Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Retired F.B.I agent in Akron: "Oswald did not do it."

He hit the head on the third, how is that a miss?

Maybe he was real good and his only shot on the second was the neck because of the trees.

==============

Have you even read the testimony and findings of all four or five of the expertys above who were hired specifically to perform and then report upon the autopsy?


9.3.1 The Dallas doctors differed with the autopsists.

True at the time. The Dallas doctors spent twenty minutes laboring in
vain to save the President's life. The President's wounds were covered
with blood. They never turned JFK over. Consequently, some of their
initial descriptions of the wounds differed from the official determina-
tion of the autopsy. However, upon review most of the Dallas doctors
agree with the findings of the autopsy.

The also enlarged the hole in the front of the neck for a tracheotomy almost as soon as he came through the door. Later, other doctors newly arrived in the room, saw the hole and didn't even realize that it was a bullet wound.

................Like I stated in my posts, either all the doctors at Parkland were sadly mistaken or they were correct. The actual condition of the head trumps all theory, speculations, etc.

True! There was no damage to the left rear of the skull, but as the docs all stated, there was considerable damage to the right rear portion of the skull which doesn`t jive with Oswald acting alone. If the Dallas doctors were correct and I believe they were, you must account for another assassin. An entrance wound to the skull using a round nosed bullet from a 6.5mm Carcano, will not cause a 2 3/4" gaping rear wound to the skull.

You are either correct, or the doctors were wrong!

Explain then, how an occipital skull bone fragment which is later found on the grass some 41 feet to the left rear of the fatal impact point. By an entrance wound fired from the rear??? An entrance wound to the skull is going to cause a fragment of occipital bone to fly some 41 feet to the rear?..........Ain`t buying that one!!!

...............Then why do we have statements from the Bethesda X ray techs, who in fact DID see the back of the prez`s head, collaborating the very things that the Parkland doctors saw?

I meant he hit the head one time as you well know I stated in my first post. The one you originally replied to, remember??

If you ever try a case in Mississippi , you might want to retain local counsel !.

I'm keeping an open mind and it is doubtful that at this late date any evidence will be forthcoming to establish that Oswald had no help .

OTOH , with Fat Ted gone and Fidel barely holding on , the climate could well change over the next few years be more favorable to further disclosures .

I was just confused why you said "three times". Thought there was some cleverness I was missing.

Also, the autopsy photos presented to the Warren Commission were actual rendered drawings submitted by the govt. Those drawings did not show any damage the rear of the skull.

The govt handed over to the Warren Commission, only what they wanted them to see.

============

There is zero evidence to suggest he did have help. Nothing you or big squeeze are saying isn't supported by any proof or link you've provided. You simply say "stuff" and expect it warrants some credibility.

And curdog.....I really don't need you telling me whether or not forensic expert testimony is given less weight than eyewitness testimony,OK? Way out of your bailiwick,my boy!!

I'm impressed by all the forensic investigators and forensic pathologists we have on this board.

English Bob was real amusing until Little Bill kicked the schitt out if him.

.........Back in the 80s, I saw interviews with several of the Dallas doctors, as well as an interview given by Paul Kelly O`Connor (now deceased), who was one of the X ray techs on duty that night at Bethesda. They all state, that there was a large exit wound at the right rear part of the skull and not a wound of entry.

Can someone please explain to me how a wound of entry, created by a 160 gr round nosed bullet fired from a 6.5mm Carcano, can create an entry hole to the skull of around 2 3/4" in diameter???

It doesn`t take a forensic investigator or a foresnic pathologist, of which I`m certainly not either, to figure that out, that bullet entry wounds are much smaller and create far less damage than are bullet exit wounds which are much larger and create far more damage.

I've shot a deer right in the sternumn before, took about a 1.5 inch chunk of bone out upon entry.
You can't apply logic to what a crazy person did. Oswald did it himself. Because this doesn't make sense to most sane people, they automatically think he had to have had help.

R.

It does raise an interesting question.

How important does a person have to be before it switches from murder to assassination?

Public Office?
An assassination may require a plan, where a murder may not?
Do you murder or assassinate a mayor, or police chief?

R.

What about an Alderman or city council member? What's the line?

My remark was not directed at you bigsqueeze. It was "quick reply" and you were right above me.

The comment stands in regard to this thread. I'll bet a Pepsi no one's thinking gets changed.

prison planet TV......TRH's favorite network

Little Bill got the jump on him. In a fair shootout, who knows what would have happened.