Home
Do you agree it's ok that Trump whacked Soleimani? Dont need to answer if you agree with your buds on the left that it would not be ok to take out Soleimani who killed 600 Americans.

What about Obama hitting OBL? Dont need to answer if you think it was OK for Obama to invade Pakistan and kill OBL.

Dont go confusing them.
I hear the democrats are suing Iran for the right to use the "Death to America" chant.
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Do you agree it's ok that Trump whacked Soleimani? Dont need to answer if you agree with your buds on the left that it would not be ok to take out Soleimani who killed 600 Americans.

What about Obama hitting OBL? Dont need to answer if you think it was OK for Obama to invade Pakistan and kill OBL.



Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani. Would have been far better to do it anonymously instead of the full frontal challenge Iraq to retaliate as they are doing and will continue to do. .

Taking out OBL proved to be the right move, obviously. Even you would admit that.
Quote
Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani



Always better to let them land the first blow huh leroy grin grin

Why do liberals hate America and Americans?
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Quote
Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani



Always better to let them land the first blow huh leroy grin grin

Why do liberals hate America and Americans?


Because they hate themselves!
Trump hasn't whacked any American citizens without due process yet, even the ones who have renounced their citizenship and are actively aiding and abetting the terrorists. Any comments on that from the commies on the site?
Jerry
Originally Posted by watch4bear
I hear the democrats are suing Iran for the right to use the "Death to America" chant.

My side hurts.Damn that was good.
Quote
Because they hate themselves!



There is no honor in being a liberal; that's for damn sure.
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Do you agree it's ok that Trump whacked Soleimani? Dont need to answer if you agree with your buds on the left that it would not be ok to take out Soleimani who killed 600 Americans.

What about Obama hitting OBL? Dont need to answer if you think it was OK for Obama to invade Pakistan and kill OBL.



Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani. Would have been far better to do it anonymously instead of the full frontal challenge Iraq to retaliate as they are doing and will continue to do. .

Taking out OBL proved to be the right move, obviously. Even you would admit that.


Yes, but what is confusing is how you can support an obviously illegal invasion of a sovereign country to do so, and how you can support the obviously two faced dimocraps who wish to bring up the question of whether Trumps move was an illegal incursion when they werent so concerned about Zero and OBL.

It's also disconcerting that you consider it a good move by Obama but say the jury is out on Trumps action. OBL killed over 3000 Americans and Soleimani has killed over 600 Americans and maybe over 1000.

Has Soleimani not yet killed enough to get your endorsement? If that's the case, how many more do you think we should have let him kill before you would give your blessing.

Does the jury being out depend on the repercussions from Iran to deem it justified or not?

Have you no concerns about your buds being so low life as to be raising cain to denigrate Trump but obviously gave Obama a free pass.
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Do you agree it's ok that Trump whacked Soleimani? Dont need to answer if you agree with your buds on the left that it would not be ok to take out Soleimani who killed 600 Americans.

What about Obama hitting OBL? Dont need to answer if you think it was OK for Obama to invade Pakistan and kill OBL.



Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani. Would have been far better to do it anonymously instead of the full frontal challenge Iraq to retaliate as they are doing and will continue to do. .

Taking out OBL proved to be the right move, obviously. Even you would admit that.


Yes, but what is confusing is how you can support an obviously illegal invasion of a sovereign country to do so, and how you can support the obviously two faced dimocraps who wish to bring up the question of whether Trumps move was an illegal incursion when they werent so concerned about Zero and OBL.

It's also disconcerting that you consider it a good move by Obama but say the jury is out on Trumps action. OBL killed over 3000 Americans and Soleimani has killed over 600 Americans and maybe over 1000.

Has Soleimani not yet killed enough to get your endorsement? If that's the case, how many more do you think we should have let him kill before you would give your blessing.

Does the jury being out depend on the repercussions from Iran to deem it justified or not?

Have you no concerns about your buds being so low life as to be raising cain to denigrate Trump but obviously gave Obama a free pass.



It is quite concerting that you are so disconcerted.

Good ideas, executed stupidly are still stupid. I realize that is disconcerting to you and WAY over your pay grade and IQ, but live with it. You will be okay in your mother's padded basement.
So Obama sponsored 2800 sorties in Syria and Iraq where we had no declared war and without notifying Congress or getting permission made over 500 drone strikes killing folks, some Americans, without legal clearance and no war declared.

A bit of a double standard only chickenschiett dimocraps could condone it seems to me.
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Quote
Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani



Always better to let them land the first blow huh leroy grin grin

Why do liberals hate America and Americans?

brain-dead idiots like a LeRoy don't know what to think on their own until the big crony demos tell him what to think
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Do you agree it's ok that Trump whacked Soleimani? Dont need to answer if you agree with your buds on the left that it would not be ok to take out Soleimani who killed 600 Americans.

What about Obama hitting OBL? Dont need to answer if you think it was OK for Obama to invade Pakistan and kill OBL.



Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani. Would have been far better to do it anonymously instead of the full frontal challenge Iraq to retaliate as they are doing and will continue to do. .

Taking out OBL proved to be the right move, obviously. Even you would admit that.


Yes, but what is confusing is how you can support an obviously illegal invasion of a sovereign country to do so, and how you can support the obviously two faced dimocraps who wish to bring up the question of whether Trumps move was an illegal incursion when they werent so concerned about Zero and OBL.

It's also disconcerting that you consider it a good move by Obama but say the jury is out on Trumps action. OBL killed over 3000 Americans and Soleimani has killed over 600 Americans and maybe over 1000.

Has Soleimani not yet killed enough to get your endorsement? If that's the case, how many more do you think we should have let him kill before you would give your blessing.

Does the jury being out depend on the repercussions from Iran to deem it justified or not?

Have you no concerns about your buds being so low life as to be raising cain to denigrate Trump but obviously gave Obama a free pass.



It is quite concerting that you are so disconcerted.

Good ideas, executed stupidly are still stupid. I realize that is disconcerting to you and WAY over your pay grade and IQ, but live with it. You will be okay in your mother's padded basement.


Well, now isn't that an intellectual explanation. Sounds like you havent the mental capability to justify your duplicitous positions.

Ha, "well we just want to be that way and if you arent smart enough to understand it then lump it", huh?

Hahaha. So obviously you dont subscribe to the saying that what's good for the goose is good for the gender?

Oh, I obviously forgot, Obama is your perfect God and his acts require no explanation or justification.

Kind of like Hillary saying "We came, we saw, we conquered" referring to taking the TOP LEADER of a sovereign country out and turning Lybia over to the moslem caliphate. Humm, I would think that would be illegal except of course for the lack of concern shown by dimocraps.

I hope you arent stupid enough to think the average fire guy considers your BS reply as a suitable justification of the dimocraps actions.
Damn near was a few years ago, a large heavy haul semi, wide long load was headed up to Rushmore during Sturgis bike week, had the whole damn road blocked, all lanes of some on the curves, they thought the bikers were about to start shooting people, don't know what they ever did with that big lump of coal they were going to chisel on for obongo on the mountain.
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Do you agree it's ok that Trump whacked Soleimani? Dont need to answer if you agree with your buds on the left that it would not be ok to take out Soleimani who killed 600 Americans.

What about Obama hitting OBL? Dont need to answer if you think it was OK for Obama to invade Pakistan and kill OBL.



Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani. Would have been far better to do it anonymously instead of the full frontal challenge Iraq to retaliate as they are doing and will continue to do. .

Taking out OBL proved to be the right move, obviously. Even you would admit that.


Yes, but what is confusing is how you can support an obviously illegal invasion of a sovereign country to do so, and how you can support the obviously two faced dimocraps who wish to bring up the question of whether Trumps move was an illegal incursion when they werent so concerned about Zero and OBL.

It's also disconcerting that you consider it a good move by Obama but say the jury is out on Trumps action. OBL killed over 3000 Americans and Soleimani has killed over 600 Americans and maybe over 1000.

Has Soleimani not yet killed enough to get your endorsement? If that's the case, how many more do you think we should have let him kill before you would give your blessing.

Does the jury being out depend on the repercussions from Iran to deem it justified or not?

Have you no concerns about your buds being so low life as to be raising cain to denigrate Trump but obviously gave Obama a free pass.



It is quite concerting that you are so disconcerted.

Good ideas, executed stupidly are still stupid. I realize that is disconcerting to you and WAY over your pay grade and IQ, but live with it. You will be okay in your mother's padded basement.


Well, now isn't that an intellectual explanation. Sounds like you havent the mental capability to justify your duplicitous positions.

Ha, well we just want to be that way and if you arent smart enough to understand it then lump it, huh?

Hahaha. So obviously you dont subscribe to the saying that what's good for the goose is good for the gender?

Oh, I obviously forgot, Obama is your perfect God and his acts require no explanation or justification.

Kind of like Hillary saying "We came, we saw, we conquered" referring to taking the TOP LEADER of a sovereign country out and turning Lybia over to the moslem caliphate.

I hope you arent stupid enough to think the average fire guy considers your BS reply as a suitable justification of the dimocraps actions.



You can keep inventing and making false attributions, but they are what they are, inventions and false attributions. You cannot help yourself. No news there.
If the "jury" that's still out is democrat it's "Must.. get.. Trump....gasp...sob...".
You might check snopes on the number of drone attacks Obama Obama ordered and the number of sorties he directed in Iraq and Syria.

So, since you havent had the decency to respond to the question of what the jury being still out on Trumps action I have to assume you are worried, as your chicken buds obviously are, about the possible retaliation by Iran.

IOW, our policy of dealing with terrorist states should be directed not by them killing us, but by whether we may pay for extracting justice, which means our justice for terroristic acts must be affected by blackmail.

Well, now that should lead to an admiral foreign policy.
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Quote
Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani



Always better to let them land the first blow huh leroy grin grin

Why do liberals hate America and Americans?


Because they hate themselves!

Yeah, really? I hate 'em, too! Now we have something in common to talk about.
Originally Posted by jaguartx
You might check snopes on the number of drone attacks Obama Obama ordered and the number of sorties he directed in Iraq and Syria.

So, since you havent had the decency to respond to the question of what the jury being still out on Trumps action I have to assume you are worried, as your chicken buds obviously are, about the possible retaliation by Iran.

IOW, our policy of dealing with terrorist states should be directed not by them killing us, but by whether we may pay for extracting justice, which means our justice for terroristic acts must be affected by blackmail.

Well, now that should lead to an admiral foreign policy.


aw, jag, I don't worry. Not ever. It is what it is. So your assumption (as usual) is wrong.

You pour bastard. You live your day banging away at your keyboard in fury and contempt. A sorry bastard you are. Here you are, midafternoon in your part of the world. You have about 22 posts in the book, 24 posts being your average. You feel great need to up your game, of course, so with a few more hours of banging you should bump your average up a bit. That will be a good day for you. Keep at it, I'm glad to help when I have the time.
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans


Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani. Would have been far better to do it anonymously instead of the full frontal challenge Iraq to retaliate as they are doing and will continue to do. .

Taking out OBL proved to be the right move, obviously. Even you would admit that.


We are the only ones with that capability in theater, so "anonymous" would have been about the same as a lie and that is the purview of democrats
If we use YOUR method of effectiveness criteria you used for the Salami roll (sic) "get back to me after the next American is killed as a result", then the OBL kill was a disaster. We lost practically the whole of SEAL Team Six as a result. But be that as it may, I said it was a good kill, but I won't wait until you wait for the "vote count" on Soleimani, which BTW, he was killed for what he already did (17% of our KIA/WIA were attributed to him), so I'll go out on a limb and say, yeah it was a good kill. Too bad it was instantaneous though, a little suffering would have been nice...
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Do you agree it's ok that Trump whacked Soleimani? Dont need to answer if you agree with your buds on the left that it would not be ok to take out Soleimani who killed 600 Americans.

What about Obama hitting OBL? Dont need to answer if you think it was OK for Obama to invade Pakistan and kill OBL.



Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani. Would have been far better to do it anonymously instead of the full frontal challenge Iraq to retaliate as they are doing and will continue to do. .

Taking out OBL proved to be the right move, obviously. Even you would admit that.



Dude, you need to stay awake in class for a few lessons.

Iran.....
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Do you agree it's ok that Trump whacked Soleimani? Dont need to answer if you agree with your buds on the left that it would not be ok to take out Soleimani who killed 600 Americans.

What about Obama hitting OBL? Dont need to answer if you think it was OK for Obama to invade Pakistan and kill OBL.



Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani. Would have been far better to do it anonymously instead of the full frontal challenge Iraq to retaliate as they are doing and will continue to do. .

Taking out OBL proved to be the right move, obviously. Even you would admit that.

I'm not totaly convinced that it was Osama bin laden they wacked.
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Do you agree it's ok that Trump whacked Soleimani? Dont need to answer if you agree with your buds on the left that it would not be ok to take out Soleimani who killed 600 Americans.

What about Obama hitting OBL? Dont need to answer if you think it was OK for Obama to invade Pakistan and kill OBL.



Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani. Would have been far better to do it anonymously instead of the full frontal challenge Iraq to retaliate as they are doing and will continue to do. .

Taking out OBL proved to be the right move, obviously. Even you would admit that.



Dude, you need to stay awake in class for a few lessons.

Iran.....



Iraq is Iran's unruly stepchild, who thinks it's ok to party with the Americans now and then, and stuff like that.
Originally Posted by montanabadger
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Do you agree it's ok that Trump whacked Soleimani? Dont need to answer if you agree with your buds on the left that it would not be ok to take out Soleimani who killed 600 Americans.

What about Obama hitting OBL? Dont need to answer if you think it was OK for Obama to invade Pakistan and kill OBL.



Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani. Would have been far better to do it anonymously instead of the full frontal challenge Iraq to retaliate as they are doing and will continue to do. .

Taking out OBL proved to be the right move, obviously. Even you would admit that.

I'm not totaly convinced that it was Osama bin laden they wacked.


This too. Zero sure didnt want any independent DNA analysis done. There were several fairly credible reports he died from diabetes quite some time before.
It was a righteous kill. If we wanted to make it more personal, we could have gone in like the Israelis and sent a kill team to his hotel and let the maid find the body in the morning.
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by jaguartx
You might check snopes on the number of drone attacks Obama Obama ordered and the number of sorties he directed in Iraq and Syria.

So, since you havent had the decency to respond to the question of what the jury being still out on Trumps action I have to assume you are worried, as your chicken buds obviously are, about the possible retaliation by Iran.

IOW, our policy of dealing with terrorist states should be directed not by them killing us, but by whether we may pay for extracting justice, which means our justice for terroristic acts must be affected by blackmail.

Well, now that should lead to an admiral foreign policy.


aw, jag, I don't worry. Not ever. It is what it is. So your assumption (as usual) is wrong.

You pour bastard. You live your day banging away at your keyboard in fury and contempt. A sorry bastard you are. Here you are, midafternoon in your part of the world. You have about 22 posts in the book, 24 posts being your average. You feel great need to up your game, of course, so with a few more hours of banging you should bump your average up a bit. That will be a good day for you. Keep at it, I'm glad to help when I have the time.




Do you know what a "pour" bastard is, you "poor" bastard? Please explain.

Anwar al Awalaki-- American citizen killed by Obama drone attack, iirc, 2011, without his constitutionally guaranteed right to defend himself in the US legal system. Hummm. Yeah, I guess to some of you who know the Bible well your God is Obama. It figures, Hezbolla means party of God.
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Quote
Because they hate themselves!



There is no honor in being a liberal; that's for damn sure.



Maybe that's why liberals are so honor-less..........Makes sense.
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Do you agree it's ok that Trump whacked Soleimani? Dont need to answer if you agree with your buds on the left that it would not be ok to take out Soleimani who killed 600 Americans.

What about Obama hitting OBL? Dont need to answer if you think it was OK for Obama to invade Pakistan and kill OBL.



Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani. Would have been far better to do it anonymously instead of the full frontal challenge Iraq to retaliate as they are doing and will continue to do. .



Really? Iraq is retaliating? I must have missed it. Either that, or "they all look alike."

Dang, I see MM beat me to it.
Originally Posted by smokepole

Really? Iraq is retaliating? I must have missed it. Either that, or "they all look alike."

Dang, I see MM beat me to it.


Here you go, but it wasn't the first strike. Just the most blatant one.
https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbt...tacks-us-bases-in-iraq-here-we-go#UNREAD
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Quote
Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani



Always better to let them land the first blow huh leroy grin grin

Why do liberals hate America and Americans?



Well, technically speaking, they've already landed several "first blows" that spineless past presidents have failed to respond to. Quds functions similar to our SF in that they go into countries and raise and train indigenous armies and turn them loose to undermine govts they want to replace. They've been at it since 1980.

Only dishonest pieces of schitt like LaRoy and the usual leftist suspects would say that the jury is still out. There's some folks that need killin' with plenty left on the list to cross off.
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by smokepole

Really? Iraq is retaliating? I must have missed it. Either that, or "they all look alike."

Dang, I see MM beat me to it.


Here you go, but it wasn't the first strike. Just the most blatant one.
https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbt...tacks-us-bases-in-iraq-here-we-go#UNREAD


Leroy, put down the bong. Go back through this when your mind is clear.
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by smokepole

Really? Iraq is retaliating? I must have missed it. Either that, or "they all look alike."

Dang, I see MM beat me to it.


Here you go, but it wasn't the first strike. Just the most blatant one.
https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbt...tacks-us-bases-in-iraq-here-we-go#UNREAD



Are you Iranian?


I only ask because it seems you have a lot of misses as well........
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Do you agree it's ok that Trump whacked Soleimani? Dont need to answer if you agree with your buds on the left that it would not be ok to take out Soleimani who killed 600 Americans.


It's not okay, we aren't at war with Iran, the Iraqi government didn't approve a strike, especially one at their international airport, and it was not a tactically sound decision and did not make Americans any safer. The idea of Suleimani plotting an "imminent" attack is extremely questionable as there's no evidence of such yet apart from... Trump's Tweet. Whether Suleimani "deserved" to be blown up is not the point.
He was responsible for 17% of our dead soldiers in the sandbox. Injured and maimed another 1600. I’m glad they located him and turned him into a puddle of goo. His death absolutely made Americans safer. If you don’t believe that, you’re either blinded by your hate for the bad orange man or you’re stupid.
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by smokepole

Really? Iraq is retaliating? I must have missed it. Either that, or "they all look alike."

Dang, I see MM beat me to it.


Here you go, but it wasn't the first strike. Just the most blatant one.
https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbt...tacks-us-bases-in-iraq-here-we-go#UNREAD


Leroy, put down the bong. Go back through this when your mind is clear.


Ya' reckon Leroy is dyslexic? Come to think of it, Iran....Iraq, they do all look alike.
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Do you agree it's ok that Trump whacked Soleimani? Dont need to answer if you agree with your buds on the left that it would not be ok to take out Soleimani who killed 600 Americans.

What about Obama hitting OBL? Dont need to answer if you think it was OK for Obama to invade Pakistan and kill OBL.



Jury is still out on hitting Soleimani. Would have been far better to do it anonymously instead of the full frontal challenge Iraq to retaliate as they are doing and will continue to do. .

Taking out OBL proved to be the right move, obviously. Even you would admit that.



Obama took out Bin Laden because he didn't have a choice.
Originally Posted by Goosey
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Do you agree it's ok that Trump whacked Soleimani? Dont need to answer if you agree with your buds on the left that it would not be ok to take out Soleimani who killed 600 Americans.


It's not okay, we aren't at war with Iran, the Iraqi government didn't approve a strike, especially one at their international airport, and it was not a tactically sound decision and did not make Americans any safer. The idea of Suleimani plotting an "imminent" attack is extremely questionable as there's no evidence of such yet apart from... Trump's Tweet. Whether Suleimani "deserved" to be blown up is not the point.



Golly Geez. Didn't know you were party to US, Israeli, British OPSEC level intelligence and ops planning. Good to know, though.
Originally Posted by hunter4623
He was responsible for 17% of our dead soldiers in the sandbox. Injured and maimed another 1600. I’m glad they located him and turned him into a puddle of goo. His death absolutely made Americans safer. If you don’t believe that, you’re either blinded by your hate for the bad orange man or you’re stupid.


Plus failed night club bombings in the US, terrorists attacks in other countries in restaurants and nightclubs, ....Istanbul 35+ dead, Kiss fire in Brazil got 230 or so, Pulse Night Club massacre in Orlando by ISIS affiliated sympathizers, ......

What is interesting is that our fire liebs cant connect the dots that many of the groups who financed ISIS were the same groups contributing to the Cointon Foundation. Many groups were from Qatar and Saudi Arabia. That was before Trump instituted leadership change in SA and flipped it from the dark side, much to Nancy and the left's chagrin. That's why they raised such a stink over the false flag killing of their old bud and international arms dealer, Koshoge, who they called a journalist.

I wonder how much of the $5 billion Zero gave Qatar to take the GITMO terrorists back contributed to ISIS.

Its apparent goosy, la Roy and Sickermore dont wonder about it.

I guess Sickermore is still trying to figure out if killing Soleimani, the killer of many of Sickermores servicemen buds, was a good or a bad thing.

Sounds like the Ukrane airliner shot down had 83 Iranians on board. Sarah Carter said Soleimanis untimely death had stricken terror in many other Iranian terrorists and they were trying to get out of Iran and hidden asap, along with others Iranians not wanting to die in WW3.

It's also strange Iran has been hit with several earthquakes scattered at various locations of the peaceful country as of late with many occurring near Iranian industrial sites. whistle
One recent one was 4.9.

It's rather strange
Originally Posted by tdbob
It was a righteous kill. If we wanted to make it more personal, we could have gone in like the Israelis and sent a kill team to his hotel and let the maid find the body in the morning.


Hahaha. For sure. That way the left could have blamed SA and put the squeeze on Trump to denounce our new allies in the region.
I guess Sickermore would prefer turning his back on US Servicemen than to turn against Piglosi and his other leftest commie friends. Sad.

I figured that would be the case with Gayghost.

SAC is another story. Hes too stupid to understand the question and froze in place like a quail hiding from a hawk.

Hey, Northmam, why not let us know how you stand on this, unless you're too ashamed, of course?
© 24hourcampfire