|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,603
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,603 |
My son has invited me on an Alaskan brown bear hunt and a Canadian black bear hunt next year. I have a 30-06, a 45-70, and a 9.3x62. 1. Would I be correct in assuming that any of these 3 calibers are enough gun for even large Canadian black bears over bait? 2. Which, if any, of these 3 calibers are enough gun for Alaskan brown bears? If not enough gun, what would you recommend?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,871
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,871 |
Take the one you shoot the best and carry most often, the 9.3x62 is certainly "enough gun". cheers and good hunting. NC
don't judge until you have walked a mile in other persons' moccasins' SUM QUOD SUM........HOMINEM TE ESSE MEMENTO
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,107
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,107 |
The term "stopping rifle" is subjective - which is why these forums never die - and someone can always dream up a scenario where there is no such thing as too big. As effective as my 458 is - and as much as I dearly love it - I would not feel under gunned if forced to continue my guiding with "only" a 9.3x62. I have used my 9.3x62 as well as my 9.5x62 (aka 375 Scovill) on big bears and see very little difference between them and the 375 H&H. Which means they are virtually ideal for use on big bears. _________________________ Phil Shoemaker
" The problem with the world is that fools & fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubt" Bertrand Russell
Blue text a post from .458 Win. Note the calibers he mentions. Use the search for last month on ask the gunwriters, will find two or three threads on your sought for information. Your other two calibers will also have info on these threads too.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,943 Likes: 12
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,943 Likes: 12 |
Thanks ramseven, I get tired of repeating myself every other week.
Cole, any one of the rifles you mentioned will work but from your three choices I would recommend the 9.3.
Phil Shoemaker Alaska Master Guide, Alaska Hunter Ed Instructor FAA Master pilot www.grizzlyskinsofalaska.comAnyone who claims the 30-06 is not effective has either not used one, or else is unwittingly commenting on their marksmanship.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,819 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,819 Likes: 1 |
But Phil, it shows how consistent you are. Not a bad thing, albeit tedious.
"Be sure you're right. Then go ahead." Fess Parker as Davy Crockett
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,603
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,603 |
Thanks Phil, that is what I thought. I just got the 9.3x62 and I have not gotten to the range with it yet. If I can shoot it well this is the rifle I will take.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,000
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,000 |
Thanks Phil, that is what I thought. I just got the 9.3x62 and I have not gotten to the range with it yet. If I can shoot it well this is the rifle I will take. Careful with that 9.3... next thing you know all your friends will have one and there won't be a 338 Win Mag within twenty miles of your camp! It's a great cartridge.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,527
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,527 |
I don't know if it is a lot of help. I have taken 2 black bears,, sorta average in size, one with with a 35-284 Wildcat,which pretty much a duplicates a 35 Whelen, just a shorter case and one with a 45-70 Ruger #1. They both went down just about the same. The 9.3 is very close to a .358 bore. I sure would take a .358 caliber just as soon as a 9.3. I think once you get past .30 caliber you will do as well or better with bigger bores.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 29,348
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 29,348 |
I'd be comfortable with any of your three � most comfortable with whichever one I could shoot best.
On the basis of cartridge choice alone, I'd prefer the .45-70 to the 9.3x62mm, and the 9.3 to the '06 � assuming that there'd probably be no call for a shot beyond a couple of hundred yards.
"Good enough" isn't.
Always take your responsibilities seriously but never yourself.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,603
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,603 |
Mr. Howell thanks for your reply. I�m thinking of taking the 45-70 as a backup. With 300 to 350 grain bullets this rifle shoots 1� to 1.25� groups. I have ordered some 400 and 500 grain bullets and I�ll see how they will do. The trigger on this rifle could use a little work. I took the 9.3x62 to the range this morning and I was impressed. Using Norma factory 286 grain ammo my best 3 shot group was 1.25� and the worst was 1.75�. The best group was the last group. Not bad for a new out of the box rifle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 29,348
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 29,348 |
Ever since I got my Iver Henriksen custom .458 Winchester Magnum (made 1956�1957), friends have asked whether it'd shoot inside an inch at a hundred yards. My answer has always been that I don't know, and I don't care.
I've always been a hundred percent certain that anything that I was likely to shoot with that rifle would be lots bigger than an inch and lots closer than a hundred yards.
"Good enough" isn't.
Always take your responsibilities seriously but never yourself.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,826
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,826 |
Ever since I got my Iver Henriksen custom .458 Winchester Magnum (made 1956�1957), friends have asked whether it'd shoot inside an inch at a hundred yards. My answer has always been that I don't know, and I don't care.
I've always been a hundred percent certain that anything that I was likely to shoot with that rifle would be lots bigger than an inch and lots closer than a hundred yards. I'll wager that 458 either isn't scoped at all either, or has something that will work in the 2X or so range. Just a gut level feeling about folks who know what they're doing. Wayne
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 29,348
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 29,348 |
Peep sight with classic Redfield "Sourdough" front sight. Not even D&T for scope mount. Who needs anything else?
"Good enough" isn't.
Always take your responsibilities seriously but never yourself.
|
|
|
|
537 members (1beaver_shooter, 1OntarioJim, 219 Wasp, 1badf350, 219DW, 1234, 63 invisible),
2,396
guests, and
1,303
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,799
Posts18,496,275
Members73,977
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|