9x19mm is my go to. It’s cheap and quiet even with supersonic bulk ammo shot through PCC’s or pistols with a can. I’ve always been a Glock guy but my current carry gun is a Sig 365 Macro. I love it. The grip leads up to a high bore axis hold better than any pistol that I’ve owned and is slim while holding 17 rounds in a standard flush fit mag.
I’ve never noticed much difference in standard velocity 9mm Vs 45 ACP recoil but 9mm is noticeably quieter suppressed, statistically they’re about the same in stopping power and more rounds is a real thing.
I think you’re bored tonight OP. Run out of chips and dip😂
I have killed several sheep and a couple cows with one.
I put down one of our old cows with one. It’s all I had with me that day. 124 gr Speer Gold Dot HP + P load. Gun barrel was about 6” from the center of her forehead. Dead Right there.
I've been wondering about the 22LR as threat reducer.
Got shot in the leg with one in HS by one of my dumb ass buddies. Stung like a mofo. Luckily he didn’t hit bone or an artery. Passed all the way through. I wouldn’t recommend it. 😬
Not according to Jeff Cooper. You need at least a .40 in his opinion, and a .45 is best.
I’m a Cooper fan and a 1911 fan. He wasn’t wrong but was a product of a different era IMO.
Were he around today and 35 years old. I suspect that he’d be an advocate of polymer striker fired 9’s.
Probably.
I know that you’re a big collector/gun guy. If you haven’t already checked out the Sig Macro look at one when you get a chance. I’ve commented on it in the handgun forum and really like it. I think you’ll like it too.
I’ve never liked .40 S&W. It’s always seemed like neither fish or fowl to me. 9x19mm and 45 ACP both have a ton of history behind them. The .40 was a watered down 10mm FBI special with no history that just sort of split the difference. Obviously there’s nothing wrong with it. I’ve just never really liked it.
I for one am not a fan of the 9mm. It has nothing to do with the round however, and more to do with what I grew up on. I grew up on the 38spcl & 357mag. Later I went to the 40cal (which some people also have no love for) as a LEO with a 380 in my boot. I just don't own a 9mm gun and have no place for one.
However, the 9mm has a history of getting the job done when used by a trained shooter.
"there are entire graveyards full of bad dudes who have been killed by 9mm, and that every argument to get “more stopping power than a 9mm” had nothing to do with the 9mm’s terminal performance. But it’s easier to buy new cartridges than teach people to shoot better"
Not according to Jeff Cooper. You need at least a .40 in his opinion, and a .45 is best.
I’m a Cooper fan and a 1911 fan. He wasn’t wrong but was a product of a different era IMO.
Were he around today and 35 years old. I suspect that he’d be an advocate of polymer striker fired 9’s.
Probably.
I know that you’re a big collector/gun guy. If you haven’t already checked out the Sig Macro look at one when you get a chance. I’ve commented on it in the handgun forum and really like it. I think you’ll like it too.
I just can’t see buying a comped gun for a carry pistol. Might be fine for plinking. Buy a standard Sig P365 and never look back. It’s very reliable with everything I’ve tried in it. And damn accurate too for a small 9mm. Best “small” carry pistol I’ve ever purchased.
I've been wondering about the 22LR as threat reducer.
It may be ugly, but 33 Stingers ain't no joke...
I have a stash of those and some other high velocity stuff.
Sam; Good evening my friend, I hope the week behaved well enough for you all.
While I'm cognizant coyotes and people are two different things, I have hit coyotes with a 165gr BT out of a .308 Norma and had them just shift gears and leave - for a wee bit.
Anyways Sam, CCI Velocitor is the "house load" here for coyotes now. I want to say I'm at 6 now with one shot stops and usually stop and drop with Velocitors. Edit to add - that's out of a rifle to be clear.
We Stingered at least one and another one caught a Yellow Jacket, but both of them are better gopher/pigeon/rat bullets as they don't penetrate quite enough.
Now as to whether or not the Velocitor gets up to enough speed in a short barrel Sam, that I cannot say, but we did chronograph Stingers from a 5" pistol and while I can't recall the speed, it wasn't as fast as out of a rifle - I think....
The other "yard load" here is a .357 Mag carbine that puts 158gr out at 1700fps, but it's not been fired in anger into anything - yet.
All the best and back to the regular 9mm topic now Sam.
I distinctly remember reading the famous Cooper quote when he was asked about the 9x19 on a 1911 frame he said" You would be better off to save your money to have your testosterone level checked". Ol Mike it will work fine for you but you need to distract them first by asking if they want chips N dip.... mb
.357 Sig round does about the same as a .38 super. I’ve got two Glocks in that caliber. It works well on feral hogs. Wish some MFG would chamber a 1911 in that caliber. Springfield Armory claimed they were going to chamber their EMP 1911in .357 Sig. But they never did.
Not according to Jeff Cooper. You need at least a .40 in his opinion, and a .45 is best.
I’m a Cooper fan and a 1911 fan. He wasn’t wrong but was a product of a different era IMO.
Were he around today and 35 years old. I suspect that he’d be an advocate of polymer striker fired 9’s.
Probably.
I know that you’re a big collector/gun guy. If you haven’t already checked out the Sig Macro look at one when you get a chance. I’ve commented on it in the handgun forum and really like it. I think you’ll like it too.
I just can’t see buying a comped gun for a carry pistol. Might be fine for plinking. Buy a standard Sig P365 and never look back. It’s very reliable with everything I’ve tried in it. And damn accurate too for a small 9mm. Best “small” carry pistol I’ve ever purchased.
I don’t disagree.
I’d prefer it without the comp. It isn’t noticeably louder to my ear but I haven’t really noticed much of a recoil reduction either.
I’d like it better with either a full length barrel or shortened without the comp.
What I really like about it is how compact and concealable it is while fitting my 2x hands and being easy to shoot with a full a capacity Glock 17 size mag in a slimmer gun. Sigs have obviously never been known for their low bore axis but the 365 grip IMO guides the hand into a high hold better than anything I’ve handled.
Not according to Jeff Cooper. You need at least a .40 in his opinion, and a .45 is best.
I’m a Cooper fan and a 1911 fan. He wasn’t wrong but was a product of a different era IMO.
Were he around today and 35 years old. I suspect that he’d be an advocate of polymer striker fired 9’s.
Probably.
I know that you’re a big collector/gun guy. If you haven’t already checked out the Sig Macro look at one when you get a chance. I’ve commented on it in the handgun forum and really like it. I think you’ll like it too.
I just can’t see buying a comped gun for a carry pistol. Might be fine for plinking. Buy a standard Sig P365 and never look back. It’s very reliable with everything I’ve tried in it. And damn accurate too for a small 9mm. Best “small” carry pistol I’ve ever purchased.
I don’t disagree.
I’d prefer it without the comp. It isn’t noticeably louder to my ear but I haven’t really noticed much of a recoil reduction either.
I’d like it better with either a full length barrel or shortened without the comp.
What I really like about it is how compact and concealable it is while fitting my 2x hands and being easy to shoot with a full a capacity Glock 17 mag in a much slimmer gun. Sigs have obviously never been known for their low bore axis but the 365 grip IMO guides the hand into a high hold better than anything I’ve handled.
C and Dwayne, I also ordered some Federal Punch, they are supposed to get 1070fps out of a 2" barrel and 1650fps out of a 24".
Just screwing around trying something new I guess.
If I was actually worried about being attacked by gangsters I'd have something more potent.
Figured you were thinking about letting your wife carry it. I figured you’d carry your P365. Or your Titanium pocket Rocket in 357 magnum. If she thinks the new revolver is too big to carry in her purse, you might consider the Ruger LCP II for her. Mine has worked flawlessly. Not much recoil either.
