Home
So during the closing Arguments ADA takes an Ar-15 and points it at the Jury with his finger on the trigger...
Is he guilty of recklessly handling a firearm?
After all he attempted to get the witness/observer who was there during the first shots to say kyle was recklessly handling his while the .muzzle was pointed in a safe direction..
See photo on The gateway Pundit...

Also how did Kile shoot so accurately with no sights on the rifle?
[Linked Image from media.giphy.com]
Originally Posted by OldmanoftheSea
Also how did Kile shoot so accurately with no sights on the rifle?


It's hard to miss when your target gets powder burned from grabbing the muzzle!


Very difficult to miss when all shots were made in less than six feet. GW
Note that the bolt was closed in the photo, no chamber flag, no ziptie through the mag well...
Originally Posted by oldtimer303


Very difficult to miss when all shots were made in less than six feet. GW

...
My actual point was that perhaps they went missing in the evidence locker?
I would have to pull up the pre riot photo of him with the rifle but he seems too well trained to have gone into a crowded situation with no front or rear sight...
Originally Posted by OldmanoftheSea
So during the closing Arguments ADA takes an Ar-15 and points it at the Jury with his finger on the trigger...
Is he guilty of recklessly handling a firearm?
After all he attempted to get the witness/observer who was there during the first shots to say kyle was recklessly handling his while the .muzzle was pointed in a safe direction..
See photo on The gateway Pundit...

Also how did Kile shoot so accurately with no sights on the rifle?



No, much as I hate the prick. I'd venture the gun had been "safed" by the bailiff and may have even had a trigger lock on it.
Are you really that stupid?
His finger was in the trigger well.
What lock?
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by OldmanoftheSea
So during the closing Arguments ADA takes an Ar-15 and points it at the Jury with his finger on the trigger...
Is he guilty of recklessly handling a firearm?
After all he attempted to get the witness/observer who was there during the first shots to say kyle was recklessly handling his while the .muzzle was pointed in a safe direction..
See photo on The gateway Pundit...

Also how did Kile shoot so accurately with no sights on the rifle?



No, much as I hate the prick. I'd venture the gun had been "safed" by the bailiff and may have even had a trigger lock on it.


Alex Baldwins gun was ‘safed’ too. No excuse for unsafe weapon handling.

Old70
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?


lol, now that's a dumb question.......... wink
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by OldmanoftheSea
So during the closing Arguments ADA takes an Ar-15 and points it at the Jury with his finger on the trigger...
Is he guilty of recklessly handling a firearm?
After all he attempted to get the witness/observer who was there during the first shots to say kyle was recklessly handling his while the .muzzle was pointed in a safe direction..
See photo on The gateway Pundit...

Also how did Kile shoot so accurately with no sights on the rifle?



No, much as I hate the prick. I'd venture the gun had been "safed" by the bailiff and may have even had a trigger lock on it.


^Biden voter logic^
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?


Yep. Same guy that said George Floyd was murdered.
Originally Posted by Tarquin



No, much as I hate the prick. I'd venture the gun had been "safed" by the bailiff and may have even had a trigger lock on it.



jajajaja dummy !!
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?



From what I've been told, that's typically how it's done in court. Lawyers point weapons at juries all the time. It's part of the theatrics.
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?



From what I've been told, that's typically how it's done in court. Lawyers point weapons at juries all the time. It's part of the theatrics.


^^^^^^^^^^
Prove Positive He REALLY is that Stupid. 🤪
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?



From what I've been told, that's typically how it's done in court. Lawyers point weapons at juries all the time. It's part of the theatrics. You think the judge or bailiff would ever let ammo near a weapon that is in evidence?
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?



From what I've been told, that's typically how it's done in court. Lawyers point weapons at juries all the time. It's part of the theatrics.



[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Really ?
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by OldmanoftheSea
So during the closing Arguments ADA takes an Ar-15 and points it at the Jury with his finger on the trigger...
Is he guilty of recklessly handling a firearm?
After all he attempted to get the witness/observer who was there during the first shots to say kyle was recklessly handling his while the .muzzle was pointed in a safe direction..
See photo on The gateway Pundit...

Also how did Kile shoot so accurately with no sights on the rifle?



No, much as I hate the prick. I'd venture the gun had been "safed" by the bailiff and may have even had a trigger lock on it.


And that’s exactly how Alex Baldwin shot two people on that movie set.
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?



From what I've been told, that's typically how it's done in court. Lawyers point weapons at juries all the time. It's part of the theatrics. You think the judge or bailiff would ever let ammo near a weapon that is in evidence?


WOW... just WOW...

Please please do not type another word... EVER
Originally Posted by CashisKing
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?



From what I've been told, that's typically how it's done in court. Lawyers point weapons at juries all the time. It's part of the theatrics. You think the judge or bailiff would ever let ammo near a weapon that is in evidence?


WOW... just WOW...

Please please do not type another word... EVER



I saw a prosecutor, in a jury trial, pull the gun the robber used out of the back of his pants and point it at us jurors as he dramatically tried to illustrate how the robbery victim felt. The judge allowed it. Happens all the time.
Originally Posted by CashisKing
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?



From what I've been told, that's typically how it's done in court. Lawyers point weapons at juries all the time. It's part of the theatrics. You think the judge or bailiff would ever let ammo near a weapon that is in evidence?


WOW... just WOW...

Please please do not type another word... EVER



Okay F. Lee Bailey. crazy Whatever you say. laugh Isn't the bailiff in charge of courtroom safety and security? Why do you think he didn't utter a peep when Binger pulled his little stunt? Because Binger cleared it with him first. He knew it was going to happen. The incompetent defense attorney should have done it first with Grossekunt's handgun and then asked the jury, "are you telling me Kyle has to wait for Grossekunt to pull the trigger before he has a right of self-defense?" with the handgun pointing at the jury.
It's a way to get the jury to identify sympathetically with those shot and not the shooter(Kyle). The judge should have tossed these guys long ago and would have except they have been transparently trying to get a mistrial instead of an acquittal.
What a phuquing clown show! This should never have gone to trial and phuque those in Kenosha who condone this clusterphuque!
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by OldmanoftheSea
So during the closing Arguments ADA takes an Ar-15 and points it at the Jury with his finger on the trigger...
Is he guilty of recklessly handling a firearm?
After all he attempted to get the witness/observer who was there during the first shots to say kyle was recklessly handling his while the .muzzle was pointed in a safe direction..
See photo on The gateway Pundit...

Also how did Kile shoot so accurately with no sights on the rifle?



No, much as I hate the prick. I'd venture the gun had been "safed" by the bailiff and may have even had a trigger lock on it.


Did you learn nothing from the Alec Baldwin fiasco.... ?
Someone "told" him it was unloaded, too....
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by CashisKing
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?



From what I've been told, that's typically how it's done in court. Lawyers point weapons at juries all the time. It's part of the theatrics. You think the judge or bailiff would ever let ammo near a weapon that is in evidence?


WOW... just WOW...

Please please do not type another word... EVER



Okay F. Lee Bailey. crazy Whatever you say. laugh Isn't the bailiff in charge of courtroom safety and security? Why do you think he didn't utter a peep when Binger pulled his little stunt? Because Binger cleared it with him first. He knew it was going to happen. The incompetent defense attorney should have done it first with Grossekunt's handgun and then asked the jury, "are you telling me Kyle has to wait for Grossekunt to pull the trigger before he has a right of self-defense?" with the handgun pointing at the jury.


Pretty sure pointing a gun at someone to invoke fear is a criminal act.
I'm not aware of any exceptions for the courtroom.
The D.A. is a fuggin liberal and they should never be trusted with a gun
Tarqueens a Covidtard moron so it’s to be expected.
Lawyers should never be allowed to practice law. They are both ignorant and malicious of it
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by CashisKing
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?



From what I've been told, that's typically how it's done in court. Lawyers point weapons at juries all the time. It's part of the theatrics. You think the judge or bailiff would ever let ammo near a weapon that is in evidence?


WOW... just WOW...

Please please do not type another word... EVER



Okay F. Lee Bailey. crazy Whatever you say. laugh Isn't the bailiff in charge of courtroom safety and security? Why do you think he didn't utter a peep when Binger pulled his little stunt? Because Binger cleared it with him first. He knew it was going to happen. The incompetent defense attorney should have done it first with Grossekunt's handgun and then asked the jury, "are you telling me Kyle has to wait for Grossekunt to pull the trigger before he has a right of self-defense?" with the handgun pointing at the jury.


I was GENUINELY POLITE in my first request... honestly I was.

This time I will call you a hysterical fools that is lying thru his his teeth.

POST THE TRIAL..

I will Lexus Nexus it... we can go from there you pathetic lying POS...

Azzholes that dig a grave should be buried in it.

POST THE CASE LAW... FACT!
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by CashisKing
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?



From what I've been told, that's typically how it's done in court. Lawyers point weapons at juries all the time. It's part of the theatrics. You think the judge or bailiff would ever let ammo near a weapon that is in evidence?


WOW... just WOW...

Please please do not type another word... EVER



I saw a prosecutor, in a jury trial, pull the gun the robber used out of the back of his pants and point it at us jurors as he dramatically tried to illustrate how the robbery victim felt. The judge allowed it. Happens all the time.


I was GENUINELY POLITE in my first request... honestly I was.

This time I will call you a hysterical fool that is lying thru his his teeth.

POST THE TRIAL..

I will Lexus Nexus it... we can go from there you pathetic lying POS...

Azzholes that dig a grave should be buried in it.

POST THE CASE LAW... FACT!
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by CashisKing
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?



From what I've been told, that's typically how it's done in court. Lawyers point weapons at juries all the time. It's part of the theatrics. You think the judge or bailiff would ever let ammo near a weapon that is in evidence?


WOW... just WOW...

Please please do not type another word... EVER



Okay F. Lee Bailey. crazy Whatever you say. laugh Isn't the bailiff in charge of courtroom safety and security? Why do you think he didn't utter a peep when Binger pulled his little stunt? Because Binger cleared it with him first. He knew it was going to happen. The incompetent defense attorney should have done it first with Grossekunt's handgun and then asked the jury, "are you telling me Kyle has to wait for Grossekunt to pull the trigger before he has a right of self-defense?" with the handgun pointing at the jury.

So you are saying if the DA was trying a rape case he would pull out his dick and throw the rape victim on the floor and boink her to show the jury just what happened?
Originally Posted by OldmanoftheSea
Also how did Kile shoot so accurately with no sights on the rifle?


[Linked Image from scallywagandvagabond.com]
The bailiff should have shot that stupid fugger.
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?


Yes, she is.
Tarq, just give it up already. Youre too stupid to learn a square peg.........
Originally Posted by Tarquin


I saw a prosecutor, in a jury trial, pull the gun the robber used out of the back of his pants and point it at us jurors as he dramatically tried to illustrate how the robbery victim felt. The judge allowed it. Happens all the time.


LOL
Originally Posted by MARCEL
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?



From what I've been told, that's typically how it's done in court. Lawyers point weapons at juries all the time. It's part of the theatrics.



[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Really ?




The cockatoo DA needs her kunk kicked in.
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by boatammo
Are you really that stupid?



From what I've been told, that's typically how it's done in court. Lawyers point weapons at juries all the time. It's part of the theatrics.
You are either an actual retard or an Oscar winning performer in the category of best rendition of a retard
Originally Posted by oldtrapper
It's a way to get the jury to identify sympathetically with those shot and not the shooter(Kyle). The judge should have tossed these guys long ago and would have except they have been transparently trying to get a mistrial instead of an acquittal.


Prezactly. That's why it was done. And it was done with the approval of the bailiff or he'd have said something. You don't get to waive evidence weapons around a courtroom, pointing them at people willy-nilly even as a tool to convince (theatrics) without someone's permission. In today's anti-gun world where everyone has an irrational fear of guns (you know how they just jump off the table and start shooting people! crazy). Binger had the bailiff's permission or he never would have done it. Just a shame the defense attorney didn't think to do that little stunt first using the Grosskunt Glock.
Originally Posted by JOG
Originally Posted by OldmanoftheSea
Also how did Kile shoot so accurately with no sights on the rifle?


[Linked Image from scallywagandvagabond.com]

Ah thanks to you and the person who posted the ADA photo..
So the holo has gone missing...
[Linked Image from media.giphy.com]
© 24hourcampfire