over the internet?
I pointed out the correct laws from the above statute 10 PAGES BACK:
Quote
Sec. 9.31. SELF-DEFENSE. (a) Except as provided in Subsection (b), a person is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force. The actor's belief that the force was immediately necessary as described by this subsection is presumed to be reasonable if the actor:
(1) knew or had reason to believe that the person against whom the force was used:
(A) unlawfully and with force entered, or was attempting to enter unlawfully and with force, the actor's occupied habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment;
61 years old, and you purposely lie, and ignore the facts of the case.
That is what closet commies do, they protect THEIR FELLOW COMMIEs like Chad Reid, who was a FELON with multiple crimes including assaults, and his ex wife was also a FELON.
Democrats like you always protect the felons, and they always twist the law to fit their needs, just like you are doing here.
Reid unlawfully ENTERED Carruths domocile and place of business WITH FORCE and removed Carruth from his domocile and place of business WITH FORCE.
That IS the law that applies, not your lying provocation / argument BS.
Brandishing a weapon is not provocation. Go learn the actual law in Texas.
Says the “Professional” ElkTurdBurglar. Or another words Professional Liar !
Might want to ask the Dr at the Looney Asylum to adjust your Psych Meds, Scooter !
ElkTurdBurglar pondering his next Retard Response:
🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
Last edited by chlinstructor; 12/02/21.
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
Evidently Reading Comprehension is not your strong suit. Let me make it crystal clear for ya. I highlighted the pertinent Statue in Bold Letters for ya. To make it easy for ya.
Texas Penal Code: Justification For Use Of Deadly Force: Subchapter C. Protection of Persons:
Sec. 9.31. SELF-DEFENSE. (a) Except as provided in Subsection (b), a person is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force. The actor's belief that the force was immediately necessary as described by this subsection is presumed to be reasonable if the actor: (1) knew or had reason to believe that the person against whom the force was used: (A) unlawfully and with force entered, or was attempting to enter unlawfully and with force, the actor's occupied habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment; (B) unlawfully and with force removed, or was attempting to remove unlawfully and with force, the actor from the actor's habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment; or (C) was committing or attempting to commit aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated robbery; (2) did not provoke the person against whom the force was used; and (3) was not otherwise engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic at the time the force was used. (b) The use of force against another is not justified: (1) in response to verbal provocation alone;
Why did you ignore the law that applies to the facts of the case, and bold the law that only supports the lies the closet commies are spreading all over the internet?
I pointed out the correct laws from the above statute 10 PAGES BACK:
Quote
Sec. 9.31. SELF-DEFENSE. (a) Except as provided in Subsection (b), a person is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force. The actor's belief that the force was immediately necessary as described by this subsection is presumed to be reasonable if the actor:
(1) knew or had reason to believe that the person against whom the force was used:
(A) unlawfully and with force entered, or was attempting to enter unlawfully and with force, the actor's occupied habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment;
61 years old, and you purposely lie, and ignore the facts of the case.
That is what closet commies do, they protect THEIR FELLOW COMMIEs like Chad Reid, who was a FELON with multiple crimes including assaults, and his ex wife was also a FELON.
Democrats like you always protect the felons, and they always twist the law to fit their needs, just like you are doing here.
Reid unlawfully ENTERED Carruths domicile and place of business WITH FORCE and removed Carruth from his domicile and place of business WITH FORCE.
That IS the law that applies, not your lying provocation / argument BS.
Brandishing a weapon is not provocation. Go learn the actual law in Texas.
Says the “Professional” ElkTurdBurglar. Or another words Professional Liar !
ElkTurdBurglar pondered his next Retard Response:
Closet commie here never read the posting to learn the law.
He posted his response within 4 minutes.
Sad, when you refuse to educate yourself, but that is exactly how democrat's respond when they are too stupid to be educated.
Last edited by ElkSlayer91; 12/02/21.
"He is far from Stupid"
”person, who happens to have an above-average level of intelligence”
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/hjKB0GPf/B1605-C74-753-C-4-D4-E-A308-537-BA3-C3-CD80.gif)
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/yYDjsxrQ/IMG-0124.jpg)
