24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,423
F
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,423
i would

GB1

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
Originally Posted by splattermatic
i have never nor will i ever own a 270.
uselss cartridge in my opinion.


While the .30-06 is arguably more useful over a wider variety of game, I�ve always felt the .270 Win was perhaps the best cartridge for a dedicated deer rifle. It is certainly more than enough for most hunting purposes. Judging by the numbers of elk and moose that fall to a .270 and smaller cartridges every year, it is very hard to appear anything but a fool when arguing that it isn�t adequate for elk.

For some reason, some people compare a .30-06 with heavy bullets to a .270 with light bullets � apples to oranges. Load a 150g A-Frame into a .270 Win and you are good for anything except perhaps certain situations involving big bears. In those situations a .30-06 wouldn�t be my first choice, either.


Quote

30 cal's have a larger bullet selection in weight and styles. 7mm's are plain sexy with the same large variety in weights and styles.
and anything a 270 can do a 280 can do better. think of 270 trajectory with the power of a 30-06.


Just how many good bullets do you need for a cartridge to be viable for hunting?

Here�s just a few that are available for the .270 Win:
110g, 130g Barnes TTSX
130g Swift Scirocco II
130g Hornady GMX
130g, 140g, 150g Swift A-Frame
130g, 140g Nosler AccuBond and Partition
130g, 150g Hornady InterBond
130g, 150g Barnes MRX
130g, 150g North Fork SS
150g, 160g Nosler Partition

And that list doesn�t begin to over the cup-and-core bullets available.
Quote


yep, never have, not ever will have a use for such a cartridge.

worse case, a 30-06 with a good stout 180 grain bullet, or a 338 with a 225 or a 250 grain bullet, or any of the large 30 cals.
even a little 300 wsm would work wayyy better.
power, bullets, range, and accuracy. not that i'm saying a 270 is inaccurate or anything.

(big grin)



Don�t own a .270 Win myself, but have certainly seen them be effective�


Coyote Hunter - NRA Patriot Life, NRA Whittington Center Life, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!

No, I'm not a Ruger bigot - just an unabashed fan of their revolvers, M77's and #1's.

A good .30-06 is a 99% solution.
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,369
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,369
Exotic animals prefer to be shot with exotic calibers. Since elk are not exotic, both the 270 and the 30-06 will service the elk with similar aplomb.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,361
Likes: 1
9
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
9
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,361
Likes: 1
270 vs 30-06? How many times has this been debated in the last 75 years?

Must be one of the great mysteries in the universe.

Kind of like blondes vs brunettes. How many times has that been debated in the last 5,000 years?

Does anybody really think we can ever get to the bottom of these questions?



"You cannot invade mainland America. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass"
~Admiral Yamamoto~

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. ~Thomas Jefferson~
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 66
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 66
I will take a brunette with blue eyes. That one turns me on. 270 will never be big enough for some guys. And to others the 06 and bigger calibers aren't needed. I own a 30-06 and a 270. Both shoot awesome little groups. Both drill the ten ring at 250 with a dead on hold. But I dont carry either one. I dont think there is a tried and true perfect caliber for everyone. Thats why there are so many options out there. Personally I dont care which caliber rifle or which make someone brings to my camp as long as they can put the bullet where it belongs. 270, 30-06 they will both do the same job as long as the guy behind it does his. I like the "Theres not a nickles worth of difference between the two." line that was used earlier. I love 25 caliber rifles for some reason and would take mine over a 270 or 30-06 anyday. I can say as long as I do what I have to, that round will get it done. But thats me, opinions vary and thankfully we all get to have one. Shoot straight and let the work begin.

Last edited by stwfanatic; 04/27/10.
IC B2

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,361
Likes: 1
9
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
9
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,361
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by stwfanatic
I will take a brunette with blue eyes.


Dude...we are definitely on the same page now. I am so with you on that one.

Let's get off this boring 270 vs 30-06 stuff for a while and talk chicks.

Anybody else in?


"You cannot invade mainland America. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass"
~Admiral Yamamoto~

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. ~Thomas Jefferson~
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,307
Likes: 2
Campfire Oracle
Online Content
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,307
Likes: 2
Refer to Military Sniping Rifle Thread..... grin

Ingwe


"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 158
S
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
S
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 158
I would take which ever one I had partition or good solid lead bullet loaded for elk. The difference between them is .277 vs .308 or .o31 which isn't big enough for 99% of the hunters out there to even see much less be able to place better.


In a free country the government doesn't fear its citizens and there firearms. In a crocked government everything is up to be removed even the citizens if they truly believe in freedom.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,826
P
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
P
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,826
In the arguement about whether the 270 is a better elk rifle than a 243 Win, I'd have to go with a 270. Of course if you have to shoot the 90 grain in the 270 so it doesn't ruin your makeup I'll take the 105 grain 243. Cheers! smile wink

Wayne

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5
J
New Member
Offline
New Member
J
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5
270 works ok on elk ,the guy i hunt with uses 243or a 708 308
280 300wsm just know your gun and shoot often at diff ranges
and use a good bullet, watch best of the west on ODC
they swear by a 6.5x284 at 800yds just have to know where your bullet will go

IC B3

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,737
Likes: 1
C
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
C
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,737
Likes: 1
I've got no use for a 270. If I wanted a smaller caliber than the 30-06 I'd use a 25-06 for antelope and deer. Other wise my hunting rifles start at 30-06.


NRA LIFE MEMBER
GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS
ESPECIALLY THE SNIPERS!
"Suppose you were an idiot And suppose you were a member of Congress... But I repeat myself."
-Mark Twain
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 762
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 762
I love my .270s. If I feel I need something bigger I go to the .338WM. So, I've taken a .338 on a brown bear hunt and passed on a big grizzly with my .270

I'm probably not going to hunt brown bear again and I ca't ever see affording a polar bear hunt, so I think my .270 will do me for the rest of my days...

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 44
S
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
S
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 44
I bought a 270 WSM last year and have bagged pronghorn and whitetail with it.

I would take it for Elk anyday. shot placement is more important than anything.

There was a famous outdoor writer, his name was like O'Conner or something like that, I think he liked the 270........

I would shoot anything in North America with the 270 except maybe moose and Grizzly bear. If I were planning one of those hunts, I might want something bigger.


BOOM!!!!
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,162
K
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
K
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,162
Originally Posted by seasidehunter

There was a famous outdoor writer, his name was like O'Conner or something like that, I think he liked the 270........



Although he allegedly confessed, in his latter days, that he actually liked the 280 better. wink

Anyway, these arguments are silly to begin with. Everyone knows that Man Rules of Riflery require us to possess, at minimum, rifles chambered for half a dozen different cartridges per species hunted in order to ensure that we never... ever... run out of material to fuel caliber/cartridge/rifle arguments.

Last edited by Kentucky_Windage; 06/11/10.

If you're fixin' to put a hole in something,
make it a hole to remember.
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,815
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,815
Didn't know the .270 met the minimum cartridge size for Elk. You sure one can legally use them?

Anyway, the stuff you learn here is never ending, so I guess I'm wrong again.

Bob: Scotch on an Elk hunt? That's just not right. I mean if the horses got into that chit, they would die and then what would one do? grin


laissez les bons temps rouler
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,815
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,815
Originally Posted by Paul Walukewicz
i'd take it over a sharp stick and a rock...


If I could get both I wouldn't. Only the rock or sharp stick, I would give it some thought.


laissez les bons temps rouler
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,185
C
CLB Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
C
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,185
Splitting atoms is all we are doing here.....

I'd just grab my .280 and go hunting or maybe even my new 7SAUM smile

CLB

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
The specifics of the rifle might be the way I'd choose. I'd gladly take the 270 over the '06 even if the 270 was a M700...if the '06 was a Garand. But if the rifles were otherwise essentially identical, then I'd go with the '06.


Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 107
M
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
M
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 107
I suppose it really only matters which one you shoot more accurately. I have both and have used both on elk and I can't tell the difference. I prefer the 30-06 simply because I like the rifle it is chambered in better than my rifle chambered in 270.

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 254
R
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
R
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 254
I own both rifles and I'd say the 30-06. my 270 is a savage 110 and my 30-06 is a JC Higgins FN Mauser and the old sears rifle just feels better

Last edited by reddnek; 06/18/10.
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

564 members (10gaugemag, 06hunter59, 219 Wasp, 117LBS, 21, 12344mag, 66 invisible), 2,630 guests, and 1,240 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,194,386
Posts18,527,640
Members74,031
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.173s Queries: 54 (0.037s) Memory: 0.9092 MB (Peak: 1.0089 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-21 19:16:16 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS