|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,426
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,426 |
One of the cartridges I’ve been interested in is the 375 Whelen AI. I built one on an between the wars 98 action; the rifle has a Lyman steel aperture rear sight and a post front. The following photo is from an article July-August 91 Handloader 152. Note the velocities are from a rifle with a 20” barrel. The author seemed to like 270 grain Hornady bullets, RN & SP. Unfortunately his best loads seem to be IMR4320. Which is my favorite powder in several rifles. I only have 3 or 4 lb left. [url=https://postimg.cc/PP7QC96T] [/url
Last edited by Bugger; 05/21/22.
I prefer classic. Semper Fi I used to run with the hare. Now I'm envious of the tortoise and I do my own stunts but rarely intentionally
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,935 Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,935 Likes: 1 |
I bet CFE223 would work perfectly in the 375 Whelen
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,017
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,017 |
I heard Accurate 4064 makes a good substitute for IMR-4320, though with the amount of 4320 I have, i may not get around to load analysis to test this claim. The Accurate powders tend to burn slower than the others of the same number.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,976
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,976 |
One of the cartridges I’ve been interested in is the 375 Whelen AI. I built one on an between the wars 98 action; the rifle has a Lyman steel aperture rear sight and a post front. The following photo is from an article July-August 91 Handloader 152. Note the velocities are from a rifle with a 20” barrel. The author seemed to like 270 grain Hornady bullets, RN & SP. Unfortunately his best loads seem to be IMR4320. Which is my favorite powder in several rifles. I only have 3 or 4 lb left. [url=https://postimg.cc/PP7QC96T] [/url The first .375 AI article HANDLOADER published was in #119, May 1986. There's some more load data there for comparison.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,426
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,426 |
I’ll look for that article. I’m going through my old Rifle and Handloader magazines.
I prefer classic. Semper Fi I used to run with the hare. Now I'm envious of the tortoise and I do my own stunts but rarely intentionally
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,822
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,822 |
Bugger,
Have you looked at the Hawk Cartridges Manual for .375 Hawk (a .375 Whelen Imp variation) load data?
Ed
"Not in an open forum, where truth has less value than opinions, where all opinions are equally welcome regardless of their origins, rationale, inanity, or truth, where opinions are neither of equal value nor decisive." Ken Howell
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,426
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,426 |
Bugger,
Have you looked at the Hawk Cartridges Manual for .375 Hawk (a .375 Whelen Imp variation) load data?
Ed Is it on-line? I know people have had good luck with Hawk Bullets. Unfortunately, I’m not one of them. My understanding is they have an annealed copper jacket and that their load data may be light compared to gilding metal jacketed bullets. I’ve only used 35 caliber Hawk bullets. I think the best group was about 4” at 100 meters.
Last edited by Bugger; 05/23/22.
I prefer classic. Semper Fi I used to run with the hare. Now I'm envious of the tortoise and I do my own stunts but rarely intentionally
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 161
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 161 |
Bugger,
Have you looked at the Hawk Cartridges Manual for .375 Hawk (a .375 Whelen Imp variation) load data?
Ed Is it on-line? I know people have had good luck with Hawk Bullets. Unfortunately, I’m not one of them. My understanding is they have an annealed copper jacket and that their load data may be light compared to gilding metal jacketed bullets. I’ve only used 35 caliber Hawk bullets. I think the best group was about 4” at 100 meters. Don't think about Hawk bullets. https://www.amazon.com/Hawk-Cartridges-Reloading-Manual-Zeglin/dp/0983159807
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,822
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,822 |
Bugger,
Have you looked at the Hawk Cartridges Manual for .375 Hawk (a .375 Whelen Imp variation) load data?
Ed Is it on-line? I know people have had good luck with Hawk Bullets. Unfortunately, I’m not one of them. My understanding is they have an annealed copper jacket and that their load data may be light compared to gilding metal jacketed bullets. I’ve only used 35 caliber Hawk bullets. I think the best group was about 4” at 100 meters. Don't think about Hawk bullets. https://www.amazon.com/Hawk-Cartridges-Reloading-Manual-Zeglin/dp/0983159807What Jake said... The book contains load data for other than Hawk bullets and is a starting place for me and my .375-06 RCBS (.375 Whelen with a 30% shoulder and a full caliber neck) The BL-C(2) loads for the 235gr Speer SP were very accurate in mine. Ed
"Not in an open forum, where truth has less value than opinions, where all opinions are equally welcome regardless of their origins, rationale, inanity, or truth, where opinions are neither of equal value nor decisive." Ken Howell
|
|
|
|
599 members (10ring1, 007FJ, 10gaugemag, 1lessdog, 219DW, 1234, 54 invisible),
2,517
guests, and
1,323
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,201
Posts18,485,216
Members73,966
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|