24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,921
4
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
4
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,921
sounds like they need to start loading there own line of ammo

GB1

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,458
Likes: 2
T
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
T
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,458
Likes: 2
The large loop .30-30 is interesting. Seems like they're focusing on niche stuff, not mainstream. I'd pay extra to skip the skinner sights and the scout mount as well and just have a plain blade front with a flat-topped open rear in a dovetail on the barrel .. kinda like what my old TC Seneca .45 had. I don't like a cluttered gun. I wish they'd stretch the barrels to 22", preferably 24", except on the trapper models. The big loop is fine, I don't like the pistol grip without a big loop, bashes my knuckles.

In the 1894 I sure wish they'd do a .25-20. However, I have a new one in .357 and I'm not real happy with it. You really have to snap the lever open hard to get reliable extraction otherwise it will drop 20% of the empties inside the action tying up the gun. It may break in .. but I may not keep it that long.


Anyone who thinks there's two sides to everything hasn't met a M�bius strip.

Here be dragons ...
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,359
M
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
M
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,359
For the life of me, I don't understand their decision. A trapper model 30-30??? That's a cartridge that appreciates a little extra barrel. The obvious is a trapper 357 or 44 mag. Rounds that likely start losing velocity in a 20" barrel and rounds that will likely never be used past 100 yards.

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
S
Campfire Regular
OP Online Content
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Mountain10mm
For the life of me, I don't understand their decision. A trapper model 30-30??? That's a cartridge that appreciates a little extra barrel. The obvious is a trapper 357 or 44 mag. Rounds that likely start losing velocity in a 20" barrel and rounds that will likely never be used past 100 yards.
Never had a problem with a 30-30 trapper. The velocity I’ve lost over a 20” barrel has been negligible and if you reload, velocity in a 16” will exceed factory ammo in a 20”. All useful additional velocity is realized only at the maximum range anyways. You can always rationalize the need for the extra velocity but a lifetime hunting with a 16” barrel most likely won’t be a consequence. In fairness 357s and 44s benefit less with a 20” as opposed to a 16”
S.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

605 members (22kHornet, 204guy, 222Sako, 01Foreman400, 257 mag, 61 invisible), 2,499 guests, and 1,333 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,602
Posts18,492,280
Members73,972
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.170s Queries: 22 (0.006s) Memory: 0.8172 MB (Peak: 0.8602 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-05 23:42:21 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS