|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,340
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,340 |
Do the za5 have lift and set turrets? I just got a za3 and you have to play w/set screws. Sure hate to see all the quality problems. If all these scopes are put together in America they have a long long way to go to match leupolds workforce!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 487
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 487 |
my ZA5 1.5-8x32 doesn't have lift-n-set turrets
Last edited by John_in_MS; 08/31/13.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,819 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,819 Likes: 1 |
Yeah, 6x is much more effective at close ranges than most people think. My closest shot was a running wild boar at 10 yards.
I suspect the "scope full of hair" stories about 6x being too much for closer ranges started back in the really old days when scopes not only had small main tubes but small ocular lenses. Today's 6x scopes, or variables set on 6x, generally have a FOV at 100 yards of around 18 feet, which means 4.5 feet at 25 yards. Most of the "scope full of hair" stories come from people who have never seen a scope full of hair but did read about it in F&S.
"Be sure you're right. Then go ahead." Fess Parker as Davy Crockett
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121 Likes: 1
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121 Likes: 1 |
People having problems with a 6x are the idiots that have NO idea how to shoulder a rifle. Lots of folks out there that have to 'find' stuff through the scope.
"Dear Lord, save me from Your followers"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 487
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 487 |
Anyone else get a Minox and not like and/or have problems with the rubber power ring thingy??? The more I look and fiddle with it, I don't know if it's something that can be relied upon for long term use.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 487
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 487 |
Well........a call to Minox was both helpful/reasuring, but also a bit discouraging at the same time. Said they are aware of the problem, and said careful application of a good glue would not void any warranty, and therefore didn't recommend a return. However, they would take it back and repair free of charge if I absolutely wanted to, or if it becomes a continual problem.
Needless to say, I just put a few dabs of automotive rubber/plastic trim adhesive on and reattached it........works like a charm now. Still not too thrilled about that one design aspect, but like everything else about it. Especially at the price I payed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 458
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 458 |
I own two ZA5 scopes a 3-15-50 illuminated and a 2-10-50 both are nice I was a little worried about the 4" eye relief but no problems there so far . You must use high scope mounts on the 50mm objective scope to keep the objective end from touching the barrel. The only problem I have had so far is the 2-10-50 turned all the way down I can see the end of the barrel turn it up to four no problem. Great in low light . For the price can't beat them . Can't wait to see the new ZA HD line.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,916 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,916 Likes: 1 |
I know this thread is old, but I thought I'd chime in about the Minox ZA5 3-15 x 42 I have. I bought it last year as a demo from Cameraland and mounted it on a 25-06. Last year I hunted with it a few times and I couldn't warm up to it for some reason or another. all of my other scopes are Zeiss Conquests in 3-9 or 3.5 x 10 and I've been real happy with them.
I took the Minox out again this past weekend and these are the four things I noticed. Has anyone else experienced this with theirs?
1. I was panning some pigs and there's a noticeable "fish eye" effect. As you pan around, you'll see the image get larger as it moves to the center of the view and then decrease as it reaches the edges again.
2. The focus shifts significantly as you change power. I've focused it at 15X, 7X and 3X and it happens in either direction.
3. When adjusted to 3X, objects appear farther away then they do with my naked eye.
4. In low light conditions, there's significant changes in light transmission when changing power. Some of this is to be expected, but I haven't seen it to such a degree with my Zeiss Conquests.
I'm getting ready to send it back to Minox for evaluation/repair as I'm hoping it's just out of adjustment. Either it needs repaired or it's a piece of crap IMO.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 574
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 574 |
I know this thread is old, but I thought I'd chime in about the Minox ZA5 3-15 x 42 I have. I bought it last year as a demo from Cameraland and mounted it on a 25-06. Last year I hunted with it a few times and I couldn't warm up to it for some reason or another. all of my other scopes are Zeiss Conquests in 3-9 or 3.5 x 10 and I've been real happy with them.
I took the Minox out again this past weekend and these are the four things I noticed. Has anyone else experienced this with theirs?
1. I was panning some pigs and there's a noticeable "fish eye" effect. As you pan around, you'll see the image get larger as it moves to the center of the view and then decrease as it reaches the edges again.
2. The focus shifts significantly as you change power. I've focused it at 15X, 7X and 3X and it happens in either direction.
3. When adjusted to 3X, objects appear farther away then they do with my naked eye.
4. In low light conditions, there's significant changes in light transmission when changing power. Some of this is to be expected, but I haven't seen it to such a degree with my Zeiss Conquests.
I'm getting ready to send it back to Minox for evaluation/repair as I'm hoping it's just out of adjustment. Either it needs repaired or it's a piece of crap IMO. Did you happen to adjust the ocular assembly significantly? Also, for #2, are you viewing an object at a distance past 100yds, or in close? Far away is ok, but in close that's just a function of depth of field. So long as #2 is tested using a far away target, I'd definitely send it back. This sounds like what happens when an ocular is off axis with the rest of the optical system, or when it is screwed out way, way too far back. #4 is the only thing that I would suspect to just be normal or inherent to the glass.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318 Likes: 1 |
The 3-9 Z3 I have is "OK" but I want to replace it, I find the sweet spot on the scope to be smaller than I like, i.e. your head position is more critical than I am used too.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,916 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,916 Likes: 1 |
[/quote] Did you happen to adjust the ocular assembly significantly? ..... This sounds like what happens when an ocular is off axis with the rest of the optical system, or when it is screwed out way, way too far back. [/quote]
With this being an open box demo, I suspect that may be what the problem is after folks fiddled with it. I'll send it in, because something is definitely not right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,233
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,233 |
It is a fast focus eyepiece on the Minox scopes
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,691
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,691 |
I have one of the za3 3-9x40 models with the #4 reticle and have been happy with its performance. The glass is great and the tracking has been spot on.
|
|
|
|
593 members (1234, 007FJ, 17CalFan, 160user, 1beaver_shooter, 12344mag, 62 invisible),
2,446
guests, and
1,252
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,659
Posts18,493,524
Members73,977
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|