24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#9634760 02/25/15
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,164
R
Campfire Ranger
OP Online Content
Campfire Ranger
R
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,164
For the most part, hunting rifles wear glass nowadays.
And, most rifles seem to be tapped straight and CNC manufacturing seems to produce some excellent rings.
Its not outside the realm of possibilities for a person to be able to mount a scope and zero it for hunting distance within 10-15 clicks either way of center.
So, what advantage, if any, does a modern 30mm have over the same objective diameter 1" tube scope? Equal power and quality of glass assumed.


TRUMP- GABBARD 2024
GB1

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,792
H
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
H
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,792
For those that dial, more elevation travel, for those that don't none.

John


If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land. 2 Chronicles 7:14
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 563
W
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
W
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 563
On paper the 30mm tube that has the same wall thickness as a 1" tube will be 'stronger.' I have no idea if this would benefit any one in the real world...

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,279
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,279
Originally Posted by ringworm
So, what advantage, if any, does a modern 30mm have over the same objective diameter 1" tube scope? Equal power and quality of glass assumed.

I'm with you. A 30mm scope seems to have a big disadvantage. It prevents switching scopes without switching rings, too.

I've heard 30mm is a standard for European scopes. I don't know whether that's true or not, but I see a lot of Euro scopes with 1" tubes. On the theory that a 30mm is stronger than a 1" tube of the same thickness, I have my doubts. If that were true, wouldn't a 4-foot pipe with the same thickness of a 1" pipe be stronger than the 1-incher?

Another disadvantage is that the 30mm is heavier.

Steve.


"I was a deerhunter long before I was a man." ~Gene Wensel's Come November (2000)
"A vote is like a rifle; its usefulness depends upon the character of the user." ~Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,076
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,076
All the inbreds down here will tell you with 100% certainty that they "gather way more light."

IC B2

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,854
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,854
bloodworks,

Everyone knows that. Did you know any reason for a 34mm?


"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation."
Everyday Hunter
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,076
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,076
If I asked a random inbred they'd say it's essentially night vision.

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 278
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 278
One advantage to the 30mm tube is that you can fit more stuff in there making 6x and even 8x zoom ranges possible (Swarovski Z6, Leupold VX6, etc.) so instead of a 3-9, you get a 3-18.

There can theoretically be an optical advantage if the manufacturer uses 30mm internals because a larger lens is easier to make correctly and is more efficient. Having said that, most 30mm tubes have 1" internals to provide more range of adjustment.


I hunt, therefore I am.
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,854
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,854
kilmer,

Speaking of Swarovski and Leupold.....

Today I compared the Swarovski z5 5-25X52 (1") with a Leupold VX-6 4-24X52 (34mm) on deer antlers 131 yards away in the woods and 127 yards away on an "eye chart".

It was about 1:45 with an overcast sky. I adjusted the side focus and magnification as best I could and still see a particular point on an antler.

VX-6 - 8X
z5 - 9X

bottom line on "eye chart"
VX-6 - 17 1/2X
z5 - 18 1/4X


"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation."
Everyday Hunter
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,016
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,016
Originally Posted by Everyday Hunter
On the theory that a 30mm is stronger than a 1" tube of the same thickness, I have my doubts. If that were true, wouldn't a 4-foot pipe with the same thickness of a 1" pipe be stronger than the 1-incher?

Another disadvantage is that the 30mm is heavier.

Steve.


A 4' pipe of the same wall thickness is undoubtedly stronger (will carry more of a load) than a 1' pipe
Effort to punch through the pipe is likely the same, but bending strength is way higher.
There is more steel in the 4' pipe.


Democracy is not freedom. Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to eat for lunch. Freedom comes from the recognition of certain rights which may not be taken, not even by a 99% vote.
*Marvin Simkin* L.A. Times (1992)
IC B3

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,164
R
Campfire Ranger
OP Online Content
Campfire Ranger
R
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,164
But from the inside out, pressure wise, isn't the thinner cylinder stronger?
Not sure that has anything to do with the ability to maintain a seal.

But, of equal quality glass, a "set it and forget it" scope, the 30 offers zero advantage?


TRUMP- GABBARD 2024
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,755
D
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,755
From a business standpoint, there is a big advantage. First you convince everyone that they need to replace their 1" scopes with a 30mm scope. Then in the future you convince them that they need to replace their heavier 30mm scope with a lighter 1" scope. That is a big boost in sales.


He who joyfully marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice.

- Albert Einstein
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,271
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,271
Originally Posted by Hondo64d
For those that dial, more elevation travel, for those that don't none.

John


This.


“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Originally Posted by ringworm
For the most part, hunting rifles wear glass nowadays.
And, most rifles seem to be tapped straight and CNC manufacturing seems to produce some excellent rings.
Its not outside the realm of possibilities for a person to be able to mount a scope and zero it for hunting distance within 10-15 clicks either way of center.
So, what advantage, if any, does a modern 30mm have over the same objective diameter 1" tube scope? Equal power and quality of glass assumed.


You will have to ask the owner of a Swarovski Z5 and a Z6 one that has a 1 inch tube with 1inch internals and the other with a 30mm tube and 30mm internals and yes the same exact zoom range.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Originally Posted by Brad
Originally Posted by Hondo64d
For those that dial, more elevation travel, for those that don't none.

John


This.


Provided the 30mm has 1 inch internals there is more room for w/e adjustments . No european scope from the big 3 has 1 inch internals.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Originally Posted by doubletap
From a business standpoint, there is a big advantage. First you convince everyone that they need to replace their 1" scopes with a 30mm scope. Then in the future you convince them that they need to replace their heavier 30mm scope with a lighter 1" scope. That is a big boost in sales.


Seems like 34MM is the new ultra diameter.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Originally Posted by Everyday Hunter
Originally Posted by ringworm
So, what advantage, if any, does a modern 30mm have over the same objective diameter 1" tube scope? Equal power and quality of glass assumed.

I'm with you. A 30mm scope seems to have a big disadvantage. It prevents switching scopes without switching rings, too.

I've heard 30mm is a standard for European scopes. I don't know whether that's true or not, but I see a lot of Euro scopes with 1" tubes. On the theory that a 30mm is stronger than a 1" tube of the same thickness, I have my doubts. If that were true, wouldn't a 4-foot pipe with the same thickness of a 1" pipe be stronger than the 1-incher?

Another disadvantage is that the 30mm is heavier.

Steve.



Not necessarily look at a Zeiss Victory HT with its glass and optics and compare it to a 1 inch model from the same manufacturer. It is lighter.

Switching scopes without switching rings...I use Talley detachable screw lock rings , I can put anything I want on my rifle depending on where I am at.

Which 30mm scope made by the big 3 alpha companies has 1 inch internals?

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Originally Posted by bloodworks
If I asked a random inbred they'd say it's essentially night vision.


The inbred hunters in Europe use them quite nicely at Night.

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,239
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,239
Not a Swaro, but when comparing a 3.5-10x40 VX3 (marvelous hunting scope IMO), with a 2-12x42 VX6 (marvelouser hunting scope) 1" vx 30mm (obviously), I can report the following:

VX6 advantages: more forgiving eye box across the zoom range, especially at highest mags, best of any scope maker anywhere at any price that I've personally seen. Better glass, better reticle, more W/E range, relatively lightweight for a 30mm tuber.

VX3 advantages: smaller package, W/E adjustments are "clickier".


It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Originally Posted by JGRaider
Not a Swaro, but when comparing a 3.5-10x40 VX3 (marvelous hunting scope IMO), with a 2-12x42 VX6 (marvelouser hunting scope) 1" vx 30mm (obviously), I can report the following:

VX6 advantages: more forgiving eye box across the zoom range, especially at highest mags, best of any scope maker anywhere at any price that I've personally seen. Better glass, better reticle, more W/E range, relatively lightweight for a 30mm tuber.

VX3 advantages: smaller package, W/E adjustments are "clickier".



Those VX-6 scopes are done right that is for sure..tremendous w/e adjustments for a 30mm scope with 30mm innards.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

553 members (1234, 10gaugeman, 153, 160user, 10Glocks, 51 invisible), 2,363 guests, and 1,244 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,530
Posts18,472,708
Members73,939
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.092s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8954 MB (Peak: 1.0378 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-27 16:45:14 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS