24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,509
R
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,509
thanks greydog and kilmer....good info.

I'll talk to the 'smith about some recontouring,..he likes Douglas contours and did one on my Pre'64 308 Norma.

Originally Posted by Nrut
If you want to save money and go light buy a Montana 84L and rebarrel..
I know where you can get Kimbers cheap.. laugh


I have a Kimber 84M Classic in 338 Fed if I want to travel light with a bore bigger than 30.....

sorry for the hijack 'bartell.....nah,...I aint sorry at all...:-)

Last edited by rembo; 01/10/12.

"after the bullet leaves the barrel it doesn't care what headstamp was on the case"
"The 221 Fireball is what the Hornet could have been had it stayed in school"
GB1

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,073
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,073
Originally Posted by Dawn2Dusk

Question, is there "enough" meat on the end of the barrel to work with a 338 bore?


.600" @ muzzle for #1, .625" for #3. #2 is same as #3 just a quicker taper shank

good question...I'll ask a new question see what the experts think

As for Kimber - do they make a 338-06 with a floorplate? laugh

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,640
N
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
N
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,640
Originally Posted by todbartell
Originally Posted by Dawn2Dusk

Question, is there "enough" meat on the end of the barrel to work with a 338 bore?



As for Kimber - do they make a 338-06 with a floorplate? laugh

I don't doubt that you have never seen one... whistle
Minimum on muzzle would be .10 to .12 per side..


It's a great life if you don't weaken..
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 59,177
Likes: 3
R
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
R
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 59,177
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by todbartell
I might change to #1 contour. Using Pacnor's barrel weight calculator, seems like there's a half lb difference between a #1 and #3.

I wouldn't.. One, I doubt they'll flute a #1.. Two, IMHO, I'd be a bit hesitant to use a #1 for a .338, especially if it's SS instead of CM.. My own rule of thumb is .015 minimum at the muzzle.. Maybe it's just me.. smile


Ex- USN (SS) '66-'69
Pro-Constitution.
LET'S GO BRANDON!!!
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,676
P
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
P
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,676
Redneck, I'm thinking you meant .150 at the muzzle!

IC B2

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
IMO a #2 Dougy cut to 23" would be about model perfect. Most of the 338/06's that I see on the Fire are built too darn heavy for my liking.

Build it to be 8 lbs all up (sling and rounds also) and you'll be Golden. Use the Edge fill and keep the weight out front.

Dober


"True respect starts with the way you treat others, and it is earned over a lifetime of demonstrating kindness, honor and dignity"....Tony Dungy
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,294
W
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
W
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,294
interesting weight calculator at pacnor....

26" #2 or #3 in 338 weighs within a few ounces of a 22" 257 of same contour..... Thought it would be more...

W


"I would build one again, if it were not for my 350RM (grin)."

MtnHtr
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,408
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,408
Originally Posted by rembo
thanks greydog and kilmer....good info.
I'll talk to the 'smith about some recontouring,..he likes Douglas contours and did one on my Pre'64 308 Norma.


I think you just did...grin

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 59,177
Likes: 3
R
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
R
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 59,177
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by patbrennan
Redneck, I'm thinking you meant .150 at the muzzle!
Correct.. My bad.. smile


Ex- USN (SS) '66-'69
Pro-Constitution.
LET'S GO BRANDON!!!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,407
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,407
A 7 1/2 or so scoped 338-06 is about ideal IME.

[Linked Image]

IC B3

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,073
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,073
decided to stick to the #1 contour. I'll be packing it a lot more than shooting it for extended strings so it should be ok. Gunsmith said it will group just fine, my expectations are 1moa 3 round groups.

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,293
KDK Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,293
Originally Posted by Tony
A 7 1/2 or so scoped 338-06 is about ideal IME.

[Linked Image]


Can you give me the quick rundown on specs? I have an ADL SS .270 that I'd like to have turn into something like that. Thanks.


Originally Posted by ingwe
This is a shooting forum, there is no place here for logic.
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,407
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,407
Originally Posted by KDK
Originally Posted by Tony
A 7 1/2 or so scoped 338-06 is about ideal IME.

[Linked Image]


Can you give me the quick rundown on specs? I have an ADL SS .270 that I'd like to have turn into something like that. Thanks.


A Cliff LaBounty rebored WallyWorld 270 ADL (22") I bedded in a take-off McM Mountain Rifle stock from a Rem custom shop KS in Talley LW's with a 2.5-8X Leupy. Been happily using it since 1995.

[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612
Tony, that's a pretty sweet mountain gun.


Gerry.
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,287
Likes: 2
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,287
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Mark R Dobrenski
IMO a #2 Dougy cut to 23" would be about model perfect. Most of the 338/06's that I see on the Fire are built too darn heavy for my liking.

Build it to be 8 lbs all up (sling and rounds also) and you'll be Golden. Use the Edge fill and keep the weight out front.

Dober


Agreed 100%.


“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 661
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 661
So which weighs less a douglas #2 or a remington sporter in the same length?

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,716
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,716
That's a good question. The #2 Douglas looks thinner and lighter to my eye, but that doesn't mean it actually is lighter.

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,408
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,408
Originally Posted by bigJ
So which weighs less a douglas #2 or a remington sporter in the same length?


Douglas #2

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 661
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 661
Blargon, have you weighed the actual barrels?

I would like to hear more - hopefully from someone with both. Mcgowans weight chart says the douglas #2 will weigh 2 3/4 lbs, and the Remington sporter at 26" weighs 2 lbs... which seems offly light, but somewhere else I read the remington is lighter aswell.

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,408
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,408
Have had both, never weighed them. I guess it would depend on the shank length.

Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

73 members (35, Boarmaster123, blackhawk44, 257robertsimp, 10gaugemag, 8 invisible), 1,202 guests, and 888 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,863
Posts18,497,235
Members73,980
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.137s Queries: 54 (0.010s) Memory: 0.9009 MB (Peak: 1.0030 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-08 08:52:49 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS