Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunting Rifles Ruger .44 Carbine (Good, Bad, and Ugly)?

Print Thread

Hop To

Page 2 of 2

Re: Ruger .44 Carbine (Good, Bad, and Ugly)? gunzo #17573550 09/03/22
Joined: Jan 2017 Posts: 8,911 Likes: 2 M Magnum_Bob Campfire Outfitter
Magnum_Bob Campfire Outfitter M Joined: Jan 2017 Posts: 8,911 Likes: 2	Originally Posted by gunzo Early models had a trigger housing issue. Ruger later re-designed. I don't know the s/n range it happened, but it's out there somewhere. shaman had a thread on this 9/29/20 https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbt...9047/requiem-for-a-model-44#Post15269047 Well said, good of you to bring this up it is relevant as there are no parts availible and not a isolated incidence of failure...mb " Cheapest velocity in the world comes from a long barrel and I sure do like them. MB "

HR IC

Re: Ruger .44 Carbine (Good, Bad, and Ugly)? taylorce1 #17578536 09/05/22
Joined: Nov 2017 Posts: 771 Northeast Kingdom VT T Tom_in_VT Campfire Regular
Tom_in_VT Campfire Regular T Joined: Nov 2017 Posts: 771 Northeast Kingdom VT	I have always wanted one. I’ve heard not to use cast bullets, which isn’t ideal. They sure are light and handy, with plenty of punch. “One thorn of experience is worth a whole wilderness of warning.” - James Russell Lowell

Page 2 of 2

Moderated by RickBin

Link Copied to Clipboard

AX24

530 members (1beaver_shooter, 10gaugeman, 12344mag, 10Glocks, 1Longbow, 160user, 67 invisible), 2,499 guests, and 1,227 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

May
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Forum Statistics

Forums81

Topics1,192,445

Posts18,489,618

Members73,970

Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023

Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.109s Queries: 18 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8021 MB (Peak: 0.8244 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-04 21:18:32 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS