|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,973
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,973 |
I totally agree with Las. Wolves are opportunists and as such, they will focus on prey which provides the best opportunity - whether it be deer, beavers, bear cubs, adult bears, moose, moose calves or whatever. Granted that some packs develop a "taste" for a particular prey specie, it still doesn't negate the fact that wolves are opportunistic hunters. The fact of the matter is that Minnesota's moose are subject to a myriad of factors which negatively influence their population. The combination of those factors are what's contributing to the long-term decline. While arresting the decline might be possible, severe wolf reduction isn't going to contribute to a miraculous recovery.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,239
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,239 |
I think if you eliminate ticks, lice, deer, brainworms, and the high wolf population...you still aren't going to see a miraculous recovery. Maybe a recovery-somewhat.
Now they have the warmer than usual winters to contend with...
I should have just bought a [bleep] T3...
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,202
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,202 |
Roundoak is right a few threads back, moose are popping up in Wisconsin more the last few years. We are real thin on the deer numbers. By chance? Maybe, but why is Wisconsin not being affected by global warming but Minnesota is? Global warming is not the reason. We have half the wolves and less snow, milder winter. Been hearing stories of better deer hunting in northern minn. than Wisconsin too. It may be deer, but then again maybe just nature taking it's course. Was a time in the 60's some say minnesota had a low of 500 moose. Nature taking it's course.
Last edited by ihookem; 03/04/12.
But the fruits of the spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness,faithfulness, Gentleness and self control. Against such things there is no law. Galations 5: 22&23
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,738
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,738 |
Save an elk, shoot a cow.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,402
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,402 |
Considering we do not clear cut or cut much of anyting in our forest anymore it doest take a lot to affect the moose population.
PS. they, the DNR, refuse to admit the wolves have any impact on moose and have done nothing to see what the wolf impact is on moose calves.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,828
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,828 |
Minnesota takes care of the wolf population and that will go a long way in taking care of the Moose population. Something is killing the calves. Between wolf and Coyote predation, yea Moose populations would be way down if you started with not a huge population to begin with that is common sense. All you have to do is look at what has happened and its happening to elk in Montana and Idaho.
"Any idiot can face a crisis,it's the day-to-day living that wears you out."
Anton Chekhov
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,514
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,514 |
damn,and just when I wanted to go moose hunting.
********************** [the member formerly known as fluffy}
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 35,293
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 35,293 |
All of the above....
Since Minn is on the southern end of the mooses temperature range already, they are surviving on a thin margin as it is. Factor in a perhaps aging population gradually dying off, little calf recruitment (stress/bears/wolves), more stress from deer ticks, brainworm, and climate warming, and a declining population should not come as a surprise.
I suspect wolves are taking few adults there unless they are caught at a severe disadvantage, such as deep crusted snow that the wolves can run on, and the moose can't, making for an easy and safe kill. If there are deer available, or moose calves, the wolves will prefer these to large, more dangerous animals that will likely injure or kill some of them in the taking. Not to say they can't take them if they are hungry enough, but it's gonna cost 'em - and they know it. These are touchy subjects and I usually find myself shooting a couple holes in people's opinions, even if I just keep it to myself. But I have no arguments with any of this.
Something clever here.
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,503
Posts18,490,593
Members73,972
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|