24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 14,180
Likes: 23
G
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
G
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 14,180
Likes: 23
Originally Posted by hanco
I like having my own things, my own stand, feeders, etc. I don’t like the idea of people wandering up on me that I don’t know. I don’t like the idea of walking up on another hunter. There are dummies that will shoot anything that moves.

Even though I am six miles in off the road and have exclusive rights to 1,700 acres out of a low fenced/no fenced ranch of som 60K acres, I wear a headlight walking in to the stand in the dark in both the AM and in the PM. Deer don't wear headlights and where I hunt, an old fart such as I is not the top predator. I like seeing what is charging me in the dark.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]




ya!

GWB


A Kill Artist. When I draw, I draw blood.
GB1

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,207
Likes: 9
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,207
Likes: 9
Geedubya,

I think most any critter, 2 or 4 legged, messing with you would be in a heap of trouble...

DF

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,938
Likes: 3
R
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
R
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,938
Likes: 3
I’ve once been the unwilling participant of a Mountain Lion encounter. I will never forget it & don’t want to do that again. I pack my 45 Super anytime I go afield, no matter what I am doing.

Though 20 miles away from my current lease, there were 4 lions captured on a game camera a couple of months back. You never know where they may appear. I would hate to have to kill one. But, they are a very real contingency in Texas, anytime or anywhere.


By the way, in case you missed it, Jeremiah was a bullfrog.
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19,276
Likes: 11
B
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19,276
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by geedubya
Originally Posted by Blackheart
You gotta do what you gotta do I guess. The stand/feeder program would quickly bore the shyt outta me. No doubt an effective way to kill deer but that's just it. It's killing not hunting. You don't even have to be a good rifleman/marksman, what with a built in rest and all.. Nor do you need to learn to read sign, track, stalk, learn what deer prefer to feed on in the forest, where they'll likely be found at different times under varying weather conditions, where the bucks prefer to bed etc. etc. etc... All important stuff as there aren't many deer in a vast, mature forest and there's a whole bunch of it where they'll rarely if ever be found. Without the proper skills, your chances of success will be slim. Hell, even little kids with very little knowledge, skill or experience can kill deer from a stand overlooking a feeder/bait so where's the challenge/thrill/satisfaction in that ?

Ignorance vs. stupidity.

I don't think you are stupid, but.......

Your ignorance is on display most every time you reply/post about how we hunt in Texas.

"Hunting is the human practice of seeking, pursuing, capturing, or killing wildlife or feral animals.[10] The most common reasons for humans to hunt are to exploit the animal's body for meat and useful animal products (fur/hide, bone/tusks, horn/antler, etc.), for recreation/taxidermy (see trophy hunting), although it may also be done for non-exploitative reasons such as removing predators dangerous to humans or domestic animals (e.g. wolf hunting), to eliminate pests and nuisance animals that damage crops/livestock/poultry or spread diseases (see varminting), for trade/tourism (see safari), or for ecological conservation against overpopulation and invasive species.
Recreationally hunted species are generally referred to as the game, and are usually mammals and birds. A person participating in a hunt is a hunter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunting

I realize that once a topic is posted, that the direction that thread takes is "fair game" for any and all. This thread was about losing a lease. Most folks here in Texas and most likely any area that has private land hunted by leaseholders understand and can relate to Hanco's predicament.

In the 25 years or so that I've enjoyed differing hunting forums, I continue to be amused by folks such as yourself who seem to see it as their duty/mission to criticize how we hunt considering that it is a way of life of which they have little or no experience.



Quien Sabe,

GWB
I'm not the least bit ignorant of how you go about what you call hunting in Texas. Many Texas members post about it with pictures regularly including yourself. I think it's unfortunate in a sense what you are reduced to doing but if it blows your skirt up and as you say, it's your only viable option due to impenetrable cover, so be it. I do wish you had kept it there though, as I've watched your practices of trophy buck management and leasing spread across the Country like a fuucking disease and thereby do more to damage/ruin the sport than anything else I could possibly name. If you can't see how this is so, it is you who is truly either ignorant or stupid.

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,645
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,645
Critters were on the move tonight. We saw two truck loads of deer, several coons and stumbled upon a bbq donor.
Thermal toys are too much fun!

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

IC B2

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,207
Likes: 9
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,207
Likes: 9
As I understand Texas history and how it came into the Union as a Republic, not as a territory, vast acreages weren’t originally govt. land.

If the govt has TX land they bought it or arranged for it. In the territories it was all govt land until homesteaded or bought. So, public free hunting land in TX isn’t that plentiful as it may be in states that were territories.

Correct me if I’m wrong. So, Texicans usually lease or own land where they hunt. And trespassing isn’t tolerated. Well maybe except govt protected illegals, specially in South Texas. Better not bag one of them, unless you wanna do life in the big house.

DF

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19,276
Likes: 11
B
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19,276
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
As I understand Texas history and how it came into the Union as a Republic, not as a territory, vast acreages weren’t originally govt. land.

If the govt has TX land they bought it or arranged for it. In the territories it was all govt land until homesteaded or bought. So, public free hunting land in TX isn’t that plentiful as it may be in states that were territories.

Correct me if I’m wrong. So, Texicans usually lease or own land where they hunt. And trespassing isn’t tolerated. Well maybe except govt protected illegals, specially in South Texas. Better not bag one of them, unless you wanna do life in the big house.

DF
Texas hunters brought all that onto themselves. The practice of paying to hunt private land I mean. Nobody had ever heard of such a thing as a hunting lease or considered paying to deer hunt private land here when I started hunting back in the '70's. There was still much private land that wasn't posted back then and if it wasn't posted it was generally understood it could be hunted without asking permission. Both of my grandfathers and my uncle owned farms here back then. None of them ever posted. Permission to hunt most land that was posted could be obtained simply by asking. No landowners expected to be paid to hunt. Combine the practice of QDM/trophy buck management, the trophy buck hunting craze and the desire of more affluent trophy hunters to exclude competition for those bucks and I give you the pay to hunt lease system.

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,645
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,645
Blackheart, What state do you hunt in?

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,207
Likes: 9
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,207
Likes: 9
Originally Posted by Blackheart
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
As I understand Texas history and how it came into the Union as a Republic, not as a territory, vast acreages weren’t originally govt. land.

If the govt has TX land they bought it or arranged for it. In the territories it was all govt land until homesteaded or bought. So, public free hunting land in TX isn’t that plentiful as it may be in states that were territories.

Correct me if I’m wrong. So, Texicans usually lease or own land where they hunt. And trespassing isn’t tolerated. Well maybe except govt protected illegals, specially in South Texas. Better not bag one of them, unless you wanna do life in the big house.

DF
Texas hunters brought all that onto themselves. The practice of paying to hunt private land I mean. Nobody had ever heard of such a thing as a hunting lease or considered paying to deer hunt private land here when I started hunting back in the '70's. There was still much private land that wasn't posted back then and if it wasn't posted it was generally understood it could be hunted without asking permission. Both of my grandfathers and my uncle owned farms here back then. None of them ever posted. Permission to hunt most land that was posted could be obtained simply by asking. No landowners expected to be paid to hunt. Combine the practice of QDM/trophy buck management, the trophy buck hunting craze and the desire of more affluent trophy hunters to exclude competition for those bucks and I give you the pay to hunt lease system.
I personally like the Texas model, ownership ruling the day, trespassers not welcomed.

I know that can cause some envy to those wanting free range, but property rights mean something in TX.

In Louisiana, we're not as strict on trespassers, but should be.

Timber companies with vast acreages, for years allowed free access. Then, they discovered that they could lease those lands to hunters. Hunting clubs actually took better care of the land which the companies liked, plus some additional revenue for them. Locals who thought they had some implied "birth right" to those lands, "cause Uncle Bob and grandpa hunting there for decades", found out that ownership rather than perceived birth rights ruled the day. Some of those people became vicious, burned camps and ATV's, did all kinda hostile stuff to the lease holders. It took a while for law enforcement to arrest enough of them to cap that behavior. It finally settled down, lease holders policing their leases, land owners pleased with the new arrangement for a number of reasons.

A good friend has 2,000 acres of hardwood bottom land on the Red River. He high fenced around a thousand acres, mainly to keep the natives and poachers out. He got together with surrounding land owners; they hired a retired Game Warden, had him deputized by the local sheriff, paid him to patrol the area. That has worked out pretty well. Ownership does mean something, even in Louisiana. How can one build a camp, have a conservation program, grow nice deer with poachers stealing your game. The answer, you can't and shouldn't have to.

DF

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,884
Likes: 5
R
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,884
Likes: 5
Blackheart, Get off your high horse, I have been hunting public and private Ranch's sense the late 1940s I was born on a 50,000 ranch in North Western Colorado, I can't remember when we didn't sell guided hunts on public and private land, it sounds like you think you are Danial Boone, and Davy Crockett, and everyone else is a FOOL,your more impressed with yourself than anyone else is. Rio7

IC B3

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19,276
Likes: 11
B
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19,276
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by Blackheart
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
As I understand Texas history and how it came into the Union as a Republic, not as a territory, vast acreages weren’t originally govt. land.

If the govt has TX land they bought it or arranged for it. In the territories it was all govt land until homesteaded or bought. So, public free hunting land in TX isn’t that plentiful as it may be in states that were territories.

Correct me if I’m wrong. So, Texicans usually lease or own land where they hunt. And trespassing isn’t tolerated. Well maybe except govt protected illegals, specially in South Texas. Better not bag one of them, unless you wanna do life in the big house.

DF
Texas hunters brought all that onto themselves. The practice of paying to hunt private land I mean. Nobody had ever heard of such a thing as a hunting lease or considered paying to deer hunt private land here when I started hunting back in the '70's. There was still much private land that wasn't posted back then and if it wasn't posted it was generally understood it could be hunted without asking permission. Both of my grandfathers and my uncle owned farms here back then. None of them ever posted. Permission to hunt most land that was posted could be obtained simply by asking. No landowners expected to be paid to hunt. Combine the practice of QDM/trophy buck management, the trophy buck hunting craze and the desire of more affluent trophy hunters to exclude competition for those bucks and I give you the pay to hunt lease system.
I personally like the Texas model, ownership ruling the day, trespassers not welcomed.

I know that can cause some envy to those wanting free range, but property rights mean something in TX.

In Louisiana, we're not as strict on trespassers, but should be.

Timber companies with vast acreages, for years allowed free access. Then, they discovered that they could lease those lands to hunters. Hunting clubs actually took better care of the land which the companies liked, plus some additional revenue for them. Locals who thought they had some implied "birth right" to those lands, "cause Uncle Bob and grandpa hunting there for decades", found out that ownership rather than perceived birth rights ruled the day. Some of those people became vicious, burned camps and ATV's, did all kinda hostile stuff to the lease holders. It took a while for law enforcement to arrest enough of them to cap that behavior. It finally settled down, lease holders policing their leases, land owners pleased with the new arrangement for a number of reasons.

A good friend has 2,000 acres of hardwood bottom land on the Red River. He high fenced around a thousand acres, mainly to keep the natives and poachers out. He got together with surrounding land owners; they hired a retired Game Warden, had him deputized by the local sheriff, paid him to patrol the area. That has worked out pretty well. Ownership does mean something, even in Louisiana. How can one build a camp, have a conservation program, grow nice deer with poachers stealing your game. The answer, you can't and shouldn't have to.

DF
You aren't trespassing on land that you have permission to hunt. You've been under your "system" down South for so long you just can't even fathom that. My grandparents and uncle had very few problems from not posting and allowing folks to hunt. Once a fence got left open and the heifers got out. The neighbor who forgot to close the gate apologised profusely and he and his sons helped get the stock rounded up. Heck, a farmer down the road from us when I was growing up actively recruited people to deer hunt on his land and encouraged them to shoot anything and everything they could. He had no use for deer and saw them only as criop eating pests to be eliminated. He in fact paid me for woodchucks I killed on his property when I was a kid. Texans might be wise to take notes on such when it comes to their hog infestations but no , they're too fuucking greedy and would rather bitch about the damage hogs cause incessantly. License sales are plummeting due to the lease system and the inability of many , particularly youngsters, to afford to pay to play. It's killing the the future of the sport.

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19,276
Likes: 11
B
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19,276
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by RIO7
Blackheart, Get off your high horse, I have been hunting public and private Ranch's sense the late 1940s I was born on a 50,000 ranch in North Western Colorado, I can't remember when we didn't sell guided hunts on public and private land, it sounds like you think you are Danial Boone, and Davy Crockett, and everyone else is a FOOL,your more impressed with yourself than anyone else is. Rio7
You're far more impressed with you than I am, that's for sure.

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,207
Likes: 9
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,207
Likes: 9
Originally Posted by Blackheart
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by Blackheart
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
As I understand Texas history and how it came into the Union as a Republic, not as a territory, vast acreages weren’t originally govt. land.

If the govt has TX land they bought it or arranged for it. In the territories it was all govt land until homesteaded or bought. So, public free hunting land in TX isn’t that plentiful as it may be in states that were territories.

Correct me if I’m wrong. So, Texicans usually lease or own land where they hunt. And trespassing isn’t tolerated. Well maybe except govt protected illegals, specially in South Texas. Better not bag one of them, unless you wanna do life in the big house.

DF
Texas hunters brought all that onto themselves. The practice of paying to hunt private land I mean. Nobody had ever heard of such a thing as a hunting lease or considered paying to deer hunt private land here when I started hunting back in the '70's. There was still much private land that wasn't posted back then and if it wasn't posted it was generally understood it could be hunted without asking permission. Both of my grandfathers and my uncle owned farms here back then. None of them ever posted. Permission to hunt most land that was posted could be obtained simply by asking. No landowners expected to be paid to hunt. Combine the practice of QDM/trophy buck management, the trophy buck hunting craze and the desire of more affluent trophy hunters to exclude competition for those bucks and I give you the pay to hunt lease system.
I personally like the Texas model, ownership ruling the day, trespassers not welcomed.

I know that can cause some envy to those wanting free range, but property rights mean something in TX.

In Louisiana, we're not as strict on trespassers, but should be.

Timber companies with vast acreages, for years allowed free access. Then, they discovered that they could lease those lands to hunters. Hunting clubs actually took better care of the land which the companies liked, plus some additional revenue for them. Locals who thought they had some implied "birth right" to those lands, "cause Uncle Bob and grandpa hunting there for decades", found out that ownership rather than perceived birth rights ruled the day. Some of those people became vicious, burned camps and ATV's, did all kinda hostile stuff to the lease holders. It took a while for law enforcement to arrest enough of them to cap that behavior. It finally settled down, lease holders policing their leases, land owners pleased with the new arrangement for a number of reasons.

A good friend has 2,000 acres of hardwood bottom land on the Red River. He high fenced around a thousand acres, mainly to keep the natives and poachers out. He got together with surrounding land owners; they hired a retired Game Warden, had him deputized by the local sheriff, paid him to patrol the area. That has worked out pretty well. Ownership does mean something, even in Louisiana. How can one build a camp, have a conservation program, grow nice deer with poachers stealing your game. The answer, you can't and shouldn't have to.

DF
You aren't trespassing on land that you have permission to hunt. You've been under your "system" down South for so long you just can't even fathom mthat. License sales are plummeting due to lyour lease system and the inability of many, particularly youngsters, to afford to pay to play. Congratulations.
There's an old saying, "Money talks, B.S. walks".

Responsibility, as in who's paying the upkeep and who's paying the property taxes.... Surely not poachers, surely not free loaders.

Now, if a land owner wants to open his property to the public, gratis, so be it. It's his choice.

But, unfortunately, that open door policy, often over time, causes problems, trash, litter, gates left open, equipment vandalized or stollen, livestock injured or stollen, etc. Of course, not everyone does that, but enough that most landowners don't have that policy. Or if they did, they revert to controlled access. And, all too often those decisions are from their experiences of being overly "generous" (naive) granting free access....

Just ask ranch owners, talk to them, hear their stories. I have and some of their accounts are pretty interesting. All my property is in Louisiana with controlled access. I'd for sure do the same if I was in TX.

DF

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,185
W
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
W
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,185
DF, that is the current state of NYS land ownership.
Everyone local thinks they can walk all over it because "PawPaw" did 50 years ago.
Don't get me started on the ATV's/UTV's and Jeeps.
And those locals help themselves to whatever they find there too. If they don't want it they damage it.

That is what is causing an increase in POSTED signs and the painting of boundary trees on private lands.

Hanco, change is inevitable. Enjoy the memories. and keep looking for the next opportunity!

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19,276
Likes: 11
B
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19,276
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by Blackheart
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by Blackheart
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
As I understand Texas history and how it came into the Union as a Republic, not as a territory, vast acreages weren’t originally govt. land.

If the govt has TX land they bought it or arranged for it. In the territories it was all govt land until homesteaded or bought. So, public free hunting land in TX isn’t that plentiful as it may be in states that were territories.

Correct me if I’m wrong. So, Texicans usually lease or own land where they hunt. And trespassing isn’t tolerated. Well maybe except govt protected illegals, specially in South Texas. Better not bag one of them, unless you wanna do life in the big house.

DF
Texas hunters brought all that onto themselves. The practice of paying to hunt private land I mean. Nobody had ever heard of such a thing as a hunting lease or considered paying to deer hunt private land here when I started hunting back in the '70's. There was still much private land that wasn't posted back then and if it wasn't posted it was generally understood it could be hunted without asking permission. Both of my grandfathers and my uncle owned farms here back then. None of them ever posted. Permission to hunt most land that was posted could be obtained simply by asking. No landowners expected to be paid to hunt. Combine the practice of QDM/trophy buck management, the trophy buck hunting craze and the desire of more affluent trophy hunters to exclude competition for those bucks and I give you the pay to hunt lease system.
I personally like the Texas model, ownership ruling the day, trespassers not welcomed.

I know that can cause some envy to those wanting free range, but property rights mean something in TX.

