24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 12 of 19 1 2 10 11 12 13 14 18 19
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,228
Likes: 36
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,228
Likes: 36
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
And this my friends is the key to the whole mess...the shipowners have fought this forever, it's all about the money...within seconds the pilots could have had 12,000 hp guiding the disabled hulk through the bridge footings.

Many are going to learn that it's the companies with cargo on the ship that crashed into the bridge that will pay the damages, not the ship owner or ship operator. That's because of ancient maritime law (older than the US constitution) called "General Average" designed to prevent sailors from fighting over which cargo to toss overboard, and instead to focus on saving the ship. Per Ryan Peterson.

Blog post/linky


Learned from the Evergreen mishaps.


Me




Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,584
Likes: 6
L
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
L
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,584
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by atvalaska
Originally Posted by ldholton
I watched both views of that impact from behind and from in front. it certainly look like it was steered into the pillar to me..
I watch twice.... perfectly lined up on the pillar... Hell even the camera was in the right spot
I noticed it more in this video than the first one..

https://x.com/DCNewsLive/status/1772548737904107848?s=20

Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 7
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles

I sailed up through Norfolk a few times. No bridges on the Hampton end but huge ships come barreling through there in and out on their own constantly. The only tugs I saw were escorting a submarine and pushing me out of the channel.

Last edited by Crash_Pad; 03/26/24.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,380
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,380
Let's see , when those passenger rail cars always crash or they're going too fast on a corner and ends up being a gay guy arguing with his lover and in the end .. maybe
the harbor pilot was pizzed at his lover... with all the diversity they could hire that female engineer crew out of Florida that built the pedestrian bridge that fell and they could get right on it and Old Pete butt plug could be in charge. Everyone go home they got this!


I work harder than a ugly stripper....
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,228
Likes: 36
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,228
Likes: 36
Originally Posted by gunchamp
I find it amusing that some of you couldnt possibly imagine this not being an accident. There currently is not enough info out there for me to form a good opinion yet, but after all the insanity we have seen in the past few years, anything is possible. This could be cyber or lord knows what. Could just be a bad accident as well. Laughing off either possibility is very short sighted

The prevailing thought has been that it's anything BUT an accident. Some people, believing it's an accident, realize that it's unlikely that the engine room was "hacked" to stop ships power and then EXPERTLY rode momentum and currents to create a collision to take out a bridge at the BEST possible time of day to do so for mitigating loss of life. They did this knowing eventually power would come back on and reactions would ensure a collision after. They couldn't plan on her sinking as she only has 10 feet from keel to the bed - she's not gonna disappear under the waves....

The MAN 55,000 hp powerplant has Wi-fi and internet connectivity that opens it up for hacking - I'm sure.

They want to "attack" as retribution for whatever but not hurt anyone - makes sense.


Me



IC B2

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 2
R
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 2
asian muzzys (alum hat on)

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 16,112
Likes: 2
G
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
G
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 16,112
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Aagaardsporter
I appreciate the clear headed comments and link from Teal, Gnoahh, and some others. I've been over the Key Bridge a couple of times and appreciate Gnoahh's trepidation on the crossing. As on our Mackinac Bridge (da Bridge) the driver doesn't get to admire the adjacent views.

Regardless of whether the Dali is diesel, diesel electric, or steam turbine electric powered, the propulsion, rudder, and bow thruster controls from the bridge would be electrical/electronic and subject to failure from the two apparent power outages. Both indicators and control devices for propulsion and steering would malfunction.
Wife took me to Northern Michigan last year. The Mackinac Bridge, much to her chagrin, was the highlight to me. That is an impressive structure! She was also pissed when visiting Las Vegas that my main interest was the Hoover Dam.

Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 596
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 596
Originally Posted by steve4102
You guys are missing the elephant in the room.

Ok the lights went out, supposedly the ship lost control, ok fine, but…

Why was this ship being steered so close to the support in the first place. Why wasn’t this ship being steered dead center between the two supports from the get go.

There was no reason for this ship to be piloted this close to the support when there was schit tons of room available.

This was intensional


Why didn't your mother insist on a condom? THAT is the elephant in the room.

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,228
Likes: 36
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,228
Likes: 36
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
And this my friends is the key to the whole mess...the shipowners have fought this forever, it's all about the money...within seconds the pilots could have had 12,000 hp guiding the disabled hulk through the bridge footings.

Many are going to learn that it's the companies with cargo on the ship that crashed into the bridge that will pay the damages, not the ship owner or ship operator. That's because of ancient maritime law (older than the US constitution) called "General Average" designed to prevent sailors from fighting over which cargo to toss overboard, and instead to focus on saving the ship. Per Ryan Peterson.

Blog post/linky

Actually - speaking with more people - to clarify, damages to the vessel and cargo are covered under “general average”—paid by the cargo owners and their insurance companies. The bridge and other external damages will be covered by the property insurance of the ship operator.


Me



Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,167
Likes: 16
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,167
Likes: 16
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by atvalaska
Originally Posted by ldholton
I watched both views of that impact from behind and from in front. it certainly look like it was steered into the pillar to me..
I watch twice.... perfectly lined up on the pillar... Hell even the camera was in the right spot

For most of the time - it doesn't have power or steerage. When it does, it went full astern (the smoke is this ship basically rolling coal to do so) and without steering in reverse on a single screw vessel - prop walked the boat. Stern goes to port - lining up the ship and drift forward into the pilling.

Human error.

It absolutely could be a combination of mechanical failure and human error.

At this point nobody knows and NTSB has not been aboard the ship.

Anyone, including the FBI, claiming to "know" what happened is wrong right now even if their guess turns out to be correct.

There are plenty of reasons why plenty of persons are having a very good day today.


John Burns

I have all the sources.
They can't stop the signal.

IC B3

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,944
Likes: 27
Campfire Outfitter
Online Shocked
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,944
Likes: 27
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by gunchamp
I find it amusing that some of you couldnt possibly imagine this not being an accident. There currently is not enough info out there for me to form a good opinion yet, but after all the insanity we have seen in the past few years, anything is possible. This could be cyber or lord knows what. Could just be a bad accident as well. Laughing off either possibility is very short sighted

The prevailing thought has been that it's anything BUT an accident. Some people, believing it's an accident, realize that it's unlikely that the engine room was "hacked" to stop ships power and then EXPERTLY rode momentum and currents to create a collision to take out a bridge at the BEST possible time of day to do so for mitigating loss of life. They did this knowing eventually power would come back on and reactions would ensure a collision after. They couldn't plan on her sinking as she only has 10 feet from keel to the bed - she's not gonna disappear under the waves....

The MAN 55,000 hp powerplant has Wi-fi and internet connectivity that opens it up for hacking - I'm sure.

They want to "attack" as retribution for whatever but not hurt anyone - makes sense.
I dont know alot about shipping or ships in general. You may be absolutely correct. I just question everything these days. Too many odd things happening

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,944
Likes: 27
Campfire Outfitter
Online Shocked
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,944
Likes: 27
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
And this my friends is the key to the whole mess...the shipowners have fought this forever, it's all about the money...within seconds the pilots could have had 12,000 hp guiding the disabled hulk through the bridge footings.

Many are going to learn that it's the companies with cargo on the ship that crashed into the bridge that will pay the damages, not the ship owner or ship operator. That's because of ancient maritime law (older than the US constitution) called "General Average" designed to prevent sailors from fighting over which cargo to toss overboard, and instead to focus on saving the ship. Per Ryan Peterson.

Blog post/linky

Actually - speaking with more people - to clarify, damages to the vessel and cargo are covered under “general average”—paid by the cargo owners and their insurance companies. The bridge and other external damages will be covered by the property insurance of the ship operator.
If it is an accident, does any blame or penalties fall on the captain?

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,584
Likes: 6
L
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
L
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,584
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by atvalaska
Originally Posted by ldholton
I watched both views of that impact from behind and from in front. it certainly look like it was steered into the pillar to me..
I watch twice.... perfectly lined up on the pillar... Hell even the camera was in the right spot

For most of the time - it doesn't have power or steerage. When it does, it went full astern (the smoke is this ship basically rolling coal to do so) and without steering in reverse on a single screw vessel - prop walked the boat. Stern goes to port - lining up the ship and drift forward into the pilling.

Human error.
I don't doubt or disagree with what Teal is said here. just from my observation and said looks like. that video will cause conspiracy theories for the next hundred years.

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,228
Likes: 36
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,228
Likes: 36
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
And this my friends is the key to the whole mess...the shipowners have fought this forever, it's all about the money...within seconds the pilots could have had 12,000 hp guiding the disabled hulk through the bridge footings.

Many are going to learn that it's the companies with cargo on the ship that crashed into the bridge that will pay the damages, not the ship owner or ship operator. That's because of ancient maritime law (older than the US constitution) called "General Average" designed to prevent sailors from fighting over which cargo to toss overboard, and instead to focus on saving the ship. Per Ryan Peterson.

Blog post/linky

Actually - speaking with more people - to clarify, damages to the vessel and cargo are covered under “general average”—paid by the cargo owners and their insurance companies. The bridge and other external damages will be covered by the property insurance of the ship operator.
If it is an accident, does any blame or penalties fall on the captain?

I'd think like anything else, you'd have to prove impairment (drunk/drugs) or gross negligence/malpractice - ignoring all protocol etc.

I do not know if their insurance has a deductible lol.


Me



Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,944
Likes: 27
Campfire Outfitter
Online Shocked
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,944
Likes: 27
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
And this my friends is the key to the whole mess...the shipowners have fought this forever, it's all about the money...within seconds the pilots could have had 12,000 hp guiding the disabled hulk through the bridge footings.

Many are going to learn that it's the companies with cargo on the ship that crashed into the bridge that will pay the damages, not the ship owner or ship operator. That's because of ancient maritime law (older than the US constitution) called "General Average" designed to prevent sailors from fighting over which cargo to toss overboard, and instead to focus on saving the ship. Per Ryan Peterson.

Blog post/linky

Actually - speaking with more people - to clarify, damages to the vessel and cargo are covered under “general average”—paid by the cargo owners and their insurance companies. The bridge and other external damages will be covered by the property insurance of the ship operator.
If it is an accident, does any blame or penalties fall on the captain?

I'd think like anything else, you'd have to prove impairment (drunk/drugs) or gross negligence/malpractice - ignoring all protocol etc.

I do not know if their insurance has a deductible lol.
Kind of what I figured. Ive heard they have not located everyone missing yet, so with water temps in the 40s, my guess is there will be a few casualties sadly. Wonder if that will impact who gets the blame for this

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,228
Likes: 36
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 39,228
Likes: 36
Step 1 - reroute surface traffic and develop a new Hazmat/OS/OD route.
Step 2 - clear the river and get the docks open and going again
Step 3 - rebuild the bridge, likely with precautions like dolphins (not the animal) before the bridge supports both in and outbound.

The blame game will happen concurrently to all of those I bet. Just thinking of it as a project to get through. I'm sure they have local salvage and diver crews - Roen won't be chugging out from Sturgeon Bay here...


Me



Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,847
2
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
2
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,847


Please don't feed the trolls!
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,141
Likes: 3
F
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,141
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
And this my friends is the key to the whole mess...the shipowners have fought this forever, it's all about the money...within seconds the pilots could have had 12,000 hp guiding the disabled hulk through the bridge footings.

Many are going to learn that it's the companies with cargo on the ship that crashed into the bridge that will pay the damages, not the ship owner or ship operator. That's because of ancient maritime law (older than the US constitution) called "General Average" designed to prevent sailors from fighting over which cargo to toss overboard, and instead to focus on saving the ship. Per Ryan Peterson.

Blog post/linky

Actually - speaking with more people - to clarify, damages to the vessel and cargo are covered under “general average”—paid by the cargo owners and their insurance companies. The bridge and other external damages will be covered by the property insurance of the ship operator.
If it is an accident, does any blame or penalties fall on the captain?
The senior pilot is the captain during the period they are contracted for, it is very respectful, but 99 times out of 100, the ships captain keeps his mouth shut..and is often not much more than a translator when languages are a problem.
I got one side of the story once working on a docking assist at Bremerton/Kitsap Naval Base, a Navy Captain countermanded the order of the pilot...the skipper on the tug I was on balked at the order of the naval captain...the pilot told my skipper he had been relieved and please enter that with the correct time in the tug's log. Very tense but polite..no voices raised on the radio. Normally the navy has their own tugs. The navy ship damaged about 60 ft of pier and a small forest of piling with some hull damage to her stern. I don't know who ended up paying, but we never docked another naval vessel while I was there. The pilot continued to dock tankers and containerships successfully for another 12 years until he retired. I suspect my company didn't think the little bit of navy work was worth the hassle.


Well this is a fine pickle we're in, should'a listened to Joe McCarthy and George Orwell I guess.
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,120
Likes: 2
G
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
G
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,120
Likes: 2
I, as well as everyone I know here is still is still in shock. From what I understand, the pilot did get on the horn to shore authorities the instant it became apparent that the ship was going to hit. The authorities, who we locals refer to as "the bridge cops" (MTA cops responsible for all the bridges in the Bay region) who did immediately choke off traffic onto the bridge. The vehicles seen in the videos were merely stragglers who scooted through in the last second, it's unclear if any of them took the plunge. (The videos show only a couple vehicles moving on the bridge - which even at that time of night is usually damned near bumper to bumper.) The vehicles that went in the drink were seemingly work vehicles of the maintenance crew standing on the bridge, as were most if not all, of the people who went down. It would seem that the emergency response was prompt and effective, sparing a whole lot more souls from a grizzly end. You gotta remember this ship was moving at a snail's pace, a big irresistible force, but a snail's pace nonetheless.

The main question I have is why didn't the maintenance crew get the word to drop what they're doing and scoot. Maybe they did and simply didn't react fast enough, who knows - we may never know.

I knew when this thread started that the conspiracy theorists and "Chicken Littles" would jump to conclusions and start promulgating wild ideas based entirely on gut feelings, scant information, and prejudices. Hell, they may well be right at the end of the day but it bears keeping quiet about it until the facts are in - if for no other reason than to honor the poor bastards who lost their lives.


"You can lead a man to logic, but you cannot make him think." Joe Harz
"Always certain, often right." Keith McCafferty
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 21,876
Likes: 5
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 21,876
Likes: 5
Gnoahh,
My first guess would be the workers were overlooked.
In an extreme emergency the traffic would be the first though.
Someone may have nightmares for years over that normal oversight.


Parents who say they have good kids..Usually don't!
Page 12 of 19 1 2 10 11 12 13 14 18 19

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

550 members (1minute, 219 Wasp, 007FJ, 1badf350, 1_deuce, 12344mag, 57 invisible), 2,324 guests, and 1,225 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,027
Posts18,500,540
Members73,986
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.173s Queries: 54 (0.012s) Memory: 0.9385 MB (Peak: 1.0563 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-09 20:23:13 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS