Do you believe her?

Nope, too much estrogen.

Slick and polished politician full of BS.

She is a Marine (oops, Army apologies to the Marines) officer, extremely articulate and "likable".... it would be nice to think she has seen the light, but still....

She's presenting evidence that she's changed her views. I want proof, not evidence

Whaaaa?

What would that take Rider?

Her running for State office ( HI Governor?) and introducing STRONG 2A legislation?

Her running for Senate and doing the same? And voting against any anti legislation?

I didn’t watch it all but she’s a slick talker and with any luck she has seen the light. We will see where she’s at in another decade on that stance. I like the point that she made that during COVID that the authoritarian types got power and refused to relinquish it.

Saying the right things

She is sure lucky she is a broad and conservative men are dog shìt dumb.

Good question, Geno. I dunno and I'm glad she's the one who has to figure that out and not me.

It's not often that the army national guard is confused with the Marine Corps.

I think she should sit on my face while she tries to explain it to me........

With a good set of tits...anything is possible.

If only obviously.

If her snatch was as rough as her face before they trowel on the mud to hide it you would look like they took a belt sander with a 36 grit belt to you.

Well, I wouldn't go that far, but yeah, skin color and texture that uniform is applied with a sprayer of some sort.

We do need all the allies we can get, especially well spoken and charismatic ones. So I'm hoping she'll prove herself to be completely in the 2A corner. But until then, trust her? Not so much.

That Ass.








explains a lot.

Wet finger, hold up to see which way the wind blows, make decision.

Sounds like Abbott.

We’re talking about someone who just four years ago endorsed Biden for President.

Be that as it may, I can relate to her position on guns.She says she grew up regarding Hawaiian gun laws as the norm.

The laws you grew up with become the norms. I grew up in England where even an air rifle was a strange and exotic thing. Never questioned why firearms were largely nonexistent, didn’t conceive of a right to own guns. Teens through college in NY State, bought rifles shotgun as a teenager, don't recall wanting a handgun, most people didn’t have them, I didn’t question that.

So I get that part.

Tulsi Gabbard is bright, motivated and also a political shape-shifter. However she presented a cogent defense of the 2nd in that interview and is someone women could relate to.

Why do I keep seeing the Amazing Whore Rhonna every time I look at Her ..

There ain’t nothing good cum out of Hawaii

That includes The Black Jesus.

She sure has me convinced.

Nah, my two day whiskers would do it.

In other words, Hillary threatened her life.

Given that, no. I still don't trust her.

X2

That is funny and sadly true.

People can change, wasn’t Trump a Democrat?

Yup

Shes a politician. News flash fellas, they lie

Snake, all coiled up and hissin'.

all of them.....do you trust any politician?.....bob

No I dont. Some are better than others, very few that is, but I dont trust any of them. Nor should any of you guys

No kidding.

I think one of the qualifications for a politician is being able to lie with a straight face. I am finding it harder and harder to get amped up about elections anymore....I will vote for repub only always have....but don't like it to much.....bob

Agree with that. I will always vote republican, but I find it hard to get excited. There will never be a time, NEVER, that I pull a lever for a dem!

Not sure - but I think Reagan once was.

I think Rubin is a paid shill for a polished politician looking for a seat in gov't.

Wasn't too long ago when no women were politicians due to "temperament." Things sure have gone to sh-t since then.

She says the right things and looks good doing it. As president, she says she would not "come after our guns." But would she appoint judges who would undermine the Second Amendment? That's the big question I'd have.

She might, but that is mostly our fault. I mean she probably wouldn’t appoint hardcore commies who would do it, but I’d be more worried about “Republicans” who would. The only “moderates” these days are Republicans. Republicans are the only ones who ever break the ideological mold and get “bi-partisan”.

Guys like Roberts, Barrett and others have at times, been real disappointments. The biggest reason for this is that Republicans still buy into this bullschit that Ivy League educations are a prerequisite for high profile judicial appointments. As long as they do that, the “Republicans” we get from places like that are going to way more liberal than your average republican.

That Rasmussen study that came out in the last few months that showed how out of touch the so-called elites were showed that the so-called super elite predominantly went to one of twelve schools and that just six percent of the enrollees at those schools were protestant.

Even the most pro-Trump America First conservatives like Steve Bannon fall into this trap. If you listen to his show he will always talk up Ivy League graduates.

If those schools were ever as elite as we imagined, they aren’t now. They are mostly turning out dumb trust fund baby legacies and minorities. These people are taught that they are better and smarter than everyone else and thoroughly indoctrinated in the latest leftist claptrap. Until we completely reject them as a class and as a whole, we are going to be disappointed and betrayed by those we thought were on our side.

I agree with Birdwatcher, the way you are raised has a big influence on your beliefs and your position on the issues. Sometimes people change their position when presented a different point of view, sometimes not. Hard to know. Like others have said, I question the integrity of our election process and have no faith in the outcome. No telling how long it has been corrupt.

Reagan was indeed a Democrat Politician, Trump was never a politician and held no political offices before becoming President.

Trump may or may not have voted for Democrats in the past, but I’m pretty sure he made financial contributions (Bribes) to Democrat politicians in order to get his building project’s approved, especially in NYC and Chicago.
Does that make him a Democrat like Tulsi, not hardly.

Now that he no longer payed them off, look what they are doing to him in order to get their money.

To those questioning others who changed Party. They didn't do it in the middle of a campaign. If you recall, she was a Candidate. That's like sneaking into the brothers room in the middle of the night.

Joe Lieberman was a Democrat Senator for years, he switch to an (I) late in his career. He claimed the Democrat left him and he could no longer call himself a Democrat.

I believe he still caucused with the Democrats and still voted with Democrats.

Changing to an (I) means nothing if you are still loyal to the Democrat Party.

Some people just like to bitch.

Her face is pock marked.
She used to be a Democrat.
She is from Hawaii.
She isn’t that good looking.
She can’t be trusted.


What a bunch of whiners, I’d vote for her just because of the whining.

She has given up the Democratic Party and she is still a Democrat?

No wonder democrats win more than their fair share, as crooked as they are, they hang together. Republicans only bitch because they can’t find the perfect candidate.

“Trump tweets mean things”
“Trump was a democrat”
“Trump is a womanizer”


Trump should win by a landslide and Gabbard is no longer a democrat, but it still isn’t good enough for republicans and they call everyone else a RINO!

Holy $hit, no wonder America is in trouble, half the country are losers and the other half can’t make a decent decision…

She still does not understand that many of us that just like to go out in the desert, hills or to a range and shoot. Recreational shooting does not seem to register in her mind.

I'm calling snake .....

Recreational shooting is beside the point snd irrelevant.

Lying bitch

Sucker for brunettes apparently.

Funny thing, but my wife (as well as some of our female friends) takes a very anti-woman stance for presidential candidates. In fact, even more so than myself. They're also very derisive of the idea that "if a man can do it a woman can do it, too, if not better."
There's still hope, guys.

We believe truth over facts.

Joe Biden 2020

Haha. Agree.

Makes me wonder though what some conservative women think about her?

I don’t trust her at this point and there are far better options.

I'll believe her when she goes quail hunting with Dick Cheney.

Trump ain’t a brunette…

Maybe Tulsi is returning somewhat to her roots? Seems she "flopped" somewhat earlier in her evolution as a politician.

[quote]“Gabbard” is a loaded name in Hawaii politics, synonymous with steadfast socially conservative views.

State Sen. Mike Gabbard has led the charge against same-sex marriage in the state for two decades. His 30-year-old City Council member daughter, Tulsi, long shared his stances against abortion rights and in favor of a constitutional amendment to restrict marriage to being between one man and one woman.[/quote}

The article addresses her "leftward" turn at that point in time.

https://www.civilbeat.org/2012/01/tulsi-gabbards-leftward-journey/

No doubt happily married, too.

I fell for her patriotic spiel, especially all the talk of God and us all being his children. She laid waste to Kamala in the debates and looked sharp in her bright colors. That was enjoyable. But she is a Hindu, and like them hates Muslims by her stance supporting genocide in Gaza. So much for the love of God n' sheet. Very chummy with Shmuley Botoxic scum ball. Not too different from too many Christians. Equally despicable.

She makes a lot of sense about growing up in a strict environment. Just how much does she revere the second amendment? I do think she has a long way to go to explain her support for leftists, abortion, lgbtqxyz, etc. We have been beset with politicians that are authoritarians and treat us as we're their children. That doesn't fly with me.

It’s kinda funny that she has “seen the light” only after her presidential aspirations were squashed by the DNC back in 2020… she comes across as genuine and honestly believes what she’s saying, but it wouldn’t be the first time I’ve heard a democrat skillfully lie and hide their true intent.

While I don't trust anyone in such a short time frame for a major change of thought she has competed and done well at the Tactical Games, so she does shoot in the desert and for recreation, for whats that worth.


What part of ""shall not be infringed" is confusing to you?

The 2nd Amendment codifies the right "To Keep and Bear Arms".

We have a right to "keep and bear" arms for recreation, hunting, milita use, face shooting tyrants, ect. There is no qualifiction to the arms we can "keep and bear".

Those of you that wish to restrict arms simply because you don't use or own those arms need to get right with the 2nd Amendment. You're just the same as the Fudds wanting to restrict black guns. The other side of the same coin.

I like Tulsi compared to some of the alternatives. As far as "genocide in Gaza"....mostly at the hands of Hamas! I say , level the place!

You have to work at being that stupid. The Jews have leveled the place. Killed 32,000 innocent souls. Hamas has killed enough IDF cowards to send them to their safe spaces.

You are an idiot! People die in war. Hamas et al have falsified numbers, fool! I say wipe Hamas off the earth!

No!

Collective punishment to the point of genocide isn’t war. But what Hamas has accomplished by killing only a few hundred Zionist scum has won them the strategic defeat over a Jews only state. The Jews are stuck with no way out but digging their own grave. A paradox of Biblical proportion.

Or they could buy TikTok and reverse the narrative.

You broadcasting from Rafah?

What amazes me is the lefts belief that you will believe their lies over your own eyes. They are truly insane. They believe what they are told to believe and expect men with IQ’s above room temperature to do the same. Then they get on a forum like this and believe they can convince people who are seeing their way of life destroyed by a cabal of corrupt elite politicians that day is night, and right is wrong. There is no stopping them with logic as they have a deep seated faith that defies reason and reality. They truly are spawn of Satan, the father of lies, and destruction. Like the man said, it’s not that Hitler killed 6 million Jews, it’s that ordinary Germans were convinced that this was the right thing to do.

edited to add- the only thing they have is to spew hate and personal attack's and call you their predesignated names.

You were doing pretty good until you ran out of logic yourself :

"Like the man said, it’s not that Hitler killed 6 million Jews, it’s that ordinary Germans were convinced that this was the right thing to do."

At Eichman's trial Israel didn't allege gas chambers or final solution orders, extermination camps, or such grievously large, even numbers like 6,000,000. Why do you suppose such damning testimony was avoided? Wouldn't discovery and cross examination of those Satanic details prove Nazi depravity so obviously, and beyond question, that no laws across Europe would ever be required forbidding the innocent asking as to Who, When, Where, and How such a fantastical fairy tale could have ever been concocted?

The 1950 World Census shows a substantial increase in Jewish population. Deducting 6 Million from the 1940 number proves Jews were breeding and reproducing faster than anyone in human history. There is no other explanation. Is there?

Anyone who stands behind Hamas gets put on ignore.

What about those who stand for justice? Decry genocide? Call a Spade a Spade? Want America freed from Zionist strangulation?

Exactly!

There's no Zionist strangulation you dense curd. There's just people who hate other people for being successful and create mentally deranged conspiracy theories to try and justify their massive retardation.


The jews just live rent free in your head, huh?

And very blessed to be married to a very special woman.

B.S. You know nothing about which you speak.

“The prosecution case was presented over the course of 56 days, involving hundreds of documents and 112 witnesses (many of them Holocaust survivors). Hausner ignored police recommendations to call only 30 witnesses; only 14 of the witnesses called had seen Eichmann during the war. Hausner's intention was to not only demonstrate Eichmann's guilt but to present material about the entire Holocaust, thus producing a comprehensive record. … In his testimony throughout the trial, Eichmann insisted he had no choice but to follow orders, as he was bound by an oath of loyalty to Hitler – the same superior orders defence used by some defendants in the 1945–1946 Nuremberg trials. Eichmann asserted that the decisions had been made not by him, but by Müller, Heydrich, Himmler, and ultimately Hitler. Servatius also proposed that decisions of the Nazi government were acts of state and therefore not subject to normal judicial proceedings. Regarding the Wannsee Conference, Eichmann stated that he felt a sense of satisfaction and relief at its conclusion. As a clear decision to exterminate had been made by his superiors, the matter was out of his hands; he felt absolved of any guilt. On the last day of the examination, he stated that he was guilty of arranging the transports, but he did not feel guilty for the consequences.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Eichmann

In short, the Israelis did introduce evidence regarding the Holocaust as a whole. And Eichman’s defense was NOT that it did not happen or that he was not involved in it, but, rather, that he was just following orders.

No, they charge exorbitant rent to crap in yours!

My wife takes the same position. In general, women are pretty familiar with the true nature of women thus they have no desire to be lead by them.

My mother (born 1922) always said the president should not be a woman. She believed it was a job for a man.

Well said.