|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,864
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,864 |
. I keep hearing all these myths about bolt thrust on other forums until I am about to believe some of it. If chamber pressure is 60,000 PSI then that is 60K in all directions, so how can we increase/decrease the pressure on the bolt by changing the shape of the chamber? For example a straight walled case is said to apply less pressure to the bolt than a tapered wall case. Is there something here that I am missing? .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,226 Likes: 27
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,226 Likes: 27 |
No, you're not missing anything.
There's a way to actually measure bolt-thrust, and I'm gong to publish an article about it within the next year.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,864
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,864 |
.
Thanks, John
I will be watching for you article.
.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 304
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 304 |
My undestanding is that it is an issue with lever guns as the failure point could be the rear lockup of the bolt as opposed to the cylinder integrity. The backforce on the bolt is the pressure of the cartridge times the diameter off the cartridge. So a 30-30 at a given pressure will generate less backforce than a 356 Win at the same pressure as it is a skinnier cartridge. Don't think there's any debate on this point. The AI folks say that the shape of the AI cartridge, being more straight than the original, will grip the chamber walls more tightly and transmit less force back to the bolt. So you can load the AI's to a higher pressure and still be safe as the bolt thrust will be mitigated somewhat. I gave up on the 30-30AI years ago, so I don't really care whether the claims are real or imagined. JB has often pointed out that the velocity gains with the AI cartridges are due to them being loaded to higher pressures, rather than from the miniscule amount of case capacity increase from the AI. But the whole idea has filled many internet threads.
Last edited by leverite2; 07/08/12.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 29,974 Likes: 11
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 29,974 Likes: 11 |
It is a function of chamber pressure, and the inside rear surface of ones cartridge. Sort of the same reason we have small pistons in high pressure hydraulic pumps.
1Minute
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 890
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 890 |
Looking forward to Mule Deer's article, that will be interesting...curse of being an enginerd.
We use the concept that 1minute outlined on a daily basis in my field..the thrust load is simply the pressure multiplied by the normal area it acts on (very idealized approach). This gives us a ballpark number to roll with.
Once you get the axial bolt load, then you can start looking at lug shear loading and all that fun stuff...gives you an idea how bolt guns operate with respect to "safety" margin.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,226 Likes: 27
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,226 Likes: 27 |
With rifle cartridge a little more involved than most people assume. Will know more after some actual measurements of case-head presssure on the bolt face.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 890
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 890 |
Yup, most definitely more complex than the idealized case. I've messed with some pressure/compressive sensitive film between the bolt face and cartridge that I "calibrated" between hardened platens in a material test frame. It was in the ball park but more going on than simply P*A. Looking forward to your article.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,950
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,950 |
There's definitely more involved in bolt thrust than chamber pressure and inner area of the case head. I have fired 30-30 rounds that did not touch the bolt face at all as evidenced by the primer protruding from the pocket. It has been said that P.O. Ackley once fired a 30-30 rifle with the bolt completely removed from the rifle and the case did not leave the chamber. I have some older 35 Rem cartridges that have crimped primers to keep them inside the case, presumably because there was not enough rearward case movement to reseat the primers upon firing (case head never touches the bolt face). I definitely don't know all the answers, but i do know there is more to it than meets the average eye.
Our God reigns. Harrumph!!! I often use quick reply. My posts are not directed toward any specific person unless I mention them by name.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 631
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 631 |
I played with some wildcat cartridges in a model 94 Winchester a few years ago. I don't have pressure testing equipment but it looks like the brass case will contain the pressure at 30-30 pressures. A little over 40,000 PSI the case starts to stretch. Once it starts to stretch it appears that the load is very rapidly transferred to the bolt.
I also suspect that time is a factor. A smaller case using a faster powder will stretch cases less than a larger case using slow burning powder.
I have trouble believing that AI cases reduce bolt thrust. It is not difficult to make an unimproved 30-06 or the more tapered 6mm Remington case separate which tells me the case is gripping the chamber walls very nicely. What a straighter case wall does is a mystery to me. Maybe Mule Deer has the answers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,226 Likes: 27
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,226 Likes: 27 |
Don't have any answers yet, and doubt I will. All I usually do it report on what happened, and let the reader come to their own conclusions.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,323
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,323 |
Getting the case lube off completely makes a big difference, but that probably goes without saying.
`Bring Enough Gun`
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,950
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,950 |
Getting the case lube off completely makes a big difference, but that probably goes without saying. Actually, that is very much worth saying. Lubricated cases can indeed increase bolt thrust over non-lubricated cases. I have lubricated cases on purpose at times when fireforming.
Our God reigns. Harrumph!!! I often use quick reply. My posts are not directed toward any specific person unless I mention them by name.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,472 Likes: 15
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,472 Likes: 15 |
Some time spent with Dan Lilja's work on bolt lug strength is worthwhile, as bolt thrust is part of that scenario. This link takes you to that article. Good shootin'. -Al http://www.riflebarrels.com/articles/custom_actions/bolt_lug_strength.htm
Forbidden Zoner
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,102
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,102 |
The case will push forward from the primer. In a dry chamber it will stay forward until somthing like 40 KPSI. That is why lower pressure cartridges with head space will have protruding primers. About 40 KPSI the front of the case will stick and the case head will stretch back leaving a ring. If the primer was protruding it will be pushed back flattening it. If an oiled case is fired it comes back and stretches forward avoiding the stretch ring. In both cases the oiled or dry a higher pressure case will have the same "thrust". Even if you know the thrust you don't know the stress flow so you can't calculate "safety factor".
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,202 Likes: 6
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,202 Likes: 6 |
I have attempted to measure variations in bolt thrust with a crude crusher set-up on an old Lee Enfield. While it seemed possible to compare various loads and while the measurements of compression/stretch were predictable, I had no real way to quantify the amount of thrust. In other words, I could tell when thrust increased but could not really tell what pressures were. Variations occured with changes in brass manufacturer. Light loads with a lubricated case showed greater back thrust than did the same load in a dry case. Once pressure was increased to the point that cases were stretching and the bolt was compressing significantly, there was no real difference in lubed vs dry. Once the pressure was sufficient to exceed the limit of the brass strength, it seemed the full thrust was transmitted to the bolt, regardless of whether or not the case was lubed. It should be possible to do a better job of measuring bolt thrust by some electronic means. Face it, my methods are primitive, arising, as they do, from a primitive mind, and require considerable interpretation which opens the door to all sorts of errors. I look forward to MD's results and conclusions. GD
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,102
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,102 |
Greydog; Varmet Al did a finite element analysis which shows that once the case head comes back the "bollt thrust" is the same oiled or dry. I played around with some pressure indicating tape and the results supported his conclusion. I have a 760 Remington 35 remington with a tad of headspace. By loading heavy the primers will not protrude. Some of the old timers used an oiled case to "proof" the actions. I believe what they were doing was making certain that the breech locking worked.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,940 Likes: 71
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,940 Likes: 71 |
Varmint Al has done some tests regarding this. http://www.varmintal.com/abolt.htm
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 11,923
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 11,923 |
He removed the locking lug from the Winchester that he performed this test on.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,294
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,294 |
Just cut them both off and see how far the bolt flies W
"I would build one again, if it were not for my 350RM (grin)."
MtnHtr
|
|
|
|
521 members (007FJ, 1beaver_shooter, 1_deuce, 1936M71, 219DW, 260Remguy, 57 invisible),
1,740
guests, and
1,212
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,109
Posts18,522,761
Members74,026
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|