My Sig 322 is very easy to shoot well and it keeps on shooting and shooting before you need a mag change. With a can on the frt it would be even more awesome. mb
I worry far more about my wife being attacked while out and about with the kids, whether that's in a population center or in the woods. Since she likes and will shoot a moderately loaded 9, which kicks Hell out of anything smaller like a 380, I like the 9. A lot. I even carry one sometimes. Can you imagine an average guy carrying the same lung-blowing, Brownie-slaughtering cartridges that the uber-bad-asses in LE carry? It's a great country.
I knew a guy once. Big-ass Eskimo, 6'3, 220# , bully, and all-round douche. He beat the chit out of a nice old guy, 2/3 his size, also an Eskimo. When Lazzarus came back for round 2, Gus shot him once with that little (Freedom Arms? ).22 Derringer. That little .22 bounced around awhile inside the rib cage, getting several vital organs- Lazzie made it about 30 yards out the door. No, he didn't come back from the dead.
Good riddance too. Gus had to leave the village for awhile for his own safety. All asswholes have relatives who think the a-hole (once he's dead) was the finest kind ever... . Just the way of the village factions and rivalries. See it with the blacks too. White trash just seem to shrug it off....
I've a couple .22 semi-auto handguns. As a defensive weapon, I would choose hollow points and plan on using all 10.
If you can't shoot 'em with something big, shoot 'em lots....
I'd prefer my Python, tho I find it rather clumsy. Hey, for the $150 I paid for it, I'll deal with it.
I’ve never liked .40 S&W. It’s always seemed like neither fish or fowl to me. 9x19mm and 45 ACP both have a ton of history behind them. The .40 was a watered down 10mm FBI special with no history that just sort of split the difference. Obviously there’s nothing wrong with it. I’ve just never really liked it.
I tend to agree with that. I have .45's and 9's, no .40's.
With the latest and best ammo, the old 9mm sorta wakes up and isn't a bad defensive round. Sure beats a sharp stick.
I wouldn't want to use the crescent wrench version, long handled or short. That's just not much steel to work with. I guess a 9mm socket on an adapter for at least a 1/2" drive ratchet wrench might be ok.
I distinctly remember reading the famous Cooper quote when he was asked about the 9x19 on a 1911 frame he said" You would be better off to save your money to have your testosterone level checked". Ol Mike it will work fine for you but you need to distract them first by asking if they want chips N dip.... mb
chipsNdips, honey hand me another,, 9bangbangbang pepsi, Ahh love this barca lounger
Not according to Jeff Cooper. You need at least a .40 in his opinion, and a .45 is best.
A friend says 40 is a minimum, calls a 9mm a cupcake round.
Only Boomers working on dated information disregard the 9mm as a defensive round. Bullet engineering has come a long ways in the last 30 years.
Boomers paid attention when bullet engineering progressed in all calibers as well.
We heard about the Boxer Rebellion before you did also, but not before John M Browning did. He did something about it.
He also said the 9mm Luger and the .38 special revolvers were fine weapons but his invention was better against bad guys on drugs running towards the trenches.
I can’t answer the OP’s question because I haven’t shot anything but paper with my 9mm.
I broke down and bought one for the capacity, primarily. That said, it’s a full-sized 19+1 and not exactly ideal for CC. But I lose interest (or faith) in 9mm if it’s anything much less than that.
Either one is fine. Our agency is now transitioning back to 9mm from the the 40 cal. The reasoning is not effectiveness of one over the other. The reasoning is more rounds in the gun and more hits due to a slightly less recoil impulse. Last, Glock offered a crazy deal on the cost of the switch over. We are carrying the the Federal 40 cal. 180 gr HST and will be carrying the Federal 9mm HST 147gr. Absent a CSN shot and instant drop, out of the fight result ,using a standard pistol round to stop a threat is like using a small hammer to drive a big nail. It can be done but, the results are not always ideal and vary widely. People often do not know they are hit and the effect of the hits can take awhile to be observable. some people are dead on the their feet but do not know they are dead. Hence the need to keep reevaluating that threat and reengaging or disengaging as needed.
I remember reading about a criminal that was high on a PCP getting in a shootout in Illinois with the police. He had been hit 51 times with their issued 9mm rounds and was still returning fire. They stopped him with a 12 ga. slug to the neck cutting his spine in two.
CNS, meshemess. Priority 1 in self defense is to incapacitate, not kill. Don’t think it matters a lot what you shoot someone with as opposed to where.
So, maybe it’s dark and you’re excited a bit. Nobody goes anywhere without their bellybutton. Shoot’m in the gut and they’re done. On the deck, cryin’ like a little girl.
Given my proficiency with a handgun...I've been thinking a handheld claymore may be the ideal self defense round. Quite a few years ago, I saw a 1000# water buffalo that had tripped one...game over.
Either one is fine. Our agency is now transitioning back to 9mm from the the 40 cal. The reasoning is not effectiveness of one over the other. The reasoning is more rounds in the gun and more hits due to a slightly less recoil impulse. Last, Glock offered a crazy deal on the cost of the switch over. We are carrying the the Federal 40 cal. 180 gr HST and will be carrying the Federal 9mm HST 147gr. Absent a CSN shot and instant drop, out of the fight result ,using a standard pistol round to stop a threat is like using a small hammer to drive a big nail. It can be done but, the results are not always ideal and vary widely. People often do not know they are hit and the effect of the hits can take awhile to be observable. some people are dead on the their feet but do not know they are dead. Hence the need to keep reevaluating that threat and reengaging or disengaging as needed.
More female recruits over the years pushed the transition back to the 9mm. They complained that the 40 cal had too much recoil, plus Glock reps (former Leos) pushed it for more money
Our experience was similar with some our our Deputies expressing an interest in the lighter recoiling of the 9mm. Complaining about the snappy recoil of the 40 cal. We, range instructors proposed taking a portion of our consistently lowest shooters and allowing them to carry 9mms. The management denied our request under the notion that in a gunfire there could be ammo compatibility issues with the different calibers. We countered with "hits win gun fights" and we do not practice sharing magazines or the transfer of magazines while shooting and were again denied. once the admin saw other agencies switching back to the 9mm then they decided and found the funding to switch. Nothing more then a newer, shinier can opener! Then it was a great idea.
If you fail to train frequently in a realistic manner, do not use a shot timer and do not always carry your weapon of choice you revert to "stopping power" discussions.
As to caliber ,I was not one to force anyone one way or the other. My criteria was just carry what you can shoot/handle well and hit with. Our policy was limiting enough. I have worked with some range staff who have had and voiced opinions on caliber as the end all, be all choice. Shooter confidence in what you carry is a big factor in effectiveness.
Well, I'm a firm believer in the 1911 in .45 ACP. However, I have never felt poorly armed when carrying a 9MM. In certain neighborhoods, the larger magazine capacity of a 9MM can be a comforting factor. Just never saw a 9MM that really tripped my trigger although the S&W 6906 came close. Twelve plus one up the spout. Could use the 15 round magazines from the S&W 59 IIRC. I even had a Star in .40 cal. for a while. A very short while. I shot it and it was decently accurate, smaller than a 1911 but a lot heavier. I sold it at a slight profit and wished the new owner well.
I usually carry a Colt Combat Commander .45 ACP concealed with an S&W M60 .38 Spl. as a back up. Spare magazines are two Wilson 10 rounders and 2 speed loaders for the .38. Sometimes it's only the .38 which is easier to hide in my vehicle when going to the doctor's office or other medical facility. State law doesn't allow weapons of any kind in doctor's offices or medical facilities. PJ
Clothing limitations, social limitations, and location visiting usually have more influence on what I'm carrying (and I carry wherever and whenever I can) than academic arguments about "stopping power", caliber, 15 shots vs. 8 shots, striker vs. hammer vs. revolver, etc...
A Colt pocket pistol .25acp in your hand trumps a 10mm Glock G40 back home in the safe.
Every. Single. Time.
All that being said, my vehicle guns are all either .45 acp or 10mm full-sized semi autos.
I tend to carry my Colt Detective Special with Hornady Critical Defense .38 +P more than anything else, becasue it fits in my little pocket holster in my jeans pocket, so never an issue of concealment in any weather, any social condition, any location.
I'd prefer to be carrying a 5" barreled 10mm, but that is often not a practical option.
.357 Sig round does about the same as a .38 super. I’ve got two Glocks in that caliber. It works well on feral hogs. Wish some MFG would chamber a 1911 in that caliber. Springfield Armory claimed they were going to chamber their EMP 1911in .357 Sig. But they never did.
Sig used to offer the nightmare carry in .357 Sig. You may find one on the used market.
I have both a p229 and a p226 in .357 sig .... great cartridge. BTW, the upper on a p226 and p229 work with either a .357 sig or a .40 S&W barrel. I've got both barrels for my p226 and p229.
Well, I'm a firm believer in the 1911 in .45 ACP. However, I have never felt poorly armed when carrying a 9MM. In certain neighborhoods, the larger magazine capacity of a 9MM can be a comforting factor. Just never saw a 9MM that really tripped my trigger although the S&W 6906 came close. Twelve plus one up the spout. Could use the 15 round magazines from the S&W 59 IIRC. I even had a Star in .40 cal. for a while. A very short while. I shot it and it was decently accurate, smaller than a 1911 but a lot heavier. I sold it at a slight profit and wished the new owner well.
I usually carry a Colt Combat Commander .45 ACP concealed with an S&W M60 .38 Spl. as a back up. Spare magazines are two Wilson 10 rounders and 2 speed loaders for the .38. Sometimes it's only the .38 which is easier to hide in my vehicle when going to the doctor's office or other medical facility. State law doesn't allow weapons of any kind in doctor's offices or medical facilities. PJ
More often than not with a single spare magazine, often a 24 round Glock factory mag, though in the hottest part of summer I tend to carry the standard capacity 17 round mags more.
In my vehicle I keep some Glock factory 24 round versions.
I carry my own 148 grain +P hard cast flat point that clocks 1,100 FPS out of a G17, and is a very good load for deep penetration. (thats what she said! :D)
JWP475 picked some up from me and shot some into 20% gel (10% is normally the standard for handgun testing).
They did very well, to say the least.
I switched over to these for an all-around load back when the whole country was having issues with people rioting, flipping over cars, dragging innocent people out of cars, etc, all because they felt like it. I figured if I need to defend my family, I want something that will shoot through barriers, car doors, intermediate objects, etc.
Plus due to being in an area with large predators I wanted something that could be a dual purpose load. Something that would serve my needs for the trail/hunting/hiking and home/urban defense.
The punchline is that I have ZERO issue carrying a 9mm with the proper ammo, and do carry one. I carry a 9mm, .40, .45, 44 mag and .45 Colt as well. It simply depends on my needs at that time, and what I feel like carrying.
That said, I would certainly not put down the 9mm, as it has shown that it is extremely effective with the proper projectile, and skilled application.
40 cal ammo is now cheaper then 9mm. The one hold up to our switch over to 9mm was buying the ammo to do it. 9mm was so in demand that we waited 10 months to get our ammo.
Jerry and his wife Kay use to own a small gun shop In Louisiana. Sold them quite a few guns when I worked in the Wholesale Firearms Industry. His wife, Kay, the daughter of famed gunsmith Jim Clark, is a very accomplished Competition Shooter also, as is their daughter. Good folks all.
It might not just be about armor but what about a chest rig with ammo? What about going through their arm to get to vitals? What about barriers between you and them?
I would prefer one of my .45's, but can't keep my britches up while carrying one. SIG 938, S&W 37 - I can "maintain dignity" - to a point. May need to start using suspenders, since the Lord didn't provide me with much butt!