|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,522 Likes: 24
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,522 Likes: 24 |
The arrow cuts through the blood vessels and nerves. A bullet blasts it's way through. I heard of a guy who killed an elk with an arrow on a really lousy shot - he hit it in the lower leg. It bled out and he recovered it several miles away. I doubt you'd find most animals that badly hit with a bullet.
“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” ― George Orwell
It's not over when you lose. It's over when you quit.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,991 Likes: 7
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,991 Likes: 7 |
The arrow cuts through the blood vessels and nerves. A bullet blasts it's way through. I heard of a guy who killed an elk with an arrow on a really lousy shot - he hit it in the lower leg. It bled out and he recovered it several miles away. I doubt you'd find most animals that badly hit with a bullet. I've seen animals hit in the ham bleed out rather quickly when the femal artery is crushed by a bullet
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,606 Likes: 8
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,606 Likes: 8 |
Answer may depend upon whether you are going to shoot it in the eye/brain, through the gut, or somewhere in between. IMHO, placement is much more important than any specific fps or terminal ft. lbs.
NRA Member - Life, Benefactor, Patron
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,541 Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,541 Likes: 2 |
As has been stated earlier, bullet construction is more important than energy figures. Deer season '09, I had a harder time killing a deer at 30 yards with a .308 loaded with 150 grain SSTs at 2800 fps at the muzzle, than I did killing a deer at 236 yards with a .30-30 loaded with 170 grain FPs at 2184 fps at the muzzle. There was a vast difference in the amount of energy at impact, but the .30-30 still made a through and through hole, with signs of expansion. The SST blew up on impact.
The following year proved a change of bullet in the .308 was all that was needed.
With Elk, it's important to choose a bullet that will drive in deep and break things. (cough, cough, TSX, cough) Elk are more demanding of bullet integrity than a Whitetail deer.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,001
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,001 |
I've seen animals hit in the ham bleed out rather quickly when the femoral artery is crushed by a bullet Femoral artery damage is one of the quickest ways for a human to die as well. Recent knife murder nearby here- guy was cut in the thigh, bled out before EMT's arrived. They figured less than 10 minutes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,928 Likes: 13
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,928 Likes: 13 |
I've seen animals hit in the ham bleed out rather quickly when the femoral artery is crushed by a bullet Femoral artery damage is one of the quickest ways for a human to die as well. Recent knife murder nearby here- guy was cut in the thigh, bled out before EMT's arrived. They figured less than 10 minutes. Body only has about 5.5 to 6 liters of blood in total.. and it doesn't have to be bone dry to cut enough blood flow to the brain to shut the entire system down. So a good enough leak in the closed blood system, doesn't take very long... on deer or humans... or elk.
"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC
“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,991 Likes: 7
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,991 Likes: 7 |
This is the exit in the off side rib cage of a 6X7 bull Elk from a 180 grain fired from a 300 win mag the impact energy was aproximately 2700 FPE. I am holding a loaded 300 win cartridge for size comparison The is the exit in the same Bull Elk from a 500 JRH shooting a 440 grain wide meplat hard cast at about 950 FPS for a muzzle energy of 888 FPE Again I am holding a loaded 300 win mag round for size comparison The larger wound was caused by a round with about 1/3 of the amount of energy of the 300 win Energy is a very poor indicator of lethality
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,991 Likes: 7
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,991 Likes: 7 |
I've seen animals hit in the ham bleed out rather quickly when the femoral artery is crushed by a bullet Femoral artery damage is one of the quickest ways for a human to die as well. Recent knife murder nearby here- guy was cut in the thigh, bled out before EMT's arrived. They figured less than 10 minutes. Body only has about 5.5 to 6 liters of blood in total.. and it doesn't have to be bone dry to cut enough blood flow to the brain to shut the entire system down. So a good enough leak in the closed blood system, doesn't take very long... on deer or humans... or elk. Exactly
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18,508
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18,508 |
I would think Energy would play a big role in hydrostatic shock, but not so much in wound channel size.
Other considerations such as bullet construction, caliber, along with energy would be the determining factors on wound channel width and length (penetration).
Jm
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,028
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,028 |
So 80 gr 777 and a 300gr bullet will be good enough out of my .50 cal sidelock, (basically my deer load), for my first elk venture this year)?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 86,343 Likes: 34
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 86,343 Likes: 34 |
I would think Energy would play a big role in hydrostatic shock, but not so much in wound channel size.
Jm JM- Google hydrostatic shock and Dr. Fackler. That concept is pretty well debunked.
If you take the time it takes, it takes less time. --Pat Parelli
American by birth; Alaskan by choice. --ironbender
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 24,851
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 24,851 |
So 80 gr 777 and a 300gr bullet will be good enough out of my .50 cal sidelock, (basically my deer load), for my first elk venture this year)? What bullet?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 46,965
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 46,965 |
If you have enough accuracy to reliably hit vitals, you usually have enough energy to kill them.
We may know the time Ben Carson lied, but does anyone know the time Hillary Clinton told the truth?
Immersing oneself in progressive lieberalism is no different than bathing in the sewage of Hell.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,607
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,607 |
How much energy is generally required to kill an elk with any given caliber? What is the cut off to stop shooting at an elk and expect it to die when hit in the heart and lungs? its not the volts so much as the amps
Beware of any old man in a profession where one usually dies young.
Calm seas don't make sailors.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,612 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,612 Likes: 1 |
The question should be more general than how much energy does it take to kill and elk. After all people have killed polar bears and tigers with 22lr so a 22lr should be able to kill an elk. The question you should ask is what is the recommended cartridges for elk hunting.
You don't get many opportunities at an elk so you should use a cartridge that maximizes you chances for success. You need to have penetration from what every angle you happen to see him and out to 300 yards or so. You also want something that will drop the elk relatively close to where its shot. Having it run 5 miles or more and dying in the brush is not a good thing.
The generally accepted best cartridge for elk is the 338 mag. It will do all that you need for elk. The general big game cartridges - 270, 308, 7mm mag, 3006, 300 win will do ok though it would be best if you use controlled expansion bullets for better penetration.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,758
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,758 |
It depends on whether or not you have blue tape over your muzzle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,262
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,262 |
The 260 Rem with a TTSX or Partition is good for elk to 900 yards, and a 270 Wby is good a little farther. A 340 Wby is needed for ranges farther than that because it kicks more, so it hits harder.
I saw a movie where only the military and the police had guns. It was called Schindler's List.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,607
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,607 |
The question should be more general than how much energy does it take to kill and elk. After all people have killed polar bears and tigers with 22lr so a 22lr should be able to kill an elk. The question you should ask is what is the recommended cartridges for elk hunting.
You don't get many opportunities at an elk so you should use a cartridge that maximizes you chances for success. You need to have penetration from what every angle you happen to see him and out to 300 yards or so. You also want something that will drop the elk relatively close to where its shot. Having it run 5 miles or more and dying in the brush is not a good thing.
The generally accepted best cartridge for elk is the 338 mag. It will do all that you need for elk. The general big game cartridges - 270, 308, 7mm mag, 3006, 300 win will do ok though it would be best if you use controlled expansion bullets for better penetration. don't tell that to the 10's of thousands of elk that have been killed with less. elk aren't superior ironsided steel boned super animals. they are just really big deer. I've killed them with a variety of cartridges and calibers and bullet weights. from a 90 gr bullet moving fast to a 180 grain bullet moving slow. from a 25 caliber to a .30 cal and you know what? they all killed elk when hit in the right place, and they all died within feet of where I shot. this question has been asked and asked and asked and asked. if you're worried about energy, some states have a requirement, I don't remember what it is but something like 800 ft/lbs at 100 yards. and a minimum of 24 caliber. some guys use the 1000 ft lbs of energy at moment of impact as a reference. if the bullet doesn't go where it needs to, its a moot point. shoot something big enough to take down a big deer, and hit them in the vitals. nature will take care of the rest.
Beware of any old man in a profession where one usually dies young.
Calm seas don't make sailors.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 86,343 Likes: 34
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 86,343 Likes: 34 |
The generally accepted best cartridge for elk is the 338 mag.
Do you know how that was determined?
If you take the time it takes, it takes less time. --Pat Parelli
American by birth; Alaskan by choice. --ironbender
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,143
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,143 |
How much energy is generally required to kill an elk with any given caliber? What is the cut off to stop shooting at an elk and expect it to die when hit in the heart and lungs? The amount of energy is a moot point, because energy numbers will not rate terminal performance. A better question to ask is "How much penetration is required and how large of a wound channel to effectively take an Elk" Well said, jwp!
|
|
|
|
580 members (1lessdog, 160user, 1_deuce, 12344mag, 10Glocks, 17CalFan, 60 invisible),
2,470
guests, and
1,295
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,360
Posts18,527,169
Members74,031
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|