|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 363
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 363 |
I have just been gifted my Great Grandfathers 1907 vintage Savage 1899 in .303 Savage. Why did they call it .303 when its a .308 cal???
Last edited by Leverboy; 02/11/09.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,901
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,901 |
Les ??? Where are ya, Les?!? 'Splain the .303 to this man, Les... (Les is the Forum's ".303 Dude", don't cha know?)
It's smart to hang around old guys 'cause they know lotsa stuff...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 222
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 222 |
Following is a quote from Wikipedia: Savage Arms created the .303 Savage as part of an unsuccessful attempt at creating a cartridge for the military. Although the cartridge was never popular with the military, it did become a popular round for civilian hunters. Being a pointed-tip rimmed cartridge, it worked well in the Model 99 rifles that Savage produced, but not as successfully in other rifles. However, the pointed-tip bullets gave it a ballistic advantage over other cartridges such as the .30-30. [1]
The power to legislate is the power to destroy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,709
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,709 |
Cannot tell you why it is .303 but I can attest to how well it works!
Official member of "The Clan of Turd-like People"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,771 Likes: 20
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,771 Likes: 20 |
Cannot tell you why it is .303 but I can attest to how well it works! That's a beautiful old rifle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 852
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 852 |
Ken Waters in his Pet Loads article in November 1967 reported that "our No. 22 Ideal Handbook contains a statement that the original size of the .303 Savage barrel was .303 taking .311 bullets". I don't have any idea if the No 22 Ideal Handbook is correct or not, apparently neither did Waters. It seems more likely to me that Mr. Savage, always the marketer, wanted to give the impression his .30 cal was better, bigger, stronger. Just a guess.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,709
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,709 |
Thanks Hawkeye!
Not bad for a 106 year old rifle.
Last edited by sactoller; 02/12/09.
Official member of "The Clan of Turd-like People"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54,842
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54,842 |
303 Savage was the 1st production Cartridge for the Savage rifles, damn fine cartridge, ballistically the equivalent of the 30-30, but predates it by about 4 months. Shoots a .308 bullets, if the bore is .311, it is due to being shot that much, early 303 Rounds had a .311 bullet, but the bore was .308. I assume that they frigured the increased pressure would give better ballistics, but later cartridges, from the later 30's on were pretty much .308 bullets. It does handle heavier 180 and 190 grain bullets better than the 30-30, has a lot to do with case design. The main body on the 303 is larger than the 30-30, therefore the bullet doesn't sit so far into the powder. There is a sticky on here about how to make your brass form 307 Winchester if you don't mind work, or you can just get some Norma or Bertram's brass and call it good. 100 Pieces should last a lifetime. I honestly don't have a clue why they called it the 303, 308 Savage would have made more sense at the time to me. Les
Back in the heartland, Thank God!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54,842
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54,842 |
Still don't understand the folks here that look down their nose at an Original Savage cartridge and prefer the Winchester stuff. Heresy I tell ya!
Back in the heartland, Thank God!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,771 Likes: 20
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,771 Likes: 20 |
Still don't understand the folks here that look down their nose at an Original Savage cartridge and prefer the Winchester stuff. Heresy I tell ya! For some reason I was under the impression that the .303 was only available loaded with blunt nose bullets, making it no better than .30-30. Not true?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 43,766
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 43,766 |
It was originally sold with round nosed bullets, but the hunting bullets were typically 190gr versus 170gr for the 30-30. There were target rounds and varmint rounds also sold, not sure if they were all round nosed or not.
I think the original factory rounds were hotter than the 30-30's were, but in the end it's totally subjective as to whether one cartridge is better than another. The 303 Savage had a huge following at the turn of the century due to their belief it was better.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,771 Likes: 20
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,771 Likes: 20 |
I happen to think .30-30 is an excellent Eastern deer round, so being just a little better can't be bad.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,726
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,726 |
Here is the visual comparison. Left to right 30-30 Win, 303 Sav, 308 Win, 303 British
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 363
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 363 |
Blunt nosed or round nosed i am sure i will get more velocity than any of my .30-.30's as i will be pushing a 170 grain pill out of a 26" octagon barrel.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54,842
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54,842 |
Actually the case capacity between the two is about.05 grains or smaller, depending on the brand of cartridge.
Back in the heartland, Thank God!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,002
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,002 |
Les can you give a reference for the 303 Savage pre dating the 30 Winchester? I'd like it for my files. Thanks. Got some cast lead bullets with copper gas checks sent up from Glenhills, WI. Looking forward to loading them up for the oldest Savages.
"Rhetoric is no substitute for reality." -Thomas Sowell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54,842
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54,842 |
I found the listing on some obscure page, also, if you read the development of the 1895, it was released before Winchester brought out the 1894 in 3030. Les
Back in the heartland, Thank God!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54,842
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54,842 |
Remember Savage started working on this cartridge in 1893
Back in the heartland, Thank God!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 852
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 852 |
I don't have a Savage in 30-30 to compare velocities but, I get 1950 fps out of a Hornady 170 grain flat point over 31.5 grains of IMR 4320 in the 303 B that I hunt with. It has a 26" barrel. Looking at the load data for a 30-30, I don't think I can, nor do I want to, match the velocity of those modern loads in modern guns. I try to keep in mind that for me, shooting and hunting with a 303 Savage is not an exercise in achieving maximum velocity but instead is a chance to participate in a little bit of the nostalgia and history of the past. That's about as sentimental as I get.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,724
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,724 |
If you look at the older reloading manuals you will find that the high end of a .30-30 load is around the starting point of the .303 Savage. The .303 delivers a little more oompf than the .30-30 in factory loaded cartridges.
The appeal of the .303 to me has always been accuracy. I have never seen a .30-30 that would shoot moa - have seen a lot of .303s that would. A little more accuracy will put meat in the pot too.
|
|
|
|
604 members (1lessdog, 12344mag, 2500HD, 1234, 1_deuce, 17CalFan, 58 invisible),
2,390
guests, and
1,181
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,522
Posts18,491,039
Members73,972
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|