Caniglia V. Strom
Caniglia and his wife had a domestic dispute, during which he produced an unloaded gun and magazine, put it on the table, and invited his wife to just shoot him and end it all.
Wife spent the night at a hotel, but called police in the morning, worried about her husband's mental state.
Police interviewed the husband, and searched his house, removing his firearms without his consent.
Firearms were later returned to him.
1st Circuit ruled that the warrantless search and seizure were justified. SCOTUS has just granted certiorari, and will review the case.
red flag laws. to be, or not to be?
I'm thinking that she's a 30 percenter
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/Y02tRQ6Y/30-percent.jpg)
He's talking about from nut jobs, like ewe.
The NRA supports red flag laws
He's talking about from nut jobs, like ewe.
Not hardly. He's talking about anyone who owns a gun.
BTW, has he changed his mind? Has he issued a public apology?
The NRA supports red flag laws
The NRA supports red flag laws
The NRA supports red flag laws
The NRA supports red flag laws
The NRA supports red flag laws
The NRA supports red flag laws
The NRA supports red flag laws
The NRA supports red flag laws
The NRA supports red flag laws
The NRA supports red flag laws
The NRA supports red flag laws
The NRA supports red flag laws
The NRA supports red flag laws
The NRA supports red flag laws
WITH DUE PROCESS, unlike trump
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/nra-state-red-flag-laws-due-process/
If SCOTUS were completely happy with the 1st Circuit ruling, they probably would not have accepted the case. We may be fortunate enough to get some strengthened 4th Amendment protections out of this.
If SCOTUS were completely happy with the 1st Circuit ruling, they probably would not have accepted the case. We may be fortunate enough to get some strengthened 4th Amendment protections out of this.
That in itself would strike down all red flag laws.
NRA has a long history of advocating for gun control. Tell us about the Mulford Act, wanks4WLP.
Well they are a terrorist organization don't ya know
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/9HvHtSe.jpg)
When old Joe and the Democrats impose that 200.00 tax on assault rifles and hi cap magazines. There will be a lot crying where is the NRA. And they will say you defunded us just like the police. Hasbeen
I'm thinking that she's a 30 percenter
Should have made better choices.
A $200 tax is not going to fly. There is presently a small tax on guns and ammo, and it is permitted because it is not a major burden on ownership. $200 is clearly intended to prohibit ownership, and is no more permissible than a poll tax. Pure political theater, signifying nothing.
I'm thinking that she's a 30 percenter
Should have made better choices.
A Harvard study shows 98% of battered women do not understand the phrase “Shut the [bleep] up”
A $200 tax is not going to fly. There is presently a small tax on guns and ammo, and it is permitted because it is not a major burden on ownership. $200 is clearly intended to prohibit ownership, and is no more permissible than a poll tax. Pure political theater, signifying nothing.
There is already a tax on certain firearms. Assault weapons will be added to the list. Really pretty simple. Hasbeen
Well, it looks like you don’t have to worry about Trump taking your guns anymore. I’m sure sure Joe Buden will treat your better. Enjoy, amigo!
Well, it looks like you don’t have to worry about Trump taking your guns anymore. I’m sure sure Joe Buden will treat your better.
Are you saying trump wanted due process? No wonder your crying.
Adding semi auto firearms to "the list":
I don't think that can happen, if you are talking about the tax on full autos. Semi auto are protected by 2A, while full autos are not.
All handguns, including semi autos, are protected under Heller, and semi auto rifles are probably legally indistinguishable from semi auto handguns.
If SCOTUS were completely happy with the 1st Circuit ruling, they probably would not have accepted the case. We may be fortunate enough to get some strengthened 4th Amendment protections out of this.
That in itself would strike down all red flag laws.
Not necessarily.
Could be a narrow ruling, or could be more broad. We will have to wait and see.
Red flag laws completely circumvent any due process. Justification for seizure because of an impure thought, surely can't set any type of sound precedent.
Illegal search and seizure hands down.
Well they are a terrorist organization don't ya know
Why do you avoid the truth? An intelligent person - not you - would be embarrassed.
After WW II Didn’t Europe require gun manufacturers to limit magazine size to 2 or 3 bullets? My Merkel Semi held and one in the chamber I think.
Red flag laws completely circumvent any due process. Justification for seizure because of an impure thought, surely can't set any type of sound precedent.
Illegal search and seizure hands down.
FWIW, I'm rooting for your position, but I'm not giving easy odds that it will happen that way.
Red flag laws completely circumvent any due process. Justification for seizure because of an impure thought, surely can't set any type of sound precedent.
Illegal search and seizure hands down.
FWIW, I'm rooting for your position, but I'm not giving easy odds that it will happen that way.
Too bad the NRA doesn't root for that position too.....
FWIW, I'm rooting for your position, but I'm not giving easy odds that it will happen that way.
This is the first biggy heard in long while. With the addition of Amy darlin, i suspect the supreme's are going to shove right in the gun grabbers butts, with any luck and the river don't rise
Adding semi auto firearms to "the list":
I don't think that can happen, if you are talking about the tax on full autos. Semi auto are protected by 2A, while full autos are not.
All handguns, including semi autos, are protected under Heller, and semi auto rifles are probably legally indistinguishable from semi auto handguns.
I hope you are correct but I think you are not. The Second Ammendment protects ownership of all firearms which in my opinion includes full auto firearms. Full auto firearms are taxed and require special permission from the government. They will simply include semi-auto firearms under the same law and the same requirements will apply to handguns as well as long guns, including shotguns. Never under estimate the tenacity of the left.
45 100 has it about right. You peons don’t realize how much libs hate us. And Bear you have about worn out the Trump hatred. Can you state a case where he actually did what you piss and moan all the time about. How about a law he passed to that effect. Holding my breath waiting. Please hurry! Edk
Trump doesn’t write laws silly rabbit.
Here’s some light reading to further your edumacation
https://susanwbrooks.house.gov/medi...-flag-law-is-and-how-it-works-in-indiana
A $200 tax is not going to fly. There is presently a small tax on guns and ammo, and it is permitted because it is not a major burden on ownership. $200 is clearly intended to prohibit ownership, and is no more permissible than a poll tax. Pure political theater, signifying nothing.
There is already a tax on certain firearms. Assault weapons will be added to the list. Really pretty simple. Hasbeen
Keep calling them assault weapons. You'll get everybody else trying to do that, too.
Per Heller, full auto firearms have not yet received 2A protection. I agree that they should, but SCOTUS so seldom calls me for guidance.