Home Forums Reloading Reloading Software RCBS.LOAD ?

Anyone using RCBS.LOAD v3 that would care to comment on it? Is it user friendly, effective? Likes, dislikes?

I enjoy using RCBS Load; it is my go-to software for external ballistics software. I like the drop chart with its table and target circle. If there is a bullet not included in the software you can e-mail Greg Mushial and he will make every attempt to add it to the data base quickly.
I enjoy the Cartridge Designer function very much.
I am using version 3.31C I think. The update is on the web by using the update function in tools.
The latest update ads a large group of selectable bullet shapes for cartridge designer. When a bullet is seated there are additional functions which give you case capacity by powder type � not load data but useful for load density thoughts. Another function on the same chart allows you to see the bolt thrust and radial pressure on the barrel in the chamber area.
There are a number of new functions with the latest update including color capability for cartridge drawings. We now have the ability to save the cartridge drawings to JPEG or BMP and other functions.
Cartridge designer allows you to form a wildcat quickly and estimate its case capacity and compare drawings quickly.

I use the load data section quite a bit. The load data section has load data from many older and current load books. There is a built in graph function and you can graph your chronograph data and compare the data with that from the load books.
The load data function was difficult for me to learn, I am �middle aged� and not a computer wizard by any means. Once you get the hang of the data section it is quite useful and has many features I have not yet mastered.
The latest version of Load has been made much more user friendly through feed back from the users in the field. Greg is a shooter and is interested in our ability to use the program.

There is a target data base which has a few useful targets for printing.
The Target Tool is really something special. When you have shot a group you scan it in and use the tool to measure your group size. You are able to store you targets with load data. I shoot fewer 1� and under groups now that I use Target Tool to measure my targets.
I am certain there are other features I have not thought to mention but RCBS Load is a useful product for the dedicated shooter. Here is a link to Greg�s web site and you are able to look at some of the pages fro Load here. Look at the load data on the upper right side to look at the graphs. When you are on a specific caliber there is a messy combined graph. Click on the link to see the exploded individual graphs.

http://www.gmdr.com/

Hey william, thanks for the response. Does RCBS.LOAD have import/export capability of data, or can it only accept hand-entered data? For example, exporting load data from RCBS to Excel for custom analysis ... or vice versa?

If it only has hand-entered data capability, is it a quick, easy interface?

Overall, it seems like a good value. What OS and system are you running it on? I'm running with WindowsXP Professional.

Does it allow you to record load data matched to a firearm, or just load data in general? I've visited Greg Mushial's web page before ... while some questions are readily answered, others are not, hence this thread. I emailed him with questions several months ago. Never got a response. Are the updates free? ... or is there a charge?

The only version I see at any of the online sources just say 3.0 ... and his website does not list what the latest version is other than 3.0. I see you have 3.31C.

I am running Load on my PC and a small Inspiron laptop with XP.

I enter the load data manually but it is pretty quick.
I am working on a down load from the Chrony memory and I�ll let you know how that works out. I am searching for an old technical sheet on the Chrony software but cannot locate it at the moment.

You can match your load data to a firearm. It gets a little complicated to enter the basic information � rifle and other data but you only have to do this once. From then on thing work from pull downs.

The updates are free. You simply go to the tool page and click on the update.
The on-line help through the Load help icon is pretty good but Greg is a LOT smarter than I am and I often must read the pages two or three times�

Greg is one of the busiest workaholics I have ever met; he works on some very interesting projects. I will go a Month or two without hearing from him and then I�ll get several replies to my questions and general comments. He has never failed to answer a question but it does take some time when he is busy. During summer he shoots through most of his spare time and it often quite a surprise to read about some of his projects.

When you buy the Load program you register it on his web site and then download the updates.

If you are a computer guy you will probably be up and running with the load data faster than I was. I got pretty frustrated through the years � I started out on a floppy disk version of Load and a 286. I believe this latest version is quite user friendly but there are portions that require getting used to when it comes to storing data.

All other functions work quite easily. I have not seen another external ballistics generator which works as well as the one on Load.

Thanks. My chronograph is a CED Millennium version 1, not 2. That would probably leave me entering data by hand if .LOAD is not able to import electronically. The CED can export data to my PC.

Here's where to order it on-line if your local source doesn't have it.

And here's the GMDR web page on it.

Thanks Ken.

I lost RCBS.load when my computer crashed.

Yesterday, I unearthed the original CD and reinstalled it.

But it wouldn't let me go beyond the opening screen.

So I'll continue to be content with my old version of QuickLOAD. Danged if I'll buy RCBS.load again just to get a later version when my old version won't even work.

Since 1982, I've used well over a dozen ballistics programs. I don't even remember 'em all, or just how many have come and gone. But I still haven't out-grown my old version of QuickLOAD-QuickTARGET, which is still a lot more than I'll ever need.

Ken,

Is your old version rated to run on your current OS? Also, would you have to outright buy a new version if that is the issue, or just pay for an update? Seems to me that you shouldn't have to outright purchase the latest version since you have a legitimate copy of an older version. I could see paying an update fee if your far enough behind. I note that QL doesn't give updates away either.

I've considered QuickLoad as well. Seems to me, that either QL or .LOAD can guide one in their load development, but since neither one takes the place of a strain gauge or piezo transducer, they can only get you close. Both methods of pressure estimation have merit -- modeled prediction vs. statistical analysis. I've seen mixed reviews on .LOAD's user interface, but believe I could work it.

The value proposition I like about .LOAD is the cartridge designer capability, loads of statistical analysis and data, target analysis, along with what is reputed to be an excellent external ballistics program. Taken as a whole, that's a lot of bang for the buck ... around $100 for .LOAD vs $150 for QL, and another $150 for QickDesign to get the cartridge designer. I still haven't made up my mind and I'm not in a huge rush.

What I don't like about .LOAD is the added cost to get more data ... not that RCBS really has a way around it due to copyrights, but it's annoying nonetheless.

Another option would be RSI Shooting Lab. However, this is still another direction to go because it requires you to go with a strain gauge and directly measure pressure. The most accurate way no doubt, but far more expensive by the time a guy buys their transducers and hardware.

From my vantage point, these are the top three in this arena, and really when looking at cost, QL and .LOAD are really the two to consider.

An unmet friend called from afar to tell me that he was sending me the latest version of RCBS.LOAD. Hope it'll run on my sometimes cantankerous computer.

I'm inexpressibly grateful � and flattered � and inordinately curious.

The description of RCBS.LOAD on GMDR.com leads me to expect software that's big worlds beyond the first RCBS ballistics software (probably from different designers) that I tried. I don't remember much about those old RCBS programs, which didn't impress me much, but I'm really eager to see this new one. The descriptions of its features and powers on GMDR.com suggest that it may quickly become one of my three top favorites, to rank well above the other dozen or more ballistics programs that I've used since 1982.

I haven't found any one program that'll do all that I want. Some are accurate but not very user-friendly. (I need 'em user-coddling!) Some have many more good features than others.

So far, my favorites are friend Hartmut Br�mel's QuickLOAD-QuickTARGET and friend Ken Oehler's Ballistic Explorer � for separate reasons, of course.

The new RCBS.LOAD should be here when I get home from the hospital. As soon as I can, I'll let you know my first impressions of it. I'm sure that it's very accurate, and the description on GMDR.com assures me that it has beaucoup superb features. We'll just have to see how kind it is to � and how it takes to train � a senile, clumsy, forgetful ol' fossil.

Wow Ken, that sure was a stroke of good fortune. Glad to hear it. As far as I can tell, that mind of yours is still sharp as a tack, and nowhere near fossil-hood status. I on the other hand, am notorious for setting my keys down someplace, and then having to spend half an hour trying to locate where I absentmindedly put them. My other half frequently ends up finding my "temporarily misplaced" items for me .

I have RCBS.Load and have had it for a number of years. It has some data from older Load manuals and at one time you could buy the electronic data for a number of current load manuals.
After reading the other post I see that I have severely underutilized it� but not underappreciated it.
It is a good solid program which offers free and easy upgrades� if I lost it tomorrow I would buy it again

Natchezss is out right now but has been selling the RCBS software:

http://www.natchezss.com/brand.cfm?...nd=RC&category=24&prodID=RC99915

Temmi, do you have the latest updates? I really enjoy the new bullet shapes and the powder volume charts.
I had a few problems with target tool until this latest update � it works fine for me now.
I use cartridge designer with the Powley Computer and I can estimate a load for an imaginary wildcat with minimum effort.
I am having fun with the colors for the cartridge cases. I have posted pictures of pink and orange cartridges to aggravate a few of my internet friends.

I am almost sure I don't have the latest updates... I will by tonight though....

Just installed the latest RCBS.Load (version 3.0) on my wonderfully rebuilt computer and took a pretty long "quick" look at it. Very impressive! I wish that I'd had it (or something like it) years ago. Maybe I'll live long enough to make good use of what it can do. I still haven't figured-out how to make it rub my feet, but it can do so much else that I reckon I can get along without that.

Looks like I'm going to have not two but three favorite "go to" ballistics programs � QuickLOAD, Ballistic Explorer, and RCBS.Load. Last time I counted 'em (years ago!), I'd used over a dozen ballistics programs before these better ones came along.

Just wish that friend Homer P could've lived long enough to see what they can do. He did enough long and tedious ballistics work � in the industry and in the military � with slide rules, big books of math tables, and plain old country pencils to really appreciate these programs.

Ken,

I have often wondered what Homer Powley, Bob Hutton and P.O. Ackley could have accomplished with a desk-top 286�.

The cartridge designer function is a real labor saver. When you have a cartridge drawn with your individual bullet shape we are able to estimate case capacity in both grains of water and in grains of powder � with most of the commonly available powders on the chart. P.O would have had a field day. Most of us have read very little of the writing from these three and fewer are able to sort through the distortions perpetuated by the internet.
I still use my Powley computer and the RCBS Load program sure helps when I am day dreaming about wildcats.

I�ll be interested in how you like the color function for the basic cartridge cases. I generally save them in a bright color such as orange or blue. My wife likes pink for her wildcats.

The �historic� load data is great fun. The Speer Wildcat info is interesting even though I have the hard copies. One of the fun things to do is to look at the history of the 30-30 cartridge and IMR 3031, a steady reduction in load data as the year�s progress.

Homer got a TRS-80 right-off when Radio Shack introduced it �� added to it through the years � did a lot with it � and was still using it when he died in the late 1990s. Considering how much he'd already accomplished before it, and how much he accomplished with it, I've long wished that he'd lived long enough � and had moved-on far beyond that TRS-80 � to develop the fruits of his genius even further. The wonderful MathCAD software alone would've made Homer think that he was in Hawg Heaven.

That fervent, forlorn wish is right in there with the wish that Dr Mann's widow hadn't destroyed the manuscript for his second book.

Now, I'm wondering how I can best pass along Homer's library in the same way that he passed it along to me � gratis � to keep it from going to the dump, and to give it its best chance to edify even more shooters.

�Now, I'm wondering how I can best pass along Homer's library in the same way that he passed it along to me � gratis � to keep it from going to the dump, and to give it its best chance to edify even more shooters.�

My Dad started out on a TRS 80 using cassette tape software. The �Trash 80� was in fact a very fine computer in its day; it even had a voice program.

The writings of Homer Powley, Robert Hutton, P.O. Ackley and a number of other pre-war and post-war writers were confined primarily to periodicals and are pretty well unobtainable to the average researcher. Many of us have no idea what they did, or why they did it. While Powley and Hutton are virtually unknown, Ackley is misunderstood and misquoted to the point his craftsmanship, originality and innovation has been lost forever. Few of us are able to recognize and appreciate the quality of his metal work and fewer still understand the importance of the controlled expansion bullet. Most of our knowledge of P.O. Ackley�s work with cartridges centers around the �Improved� cartridge case, a term which Ackley once described as: �unfortunate.�
I do not believe it is possible to convey the amount of effort expended by Powley and Hutton during a time when slide rules and manual look-up tables were �state-of-the-art� to develop their theories and explore their hobby.
We know Harvey Donaldson�s many letters, pictures, tools and data was purchased and taken by his admirers.
I wonder what happened to the correspondence and data kept by Niedner, Ned Roberts and Ed Yard. Wouldn�t it have been interesting if the correspondence and files from these interesting men could have been gathered together in one library/research center.
I wonder if any of the loading tool companies or bullet manufacturers has an interest � considering the economic times � in creating a handloading historical/research center � it need not be pretty.

It is interesting to me how misunderstood Ken Waters�s two articles on developing Pet Loads are, and he is still alive. In neither article (the first from 1962) does Waters suggested the handloader is able to estimate pressure through the use of PRE. Yet few of us understand this. I have read a fair amount of Waters writing and I have only discovered one article where he slipped and suggested he could estimate pressure using PRE.
The preservation of these interesting handloaders work is a worthwhile cause.

Because the other guy was also one of my top Handloader staff writers, I was obliged to publish an article on "reading" head-expansion that Ken hotly disagreed with.

"So let me have your article on the subject."

"Oh, I can't do that now. I don't want to run ______'s article down."

"You needn't refer to it at all. Just write me an article on your method, just as if ______'s article had never been written."

So it was that we got a "Pet Loads" article that wasn't about just one selected cartridge � an article that we later republished as part of a supplement to Ken's Pet Loads book. I consider it to be one of the best that Ken's ever written.