24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,040
A
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
A
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,040
If you were limited to one full size hunting binocular would you go with an 8x42 or 10x50 model? I know that 10x42 are very popular but I prefer a 5mm exit pupil, for the more relaxed view. 7x42 have an even larger 6mm exit pupil but I do not hear much about them any more.

GB1

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130
V
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
V
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130
Preferably, an 8x32 for the size. Otherwise, limiting it to the x42 size, easily the 7 or 8 over anything 10, with the Zeiss Classic 10x40s being an exception to that.

Power, don't mean dick; when compared to quality and resolution.

Limited to one, only, I'd be happy with an 8x32, 7x42, or 8x42 from any of the "Big Three".




Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,943
G
GF1 Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
G
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,943
Of the two you mention, I'd go w/ the 8x42. That said, I'd be much happier w/ a 10 power, but 42 is max on the objective as I don't want the weight and bulk.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,122
3
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
3
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,122
For me a 8x32 or 8x42 as I cant hold a 10x steady anymore

Last edited by 338rcm; 11/27/10.
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,768
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,768
I went with 8x42 after having used 10x for several years. the 8x provides a clear, bright image, basically wobble free. I've not regretted having the 8x42.

IC B2

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 739
O
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 739
8x42 without a second thought.


Politicians and Diapers both need to be changed often, and for the same reason!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,742
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,742
7x42


"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered."
― George Orwell, 1984
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453
Originally Posted by one horn
8x42 without a second thought.


+1 yup. No brainer.

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 668
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 668
I grab my 8x32's most of the time, but also have an 8x42, a 10x42 and a 12x50 I use on a tripod. Of the ones you mention, 8x42 by a mile.




NRA Patron Member.
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 192
A
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 192
8x42's and if you hunt in the timber 7 or even 6 power. I have a pair of 6x32 Vortex Viper's and you can't beat them in the heavy stuff here in the Northeast part of Pa.

IC B3

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Kicking and screaming I would take an 8x42;but never had an 8X in the West when I didn't want a 10X of high quality with great glass.I would carry the 8X for one day and then want my 10's back again......and if there is a 15X in the truck, even better smile





The 280 Remington is overbore.

The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,881
E
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
E
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,881
I've never seen, or played with, a 10X50 that I could carry with comfort around my neck all day. Anything over 25 ozs. is really too heavy for me. Using that as a yardstick, it would have to be an 8X42.
I own lots of binoculars. I joke that when I go on a hunting trip, I take more binoculars than rifles. The ones I carry the most are my lighter 8X32's or my 6-6.5X stuff. The heavier 8-12X ones usually ride in the pack while a lighter model rides around my neck. E

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,888
R
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,888
I hunt with 7's and 10's. Prefer the 7's as an all rounder. Would think an 8x would be right there.

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18,926
S
SLM Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
S
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18,926
I don't think I have ever found something with 10X that I wouldn't have been able to find with 8X and I think the 8X are easier to hold stable. That being said the easiest glass to glass with that I have used is the 7X42 Swaro.

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,874
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,874
I think a better title to this one, could be which is better
the 8x42 or 10x42. I own or have owned most of the sizes mentioned here, and my favorite is the 8.5x42. But, if you
check with Cabelas, and many large sporting goods stores, the
10x42 easily outsells the 8x42. If fact they don't always stock
the 8x42. 10x50 is more specialty glass, great for low light
but heavy.

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 739
O
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 739
More is better right? if 8x is good then 10x MUST be better. This makes sense until you've put in some real ass time on a mountain.


Politicians and Diapers both need to be changed often, and for the same reason!
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,645
Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,645
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by ar15a292f
If you were limited to one full size hunting binocular would you go with an 8x42 or 10x50 model? I know that 10x42 are very popular but I prefer a 5mm exit pupil, for the more relaxed view. 7x42 have an even larger 6mm exit pupil but I do not hear much about them any more.


Much would depend on what 90% of my hunting consisted.
If the answer is "mostly in Indiana", the answer is NOT 10x50. *grins*


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

WWP53D
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
No brainer for me, 8x42. Id look at a 10x42 if I needed 10x. A 10x50 is too big and will have less fov.


Steve

Theodore Roosevelt: "Do what you can where you are with what you have"
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,042
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,042
High quality 7x42 is the best all around IMO, but you can get a heck of an 8x42 now starting at $200 with the zen ray dielectrics that 8x42 has become the standard. All things considered you could start with the 7x36 Swift Eaglets. They are so small they fit in a jacket pocket and the newest ones are awfully good. Personally, I like 10x50's and use them a lot. Unless I know I'm going to be in the woods all day I say 10x50. My Eagle Ranger Platinums are no heavier and not much bigger than a lot of 8x42's. Most of the guys I hunt with who hunt mostly open spaces have 10x binoculars. Don't know about everyone else, but I've never found myself wishing for less magnification in the field. I have many times wished I had something more than the 6-8x I was carrying.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,122
3
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
3
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,122
If I need more magnification than 8x a spotting scope is the next step

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

59 members (Akhutr, beefan, 358wsm, 2500HD, bosshoff, 12 invisible), 1,388 guests, and 735 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,243
Posts18,485,924
Members73,967
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.153s Queries: 54 (0.008s) Memory: 0.9011 MB (Peak: 0.9963 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-03 07:52:39 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS