24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,580
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,580
There's a lot of that around here.

GB1

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,738
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,738
Originally Posted by ranger1
There's a lot of that around here.


Yep, and guys like Rick seem to be serial offenders.


Save an elk, shoot a cow.
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,472
J
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,472
Can't wait until they are designing airplanes, bridges, etc..

When nothing works, who do you think they will blame? My money is on the few who actually put in the work to learn and do things the right way.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,704
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,704
A little history lesson here for you. Common Core was started and funded by two or three major corporations. In other words�privately funded. Somehow it weaseled its way into the government and now into our schools. Now for a little more reality. You'll be hard pressed to find many teachers that are really fond of Common Core. It's not something they wanted, and it's being shoved down their throats. Not to mention threatening them with their jobs if they don't adhere to it. This is one program that blaming teachers in any way, shape, or form is way off base. Look to Washington if you want to blame someone, this idea WAS NOT hatched in the classroom!


Is it Friday yet?
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,065
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,065
Originally Posted by Jcubed
Can't wait until they are designing airplanes, bridges, etc..



They already are , maybe not common core but just as stupid


Mike


Always talk to the old guys , they know stuff.

Jerry Miculek
IC B2

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 46,965
R
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
R
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 46,965
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Math is one of the absolutes of nature. However, our wonderful, liberal government is trying to change that. Here's a quote from a Foxnews article that sums it up:
Quote
�The math standard focuses on historical math, which has been shown to be a disaster,� Glyn Wright, executive director of Eagle Forum, told FoxNews.com. �With the new math standard in the Common Core, there are no longer absolute truths. So 3 times 4 can now equal 11 so long as a student can effectively explain how they reached that answer.�


This is idiocy in the 1st degree.
It's inexplicable except by scripture. Second Timothy chapter 3 tell us in the last days people will do wrong and call it right. http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Timothy+3&version=WE

We see that all around us culturally, morally, politically, societally, scientifically, and now mathmatically. The End can't be far behind.


We may know the time Ben Carson lied, but does anyone know the time Hillary Clinton told the truth?

Immersing oneself in progressive lieberalism is no different than bathing in the sewage of Hell.
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,073
Likes: 9
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,073
Likes: 9
I found some interesting things while reading through UN agenda 21. It states that better educated people are more likely to reach the middle class and would then use more of the earths resources. They have have a goal to dumb down the education system to keep people stupid and poor to protect the environment.

Critical thinkers scare progressives and so does logic. No wonder they don't want our kids being taught either. Common core is about keeping people stupid, poor, and subservient.

Bb

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,934
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,934
Originally Posted by Burleyboy
I found some interesting things while reading through UN agenda 21. It states that better educated people are more likely to reach the middle class and would then use more of the earths resources. They have have a goal to dumb down the education system to keep people stupid and poor to protect the environment.

Critical thinkers scare progressives and so does logic. No wonder they don't want our kids being taught either. Common core is about keeping people stupid, poor, and subservient.

Bb


And on welfare.


Beware of thieves, scammers and dishonest members on the "Fire" classifieds. Ya there is a thief here too. Whatever!!

They're all around the CampFire and everywhere.
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,923
R
RNF Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,923
Most would be surprised who is behind common core. Some interesting information.

http://www.freedomworks.org/blog/ameliahamilton/jeb-bush-and-the-common-core-money-trail


A gun in the hand is worth more than the entire police force on the phone.
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 33,971
byc Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 33,971
Not surprising!! When we first learned that the local public schools were no longer teaching basic math skills to include multiplication tables we were shocked. My parents immediately enrolled my nephew in the Sylvan learning institute.

Then we learned no cursive writing was being taught so it was back to Sylvan. Wonder what's next?

BTW best thousand bucks I ever spent. The kid is so proud that he can now multiply.


Proud to be a true Sandlapper!!

Go Nats!!!!


IC B3

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,529
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,529
Liberals are training the next generation of vote counters where the correct answer is always the liberal wins.

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,855
Likes: 11
M
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,855
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by Burleyboy
I found some interesting things while reading through UN agenda 21. It states that better educated people are more likely to reach the middle class and would then use more of the earths resources. They have have a goal to dumb down the education system to keep people stupid and poor to protect the environment.


Whoever made that observation has obviously never looked at any of the third world nations. The poor have demonstrated such great concern for the environment(we really need a sarcasm smiley). I hope someday we have a president with the stones to tell the UN to p*ss up a rope.

As for the common core math issue, simply apply it to their budgets and salaries. If our children can reasonably argue that 4x3=11 then surely we can argue that a salary of $4000 a month times 12 months equals $13,000. I think I like this new math. Maybe I'll push for it's application to our local school budgets. grin


Chronographs, bore scopes and pattern boards have broke a lot of hearts.
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,240
Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,240
Likes: 2
Pure Communism, I tell ya!

Nothing else can explain it, except maybe the endtimes!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_core_state_standards_initiative

Quote
...Mathematics Standards

The stated goal of the mathematics Standards[21] is to achieve greater focus and coherence in the curriculum (page 3). This is largely in response to the criticism that American mathematics curricula are "a mile wide and an inch deep".

The mathematics Standards include Standards for Mathematical Practice and Standards for Mathematical Content.
Mathematical practice

The Standards mandate that eight principles of mathematical practice be taught:

Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.
Reason abstractly and quantitatively.
Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.
Model with mathematics.
Use appropriate tools strategically.
Attend to precision.
Look for and make use of structure.
Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.

The practices are adapted from the five process standards of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and the five strands of proficiency in the National Research Council�s Adding It Up report.[22] These practices are to be taught in every grade from kindergarten to twelfth grade. Details of how these practices are to be connected to each grade level's mathematics content are left to local implementation of the Standards.

As an example of mathematical practice, here is the full description of the sixth practice:

6 Attend to precision.

Mathematically proficient students try to communicate precisely to others. They try to use clear definitions in discussion with others and in their own reasoning. They state the meaning of the symbols they choose, including using the equal sign consistently and appropriately. They are careful about specifying units of measure, and labeling axes to clarify the correspondence with quantities in a problem. They calculate accurately and efficiently, express numerical answers with a degree of precision appropriate for the problem context. In the elementary grades, students give carefully formulated explanations to each other. By the time they reach high school they have learned to examine claims and make explicit use of definitions.

Mathematical content

The Standards lay out the mathematics content that should be learned at each grade level from kindergarten to Grade 8 (age 13-14), as well as the mathematics to be learned in high school. The Standards do not dictate any particular pedagogy or what order topics should be taught within a particular grade level. Mathematical content is organized in a number of domains. At each grade level there are several standards for each domain, organized into clusters of related standards. (See examples below.)

Four domains are included in each of the six grades from kindergarten (age 5-6) to fifth grade (age 10-11):

Operations and Algebraic Thinking;
Number and Operations in Base 10;
Measurement and Data;
Geometry.

Kindergarten also includes the domain Counting and Cardinality. Grades 3 to 5 also include the domain Number and Operations--Fractions.

Four domains are included in each of the Grades 6 through 8:

The Number System;
Expressions and Equations;
Geometry;
Statistics and Probability.

Grades 6 and 7 also include the domain Ratios and Proportional Relationships. Grade 8 includes the domain Functions.

In addition to detailed standards (of which there are 21 to 28 for each grade from kindergarten to eighth grade), the Standards present an overview of "critical areas" for each grade. (See examples below.)

In high school (Grades 9 to 12), the Standards do not specify which content is to be taught at each grade level. Up to Grade 8, the curriculum is integrated; students study four or five different mathematical domains every year. The Standards do not dictate whether the curriculum should continue to be integrated in high school with study of several domains each year (as is done in other countries, as well as New York and Georgia), or whether the curriculum should be separated out into separate year-long algebra and geometry courses (as has been the tradition in most U.S. states). An appendix[23] to the Standards describes four possible pathways for covering high school content (two traditional and two integrated), but states are free to organize the content any way they want.

There are six conceptual categories of content to be covered at the high school level:

Number and quantity;
Algebra;
Functions;
Modeling;
Geometry;
Statistics and probability.

Some topics in each category are indicated only for students intending to take more advanced, optional courses such as calculus, advanced statistics, or discrete mathematics. Even if the traditional sequence is adopted, functions and modeling are to be integrated across the curriculum, not taught as separate courses. In fact, modeling is also a Mathematical Practice (see above), and is meant to be integrated across the entire curriculum beginning in kindergarten. The modeling category does not have its own standards; instead, high school standards in other categories which are intended to be considered part of the modeling category are indicated in the Standards with a star symbol.

Each of the six high school categories includes a number of domains. For example, the "number and quantity" category contains four domains: the real number system; quantities; the complex number system; and vector and matrix quantities. The "vector and matrix quantities" domain is reserved for advanced students, as are some of the standards in "the complex number system".
Examples of mathematical content

Second grade example: In the second grade there are 26 standards in four domains. The four critical areas of focus for second grade are (1) extending understanding of base-ten notation; (2) building fluency with addition and subtraction; (3) using standard units of measure; and (4) describing and analyzing shapes. Below are the second grade standards for the domain of "operations and algebraic thinking" (Domain 2.OA). This second grade domain contains four standards, organized into three clusters:

Represent and solve problems involving addition and subtraction.
1. Use addition and subtraction within 100 to solve one- and two-step word problems involving situations of adding to, taking from, putting together, taking apart, and comparing, with unknowns in all positions, e.g., by using drawings and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problem.
Add and subtract within 20.
2. Fluently add and subtract within 20 using mental strategies. By end of Grade 2, know from memory all sums of two one-digit numbers.
Work with equal groups of objects to gain foundations for multiplication.
3. Determine whether a group of objects (up to 20) has an odd or even number of members, e.g., by pairing objects or counting them by 2s; write an equation to express an even number as a sum of two equal addends.
4. Use addition to find the total number of objects arranged in rectangular arrays with up to 5 rows and up to 5 columns; write an equation to express the total as a sum of equal addends.

Domain example: As an example of the development of a domain across several grades, here are the clusters for learning fractions (Domain NF, which stands for "Number and Operations�Fractions") in Grades 3 through 6. Each cluster contains several standards (not listed here):

Grade 3:

Develop an understanding of fractions as numbers.

Grade 4:

Extend understanding of fraction equivalence and ordering.
Build fractions from unit fractions by applying and extending previous understandings of operations on whole numbers.
Understand decimal notation for fractions, and compare decimal fractions.

Grade 5:

Use equivalent fractions as a strategy to add and subtract fractions.
Apply and extend previous understandings of multiplication and division to multiply and divide fractions.

In Grade 6, there is no longer a "number and operations�fractions" domain, but students learn to divide fractions by fractions in the number system domain.

High school example: As an example of a high school category, here are the domains and clusters for algebra. There are four algebra domains (in bold below), each of which is broken down into as many as four clusters (bullet points below). Each cluster contains one to five detailed standards (not listed here). Starred standards, such as the Creating Equations domain (A-CED), are also intended to be part of the modeling category.

Seeing Structure in Expressions (A-SSE)

Interpret the structure of expressions
Write expressions in equivalent forms to solve problems

Arithmetic with Polynomials and Rational Functions (A-APR)

Perform arithmetic operations on polynomials
Understand the relationship between zeros and factors of polynomials
Use polynomial identities to solve problems
Rewrite rational expressions

Creating Equations.★ (A-CED)

Create equations that describe numbers or relationships

Reasoning with Equations and Inequalities (A-REI)

Understand solving equations as a process of reasoning and explain the reasoning
Solve equations and inequalities in one variable
Solve systems of equations
Represent and solve equations and inequalities graphically

As an example of detailed high school standards, the first cluster above is broken down into two standards as follows:

Interpret the structure of expressions
1. Interpret expressions that represent a quantity in terms of its context.★

a. Interpret parts of an expression, such as terms, factors, and coefficients.
b. Interpret complicated expressions by viewing one or more of their parts as a single entity. For example, interpret P(1+r)n as the product of P and a factor not depending on P.

2. Use the structure of an expression to identify ways to rewrite it. For example, see x4 � y4 as (x2)2 � (y2)2, thus recognizing it as a difference of squares that can be factored as (x2 � y2)(x2 + y2)....



Originally Posted by jorgeI
...Actually Sycamore, you are sort of right....
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 23,560
Likes: 21
C
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
C
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 23,560
Likes: 21
The nice thing about math is that soon it will all be teacherless, for the lower level stuff. Some freakin great computer programs that teach algebra and lower that blow away anything a classroom setting can accomplish.

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Originally Posted by Big Sky
A little history lesson here for you. Common Core was started and funded by two or three major corporations. In other words�privately funded. Somehow it weaseled its way into the government and now into our schools. Now for a little more reality. You'll be hard pressed to find many teachers that are really fond of Common Core. It's not something they wanted, and it's being shoved down their throats. Not to mention threatening them with their jobs if they don't adhere to it. This is one program that blaming teachers in any way, shape, or form is way off base. Look to Washington if you want to blame someone, this idea WAS NOT hatched in the classroom!


Exactly. (And it also isn't the "unions" who are behind this - though they do tend to support some of the folks who float these crazy schemes.) There's a lot of reasons why education isn't an attractive (or arguably smart) career choice these days. Having politicians legislate education - and stake people's livelihoods on nebulous results which can't possibly be accurately credited - all the while these same politicals can't even manage a proper budget or economy.


Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Math is one of the absolutes of nature. However, our wonderful, liberal government is trying to change that. Here's a quote from a Foxnews article that sums it up:
Quote
�The math standard focuses on historical math, which has been shown to be a disaster,� Glyn Wright, executive director of Eagle Forum, told FoxNews.com. �With the new math standard in the Common Core, there are no longer absolute truths. So 3 times 4 can now equal 11 so long as a student can effectively explain how they reached that answer.�


This is idiocy in the 1st degree.


That apparently long-flouted example is one which is taken out of context. (As near as I can tell, "we" are critical of folks who take issues important to us out of context, therefore, we should be careful not to do the same.) That example, if one views and hears the rest of it, rather clearly shows that explaining the reasoning for 3x4=11 will uncover the error in reasoning. I can't believe that everyone here has always been right about everything the first time. I know some of us have learned some things through error and discovery; surely there are a few more than that who have learned by more than the "because I said so" method. There is a place for rote learning to be sure, but rote learning without understanding is not without it's own pitfalls. Just ask the fellow who doesn't know how to navigate without a GPS....when his batteries are dead.


Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,285
Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,285
Likes: 3
Quote
There is a place for rote learning to be sure, but rote learning without understanding is not without it's own pitfalls. Just ask the fellow who doesn't know how to navigate without a GPS....when his batteries are dead.


And I'll argue that rote learning of the multiplication tables is a) just plain necessary for life in civilization and b) a great stepping stone to learning in greater depth. Thus there is absolutely no justification for allowing a student to state their reasoning behind 4 * 3 = 11. Just "Sorry, that's wrong, 4 "threes" equals 12, now how much is 5 "threes?"




Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 14,076
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 14,076
Kid: "5 threes is 14 because I just explained to you that 4 threes is 11 so add 3 more to that and it takes you to 14."

Teacher: "This here curriculum says that is correct."








Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,285
Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,285
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by heavywalker
Kid: "5 threes is 14 because I just explained to you that 4 threes is 11 so add 3 more to that and it takes you to 14."

Teacher: "This here curriculum says that is correct."


Which just goes to prove that the kid understands how to get derive the right answer, and it's the curriculum that is allowing them to fail.



Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,415
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,415
Originally Posted by heavywalker
Kid: "5 threes is 14 because I just explained to you that 4 threes is 11 so add 3 more to that and it takes you to 14."

Teacher: "This here curriculum says that is correct."


That stupid Common Core logic reminds me of this joke which I guess is now on it's way to becoming reality. crazy

Cajun Math

A construction site boss was interviewing men for a job, when along came Boudreaux. The boss thought to himself, "I'm not hiring that ole lazy cajun..."

He decided to set a test for Boudreaux, hoping he wouldn't be able to answer the questions, and he'd be able to refuse him the job without any problems.

The first question the boss asked was, "Without using numbers, represent the number 9." Boudreaux says, "Dat's easy," and draws three oak trees. The boss says, "What the hell's that?" Boudreaux says, "Tree 'n' tree 'n' tree makes nine."

The boss says, "Fair enough." "Second question, same rules, but this time represent 99."

Boudreaux stares into space for a while, then makes a smudge on each tree. "Dere ya go, sir," he says. The boss scratches his head and asks, "How on earth do you get that to represent 99?" Boudreaux says, "Each tree is dirty now! so it's dirty tree, 'n' dirty tree, 'n' dirty tree...dat's 99!"

The boss, now is getting worried he's going to have to hire him, so he says, "All right, question three. Same rules once again, but this time represent the number 100."

Boudreaux stares into space again, then shouts, "I got it!" He then makes a little mark at the base of each tree, and says "Dere ya go, sir. 100." The boss looks at Boudreaux's attempt and thinking that he's got him this time.

"Go on Boudreaux, you must be crazy if you think that represents a hundred." Boudreaux leans forward and points to the marks at the tree bases, and says, "A little dog comes along and craps by each tree, so now ya got, dirty tree an' a turd, dirty tree an' a turd, an dirty tree an' a turd, which makes a hundred! So when can I start workin'?


Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

596 members (10gaugemag, 1beaver_shooter, 1badf350, 12344mag, 1Longbow, 219 Wasp, 64 invisible), 3,044 guests, and 1,184 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,194,618
Posts18,533,005
Members74,041
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.132s Queries: 54 (0.037s) Memory: 0.9261 MB (Peak: 1.0400 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-23 23:56:59 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS