24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 945
J
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 945
I have started using some of their rifle powders and was wondering if anyone has any input on their temperature sensitivity.

GB1

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,789
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,789

When the N500 series started being imported it was billed as temp tolerant. I used quite a bit of it. I was trying to find an equivalent to RL22, around the N560. Ended up that N160 was better for tolerance for me and I used it quite a bit in a 338 Win Mag with 225's. It still lost velocity in extreme cold but not quite as much as RL22 in my guns. Found the same to be true with the propellants suitable to the '08 chamberings using N540-50 versus N140-50. Those powders worked great in 7-08's. Didn't check them in extreme cold but I concluded the double based N500 series was not my cup of tea.


Used to be bobski, member since '01
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 945
J
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 945
N560 is one of the ones I am using.
Why is the 500 series not your cup of tea? because of the temp sesitivity?

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,344
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,344
V133 is the most popular BR powder. It is temp & humidity sensitive. We have excellent powder throwers and throw straight without weighing. The guys that did best knew when to go up or down with temp and humidity changes. The powder throwers are very accurate but throw volume and not weight. For BR and we are very anal, if you weigh ea. load you will be on top of it. The volume changes with temp and humidity.

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,789
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,789
Originally Posted by jwill350
N560 is one of the ones I am using.
Why is the 500 series not your cup of tea? because of the temp sesitivity?


At the time I was developing loads in our warm weather for use in late season hunts November and December in Wyoming and Montana. When I chronographed those powders in sub freezing temps they lost significant velocity. N160 was better than N560. I had just not gotten around to the Hodgdon Extreme line at that time, where I finally ended up using H4831, which turned out to be the most tolerant of extreme temp variande for me. It was just a matter of choice. In fact, it made very little difference for shots in normal hunting range under 3-400 yards. Made one shot and hit exactly where I was aiming, @ 175 yards after I had just chronographed a load with RL22 that was 200 fps slower in the cold than when I had developed it. Didn't make a bit of difference in the end.


Used to be bobski, member since '01
IC B2


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

159 members (2ndwind, 10gaugemag, 338reddog, 450yukon, 1_deuce, 45_100, 26 invisible), 2,115 guests, and 1,023 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,387
Posts18,469,706
Members73,931
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.070s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8067 MB (Peak: 0.8510 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-26 05:58:51 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS