24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,581
Likes: 8
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,581
Likes: 8
I agree that the .280, 7RM, 300WSM, .30-06, etc, are all too close for you to ever really notice a difference on game or at the bench. Seems to me like the bigger hole is between the 6mm and the .280, to which I would say that the .25-06 would fit the bill perfectly, especially if it's just for deer and smaller- even though I carried mine for elk this year...

GB1

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,794
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,794
If you have a '06, none of the choices you outlined are gonna give you any significant added punch. Except possibly extended range with the big 7. Sorry to say, but if you're deer hunting, the .280 and the '06 have got you covered.
If you were to get a .338, it ain't gonna kill the deer any deader than you're killing them now. It'll beat you up more but that's for you to decide. If you reload and water it down to the level of what you've already got, what's the point of having it?
If anything, go the other way and get you a 7-08 or .260. They're both excellent deer cartridges that really come into their own with hand loading.


Aim for the exit hole.
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,702
Likes: 3
C
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
C
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,702
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by RinB
What are you trying to do that what you have will not do?


Rin,
Dadburn your hide. Here you are talking experience and common sense. As are quite a few of you.

When I mentioned horsepower, I guess I should have clarified. What I am looking for specifically is added range. (percieved though it may be.)



"The number one problem with America is, a whole lot of people need shot, and nobody is shooting them."
-Master Chief Hershel Davis

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,702
Likes: 3
C
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
C
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,702
Likes: 3
Hey Rin,
I had to go back and read your post about turning 60. You mentioned having a pair of .270's and a 7mm mag. (I assume Remington.) I read where you said the 270 and the 280 were virtually two peas in a pod. Then a couple of lines down you mention that the 7 mag is more gun than a .270.

It would seem that you found a use for a 7mm mag in an area beyond the .270/.280?



"The number one problem with America is, a whole lot of people need shot, and nobody is shooting them."
-Master Chief Hershel Davis

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,632
Likes: 4
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,632
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by BobinNH
You can pile up a lifetime of game and never go near a 300 magnum.


Heresy!!!


"Chances Will Be Taken"


IC B2

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Originally Posted by johnw
Originally Posted by BobinNH
You can pile up a lifetime of game and never go near a 300 magnum.


Heresy!!!



HeeHee! grin




The 280 Remington is overbore.

The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,944
G
GF1 Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
G
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,944
CrimsonTide, the only thing I haven't seen here is what game you intend to use this rifle on, and in what conditions (though I gather it's open country). Power and flatness of trajectory are two different things.

If elk's on the agenda, I'd consider the .300 Weatherby. Best of the .300s, IMO, significantly more power than any of the 7s, flatter than nearly all. A cartridge I have a deep affinity for is the .338 Win Mag - powerful, accurate, relatively flat shooting - great elk cartridge.

On the other end, if elk isn't on your list and flat shooting is for deer and antelope sized game, I'd take a hard look at the .257 or .270 Weatherby Magnums. The 25-06 is likewise outstanding.

All this said, with your 30-06 gone, I'd get another. If there's a more versatile cartridge on earth, I haven't seen it.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,807
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,807
Originally Posted by CrimsonTide


When I mentioned horsepower, I guess I should have clarified. What I am looking for specifically is added range. (percieved though it may be.)


I suggest the 7mm RM for you. It is more powerful than what you have and will reach as far as common sense says to shoot. In fact its that perception that you mention and the not so bad recoil that made the 7mm RM so popular.

==================================================================

I was going to leave my suggestion above alone however just as Brad selected a Kimber in 300 WSM I like certain rifles more than certain cartridges. Thus I would be tempted to look close at the design of the Kimbers, M70's etc. The features that the Kimbers come with such as an easy to use M70 type safety, CRF, etc. appeal more than any particular round.

But, heck, this is the fun of guns. Get what you want today and be happy today. They are easy to trade later.

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,254
Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,254
Likes: 1
7RM is a fantastic use of the belted hull. Use an action with plenty of room, a barrel of a goodly length/twist, and throw the lawn darts.....


Now with even more aplomb
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 272
F
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
F
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 272
If you have an itch that needs scratched forget the baby steps and move up to a .338 of some sort.....how about a .338 RUM?? That'll move you up the horsepower scale.

IC B3

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,704
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,704
Given what you already have and I wanted a step up in power for deer, I would go to something like the .35 Whelen. Of the ones you list I would choose the .270 WSM. I don't know if you can call it a step in horsepower from the .280/06 (I wouldn't really call the others that much either), but it will shoot the flattest of the bunch which is a bit different than what you have.

Lou

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,578
U
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
U
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,578
Originally Posted by CrimsonTide

When I mentioned horsepower, I guess I should have clarified. What I am looking for specifically is added range. (percieved though it may be.)



Aha! Now we get to the rub of it. What you really need is a .257 Roy. That is the first case we have talked about that has a performance envelope that has any significant difference from the .280/30-06, and also avoids a whole bunch of recoil that you don't need.

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,515
Likes: 1
R
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,515
Likes: 1
I have spent money on arms like a middle east dictator and have learned that if you want an obvious increase in terminal effect over a 270/280/7RM then go to 9.3 or 375. There may be a "picket fence" in the lineup of cartridges but there is not such in actual effect on big game animals. Listen to BobinNH's advice.

Last edited by RinB; 11/26/09.


“Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away”.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery. Posted by Brad.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,087
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,087
Originally Posted by utah708
Originally Posted by CrimsonTide

When I mentioned horsepower, I guess I should have clarified. What I am looking for specifically is added range. (percieved though it may be.)



Aha! Now we get to the rub of it. What you really need is a .257 Roy. That is the first case we have talked about that has a performance envelope that has any significant difference from the .280/30-06, and also avoids a whole bunch of recoil that you don't need.


Yep. When I read "horsepower" I went bigger. If this is the criteria then I'd look really hard at the .257 Wby.

One day I'm gonna go crazy, find a .257 I really like and hunt everythng with either it or my .340. (Well, other than my 30-30, but that's for sentimental reasons)


If there's one thing I've become certain of it's that there's too much certainty in the world.
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,702
Likes: 3
C
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
C
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,702
Likes: 3
Oh Man!
the .257 Roy does make a bunch of sense for what I want. I will have to go gunbrokering. My sincere thanks for all the replies.


"The number one problem with America is, a whole lot of people need shot, and nobody is shooting them."
-Master Chief Hershel Davis

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 149
F
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
F
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 149
If it's more horsepower your looking for the 338 win mag is hard to beat. It is the "go to" gun for many people around my area for elk. You already have an excellent deer and thin skinned game getter (the old faithfull '06):I think everyone should have an 06 or two laying around.I've heard the 7mm rem mag refferred to as the ballistic twin to the 30-06 (not that I believe that because it is flatter shooting and it retains more energy with similar weight bullets). As for the 300 wsm and 300 win mag, they have their downfalls (trust me, I don't want to go into specifics):Besides that, the 30-06 can almost duplicate the 300 mags when you shoot the federal high energy and hornady light magnum loads.

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 149
F
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
F
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 149
I'm sorry, I didn't see your side note for more range not necessarily "more horsepower". If that is what you are looking for, I'd go with one of the fast 7's. They have a very high ballistic coefficient, so the retained energy is greater and the trajectory is flatter. That was easy now that we are clear about what you want.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,737
Likes: 1
C
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
C
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,737
Likes: 1
None of the ones you listed are substantially more than the 30-06 you've already got. If you really want more the 338 WM is the way to go. If you just want another rifle, been lots of good suggestions. The 338 is the one I carry more than any other.


NRA LIFE MEMBER
GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS
ESPECIALLY THE SNIPERS!
"Suppose you were an idiot And suppose you were a member of Congress... But I repeat myself."
-Mark Twain
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,903
B
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,903
I think if you load your own ammo you can handload the 06' or 7mag to do anything a 300 can do in the best factory loads. I would also agree that a 375 would cover what is left over by downloading it. But if your hell bent on a 300 mag the original win mag is time tested and available everywhere.


Keep your powder dry and stay frosty my friends.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 164
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 164
Get a 416. weatherby or 50. bmg


Ill Keep My Money, Freedom, and Guns!
YOU KEEP THE "CHANGE"!
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

73 members (6mmbrfan, 10gaugemag, 7mm_Loco, 12 invisible), 1,469 guests, and 925 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,194,538
Posts18,531,085
Members74,039
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.103s Queries: 54 (0.027s) Memory: 0.9060 MB (Peak: 1.0083 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-23 08:47:33 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS