|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,703 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,703 Likes: 3 |
This may be a completely silly question, but if a man had a .243 and would rather it be a 6mm, is it as simple as running a chamber reamer in it, or is the difference in twist a problem?
I understand this is a low speed custom question, so I appreciate your indulgence. CT
"The number one problem with America is, a whole lot of people need shot, and nobody is shooting them." -Master Chief Hershel Davis
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,934 Likes: 23
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,934 Likes: 23 |
Twist isn't a problem, but the difference in taper of the case bodies probably is.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,703 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,703 Likes: 3 |
I see, so you would end up having to set back and rechamber.
"The number one problem with America is, a whole lot of people need shot, and nobody is shooting them." -Master Chief Hershel Davis
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,611 Likes: 8
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,611 Likes: 8 |
Why wouldn't you go 243AI instead? The 6 can be a bastard in a short action, mag constraints being your main concern.
I can walk on water.......................but I do stagger a bit on alcohol.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,703 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,703 Likes: 3 |
All I want to do is shoot 70 grain blitzkings and 95 grain partitions, I can't imagine that it would be a problem to run them out of a short action. I could forsee it if I wanted to shoot long matchking pills, or something like that.
I have been down the ackley road, and if I were to get squirrelly with a re-chamber it would probably be to a 6mm-284.
"The number one problem with America is, a whole lot of people need shot, and nobody is shooting them." -Master Chief Hershel Davis
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,256 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,256 Likes: 4 |
You would have to set the barrel back, as the 6mm case has more tapper from the base to the bottom of the shoulder than the 243 does. A 6-284 reamer would clean out the 243 chamber without setting back the barrel and would show a significant velocity gain with bullets in the 70 to 95 grain range. If you don't over-heat it, it might even last for 8,000+/- rounds.
Jeff
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,099 Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,099 Likes: 3 |
Those two bullets should shoot just fine out of a standard 243 Win.
erich
After the first shot the rest are just noise.
Make mine a Minaska
Heaven has walls and rules, H-ll has open borders
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,105
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,105 |
I had a 6mm-270 Winchester built last year,it's 1 of the most accurate rifles I own,I'm using 105 gr. Hornady AMAX'S and they worked great on deer and hogs last year.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,703 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,703 Likes: 3 |
Those two bullets do shoot just fine out of a .243, but they are beginning to be the strawberry ice cream in a gallon of neopolitan. (With a .30-06 being vanilla and a .270 being chocolate)
I just hate having the same thing everybody else has...Its a terrible sickness.
"The number one problem with America is, a whole lot of people need shot, and nobody is shooting them." -Master Chief Hershel Davis
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 872
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 872 |
Id say do it on a long action for the 6mm or 243ai for the short.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 488
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 488 |
This may be a completely silly question....is the difference in twist a problem? Both cartridges can use the same twist rate, and if you want to use the 95 Partition then you'll need a 1:10" minimum. The .244 Remington (predecessor to the 6mm Remington) used a 1:12" twist and the longer 6mm bullets were marginally stable. You'll have to set the barrel back quite a bit to clean up the chamber, this is not a "one thread" job. The 6mm-.284 is not a good candidate for a pure rechamber since at least part of the original throat of the .243 will still be there. I'd set it back ~4.5 threads if it were me. The half-thread part puts the barrel stamping under the forearm - a nice custom touch that costs nothing. .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 429
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 429 |
If you did the 6Rem/243AI you have to set the barrel back not sure about doing a 6/284 other choice would be a 6RemAI and you could do that without setting the barrel back.
Well good luck
USMC Life Member VFW
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 27,500
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 27,500 |
I have had a couple of 6mm's on short actions and they work great. Not sure where the idea comes from that a long or medium action is needed. A 6mm AI would be a great fit as would a 6mm/284 which I have had some play time with and really enjoyed. You do get meaningful performance upgrades going to either of the three and I agree completely that having something different is a lot of fun.
LOVE God, LOVE your family, LOVE your country, LIKE guns and sports.
About 2016 team "R" candidates "We definitely need a crew with a sack of balls the size of hot water bottles, bloviated estrogen leaking feel-gooders need not apply." Gunner 500
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,908 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,908 Likes: 2 |
I've used a 243 somewhat and I bought my son a 6mmREM in a REM 600. No problem with any bullets as far as action length. I'd stay away from the 284 based cartidges as I would be leary of having to open up the rails. Either AI version would be wonderful especially a 6mmAI. You may want to go 243AI since you already have brass you could form.
It sounds like a fun project.
RH
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,256 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,256 Likes: 4 |
Oddly enough, I've done 15+/- rebarrel or rechamber jobs to the 284 or 284 based wildcats on Remington 7, 600, 660, 700, and 722 actions without ever having to touch the guide rails. Just another proof that I live a charmed life!
Jeff
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,261 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,261 Likes: 1 |
My 700 did not need any rail work, although I swapped to a SAUM follower. Feeds all 3 from the mag very well.
Now with even more aplomb
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 342
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 342 |
I have two factory 6mm Rems in short action 700's. My only complaint about being short action is that I cannot seat my bullets remotely close to the lands and still fit them in the magazine....but that's Remington's fault for too long of a throat, not that they are short action.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,261 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,261 Likes: 1 |
Just be glad its not a .30cal. You would need an H&H-length action to touch the lands if Remington chambered the barrel. Who knows what that is all about. Also have a 700 in 270win with a stupid-long throat. It takes 150's seated way out to touch the lands.
Now with even more aplomb
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,445
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,445 |
Oddly enough, I've done 15+/- rebarrel or rechamber jobs to the 284 or 284 based wildcats on Remington 7, 600, 660, 700, and 722 actions without ever having to touch the guide rails. Just another proof that I live a charmed life!
Jeff I had a 25-284 that fed smooth and flawlessly that started life as a Remington 700, 6mm. In my case I'm not so sure of the charmed life thing though.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 27,500
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 27,500 |
Just be glad its not a .30cal. You would need an H&H-length action to touch the lands if Remington chambered the barrel. Who knows what that is all about. Also have a 700 in 270win with a stupid-long throat. It takes 150's seated way out to touch the lands. It is called product liability and low pressures. The lawyers have been running Remington for a long time. See 8mm Rem MAg for most obvious proof. Totally took its balls away and doomed it to failure. Long throats are hard to overload for with any book spec load.
LOVE God, LOVE your family, LOVE your country, LIKE guns and sports.
About 2016 team "R" candidates "We definitely need a crew with a sack of balls the size of hot water bottles, bloviated estrogen leaking feel-gooders need not apply." Gunner 500
|
|
|
|
508 members (12344mag, 1234, 17CalFan, 160user, 10Glocks, 10ring1, 47 invisible),
13,434
guests, and
932
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,195,116
Posts18,542,177
Members74,057
|
Most Online21,066 May 26th, 2024
|
|
|
|