|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,335
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,335 |
In general, is there a large gain in light gathering ability between 44mm & 50mm?
Psalm 19:14-May these words of my mouth and this meditation of my heart be pleasing in your sight, Lord, my Rock and my Redeemer. _ Humble servant of Jesus Christ. Living His plan and praying to show it in name, word, body, and light.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,481
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,481 |
Depends on your specifics eyes but, yes, potentially. Let's assume we are talking about zeiss conquest scopes, so the glass/coatings etc between the two are similar.
At max power you are going to have an exit pupil on one of 4.4 and an exit pupil on the other of 5.0. Assuming your eyes dialate that much you should see a difference.
Even if your eyes can't dialate enough to take advantage of the larger exit pupil, you will be able to run the 50 at a higher power to achieve the same exit pupil as the 44 in every case, which, again you should notice
Hope this helps. The other consideration is the sheer size of 50mm objective scopes. These days I'm happy with 42 as my max though do occasionally think about putting a 50 on a specialized rifle
Last edited by ShortMagFan; 03/21/15. Reason: Stupid auto correct
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,258 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,258 Likes: 6 |
It depends on the quality of glass and coatings IMO. If your goal is low light performance, make sure you can see the reticle against a cluttered background. Often times the glass is plenty good enough, but the reticle may suck.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,168
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,168 |
No glass gathers light, it only transmits it. Quality of glass and coatings is much more important than the size of the the objective but all things being equal the larger lense will allow more light to flow through although the advantage is VERY small.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,704 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,704 Likes: 1 |
As I calculate it a 44 MM objective has an area of 1520 square MM's and a 50 MM objective has an area of 1964 square MM's therefore providing 444 more square MM's or about 29% more light assuming equal lens coatings, etc.
NRA Life,Endowment,Patron or Benefactor since '72.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453 |
No glass gathers light, it only transmits it. Quality of glass and coatings is much more important than the size of the the objective but all things being equal the larger lense will allow more light to flow through although the advantage is VERY small. +1
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170 |
It depends on the quality of glass and coatings IMO. If your goal is low light performance, make sure you can see the reticle against a cluttered background. Often times the glass is plenty good enough, but the reticle may suck. This. A 36mm VX3 is going to transfer more light than 50mm BSA..
TRUMP- GABBARD 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,611
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,611 |
Used to use 3-9x50mm Leupolds years ago. Switched to 40 & 42mm objectives over 20 years ago. Never missed an opportunity because of light gathering ability so far. Go w/the 40-42mm Leupolds and don't look back. powdr
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,864
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,864 |
Used to use 3-9x50mm Leupolds years ago. Switched to 40 & 42mm objectives over 20 years ago. Never missed an opportunity because of light gathering ability so far. Go w/the 40-42mm Leupolds and don't look back. powdr A few years ago I switched to the larger objective because on two occasions I could see the deer was a buck, but couldn't see if it was a fork or not. Now both my hunting scopes are 52mm and my varmint scope is 50mm. Definitely helps.
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,660 Likes: 14
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,660 Likes: 14 |
No glass gathers light, it only transmits it. Quality of glass and coatings is much more important than the size of the the objective but all things being equal the larger lense will allow more light to flow through although the advantage is VERY small. This. The better difference in light transmission comes with increasing the tube diameter. Still not a magnanimous difference compared to quality glass in the first place... But a scope that has a larger tube diameter and quality glass is the best bet. Usually, that means some pretty serious money as well. You can get scopes that are good for $500-$750. To take the small step up to get one that is a small percent better, the price difference is substantial.
Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,954
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,954 |
Imbrb - In general- new 'good' glass like VX2 or better is so damn good it makes using larger lenses less "necessary" than even a few years ago. I used straight power 6x scopes for years for their brightness. Usually 6x42 but a new Vx3 40mm variable proved even brighter than the old gold standard. Like others have said- quality trumps size and the good news is that there is plenty of competitive quality available right now.
In a nutshell a larger objective lets you see better at higher magnifications including in low light- all components being of same quality of course.
When a country is well governed, poverty and a mean condition are something to be ashamed of. When a country is ill governed, riches and honors are something to be ashamed of . Confucius
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,860 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,860 Likes: 4 |
The better difference in light transmission comes with increasing the tube diameter.
Still not a magnanimous difference compared to quality glass in the first place... But a scope that has a larger tube diameter and quality glass is the best bet. Usually, that means some pretty serious money as well. How does this work?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,149 Likes: 11
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,149 Likes: 11 |
Yeah, I'm interested in hearing about that as well.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,864
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,864 |
The better difference in light transmission comes with increasing the tube diameter.
Still not a magnanimous difference compared to quality glass in the first place... But a scope that has a larger tube diameter and quality glass is the best bet. How 'bout a real world comparison between two quality scopes of differing tube diameters? Almost no one will say a z5 5-25X52 does not have good glass and almost everyone says a VX-6 4-24X52 has good glass. The tube diameter on the z5 is 1". On the other hand the tube diameter on the VX-6 is 34mm. That gives the VX-6 about a 34% cross sectional advantage. And yet in side by side setting-sun test on deer antlers in the woods 131 yards away, neither has an advantage. They both punk out at the same time. To take the small step up to get one that is a small percent better, the price difference is substantial. By the way the z5 cost about 14% more than the VX-6.
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,364
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,364 |
Depends on your specifics eyes but, yes, potentially. Let's assume we are talking about zeiss conquest scopes, so the glass/coatings etc between the two are similar.
At max power you are going to have an exit pupil on one of 4.4 and an exit pupil on the other of 5.0. Assuming your eyes dialate that much you should see a difference.
Even if your eyes can't dialate enough to take advantage of the larger exit pupil, you will be able to run the 50 at a higher power to achieve the same exit pupil as the 44 in every case, which, again you should notice
Hope this helps. The other consideration is the sheer size of 50mm objective scopes. These days I'm happy with 42 as my max though do occasionally think about putting a 50 on a specialized rifle A Good comparison. What about Resolving Power? can anyone explain that wrt different Objective diameters, where objective and internal lenses are of similar optical quality ? Thanks
Last edited by 338Rules; 03/23/15. Reason: Clarity
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453 |
My only experience with that is that it supposedly easier to make a larger lens, and their proper curvatures, than it is to make a smaller one. As far as tube diameter goes, that has been debunked years ago. I think it was one of the euro scope makers that threw out that BS to see if it stuck to the wall. Apparently it did have many folks think that way and some still do.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,149 Likes: 11
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,149 Likes: 11 |
It was the U.S. advertising agency for a Euro-scope maker, and as I recall the ad campaign claimed a 30mm tube resulted in a brighter view by allowing more light through the scope.
But somebody published a hunting optics book in 1999 that demonstrated why this wasn't true. Apparently a lot more people saw the ads than ever read the book.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,736
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,736 |
Yes that 30mm rule only is in effect during a solar eclipse. The next one over the US is Aug. 21, 2017.
My home is the "sanctuary residence" for my firearms.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,664
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,664 |
But somebody published a hunting optics book in 1999 that demonstrated why this wasn't true. Apparently a lot more people saw the ads than ever read the book.
If you see that guy tell him I liked his book.
The Karma bus always has an empty seat when it comes around.- High Brass
There's battle lines being drawn Nobody's right if everybody's wrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,335
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,335 |
But somebody published a hunting optics book in 1999 that demonstrated why this wasn't true. Apparently a lot more people saw the ads than ever read the book.
If you see that guy tell him I liked his book. Tell him I wished I had it
Last edited by iambrb; 03/23/15.
Psalm 19:14-May these words of my mouth and this meditation of my heart be pleasing in your sight, Lord, my Rock and my Redeemer. _ Humble servant of Jesus Christ. Living His plan and praying to show it in name, word, body, and light.
|
|
|
|
344 members (1Longbow, 12344mag, 10gaugeman, 10ring1, 160user, 17CalFan, 31 invisible),
1,943
guests, and
1,008
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,372
Posts18,488,411
Members73,970
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|