|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,238 Likes: 11
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,238 Likes: 11 |
Ya gotta be pretty good to take advantage of luck...
DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,477 Likes: 3
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,477 Likes: 3 |
DF -
Exactly. Since the OP was talking about a Rem 722 in .338 Federal, the slightly shorter tubes should be great.
Take care ...
Tom
Anyone who thinks there's two sides to everything hasn't met a M�bius strip.
Here be dragons ...
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,611
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,611 |
Thanks guys, I think I'm gonna go w/the 3.5-10x40 w/post and duplex. I had it made in the custom shop w/the .6 wire in the middle instead of .75. The 6x42 has the .6 wire for the reticle. Really want to get me a VX6 2-12X42 but just don't have the funds at present. powdr
Last edited by powdr; 09/05/14.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,238 Likes: 11
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,238 Likes: 11 |
powdr,
I found mine used on Ebay for $600 to my door. Can't seem to find that deal again, but I'm looking.
Now, that was pure luck...
TOM,
I have a VX-3 2.5-8 that I sent back for a CDS. Now, that is a sweet scope for a SA rifle.
DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,475
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,475 |
The 6x42 by far is the better of the two short range or long range. That eye box on the 6x is superior for picking up moving animals in thick cover, when shooting off hand. When its dark thirty the 6x is best as well. It's also a clearer scope for longer ranges. I used the 6x42 under the darkest canopy and the thickest bush in WA State. It works. post duplex 338/250s
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,513
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,513 |
The 6x42 by far is the better of the two short range or long range. That eye box on the 6x is superior for picking up moving animals in thick cover, when shooting off hand. When its dark thirty the 6x is best as well. It's also a clearer scope for longer ranges. I used the 6x42 under the darkest canopy and the thickest bush in WA State. It works. post duplex 338/250s Nice shooting!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,370 Likes: 43
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,370 Likes: 43 |
Damn good shooting!! Nice rifle too..
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style. You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole. BSA MAGA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 803
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 803 |
I've had both scopes, but have only variables now.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,047
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,047 |
Molan Labe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884 |
6x42 would get my vote on a 338 Federal
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,921
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,921 |
Got them both and have used them for years. My two favorite scopes, but if I had to pick one for the rest of my days of hunting, the 3.5-10 without question (with turrets).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,431 Likes: 7
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,431 Likes: 7 |
I have shot deer at long range with the 1.75x6, the 2x7. and the 3.5x10. This one in 2013 at 477 yards was bang flip. Oi, is the 3.5x10 nicer, and easier to get them right in the kill zone.
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. -Ernest Hemingway The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything.-- Edward John Phelps
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 235
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 235 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,223 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,223 Likes: 2 |
When used on medium or large game range wise 6x is upper limit of most peoples shooting ability. Given quality & reliability of modern variables I don't see reason I would pick 6x42.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,000 Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,000 Likes: 2 |
big +1 renoh414. A long time 6x proponent here but latest gen of Variable scopes are so bright they make other features, like field of view, much more tangible. At least as far as the VX3 is concerned. Like you, I find myself leaving it set well below 6x and appreciating the difference. I liken it to the difference in brightness I used to enjoy using fixed X instead of variables- so the tables have turned. Combining that with knowing how to use the off side eye can really give an edge.
When a country is well governed, poverty and a mean condition are something to be ashamed of. When a country is ill governed, riches and honors are something to be ashamed of . Confucius
|
|
|
|
152 members (32_20fan, 10gaugemag, 1badf350, 300_savage, 257_X_50, 1_deuce, 22 invisible),
2,665
guests, and
910
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,643
Posts18,533,663
Members74,041
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|