I would never even consider owning a Cooper simply because of Dan Cooper and his monetary support of Obama's presidential campaign.
You do know that Dan Cooper is no longer a part of Cooper rifles and hasn't been for many years, right? The company is owned by Wilson.
Correct. He still created the company and it still bears his name.
So you're sticking it to him by refusing to buy a rifle from a company that doesn't affect his life in the least little way? You're taking a stand against a company that ousted him for the Obama campaign contribution? You can't get past the name? I'm at a loss.
That ole Dan Cooper issue has been beat into the ground too many times to count.
Cooper Rifles is not Dan Cooper.
I'm assuming three lug Coopers have a 60* bolt lift. There isn't much technical info on their web site. A shorter arc doing the same work (cocking the striker) takes more effort.
On the other hand, the Wby MkV has a 60*, short bolt lift, is super smooth, slick and fast cycling.
It's usually a sour grapes excuse more than anything. The same people would have never bought one anyhow.
I have a lefty 54 and a 52, and they are both great. Would love to have a lefty synthetic Cooper, but neither they nor Bell and Carlson listen to my suggestions of starting LH stocks.
where else can one find factory rifles, pre-enjoyed at a price of 13 Benjamins or less, that have excellent fit, and finish, great triggers and can be had in most cases a half dozen chamberings in 17, 19, 20,22,24,25, 26 and 28 cals.
It's usually a sour grapes excuse more than anything. The same people would have never bought one anyhow.
You nailed it totally.
I can afford one but can't bring myself to buy one. In my opinion Cooper did not get to keep the name for free. Somehow, someway Dan Cooper is still getting paid for his name.
I know if makes everyone feel warm and fuzzy to think they ain't supporting that piece of poop but I bet if you could get into the company records he's still getting paid.