Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Buzz. RE:BHA support of 2A

he has been clear on everything....people dont want to accept the answer.....putting in a special remark " to include ars or whatever is stupid....bob

OK, I haven't read many of his posts on most other threads. Some, but certainly not a majority.

I appreciate some of the things that organization accomplishes. Was a member for a few years even.

As far as "tap dancing", I've not asked him to comment on BHA policies, I have read his statements supporting the ownership of ARs, now I'm asking him to show his support by going to the Board and asking them to further expound upon their Policy Statement in regards to the 2A.

I'm interested to know what the Board says and does about such a proposal from one of their long term members.

Do I expect anything along those lines to happen? Probably not. But I thought I'd ask as I'm no longer a member and can't do so myself.

Hope all your family and critters are doing well. If 'flave calls or texts tell him "hot, cold, or indifferent" says hello

Speaking of fishing expeditions, you seem to be on one...FFS, here, you have a computer, use it. Policy statements, several of them.

https://www.backcountryhunters.org/bha_north_american_policy_statements

Those are the positions that are pertinent to the mission statement. Do you also ask the NRA for their position on the Boundary Waters? Pebble mine? North American Model?

Its rhetorical, of course you don't and for good reason. They aren't a hunting organization, those issues aren't in their mission statement and frankly, I don't want them involved in any of those things. Nor would I expect them to be.

I also still struggle with people having a major comprehension problem. What part of the Second and BHA's statement would lead you to believe that they don't support people hunting with, and owning whatever platform of firearm they want?

We give away weatherby firearms with our life memberships, yet you still bitch and complain.

Let's be honest you could give away 10 free cases of shiner, a wyoming arms AR, a case of ammo, find a cure for cancer, and nobody pissing and moaning about BHA on the crampfire is going to join anyway, and that's a fact.

BHA supports the Second, end of discussion.

No, that's how much the gofundme was. I'm interested to know how much the bha organization donated to the gofundme.

Ah, misunderstood that post on the $ amount and where it came from...

My bad.

No worries, I believe that was the intention honestly.

Your still a fugkin maroon loser

If BHA supports any democommie politician, they actively support the anti-gun agenda, end of discussion.

Now, "look us in the eye" and tell us BHA does not support democommies.

Yes

One would think a backwards, inbred, hillbilly would learn to spell a 5 letter word.

LOL

What say you on AR 15s Callnum?

Thought early just liked the color maroon!

Ymmv

Didn't you here him boy, END OF DISCUSSION!!!!!!!


Lmao!

Your fugkin canoe is waiting when do you want to hear banjos

Not fishing, just asking for a simple clarification.

BHA is a hunting organization, as is evidenced by the name. The NRA is not, and it's not an environmental organization either, therefor no, I would not ask them for a position statement or opinion on mining in AK, Boundary Waters, or a wildlife management model.

By their own position statement BHA has acknowledged support for the Second Amendment. In a very special way, as in that it can be taken in so many different manners. It would be akin to me stating I support the right to vote and the Amendments regarding that right. But all the while not stating I support convicted felons being able to vote. Or that while the wording is pretty clear in those Amendments, I really don't support the vote for women and think the vote shouldn't be granted until a person is 21 years of age.

I realize the overall mission of BHA is to continue to support and lobby for more wild areas. Their efforts to do so have been welcomed by many, including myself. However, their support (alleged? acknowledged? ) for certain politicians leads more than one person, including myself, to be suspect of the wording of their Policy Statement. Their overall mission is a necessary one, in my mind. I wonder about some of their methods at times.

Their Statement regarding the 2A is very politically worded and I have a suspicion it was run past the legal team and approved as such.

Thanks for your help in clearing it up. You may stand for the right of private ownership of ARs and similar. I'm still not sure about the organization you are a member of.

There is a reason they are called Green Decoys.

He’s a closet gay democrat he’s still in the closet🤣🤡

I would love to take a poll of their membership, Independents, Repubs, Dems, etc and find out where they stand on the meaning of "shall not be infringed"?

Yeah, the individual members, every one of the thousands of them.

Joe Biden will look you in the eye and tell you he supports the Second Amendment. He just doesn't like to explain that he supports your right to own the firearms that he personally approves. We all know better than to trust Biden or believe a syllable that falls out of his mouth.

There are lots of people and political organizations that operate like that. To me, it's clear that BHA is one. I'd not be a bit surprised at a very high percentage of their membership thinking the Second Amendment is about duck hunting.