This. Extremely compact and handy, since you want a phone anyway. Internet connection is simple and integrated. Easy to share photos with anyone. Photo editing right there in the phone. The camera on my iPhone (12 Pro) is astonishingly good.
"There's more to optics than meets the eye."--anon
"...most of us would be better off losing half a pound around the waist than half a pound on our rifle."--dhg
This. Extremely compact and handy, since you want a phone anyway. Internet connection is simple and integrated. Easy to share photos with anyone. Photo editing right there in the phone. The camera on my iPhone (12 Pro) is astonishingly good.
JFC.
Originally Posted by Geno67
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual.
Originally Posted by Judman
Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit.
Originally Posted by KSMITH
My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
I don't own any but have read enough reviews to suggest the Panasonic Lumix line of cameras ie. the smaller point and shoot cameras. They get good ratings, have image stabilization, are known for good video and will fit your price point. Canon has some in the same range but from what I've seen, they are not as well built as the Lumix cameras.
Something in this lineup might work. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?q=panasonic%20lumix%20cameras&filters=fct_category%3Apoint_shoot_digital_cameras_8612
A lot of reviews on the youtube for just about any camera you want.
Not the best vid. and from 2021 but gives you an idea of what to look for.
Last edited by SBTCO; 12/04/22.
“Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them.” ― G. Orwell
"Why can't men kill big game with the same cartridges women and kids use?" _Eileen Clarke
"Unjust authority confers no obligation of obedience." - Alexander Hamilton
My instagram, DoubleHKnives, is almost exclusively shot now from my cell phone. I use my iPhone 12 Pro Max and the results are outstanding. Because Apple is now, what, 14 Pro Max?, the 12 can probably be purchased @ under $500
Last edited by Godogs57; 01/25/23.
You only live once, but...if you do it right, once is enough.
Joel (Doug's brother) did us an Olympus package for $839... It was two lenses, filters, extra cards etc. Smaller than a standard SLR. EM-10 model IIRC. Maybe $600 with only one lens... Not sure...
If you are not actively engaging EVERY enemy you encounter... you are allowing another to fight for you... and that is cowardice... plain and simple.
Joel (Doug's brother) did us an Olympus package for $839... It was two lenses, filters, extra cards etc. Smaller than a standard SLR. EM-10 model IIRC. Maybe $600 with only one lens... Not sure...
I would not be happy with that low resolution.
"There's more to optics than meets the eye."--anon
"...most of us would be better off losing half a pound around the waist than half a pound on our rifle."--dhg
Interesting point... it is a high MP camera... maybe Laura had the settings low or it got washed down a couple of times in the hosting sites (twice). Not really sure.
EDIT: "Looks like the Bluetooth and backup process drops things in half."... Google took another bite... Then Postimage."
Last edited by CashisKing; 01/28/23. Reason: Edit
If you are not actively engaging EVERY enemy you encounter... you are allowing another to fight for you... and that is cowardice... plain and simple.
Joel (Doug's brother) did us an Olympus package for $839... It was two lenses, filters, extra cards etc. Smaller than a standard SLR. EM-10 model IIRC. Maybe $600 with only one lens... Not sure...
I would not be happy with that low resolution.
That looks fine to me. But I don't especially look for perfection but rather pleasing. Seem's in everything we do, many people get caught up chashing perfection that most people can't even see!
Someone somewhere mentioned upgrade in a camera. Something I found out myself is many, myself especially, upgrade but are actually pretty clueless what our present camera can actually do! Now an upgrade for me is more pixel but my D7000 has more than I think I'll ever need! Great photo'sare taken by great photographersn not necessarily gread cameras. My last film camera was a Nikon f5, cost me I think it was $1600 and I took as good of photo's with my old worn out FG than I did with it. Should have spent the money on film. My all time favorite picture was taken with a Yashica 635 twin lens camera I got used for $125! Should have bought more film than that F5!
Joel (Doug's brother) did us an Olympus package for $839... It was two lenses, filters, extra cards etc. Smaller than a standard SLR. EM-10 model IIRC. Maybe $600 with only one lens... Not sure...
I would not be happy with that low resolution.
Thats one of those photo terms I don't understand. Resolution, whats that mean. Photo looks fine to me and probably 90% of everyone else but someone comes up with it has low resolution!
This. Extremely compact and handy, since you want a phone anyway. Internet connection is simple and integrated. Easy to share photos with anyone. Photo editing right there in the phone. The camera on my iPhone (12 Pro) is astonishingly good.
This. Extremely compact and handy, since you want a phone anyway. Internet connection is simple and integrated. Easy to share photos with anyone. Photo editing right there in the phone. The camera on my iPhone (12 Pro) is astonishingly good.
Nice photo, if that is your home congrats.
Thanks. That is my next door neighbor.
"There's more to optics than meets the eye."--anon
"...most of us would be better off losing half a pound around the waist than half a pound on our rifle."--dhg
The Sony ZV1 is the best bet, though it is higher then the budget you mentioned.It takes amazing stills and was designed for vlogging. With a larger sensor and better processor it will BLOW away any cell phone. Normally it's $748.00, starting next week there will be a $50 instant rebate and we will double it for members here, bringing the cost down to $648.00
Joel (Doug's brother) did us an Olympus package for $839... It was two lenses, filters, extra cards etc. Smaller than a standard SLR. EM-10 model IIRC. Maybe $600 with only one lens... Not sure...
I would not be happy with that low resolution.
Thats one of those photo terms I don't understand. Resolution, whats that mean. Photo looks fine to me and probably 90% of everyone else but someone comes up with it has low resolution!
Think of resolution as the sharpness of objects in an image. Cash’s photo has great color and contrast of the grass colors vs. blue/grey of sky and clouds, and the lone tree is a nice addition to the composition.
When looking at any photo posted here, one can zoom in and look at edges of objects and see an indication of the image’s resolution.