In Louisiana, we're not as strict on trespassers, but should be.

Timber companies with vast acreages, for years allowed free access. Then, they discovered that they could lease those lands to hunters. Hunting clubs actually took better care of the land which the companies liked, plus some additional revenue for them. Locals who thought they had some implied "birth right" to those lands, "cause Uncle Bob and grandpa hunting there for decades", found out that ownership rather than perceived birth rights ruled the day. Some of those people became vicious, burned camps and ATV's, did all kinda hostile stuff to the lease holders. It took a while for law enforcement to arrest enough of them to cap that behavior. It finally settled down, lease holders policing their leases, land owners pleased with the new arrangement for a number of reasons.

A good friend has 2,000 acres of hardwood bottom land on the Red River. He high fenced around a thousand acres, mainly to keep the natives and poachers out. He got together with surrounding land owners; they hired a retired Game Warden, had him deputized by the local sheriff, paid him to patrol the area. That has worked out pretty well. Ownership does mean something, even in Louisiana. How can one build a camp, have a conservation program, grow nice deer with poachers stealing your game. The answer, you can't and shouldn't have to.

DF
You aren't trespassing on land that you have permission to hunt. You've been under your "system" down South for so long you just can't even fathom mthat. License sales are plummeting due to lyour lease system and the inability of many, particularly youngsters, to afford to pay to play. Congratulations.
There's an old saying, "Money talks, B.S. walks".

Responsibility, as in who's paying the upkeep and who's paying the property taxes.... Surely not poachers, surely not free loaders.

Now, if a land owner wants to open his property to the public, gratis, so be it. It's his choice.

But, unfortunately, that open door policy, often over time, causes problems, trash, litter, gates left open, equipment vandalized or stollen, livestock injured or stollen, etc. Of course, not everyone does that, but enough that most landowners don't have that policy. Or if they did, they revert to controlled access. And, all too often those decisions are from their experiences of being overly "generous" (naive) granting free access....

Just ask ranch owners, talk to them, hear their stories. I have and some of their accounts are pretty interesting. All my property is in Louisiana with controlled access. I'd for sure do the same if I was in TX.

DF
Sounds like you've got lots of dirtbags in the South. Why am I not surprised ? Like I said we had VERY FEW problems over the years by allowing folks to hunt and my maternal grandfathers farm was never posted from the time he bough it in 1946 until his death in 2003. Of course the new owner, a non resident from the city, posted it up before the ink was dry on his deed. The thing I find most annoying is that many of these new landowners got THEIR start in hunting on other peoples land who graciously allowed THEM access for free. Now there,.... are some truly selfish dirtbags for you.

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,185
W
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
W
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,185
Why the heck did you not buy that farm yourself? Hmmmmmm

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19,276
Likes: 11
B
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19,276
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by WTM45
Why the heck did you not buy that farm yourself? Hmmmmmm
I ain't a farmer. What would I do with it ? I sure don't need it for hunting. I've got thousands of acres of State forest 2 miles up the road plus permission to hunt private totalling a few thousand more in 6 Counties, including my neighbors 326 acres right next door. Like I said before, it's still possible to get permission just for the asking here if you know people. The practice of leasing/paying for access hasn't completely taken over everywhere quite yet.

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,185
W
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
W
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,185
Enjoy your state land hunting.
But do not disparage those private landowners of their right to hold and manage their property as they see fit.
They pay for that right.
So when I hunt other's lands on invite or permission, I gift something. Helping out with the taxes is the right thing to do.

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 152,087
Likes: 32
hanco Online Content OP
Campfire Savant
OP Online Content
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 152,087
Likes: 32
Originally Posted by Reloder28
Originally Posted by hanco
I hunted a 10,000 acre place in Ozone Texas. It was open enough a hunter could walk and hunt. It was my favorite place ever. I liked easing up on a large canyon, used a wrist rocket to launch rocks into the brush in bottoms to see what came running out. I killed a lot of good bucks that way. They would come flying out, stop to see WTF. That was fun. Every place else was too thick, had to go the stand and feeder program.


Don’t you mean, Ozona?


Yes. Loved that place, south of town, close to the Devils River. A guy named Bob Childress owned many thousands of acres there.

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,645
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,645
Blackheart seems to be in pain. Something must be hurting him…

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

588 members (12344mag, 1badf350, 1Longbow, 1lesfox, 10gaugeman, 160user, 57 invisible), 2,329 guests, and 1,237 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,612
Posts18,511,758
Members74,008
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.123s Queries: 54 (0.035s) Memory: 0.9385 MB (Peak: 1.0693 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-14 22:00:43 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS