Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Sarah Palin is a FOX

Mrs.Palin has now risen to her best and highest station in life: a talking head, one of Hannity's babes. If this doesn't take her out of serious consideration for high office nothing will. She will follow Huckabee into talk show oblivion.

This is where she will serve the Conservative cause best.

Yep +2

Hey, thanks guys. I don't care about getting bashed; I've got pretty thick Campfire callouses these days... but it's still always nice to read posts like those.

Now I better page back a couple pages because I suspect if you guys went out of your way to say that, I've REALLY been getting bashed!! Might have to do some bashing back!

After reading all these posts, the one thing I can't believe is that no one has posted this picture yet. Here's my contribution.



This alone makes her more qualified to be President than BHO. I am not saying she is the most qualified, just more so than the current resident of the White House.

Fast Ed

That blue tape on the barrel will seal the deal for the campfire.

I was checking out her boobs and just noticed it out of the corner of my eye, in case any of you were wondering...

Did the tape scare you?

Howdy Archerhunter!

Where to begin... I'm not sure I can get the quotes right with it already chopped up so I'm just going to address that stuff in order, but all in one block as it were.

First, abortion. I have kids. I know what it means to reproduce. I am all for protecting human infants. A first-trimester fetus is not an infant. This is easy to prove logically. Further, adults make decisions all the time that kill children when it's deemed to be politically necessary.

But at the root of it, an adult female's rights to self-determination trump whatever rights a first trimester fetus might have.

As a fetus grows, the "bundle of rights" (as we put it in the real estate world) slides over to the now-infant, to the point at which by the time it's at term, the rights of the fetus trump the rights of the adult! For example, an adult has the right to get drunk. However a very pregnant woman should not, in my opinion, because at that point they have made the decision to be a vessal for a child, and the child is a viable entity.

Environmentalism. I agree, this is a contradiction to any kind of libertarian leanings a person might have. Unfortunatly it's a necessary contradiction (as often happens in the real, as opposed to theoretical "internet" world).

But, there's too many people doing too much damage to something we all share. The only solution is some sort of onerous regulation. Examples abound. Nuff said.

I don't think environmentalism NEGATES a free market or the idea of small government, but it certainly infringes on them. No argument. But then, it would be trivial to find examples in modern American "conservative" thinking that also infringe on free markets and small government, too.

Religion in public places. Your statement is so out there that I made it bold for emphasis.

The 10 Commandments categorically do NOT belong on courthouse walls as that is an explicit endorsement of a religion by government. Period. The fact that they used to be there is irrelevant to their Constitutionality. Lots of things used to be done that weren't right.

As to how people like me should be scared of the religious right, well, I am!! I keep an assault rifle in the closet partly because if society breaks down, it's my belief that the wacko right will attempt to subvert everything we hold dear as Americans and assert a religious tyranny. What you just said basically affirms that.

Homos. For them to live in the open is not flaunting. It's free people living freely. For you to deny that shows one of the contradictions in YOUR political philosophy that I simply won't accept.

And NO, I am not, have never been, and never will be a homo.

In the end, Archer, what you are saying amounts to "you should respect my God". Virtually all your comments are based around an omnipresent, imaginary diety that you want the laws of our society to reflect. That, sir, is insane.

You should have simply quit with your post above!

It did!

Spooked me right away from the feeder.

Get a life.
If memory serves, you were the one whining about JO 'ruining your entire day' whenever he made a post.

If you had half a [bleep] brain, you would just put JO on ignore and leave it at that,instead you practically have a stroke every time he posts.
He must be laughing at you...

Tim,

I have him on ignore, and he is the ONLY person I have on ignore. There's just nothing "there" and there's no point arguing with someone who's only contribution is bile... in giant red letters half the time.

But I do sneak a peak every now and then and yes, the dude cracks me up! It's like a tempest in a teapot or a toddler throwing a fit. Comedy.

If he does have a stroke it'd be good for the gene pool so I consider it a public service to keep on postin'.... grin...

Jeff,
Yeah, I just put him on ignore also.
Should have done it a while back...

I believe a person, whether I agree with them or not, who has risen to the top elected position in the land, surely must be knowledgeable about politics. Not only knowledgeable, but an expert. Not knowing your background, and making the statement I did, are not incongruous. I simply feel that by virtue of them being where they are, they not only know a lot about political theory and philosophies, but have a real "boots on the ground" real life working grasp of what is needed to win, and maintain power. Quite possibly more than most people in the country, even those in the business. You may be, and probably are, the exception to this. I apologize.

"First, abortion. I have kids. I know what it means to reproduce. I am all for protecting human infants. A first-trimester fetus is not an infant. This is easy to prove logically. Further, adults make decisions all the time that kill children when it's deemed to be politically necessary.

But at the root of it, an adult female's rights to self-determination trump whatever rights a first trimester fetus might have.

As a fetus grows, the "bundle of rights" (as we put it in the real estate world) slides over to the now-infant, to the point at which by the time it's at term, the rights of the fetus trump the rights of the adult! For example, an adult has the right to get drunk. However a very pregnant woman should not, in my opinion, because at that point they have made the decision to be a vessal for a child, and the child is a viable entity."

At what point does the fetus become an infant? The way you explain it sounds like birth.

Can't have it both ways that a women drinking or smoking during pregnancy is harming a fetus, if someone kills that pregnant women he can be charged with a double homicide, but if the women thinks raising a child interferes with her lifestyle, no problem to go and have it ripped limb to limb by a quack with a super sucker.

I honestly can't understand the thought process of pro-choicers.

First trimester is where I personally draw the line.

"As to how people like me should be scared of the religious right, well, I am!! I keep an assault rifle in the closet partly because if society breaks down, it's my belief that the wacko right will attempt to subvert everything weI hold dear as Americans and assert a religious tyranny. What you just said basically affirms that."

Too funny. The Baptists are going to take over the world. I think you have more to fear from a secular progressive government in the event of social disorder/breakdown.

So it's ok to kill em when they're young?