Well...they are communists.
California wants to tax (former) citizens in another state?
Did I get that wrong?
Did I get that wrong?
Destruction leads to a very rough road, but it also breeds creation
And earthquakes are to a girl's guitar, they're just another good vibration
And tidal waves couldn't save the world from Californication
And earthquakes are to a girl's guitar, they're just another good vibration
And tidal waves couldn't save the world from Californication
They simple refuse to admit why some are moving out. So they double down.
You can checkout but never leave?
Guess on my part, but I seriously doubt that will survive a court ruling.
IIRC, Rush fought New York for six years after he had moved the whole operation to Florida. Not defending Calif. in any way, just pointing out that it's a principle of Socialism. California DMV hounded and threatened me for years when I lived in Alaska.
Quote
California…is there something toxic in their water?
Now, there's an idea!
Will not hold up in court. MTG
We checked out and never looked back
DemaRats are worst than cockroaches
DemaRats are worst than cockroaches
They just want their fair share of what they didn’t earn.
Bezos recently moved to Florida.
Might get interesting.
Larry Ellison’ (of Oracle) annual California tax bill was the size of the annual budget of their department of transportation according to Pelosi who visited with Ellison trying to persuade him not to leave California. He moved to Lanai.
Might get interesting.
Might get interesting.
Larry Ellison’ (of Oracle) annual California tax bill was the size of the annual budget of their department of transportation according to Pelosi who visited with Ellison trying to persuade him not to leave California. He moved to Lanai.
Might get interesting.
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
Guess on my part, but I seriously doubt that will survive a court ruling.
^^^^^
Originally Posted by Traveler52
We checked out and never looked back
DemaRats are worst than cockroaches
DemaRats are worst than cockroaches
Good for you, Traveler.
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
Guess on my part, but I seriously doubt that will survive a court ruling.
Originally Posted by MTGunner
Will not hold up in court. MTG
Quote
As we informed you this morning, the State of California (or at least those of our leaders hungry for gun control) suffered a major blow in the case of Nguyen v. Bonta. In an emphatic ruling, Judge William Hayes issued a summary judgment striking down the law barring firearm purchases less than 30 days apart.
The so-called "one-a-month" law represents one of the most blatantly unconstitutional gun laws, which is really saying something in California. Think of any other fundamental right treated in such a manner.
Free speech? Sure, but no more than two tweets a week. Just another example of lawmakers treating the Second Amendment like a second class right.
We can be fairly certain that the state will appeal this ruling and that it will be stayed until that appeal is heard, but it's always good to acknowledge a well-reasoned ruling!
The so-called "one-a-month" law represents one of the most blatantly unconstitutional gun laws, which is really saying something in California. Think of any other fundamental right treated in such a manner.
Free speech? Sure, but no more than two tweets a week. Just another example of lawmakers treating the Second Amendment like a second class right.
We can be fairly certain that the state will appeal this ruling and that it will be stayed until that appeal is heard, but it's always good to acknowledge a well-reasoned ruling!
I never thought they would get away with charging athletes from teams out of state,
How these crazy rules are not overturned by the SCOTUS in the real question. Everyone knows the state of CA is a blood sucking leech, but how can an athlete who plays for the Texas Rangers, have to pay CA state tax on the games he played in CA, when his employer is the Texas Rangers based in Texas?
CA says that the games played in CA and wages paid on those days, are subject to CA state tax.
How these crazy rules are not overturned by the SCOTUS in the real question. Everyone knows the state of CA is a blood sucking leech, but how can an athlete who plays for the Texas Rangers, have to pay CA state tax on the games he played in CA, when his employer is the Texas Rangers based in Texas?
CA says that the games played in CA and wages paid on those days, are subject to CA state tax.
Geez. Only been playing on the radio a bazillion times
You can check out any time you like
But you can never leave
You can check out any time you like
But you can never leave
Originally Posted by Barkoff
I never thought they would get away with charging athletes from teams out of state,
How these crazy rules are not overturned by the SCOTUS in the real question. Everyone knows the state of CA is a blood sucking leech, but how can an athlete who plays for the Texas Rangers, have to pay CA state tax on the games he played in CA, when his employer is the Texas Rangers based in Texas?
How these crazy rules are not overturned by the SCOTUS in the real question. Everyone knows the state of CA is a blood sucking leech, but how can an athlete who plays for the Texas Rangers, have to pay CA state tax on the games he played in CA, when his employer is the Texas Rangers based in Texas?
Fuggers tried to tax my income when I worked 8 months a year in WA and vacationed in Cali in the winter where my wife worked. We managed to get through to the Franchise Tax Board that they were wrong and weren't getting anything from me.
Originally Posted by Valsdad
Originally Posted by Barkoff
I never thought they would get away with charging athletes from teams out of state,
How these crazy rules are not overturned by the SCOTUS in the real question. Everyone knows the state of CA is a blood sucking leech, but how can an athlete who plays for the Texas Rangers, have to pay CA state tax on the games he played in CA, when his employer is the Texas Rangers based in Texas?
How these crazy rules are not overturned by the SCOTUS in the real question. Everyone knows the state of CA is a blood sucking leech, but how can an athlete who plays for the Texas Rangers, have to pay CA state tax on the games he played in CA, when his employer is the Texas Rangers based in Texas?
Fuggers tried to tax my income when I worked 8 months a year in WA and vacationed in Cali in the winter where my wife worked. We managed to get through to the Franchise Tax Board that they were wrong and weren't getting anything from me.
California’s Source Revenue taxation rules are pretty complicated especially for couples filing jointly.
I crossed the commiefornia state line eastbound back to Tennessee in 1980. Last thing I did on the west side of the line was pizz out a 6 pack! Haven't gone back since then, and never intend to!
Originally Posted by Houston_2
Originally Posted by Valsdad
Originally Posted by Barkoff
I never thought they would get away with charging athletes from teams out of state,
How these crazy rules are not overturned by the SCOTUS in the real question. Everyone knows the state of CA is a blood sucking leech, but how can an athlete who plays for the Texas Rangers, have to pay CA state tax on the games he played in CA, when his employer is the Texas Rangers based in Texas?
How these crazy rules are not overturned by the SCOTUS in the real question. Everyone knows the state of CA is a blood sucking leech, but how can an athlete who plays for the Texas Rangers, have to pay CA state tax on the games he played in CA, when his employer is the Texas Rangers based in Texas?
Fuggers tried to tax my income when I worked 8 months a year in WA and vacationed in Cali in the winter where my wife worked. We managed to get through to the Franchise Tax Board that they were wrong and weren't getting anything from me.
California’s Source Revenue taxation rules are pretty complicated especially for couples filing jointly.
Idaho taxes me 6% on money I spend in other states and makes those businesses in other states collect it for them and send it too them.
As a serf of the state they are entitled to 6 % of everything I spend anywhere and another nearly 8% of everything I make.
Bb
As a serf of the state they are entitled to 6 % of everything I spend anywhere and another nearly 8% of everything I make.
Bb
Originally Posted by Barkoff
I never thought they would get away with charging athletes from teams out of state,
How these crazy rules are not overturned by the SCOTUS in the real question. Everyone knows the state of CA is a blood sucking leech, but how can an athlete who plays for the Texas Rangers, have to pay CA state tax on the games he played in CA, when his employer is the Texas Rangers based in Texas?
CA says that the games played in CA and wages paid on those days, are subject to CA state tax.
How these crazy rules are not overturned by the SCOTUS in the real question. Everyone knows the state of CA is a blood sucking leech, but how can an athlete who plays for the Texas Rangers, have to pay CA state tax on the games he played in CA, when his employer is the Texas Rangers based in Texas?
CA says that the games played in CA and wages paid on those days, are subject to CA state tax.
Just think about those college athletes being paid lots of money and the surprise they have coming when they play in California.
Originally Posted by Hotrod_Lincoln
I crossed the commiefornia state line eastbound back to Tennessee in 1980. Last thing I did on the west side of the line was pizz out a 6 pack! Haven't gone back since then, and never intend to!
You the man. I once pissed in the Cumberland.
Originally Posted by ironbender
You can checkout but never leave?
Good one! Trying to leave the Hotel California.
Well,,,,, if reparations ever happen in California just think all those who move there and become wealthy black people wont be moving back so im all for it
and just like how the income tax of 1913 was only supposed to tax the rich ..sooner or later California will trickle this tax down to the common working class folk , and middle class .Making everyone pay for 10 years after they leave cammiefornia .socialist always it this way ,start at the top and work it down to the more numerous people.Because that way the govt gets way more money
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
Guess on my part, but I seriously doubt that will survive a court ruling.
FWIW, they are also trying to pass legislation that your cost for utilities will be based on your income.
Yeah...pass me a fughking joint.
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
FWIW, they are also trying to pass legislation that your cost for utilities will be based on your income.
Originally Posted by rem shooter
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
FWIW, they are also trying to pass legislation that your cost for utilities will be based on your income.
It’s not about working class, or even the poor… it’s about MONEY… (what they consider their money) they also passed a bill for raising “fast food” workers wages… the caveat being a long list of corporations that have carved out “exemptions”… and now that it’s been exposed that one of the exemptions is a childhood friend and former schoolmate of Gavin himself, they’re claiming that everybody who was involved in negotiations for these exemptions, signed a non disclosure document, which legally prohibits them from talking about it… does anybody want to discuss the “bullet train”? 😂