It’s almost as bad as a 6.5 Creedmoor thread.

Why is it always the chicks who are in absolutely NO danger of getting knocked up who are the most outraged?

A lot of truth there.

Hard to imagine the anger that these people have simply because they think they’ll no longer be able to legally rip apart and kill a human being that is growing inside the womb.

Ugly bitch

Wow they're all exactly the same. Completely indoctrinated dumb bitches.

I haven’t seen libs this mad since yesterday.

Of all the things that have happened to us and this country in the past 30 that I thought I’d never be around to witness this decision is probably the most significant. I was roughly 2 when Roe V Wade was decided so I’ve grown up under the shadow of the RvW debate and based upon my morals and beliefs I’ve developed my own opinions. The original RvW was an absolutely horrific “judicial” decision that weakened the Constitution. For that reason alone I’m absolutely thrilled that the SCOTUS revisited and rectified the injustice of almost 50 years known as RvW.

Unless there’s a real path forward that helps us get our freedom, Constitution and Country back without war I’d prefer that the liberals use this issue as the hill they’re willing to die on. “Let’s Roll!”

That sound like popcorn popping you've been hearing the last couple of days? It's all the liberal heads exploding.

It’s called overturn Chevron precedent. That happens then only congress can make law not some unelected azzwipe in the alphabet agencies to which Chevron allows.

Lol, the supposed President doesn't even know the Constitution.

Dats funny right there !

Because they're the ones most likely to get knocked up at the gang bang....

We should've never given them the right to vote. Dayum.

I've noticed that, too.

These are the chicks dat duh bruthas be bustin in, and then leaving wit da baby.

I couldn't watch all of it. Disgusting women. I hope they all choke on a placenta.

How do all these liberals have the time and resources to wait around until the decision is made and then protest? Do they not have jobs and families to support? Maybe these protests are organized ahead of time and the protesters are paid to attend. Nah!

WELFARE !

I’m good with that. Let’s get it on !

So many easier, less controversial ways to deal with an unwanted pregnancy in this day and age that avoid the "ugliness" of fetal abortion in almost all situations. I just don't understand this response.

Of course, personal responsibility went out the window long ago so I won't go there. No use in the "sand box" in which we live. Easily available and cheap "morning after pill" seems the most logical compromise for the majority of other cases, mistakes, rapes, etc. No excuses for waiting until there are beating hearts, fully recognizable physical features. Inhumane and criminal IMHO when we get to late second trimester and later partial birth procedures, etc.

I'd love to think that actually participating in the delivery of these types of procedures would change some minds but I am not sure anymore. Sign of the times and "biblical" I am afraid.

Beijing Biden didn't even know the Constitution long before he was struck by Alzheimer's dementia.

L.W.

LMAO!

LMAO 😂

🦫

Ya think??!!? How about all the pre printed signs that show up in mere moments after a protestable event occurs?


“Politics is Hollywood for the unattractive.”
Rush Limbaugh

His “Campaign” Slogan should have been :
Joe Don’t Know Schitt From Shinola.

Traitorous POS has been ignoring the Constitution For YEARS.
Time to bring back public hangings.

You’d think the Catholic Church would Excommunicate Pedo Joe over his support of Roe Vs Wade.

But being as they’re OK with Priests raping little boys, it ain’t gonna happen. 🤪

There aren't 3 functioning brain cells between all the clowns on that clip.

And just cause....

antlers, it's also hard to believe they have no clue of what actually happened today.. That being the decision(s) on abortion returned to the people.

Same here. 😂

Oh Oh Oh it’s Magic..

'Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned'

No matter how much I watch Britney, that boob still won’t pop out. 😂

Is that a Mepp’s # 2 hanging off that first chick’s lips??? Looked too small to be a #3.

.

It is posts like this is why thou shall never be placed on ignore.

Money from moveon.org

Rachel MadCow doesn't need to worry about getting knocked up, she's a devout carpet muncher.

Unless I'm wrong here, and please correct me if I am, this decision just takes the Federal gov't out of play on the subject. Individual states will each make their own laws as to what's legal and what's not in regards to abortions.

If I'm correct, there will be plenty of blue states for women to go to, to rid their bodies of unwanted souls...some right up to the minute of birth.

If I'm wrong, I apologize and please correct me.

At least it will inconvenience some of them, making them drive to another state to kill their child.


To be the cold, cynical old bastard that I am, I have to say that ultimately, the real world effect of this ruling is that there are going to be a lot more "people of color".... being housed and fed by the White taxpayer.

It's going to be like the booze, used to be just cross the border, there will be a Planned Parent Hood Store,right on the hiway with a big parking lot. weekends and pay day are going to be busy. Rio7

I hope Pa bans abortion.

And these morons don't come here, or leave.



Win/Win!

Missouri has already outlawed abortion. My state (Ohio) is probably going to outlaw it after six weeks. If you're pro-life, either is a step in the right direction. If you're pro choice, you might have to go to California or New York or someplace. A deterrent that will make other solutions more attractive.

Yep, as I have said here before. Now we will pay for their mistakes for their lifetimes.

Ain't nobody giving half them ugly heifers any peter anyway.

Think it was the 2nd or 3rd one in that claims she won't be spending $$ in an anti-abortion state, nobody in those states wants her phuu.ging money anyway.

Wont be sending her kids to college in those states either. Pussies couldn't handle it amyway.

Go buy a gag ball and shut the phu.ck up.

We are paying for our forefathers mistake of wanting somebody else to pick their cotton. Should have left them in Africa.

Funny how these stupid bastards didn't give a damn about constitutional rights being taken away the past 2 years.

And, oh, by the way, they want to take away 2nd amendment rights. But, that's "for the children". The children that avoided being sucked out of a uterus, cause their mom chose it.

I hope this means all the liberals in Tennessee leave.

In addition to the pre-planned outrage and protests funded by hidden money, some of these exhibitionist females just seem to be simple minded - yelling about the loss of a 50 year old illegal gift that was not constitutional on its face. The illegal gift just went away.

The "right to control my body" slogan has been sham prose aimed at the effort to assign some sort of dignity to the act of kiling a baby. How disingenuous! All know that women have the right and means to avoid becoming pregnant in the first place and they have at their disposal many external tools with which to do that - and other tools to do away with a pregnancy immediately after it happens and before they nurture a human heartbeat. That is a LOT of control.

My take is that the biggest upset to those behind the abortion industry is that they will no longer be able to easaily focus their political agenda - and concentrate their lobbying funds - in D.C.. If they are true beleivers in their espoused cause, they will have 50 venues in which to work - and some of those are not as politically susceptible as D.C..

The child sacrifice must go on. The death cult must have its sacrifices.

Our culture has been destroyed by our affluent nihilism.

Always hilarious to see the Hollyweird Libertards in full blown melt down mode.

Also a good guide to which Hollyweird movies to boycott.

Hollywood reacts to Roe v. Wade being overturned: 'Absolutely terrified'

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/hollywood-reacts-roe-v-wade-overturned

Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at http://www.foxnews.com/apps-products/index.html.

They have no qualms whatsoever about murdering babies.

Even the “Devout Catholics” like Hiden Biden and Piglosi. 🤪

When do they start torching the cities again?

If a man can get pregnant, can he have an abortion?

Reminds me of the bar scene from Star Wars...

They sure know how to end pride month on a happy note.

How are the riots going? Where? Any televised? Nothing on YouTube.

Absolutely

I’ve caught a lot of fish on that lure.

They cannot ever seem to comprehend that it's not a Federal government issue. Go home and take it up with your state gov't morons.

It could be that way but based merely on my own observations, poor blacks don't have a lot of abortions. There is good money from Uncle Sugar in being a "single mom" and evidently economies of scale are reached with several kids.

Libs aren't mad about not killing children. They're mad about a step back from the Federal Government seizing complete control of the Republic.

Handmaid's Tale invoked only 50 seconds in. What took her so long?

They truly are morons because most of the protests are in states that it will be legal.

They believe so, yes.

Dreams, nightmares to the rest of us.
Really it is because their parents were using enhanced sensation lubricants when they were mistakenly concieved.

got my cheeto's ,dorito's .popcorn ,pepsi , coffee and AR-15,let the democrat ,abortian ,riots begin

No they aren’t.

They’re consistent; they believe they should be able to do whatever they want whenever they want with whomever they want and laws and civilization be damned.

To them the concept of jurisdiction is a massive waste of time; there’s pleasure to be had and baby’s blood to be spilt their fertility gods have no time for rule of law!

We’re the idiots who thought “whatever two people do in their bedroom is their business” as if such depravity wouldn’t spill into the streets.

SHAME ON US

https://www.theonion.com/

The Chevron precedent" (deference)

Chevron deference
Primary tabs
One of the most important principles in administrative law, The “Chevron deference” is a term coined after a landmark case, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 468 U.S. 837 (1984), referring to the doctrine of judicial deference given to administrative actions. In Chevron, the Supreme Court set forth a legal test as to when the court should defer to the agency’s answer or interpretation, holding that such judicial deference is appropriate where the agency’s answer was not unreasonable, so long as the Congress had not spoken directly to the precise issue at question. The scope of the Chevron deference doctrine is that when a legislative delegation to an administrative agency on a particular issue or question is not explicit but rather implicit, a court may not substitute its own interpretation of the statute for a reasonable interpretation made by the administrative agency. Rather, as Justice Stevens wrote in Chevron, when the statute is silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific issue, the question for the court is whether the agency’s action was based on a permissible construction of the statute. The Chevron deference first requires that the administrative interpretation in question was issued by the agency charged with administering that statute being construed. Accordingly, interpretations by agencies not in charge of that statute in question are not owed any judicial deference. Also, the implicit delegation of authority to an administrative agency to interpret a statute does not extend to the agency’s interpretation of its own jurisdiction under that statute.
Generally, to be accorded Chevron deference, the agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statute must be permissible, which the court has defined to mean “rational” or “reasonable.” In determining the reasonableness of a particular construction of a statute by the agency, the age of that administrative interpretation as well as the congressional action or inaction in response to that interpretation at issue can be a useful guide, if the Congress was aware of the interpretation when it acted or refrained from action, and when the agency’s interpretation is not inconsistent with the clear statutory language.

In subsequent cases, the Supreme Court has narrowed the scope of Chevron deference, holding that only the agency interpretations reached through formal proceedings with the force of law, such as adjudications, or notice-and-comment rulemaking, qualify for Chevron deference, while those contained in opinion letters, policy statements, agency manuals, or other formats that do not carry the force of law are not warranted a Chevron deference. In such cases, the Court may give a slightly less deferential treatment to the agency’s interpretation, giving a persuasive value under the Court’s “Skidmore deference” analysis.

Yes, many of the abuses engaged in by the ATF are due to the Chevron deference doctrine. It should definitely be eighty-sixed.