Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Long Range Hunting The reason why the Audette is the greatest, never-improved upon Load Development Method

Go ahead and keep embarrassing yourself.

Good one. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Best barrel I’ve ever worked with. The entire Audette was like a good group. After every shot, the impacts made the black mark just get bigger. It was not possible to mark the individual impacts and it didn’t matter since they were virtually the same POI.






I chose the highest velocity load without pressure and shot a group at 100

You are so far out of your league trying to debate this with Jordan.

You’re a phhuuuukking hack who managed to win a few matches a decade ago using someone else’s work that you “improved” and think that means something. Jordan literally has a masters degree in this type of science and makes a good living applying same.

His understanding of physics and ballistics is far beyond anything your fat spaghetti head could ever comprehend.

Sure Audette’s work but there are other ways that work just as well as may top shooters in multiple disciplines have shown.

Audette, Satterlee, OCW all work fine and neither is better then the other but none are end all be alls as most guys run them once and never again. Shooting a test once as you keep stating could be a fluke and is therefor statistically irrelevant. Doing it 2+ times starts to show patterns. Any serious shooter will do more than one data set to form an actual conclusion.

Thank you for your valuable input

How's your buddy rekobeez?

LOLOLOLOLOLO

He’s about got his land logged and was laying out his rifle range to 600 yds over the weekend. Still jealous your chunk of section 8 land would only allow a 20’ range?


At least your consistent Burns but wipe your chin as RC’s baby batter is rolling down it again.

Mallard, that's almost as funny as me smoking out Burnsie with a generic, unaimed joke and him trying to defend himself using a picture of one of his heroes that he blows! 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂


😅😂🤣🤣🤣🤣

They are both legends in their own minds

This may seem too simplistic, but I eventually marked paper targets with individual "bullseyes," in two rows from left to right. Shot around 15 rounds, noting which round landed where on each target--which when the targets were super-imposed provided the same information.

Three shot groups...

Same rifle, two different loads, two weeks apart, 451 yrds.

Really nice. That’s what we strive for.



What was your load development procedure?

Wow.

You need to repeat that at least 30 times to make sure it wasn’t luck.

And then repeat it again, ya know, to solidify statistical stuff.

Here's shots 4, 5, and 6 on the first target. Same POA.

What? There’s 6

^^^The very Definition of passive aggression ^^^^