24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,881
E
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
E
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,881
Ah, yes, the usual suspects have spoken.
Odviously we have some self styled experts here who have never made any arrests on drugged up, resisting suspects. Even some who claim that such levels of force are never necessary. That's because he's worked in a psych ward and has subdued many a noncompliant subjects, etc. That's really funny. Psych ward patients are usually drugged with stuff that makes them easy to handle, not the other way around. And they are not armed, etc.
Then we have the wrestling experts. More nonsense.
The truth is that every situation is different. Anybody that has made alot of violent arrests knows that. Some people are able to endure alot of pain and force. No two arrestees are the same. The cops involved also often have different concerns or present abilities which can vary from day to day.
This is why the legal defination of use of force says only that the police may use whatever is necessary to overcome the subject's resistance. Until he is subdued, the level of force is not excessive. Put another way, if the cop uses tactics that don't work, as it appears in this case, it is still not sufficient. That much is odvious.
You want to critize these guys fine. Punish them for not doing what you think you should have seen or not seen w/o proof that the subject had stopped resisting, and you open the door to not allowing the cops to use force to overcome resistance. When that happens, nobody who does any crime will not get arrested if they resist. That's because nobody in law enforcement will risk loosing his job because somebody didn't like what he did or how he did it.
I can name two cities in Kalifornia that are paying that price now for their attitudes towards such things. I can name a couple of cops that went to prison over nonsense like this.
When I was growing up, nobody was interested in carrying concealed. Now there is alot of interest, and 41 states that allow concealed carry. Why ? Because the cops aren't doing their jobs. All because of nit picking and political correctness as typical in this discussion. If you insist on holding them to a standard to which none can comply, you don't get the job done.
That, BTW, doesn't help much. Ask a a guy named Zimmerman what happend when he tried fill in for the cops. Cops who didn't come when he reported suspicious activity. E


Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,806
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,806
I'd like to beat you in the shins with a bat while telling you to put your hands behind your back and see how long it takes you to comply. On the other hand maybe you have no innate human behavior, and comply with any govt. order.


Be Polite , Be Professional , but have a plan to kill everybody you meet
-General James Mattis United States Marine Corps


Nothing is darker than a mau mau's moo moo.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,659
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,659
Originally Posted by Calhoun
Yes.. it was such a standard use of force that both officers were fired.



So they got fired for doing the job. crazy


"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much" Teddy Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 8,736
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 8,736
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by 12344mag
Originally Posted by fluffy
those cops are clearly incompetent.
just imagine what would have happened to them if the suspect had any weapon at all.


They would have had to shoot him....problem solved.
I've dealt with worse than that guy, with less backup, completely unarmed, choke holds and strikes prohibited, and never any broken bones. That cop bludgeoned that guy because he could, not because he needed to.
So.

Last edited by calikooknic; 03/02/13.


Sean
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,514
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,514
Originally Posted by 12344mag
Originally Posted by fluffy
those cops are clearly incompetent.
just imagine what would have happened to them if the suspect had any weapon at all.


They would have had to shoot him....problem solved.


Unless ...he got them first.

Last edited by fluffy; 03/02/13.

**********************
[the member formerly known as fluffy}
IC B2

Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 8,736
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 8,736
Originally Posted by RichardAustin
I'd like to beat you in the shins with a bat while telling you to put your hands behind your back and see how long it takes you to comply. On the other hand maybe you have no innate human behavior, and comply with any govt. order.


This one really did make me laugh.
What a moron. Armchair quarterbacks know it all, just ask them. crazy



Sean
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

639 members (10gaugeman, 10Glocks, 160user, 1936M71, 10gaugemag, 1234, 68 invisible), 2,716 guests, and 1,290 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,528
Posts18,509,790
Members74,002
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.101s Queries: 26 (0.009s) Memory: 0.8274 MB (Peak: 0.8710 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-14 00:31:39 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS