Idaho allows any centerfire for any big game animal. That's just saying its legal, not that it's smart.
These threads about how small of a caliber you can use always tell only half of it. They leave out the part about "I got an elk with my 22 Hornet and I only wounded 2 before 1 went down."
I'm not sure why anyone would shoot a .224 bullet at such large game but if you're intent on doing it I'd suggest a 22-243 (or similar) with an 80-90gr bullet. A heavy mono would likely exit IMO. Hammer bullets has an 83gr expanding mono that would certainly be a good choice for maximizing terminal performance in a .224 cartridge.
Yes it can be made to work, and relatively easily if you can shoot. But even for me-the stunt shooter- Id really prefer something else. Ive done it...twice...but both animals were previously wounded, the .223 is what I had in my hands at the time ( not hunting elk) and when you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with. And it IS legal in a few places, but still not recommended . My pard kiled a 5 point bull with a well placed shot from his .223 one evening after surgery when he was told not to shoot a recoiling heavy rifle. It worked just fine, but.......
Idaho allows any centerfire for any big game animal. That's just saying its legal, not that it's smart.
These threads about how small of a caliber you can use always tell only half of it. They leave out the part about "I got an elk with my 22 Hornet and I only wounded 2 before 1 went down."
Yes! My question about such threads is WHY! Yeah It'll kill it, IF everything goes right. But what's always left out here is what if? What if you hit just a little off of aim and hit a big thick bone? ? Wouldn't it be better to use a bigger, heavier, higher sectional density bullet that will better drill through that unplanned for bone? Instead of hitting that bone and have that bullet come apart on that bone and create a big nasty surface wound that won't cause immediate death and allow that animal to linger for a few days in pain before dying and not be found in time before spoiling the meat?
Idaho allows any centerfire for any big game animal. That's just saying its legal, not that it's smart.
These threads about how small of a caliber you can use always tell only half of it. They leave out the part about "I got an elk with my 22 Hornet and I only wounded 2 before 1 went down."
Yes! My question about such threads is WHY! Yeah It'll kill it, IF everything goes right. But what's alwsays left out here is what if? What if you hit just a little off of aim and hit a big thick bone? ? Wouldn't it be better to use a bigger, heavier, higher sectional density bullet that will better drill through that unplanned for bone? Instead of hitting that boane and have that bullet come apart on that bone and create a big nasty surface would that won't cause immediate death and allow that animal to linger for a few deays in pain before dying and not be found in time before spoiling the meat?
I posed that question to a local game warden here because of the ethics involved ( its legal in MT) and the bottom line was F&G doesn't care. They are only interested in the tag revenue.
Idaho allows any centerfire for any big game animal. That's just saying its legal, not that it's smart.
These threads about how small of a caliber you can use always tell only half of it. They leave out the part about "I got an elk with my 22 Hornet and I only wounded 2 before 1 went down."
Yes! My question about such threads is WHY! Yeah It'll kill it, IF everything goes right. But what's alwsays left out here is what if? What if you hit just a little off of aim and hit a big thick bone? ? Wouldn't it be better to use a bigger, heavier, higher sectional density bullet that will better drill through that unplanned for bone? Instead of hitting that boane and have that bullet come apart on that bone and create a big nasty surface would that won't cause immediate death and allow that animal to linger for a few deays in pain before dying and not be found in time before spoiling the meat?
This thread was started 100% tongue in cheek for entertainment, but I must say I have seen that same nasty surface wound happen with more accepted rounds/bullets. The animals died despite the rodeo and tracking job so hey......all is well because I used a more accepted caliber right? I suspect this thread will get entertaining, like the others. I am excited!
For disclosure, the smallest round I have used on elk was a 6mm Rem with 100 speer BTSP. It wasn't a big elk but it worked perfectly fine.
Idaho allows any centerfire for any big game animal. That's just saying its legal, not that it's smart.
These threads about how small of a caliber you can use always tell only half of it. They leave out the part about "I got an elk with my 22 Hornet and I only wounded 2 before 1 went down."
Yes! My question about such threads is WHY! Yeah It'll kill it, IF everything goes right. But what's alwsays left out here is what if? What if you hit just a little off of aim and hit a big thick bone? ? Wouldn't it be better to use a bigger, heavier, higher sectional density bullet that will better drill through that unplanned for bone? Instead of hitting that boane and have that bullet come apart on that bone and create a big nasty surface would that won't cause immediate death and allow that animal to linger for a few deays in pain before dying and not be found in time before spoiling the meat?
I posed that question to a local game warden here because of the ethics involved ( its legal in MT) and the bottom line was F&G doesn't care. They are only interested in the tag revenue.
Maybe so. Montana's allowance of it also made it legal for you to finish off those two incidental cripples that you mentioned I guess. Otherwise you would have had to let them continue to be a cripple due to having your .223 instead of something bigger. That is one way to look at it.
Years ago, my sister-in-law shot a mid sized bull with her 257 Roberts straight into the chest from about 200 yards. We chased this elk for about 3/4 of a mile and she shot it again. The bull took off again but lay down after a run of about 200 yards. She finished it off in its bed. We all agreed that her 257 was not enough gun for the job. My brother traded it off for a 7mm-08 and since then two elk have been taken with much better performance.
I'm sure that this episode should convince anyone reading this that elk are tough animals and deserve to be taken with minimal suffering. If a hunter can pass on long shots and shoot accurately, elk can be taken with common "deer cartridges." But going after elk with a .224 rifle is more of a stunt than anything else.
The smallest I've ever used for elk was a 270 with 150 gr bullets. I shot a lot of elk with it and none went over 50 yds. I pick my shots, use a rest, and have never shot at a running animal.
Have been in on seven elk kills with a 223, firing the 75 grain Amax at 2750 fps. Yardages were from 30 to 450ish yards. No drama, just dead elk. A good bullet placed into the breathy/bleedy region garners good results.
Not my first choice, but if I bumble into an elk I want to shoot with my swift and its an easy shot I don't think I'd hesitate.
One truth for me; If someone challenged me to hit various targets(say the size of a kill zone) from different positions I would absolutely shoot better with a .224 than a magnum of some variety. Elk are really tough animals but above and beyond anything else, take what you can hit them with.
Archers kill them with thin sticks and small sharp, light blades so yes, a good 223 bullet will do it, but I for one don't want to do it even to prove it can be done.
In the Slaughter house I worked at when I was a kid they killed cattle with a 22LR sometimes. Big bulls can be as large as American Bison but I can't be convinced that a 22 LR is a good choice for buffalo hunters.
Townson Whelen (and a few others) have killed elephants with 22 LRs and the elephants died, but that is not the point. Yes it can be used to kill an elephant and No, you probably should not do it.
If some some unforeseen reason I felt a need to use a 223 for an elk I would use a 70 grain Barnes TSX just because it's the heaviest expanding bullet I know of that won't break up. And if I shot like I was hunting with a bow and arrow I am sure I can kill a elk with it.
I just don't think I'd find a logical reason to want to use such a small rifle. I don't feel any need to prove it, considering that elephants have been killed with 22LRs. It seems to border on foolish to do it if I have rifles that shoots heavier and larger bullets. And I do..
You may do it and may harvest the elk, but no one who has any ability to reason is going to be impressed. Such a thing is done only by someone trying to impress himself and thinking that becasue he did so others will be impressed.
A rancher I know killed a few with his old .222... Shot them in Aug.. or early Sept. in his fields .. grazing like cattle.. Ear shot.. In season he use a .264..
I am with the group that says why... Why would you even want too.. There are several photos of elk shot with .22's on the site, but I think most were targets of opportunity.. Season was open, elk were there, conditions were right.. Despite the one shot in the boiler room boys, there are numerous posts on here of well hit animals that were hit, in the boiler room, but not found till later.. Conditions were such the animal was lost but recovered later... Some were in good shape some spoiled.. To me animals are to important to shoot with small calibers marginal for the job at best... We are not starving, this is a sport, they should be treated with respect and killed as quickly and cleanly as we can...
OK, one more little argument. Say I've got two cars, a Volkswagen that handles curvers better than most any car and a full house Vette with a 550 HP LS -3 Engine which also handles curves well.. Theres a race schedulede for Saturday so I want to prove the Volkswagen is capable so which car do I race with? Maybe I could do it with the VW but why when I have a 550HP Vette?
Or, you have a 5,000# travel trailer that you pull all the time and a 12,000# trailer you pull maybe once a year.
Do you drive a 1 ton dually daily for that maybe once a year, or drive a SW 3/4 ton which covers you %99.5 of the time?
Originally Posted by Filaman
OK, one more little argument. Say I've got two cars, a Volkswagen that handles curvers better than most any car and a full house Vette with a 550 HP LS -3 Engine which also handles curves well.. Theres a race schedulede for Saturday so I want to prove the Volkswagen is capable so which car do I race with? Maybe I could do it with the VW but why when I have a 550HP Vette?
If nothing else, under sporting conditions, I would say it would be a stunt and unethical to hunt such animals in such a manner. As sportsmen, we owe the game swift dispatch and I believe a round which can dependably deliver an appropriate bullet to and through the vitals from any reasonable angle is what is called for in this situation. Assuming one can shoot I generally prefer more gun than less. I have come to prefer the 9.3x62 for this reason as a general purpose round. It never disappoints.
I have a friend who's dad simply uses a .177 Crossman 760 but he does pump it 22 times for Elk been hunting elk that way for 52 years says that the 2 extra pumps does the trick...
Thanks for showing back up again, and mentioning some reality. But as you've noticed over the years, not many here are interested in reality.
Originally Posted by gssixgun
Yeah
I have a friend who's dad simply uses a .177 Crossman 760 but he does pump it 22 times for Elk been hunting elk that way for 52 years says that the 2 extra pumps does the trick...
Did you ever see one 'wake up' when taking too much time to cut throat and bleed out?
Originally Posted by szihn
In the Slaughter house I worked at when I was a kid they killed cattle with a 22LR sometimes. Big bulls can be as large as American Bison but I can't be convinced that a 22 LR is a good choice for buffalo hunters.
I have a friend who's dad simply uses a .177 Crossman 760 but he does pump it 22 times for Elk been hunting elk that way for 52 years says that the 2 extra pumps does the trick...
I have a friend who's dad simply uses a .177 Crossman 760 but he does pump it 22 times for Elk been hunting elk that way for 52 years says that the 2 extra pumps does the trick...
These threads about how small of a caliber you can use always tell only half of it. They leave out the part about "I got an elk with my 22 Hornet and I only wounded 2 before 1 went down."
Have been in on seven elk kills with a 223, firing the 75 grain Amax at 2750 fps. Yardages were from 30 to 450ish yards. No drama, just dead elk. A good bullet placed into the breathy/bleedy region garners good results.
Why would you limit yourself and possibly wound an elk. Considering all the time and effort required, use a better caliber. We have an obligation to honor the elk with a quick clean kill and should do everything we can to obtain this. When I was outfitting in Northern Idaho .270 was the smallest we allowed. Thick dense country and hard to find a wounded animal. Just my professional opinion.
Up to 99 yards you are good to go. 100.5 yards and it’s a guaranteed fail.
Also, if you’re shooting through glass, like a windshield or side window, you have to take into account the deflection and reduction in velocity the bullet will sustain.
I always recommend running chrono numbers on glass. But, I’m a purist.
SLM always rolls the window down, before the shot.
Ethical......
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Originally Posted by SLM
Up to 99 yards you are good to go. 100.5 yards and it’s a guaranteed fail.
Also, if you’re shooting through glass, like a windshield or side window, you have to take into account the deflection and reduction in velocity the bullet will sustain.
I always recommend running chrono numbers on glass. But, I’m a purist.
Satire aside, I have culled a few big red deer hinds and stags with a suppressed .222 single shot and 50 grain soft points. High neck or head shots at under 100 yards in a large high fence area. Not the same thing as the question asked but a meager bullet well aimed will drop most in their tracks.
SLM always rolls the window down, before the shot.
Ethical......
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Originally Posted by SLM
Up to 99 yards you are good to go. 100.5 yards and it’s a guaranteed fail.
Also, if you’re shooting through glass, like a windshield or side window, you have to take into account the deflection and reduction in velocity the bullet will sustain.
I always recommend running chrono numbers on glass. But, I’m a purist.
🤪🦫
SLM, shoots off a horse while holding a hot, blonde prairie vixen in his arms.
Tinman does the same, except it’s a small Latino dude he likes to hold.
I wish you would have shared your wisdom much earlier.
Don’t ever clean your windows right before a hard core elk hunt.
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Originally Posted by SLM
Up to 99 yards you are good to go. 100.5 yards and it’s a guaranteed fail.
Also, if you’re shooting through glass, like a windshield or side window, you have to take into account the deflection and reduction in velocity the bullet will sustain.
I always recommend running chrono numbers on glass. But, I’m a purist.
SLM always rolls the window down, before the shot.
Ethical......
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Originally Posted by SLM
Up to 99 yards you are good to go. 100.5 yards and it’s a guaranteed fail.
Also, if you’re shooting through glass, like a windshield or side window, you have to take into account the deflection and reduction in velocity the bullet will sustain.
I always recommend running chrono numbers on glass. But, I’m a purist.
During a January late doe season........a .35 Whelen just totally shredded the left side of the shooting window in 'my' ground blind.
Just mentioned, the guy may want to avoid road hunting.......and then got out some Red Green duct tape.
I hate giving un-asked-for advice.
Originally Posted by SLM
And double hearing protection.
Gets louder than a SOB.
Originally Posted by MIKEWERNER
Through glass?
SLM always rolls the window down, before the shot.
Ethical......
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Originally Posted by SLM
Up to 99 yards you are good to go. 100.5 yards and it’s a guaranteed fail.
Also, if you’re shooting through glass, like a windshield or side window, you have to take into account the deflection and reduction in velocity the bullet will sustain.
I always recommend running chrono numbers on glass. But, I’m a purist.
Thanks for showing back up again, and mentioning some reality. But as you've noticed over the years, not many here are interested in reality.
Originally Posted by gssixgun
Yeah
I have a friend who's dad simply uses a .177 Crossman 760 but he does pump it 22 times for Elk been hunting elk that way for 52 years says that the 2 extra pumps does the trick...
Why go clear up to .22? Why not .20 or better yet .17???
Because I have not seen any partitions or X bullets in .20 or .17 caliber. Ross Seyfried did some testing with the 60 grain .22 partition and got something on the order of 20 inches of penetration. That stands up alongside a .338 partition. The only thing left then is to put the hole in the right place, it's not a question of the bullet not digging deep enough.
I can't think of a .17 bullet that I'd want to use outside of possibly head shots. In .20, hornady made a good 45 grain soft point that dug a bit better than varmint bullets. I have a few boxes left ... would be interested in trying one on a deer under controlled conditions to see how it works.
Why go clear up to .22? Why not .20 or better yet .17???
Because I have not seen any partitions or X bullets in .20 or .17 caliber. Ross Seyfried did some testing with the 60 grain .22 partition and got something on the order of 20 inches of penetration. That stands up alongside a .338 partition. The only thing left then is to put the hole in the right place, it's not a question of the bullet not digging deep enough.
I can't think of a .17 bullet that I'd want to use outside of possibly head shots. In .20, hornady made a good 45 grain soft point that dug a bit better than varmint bullets. I have a few boxes left ... would be interested in trying one on a deer under controlled conditions to see how it works.
Mikey, the wife went to get her some new pumps and asked for “gloss brown” and they told her the LGBTQ community was the only group that requested “gloss brown” so they don’t cary it.
I’ll text TinyCOCK to see if he can find you some on his next shopping spree.
Mikey, the wife went to get her some new pumps and asked for “gloss brown” and they told her the LGBTQ community was the only group that requested “gloss brown” so they don’t cary it.
I’ll text TinyCOCK to see if he can find you some on his next shopping spree.
Mikey, the wife went to get her some new pumps and asked for “gloss brown” and they told her the LGBTQ community was the only group that requested “gloss brown” so they don’t cary it.
I’ll text TinyCOCK to see if he can find you some on his next shopping spree.
Mikey, the wife went to get her some new pumps and asked for “gloss brown” and they told her the LGBTQ community was the only group that requested “gloss brown” so they don’t cary it.
I’ll text TinyCOCK to see if he can find you some on his next shopping spree.
Thanks for showing back up again, and mentioning some reality. But as you've noticed over the years, not many here are interested in reality.
Originally Posted by gssixgun
Yeah
I have a friend who's dad simply uses a .177 Crossman 760 but he does pump it 22 times for Elk been hunting elk that way for 52 years says that the 2 extra pumps does the trick...
Totally True Story :p
Oh no I saw it, but I like picking on the one who SmokesPoles.. He is just so easy
Plus you made an erroneous assumption, I never left, I just haven't posted much in this joke of a sub-forum.. This sub-forum has a plethora on self proclaimed experts, that simply talk in circles trying to prove their stupidity correct... I realized pretty quick that there were too few in here that had any real knowledge that I could use
Much like this thread, there are literally people seriously discussing the feasibility of using Rat shooters to hunt elk.. I enjoyed joking about it myself
Smokepole WAS a rampant Mule Deer and Burns fanboy.......til he and Burns had a falling out.
Burns likely ignored that .243 thread, when it read "under 300 yards".........with his nose in the air.
John is always interested in selling cookbooks..........and Smokepole is still with him. Loyalty Trump would admire.
Just an FYI!
Originally Posted by gssixgun
Originally Posted by MIKEWERNER
Do you miss this, bugger?
Reality, man!
Originally Posted by MIKEWERNER
gssixgun,
Thanks for showing back up again, and mentioning some reality. But as you've noticed over the years, not many here are interested in reality.
Originally Posted by gssixgun
Yeah
I have a friend who's dad simply uses a .177 Crossman 760 but he does pump it 22 times for Elk been hunting elk that way for 52 years says that the 2 extra pumps does the trick...
Totally True Story :p
Oh no I saw it, but I like picking on the one who SmokesPoles.. He is just so easy
Plus you made an erroneous assumption, I never left, I just haven't posted much in this joke of a sub-forum.. This sub-forum has a plethora on self proclaimed experts, that simply talk in circles trying to prove their stupidity correct... I realized pretty quick that there were too few in here that had any real knowledge that I could use
Much like this thread, there are literally people seriously discussing the feasibility of using Rat shooters to hunt elk.. I enjoyed joking about it myself
Mikey, the wife went to get her some new pumps and asked for “gloss brown” and they told her the LGBTQ community was the only group that requested “gloss brown” so they don’t cary it.
I’ll text TinyCOCK to see if he can find you some on his next shopping spree.
I have a lifetime supply, and then some. How much is needed?
Mikey, the wife went to get her some new pumps and asked for “gloss brown” and they told her the LGBTQ community was the only group that requested “gloss brown” so they don’t cary it.
I’ll text TinyCOCK to see if he can find you some on his next shopping spree.
LMAO.
Ted, getting gang raped is always hilarious.
🦫
Is it rape if you don't resist? Ever been to Browning, MT? Them wimminz be large and scary.
Satire aside, I have culled a few big red deer hinds and stags with a suppressed .222 single shot and 50 grain soft points. High neck or head shots at under 100 yards in a large high fence area. Not the same thing as the question asked but a meager bullet well aimed will drop most in their tracks.
I wouldn't go out of my way to do so, but I did kill a free range red deer hind in NZ with a supressed .22 LR and no name cheap ammo. I was rabbit hunting and just happened upon it. One broadside shot, a 50-60 yard death run and a dead critter. No drama other than a very sparse blood trail through the brush.
I wouldn't go out of my way to do so, but I did kill a free range red deer hind in NZ with a supressed .22 LR and no name cheap ammo. I was rabbit hunting and just happened upon it. One broadside shot, a 50-60 yard death run and a dead critter. No drama other than a very sparse blood trail through the brush.
Apparently Mikey likes his penny loafers shined on a regular bases, so I’m assuming a lot.
I guess it’s an Iowa thing.
Originally Posted by T_Inman
Originally Posted by SLM
Mikey, the wife went to get her some new pumps and asked for “gloss brown” and they told her the LGBTQ community was the only group that requested “gloss brown” so they don’t cary it.
I’ll text TinyCOCK to see if he can find you some on his next shopping spree.
I have a lifetime supply, and then some. How much is needed?
Smokepole WAS a rampant Mule Deer and Burns fanboy.......til he and Burns had a falling out.
Burns likely ignored that .243 thread, when it read "under 300 yards".........with his nose in the air.
John is always interested in selling cookbooks..........and Smokepole is still with him. Loyalty Trump would admire.
Just an FYI!
Originally Posted by gssixgun
Originally Posted by MIKEWERNER
Do you miss this, bugger?
Reality, man!
Originally Posted by MIKEWERNER
gssixgun,
Thanks for showing back up again, and mentioning some reality. But as you've noticed over the years, not many here are interested in reality.
Originally Posted by gssixgun
Yeah
I have a friend who's dad simply uses a .177 Crossman 760 but he does pump it 22 times for Elk been hunting elk that way for 52 years says that the 2 extra pumps does the trick...
Totally True Story :p
Oh no I saw it, but I like picking on the one who SmokesPoles.. He is just so easy
Plus you made an erroneous assumption, I never left, I just haven't posted much in this joke of a sub-forum.. This sub-forum has a plethora on self proclaimed experts, that simply talk in circles trying to prove their stupidity correct... I realized pretty quick that there were too few in here that had any real knowledge that I could use
Much like this thread, there are literally people seriously discussing the feasibility of using Rat shooters to hunt elk.. I enjoyed joking about it myself
LOL, MIKEWERNER and sisgun. There hasn't been a duo this dynamic since Batman and Robin got behind one another.
You 3 were always so cute together.........back in the Berger bullet debates.
You guys had the facts and reality down.....
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by MIKEWERNER
Smokepole WAS a rampant Mule Deer and Burns fanboy.......til he and Burns had a falling out.
Burns likely ignored that .243 thread, when it read "under 300 yards".........with his nose in the air.
John is always interested in selling cookbooks..........and Smokepole is still with him. Loyalty Trump would admire.
Just an FYI!
Originally Posted by gssixgun
Originally Posted by MIKEWERNER
Do you miss this, bugger?
Reality, man!
Originally Posted by MIKEWERNER
gssixgun,
Thanks for showing back up again, and mentioning some reality. But as you've noticed over the years, not many here are interested in reality.
Originally Posted by gssixgun
Yeah
I have a friend who's dad simply uses a .177 Crossman 760 but he does pump it 22 times for Elk been hunting elk that way for 52 years says that the 2 extra pumps does the trick...
Totally True Story :p
Oh no I saw it, but I like picking on the one who SmokesPoles.. He is just so easy
Plus you made an erroneous assumption, I never left, I just haven't posted much in this joke of a sub-forum.. This sub-forum has a plethora on self proclaimed experts, that simply talk in circles trying to prove their stupidity correct... I realized pretty quick that there were too few in here that had any real knowledge that I could use
Much like this thread, there are literally people seriously discussing the feasibility of using Rat shooters to hunt elk.. I enjoyed joking about it myself
LOL, MIKEWERNER and sisgun. There hasn't been a duo this dynamic since Batman and Robin got behind one another.
Any more creep-out posts like this and I am leaving the Elk Forum.
Is that a promise? If so, I'll repeat myself.
But first go back and read my post again, and try not to put your own twisted spin on it. I'd happily associate with either one of those guys. I'm not sure what that means to you but whatever turns you on. And they know more about guns, shooting, and killing elk than most any other two guys you could name on here.
You and sixgums on the other hand blow more hot air than any half dozen guys you could name on here.
You two were made for each other. And you're doing great.
Any more creep-out posts like this and I am leaving the Elk Forum.
Is that a promise? If so, I'll repeat myself.
But first go back and read my post again, and try not to put your own twisted spin on it. I'd happily associate with either one of those guys. I'm not sure what that means to you but whatever turns you on. And they know more about guns, shooting, and killing elk than most any other two guys you could name on here.
You and sixgums on the other hand blow more hot air than any half dozen guys you could name on here.
TFF sixgums. I used "smokepole" for years on another outdoor site before I signed on here. I had no idea about the double meaning, and no one there ever commented on it. I guess they weren't familuar with the lingo like you are.
But I guess it's all you've got, so you go girl.
And I did get a chuckle out of "I've said it before and I'll say it again."
Looks like smokepole will soon be seeking victim status.......just like Hunter Biden.
Originally Posted by smokepole
TFF sixgums. I used "smokepole" for years on another outdoor site before I signed on here. I had no idea about the double meaning, and no one there ever commented on it. I guess they weren't familuar with the lingo like you are.
But I guess it's all you've got, so you go girl.
And I did get a chuckle out of "I've said it before and I'll say it again."
The authorities on the matter, around here, are just kinda trolling.
The stupider the stunt.......the more impressive, they think.
Problem is.......newbies are watching and actually buying into the stupidity.
Originally Posted by gssixgun
This sub-forum has a plethora on self proclaimed experts, that simply talk in circles trying to prove their stupidity correct... I realized pretty quick that there were too few in here that had any real knowledge that I could use
Much like this thread, there are literally people seriously discussing the feasibility of using Rat shooters to hunt elk.. I enjoyed joking about it myself
LOL, hardly Mike. It doesn't bother me when guys like you and sixgums show your proclivities.
I think everyone else pretty much knows what a smokepole is.
Awww Sweetie don't get upset, You're from Boulder ain't ya,
When you actually post something about shooting/hunting I might stop picking on ya, until then you are fair game and season is open
Remember you started this over the old 1500 ft/lb at range adage, that upset you so bad that you decided to be a "Forum Douche" even though we all know that formula actually works, it just tossed you into a tizzy Settle down honey, before you work yourself into a real episode
Remember you started this over the old 1500 ft/lb at range adage, that upset you so bad that you decided to be a "Forum Douche" even though we all know that formula actually works.....
LOL, where'd you read that "formula?" Was it Outdoor Life, or Field & Stream?
I've killed plenty of elk with less than 1500 ft-lbs; you get your information from a magazine or a book and tout it as gospel. That's the definition of "forum douche."
In the past I've posted plenty about hunting/shooting, but haven't lately. At least not in the last year since you signed up, so many forum douches like you it's hardly worth the time.
But as long as you're running your yap, where's all your posts about your hunts?
Remember you started this over the old 1500 ft/lb at range adage, that upset you so bad that you decided to be a "Forum Douche" even though we all know that formula actually works.....
I've killed plenty of elk with less than 1500 ft-lbs; you get your information from a magazine or a book and tout it as gospel. That's the definition of "forum douche."
Well aren't you just precious... Bragging all about your tiny little gun and how Powerful it shoots
Remember you started this over the old 1500 ft/lb at range adage, that upset you so bad that you decided to be a "Forum Douche" even though we all know that formula actually works.....
I've killed plenty of elk with less than 1500 ft-lbs; you get your information from a magazine or a book and tout it as gospel. That's the definition of "forum douche."
Well aren't you just precious... Bragging all about your tiny little gun and how Powerful it shoots
Bless your heart
LOL, you can't read sign very well. You're talking to a guy who goes by "smokepole" and can't figure out I'm talking about a .50 caliber muzzleloader.
I remember the last time you tossed out the magical 1500 number, I asked what it was based on.
You couldn't answer the question then, and you can't now.
I love a good retard fight. You all know who you are, but that won't stop folks from "agreeing" with me, convinced that the "other" guy is who I am referring to.
Remember you started this over the old 1500 ft/lb at range adage, that upset you so bad that you decided to be a "Forum Douche" even though we all know that formula actually works.....
I've killed plenty of elk with less than 1500 ft-lbs; you get your information from a magazine or a book and tout it as gospel. That's the definition of "forum douche."
Well aren't you just precious... Bragging all about your tiny little gun and how Powerful it shoots
Bless your heart
LOL, you can't read sign very well. You're talking to a guy who goes by "smokepole" and can't figure out I'm talking about a .50 caliber muzzleloader.
I remember the last time you tossed out the magical 1500 number, I asked what it was based on.
You couldn't answer the question then, and you can't now.
Oh honey you just can't let it go can you,,, You just don't see the logic behind it you are so blinded by your own ego
Here sweetie relax and listen to the song of your people
I love a good retard fight. You all know who you are, but that won't stop folks from "agreeing" with me, convinced that the "other" guy is who I am referring to.
These elk threads keep me motivated.
I agree with you, those other guys are retarts. All that's missing are ballistics tables........
I love a good retard fight. You all know who you are, but that won't stop folks from "agreeing" with me, convinced that the "other" guy is who I am referring to.
Does it hurt your coal burner feelers, does it just set your teeth on edge that it actually is a good standard.. No one ever claimed it to be absolute except you in your ignorance, but to deny it is a good target is just you showing your bruised ego ...
Ain't no "denying" about it chief, just stating the facts.
If you think I brought up 1500 ft-lbs, it should be really easy to go back, find where I brought it up, and prove it.
I'll be waiting.
What a child, I can't believe you are actually still being baited like this,, come on man go for 31809 I don't think I have ever managed to hook a fish like you so hard except on Facebook
Admit it,, you spent your youth on Pearl St in Boulder.... LMFAO
I love a good retard fight. You all know who you are, but that won't stop folks from "agreeing" with me, convinced that the "other" guy is who I am referring to.
These elk threads keep me motivated.
Me 2...I’m stoked and ready to bust out the magnums. Might even dump all my 300 mag cartridges on the bed and roll on them.
Beav’, don’t be talking about hard shiny objects on a bed around Tiny’.
Was it you that posted a video of slingshotting an elk?
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Originally Posted by T_Inman
I love a good retard fight. You all know who you are, but that won't stop folks from "agreeing" with me, convinced that the "other" guy is who I am referring to.
These elk threads keep me motivated.
Me 2...I’m stoked and ready to bust out the magnums. Might even dump all my 300 mag cartridges on the bed and roll on them.
I love a good retard fight. You all know who you are, but that won't stop folks from "agreeing" with me, convinced that the "other" guy is who I am referring to.
These elk threads keep me motivated.
Me 2...I’m stoked and ready to bust out the magnums. Might even dump all my 300 mag cartridges on the bed and roll on them.
Stoked, I tell ya...
😬🦫
I don't blame you beav, those "Big 300s" are just so sexy. I like to read the ballistics tables while I admire my big 300s.
And the .338's/375s? Get outta hear!
But I do have a question. Deer season is coming up, and I need to know the proper foot-lbs for deer hunting.
You never read about the proper ft-lbs for deer, why is that? Are deer just not as mythical as elk?
But I do have a question. Deer season is coming up, and I need to know the proper foot-lbs for deer hunting.
You never read about the proper ft-lbs for deer, why is that? Are deer just not as mythical as elk?
Wellllllll You say yer from Colorado,,, which I am now doubting you could even be a hunter in my home state.. Were you older when you started hunting ??? you didn't have to take the Colorado Hunter Safety Course I had to when I started hunting there..
I would understand your stupidity if you just recently started hunting in CO, but you should really read your Hunting Regs for the state you are hunting in..
1000 ft/lbs at 100 yards for all Big Game in Colorado they also break down the suggestions if you read farther for longer range shots and the differences between the animals you are hunting ... You have Caliber regs. there too which make this thread as irrelevant as it should be
Come on Sweetie you can get at least a few more posts outta this 31810 and anxiously awaiting your next post Bahahahaha
I still have my little Orange Hunter Safety Card from way way back, did you know that it is highly respected to have one from CO in many states I guess it is one of the best courses offered..
Pretty cool really, you should go get yours Smokes Pole..
I still have my little Orange Hunter Safety Card from way way back, did you know that it is highly respected to have one from CO in many states I guess it is one of the best courses offered..
Pretty cool really, you should go get yours Smokes Pole..
LOL, nice try sixgums, you're doing great, keep it up.
I've been an instructor for the course for about 15 years now, I guess that means I'm even more highly-respected than card holders, who knew? I've taught over 1,000 students and helped them get their card. CPW calls it "Hunter Educattion," by the way, not "Hunter Safety."
So yes, I am familiar with those regulations, and we go over those in class because it's the law here and students need to know that. But then again we're not talking about state regs here, are we?
My question to you was, what are the energy numbers based on? if you ask anyone in CPW what the magical 1,000 ft-lbs is based on, they'll have the same answer you do, which is, "I can't tell you." It's an arbitrary round number with no systematically-derived data to back it up, only anecdotes. And there are plenty of anecdotes on the other side from people who have killed deer with less than a .243, without a problem.
But if you want to talk state regs, let's talk about Wyoming or Montana or your home state of Idaho, where you can use a caliber less than .243. What does that tell you? Are the agencies there totally ignorant? If so, you really need to get off the internet and get the law changed in your state.
Or better yet, go on the deer hunting forum and ask if anyone has killed multiple deer with a .223. You'll get a lot of answers from guys who have actually done it, unlike you.
I still have my little Orange Hunter Safety Card from way way back, did you know that it is highly respected to have one from CO in many states I guess it is one of the best courses offered..
Pretty cool really, you should go get yours Smokes Pole..
LOL, nice try sixgums, you're doing great, keep it up.
I've been an instructor for the course for about 15 years now,
God I am glad I left that state, 20 years ago, We could see the infiltration of the uneducated
I still have my little Orange Hunter Safety Card from way way back, did you know that it is highly respected to have one from CO in many states I guess it is one of the best courses offered..
Pretty cool really, you should go get yours Smokes Pole..
. And there are plenty of anecdotes on the other side from people who have killed deer with less than a .243, without a problem.
You do realize that you are simply under-gunned for a ballistics convo right??
You keep ignoring the simple words "AT RANGE" a .243 which you are stammering on about, carries sufficient energy out past 400 yards using the right bullets
The adage works, if you are smart enough to use it correctly, I realize I bruised your "Oracle" ego but really you should probably STFU and go read some Ballistics tables so you don't look so stupid
ps: If you are used to poking holes with a little gun, I guess you are bound to try and defend it
Come On Smokes Poles get a couple more posts in oh great "Oracle",, how many do you need for your next Badge
Hilarious. Ballistics tables and ft-lbs never killed a damn thing. Po3kung a big enough hole in the vitals is all it takes.
What's next? Why don't you expound on hydrostatic shock, that should be a hoot and good for another 20 pages.
It is getting harder to take you seriously, you might as well start with yer Mother's Uncle's Brother's Cousin kilt him a Bull Elk with his 22 Pistol so therefore it is good to go..
I would tell you to get an education, but hell you can't even spell it
Awaiting 31812 from the "Oracle", I am beginning to think you believe in that badge Bahahahahaha..
ps: I am also beginning to doubt you have done any sort of instruction, other than a Tie-Dye class at the Pearl Mall in Boulder You do realize if you actually gave solid advice you wouldn't have to tell people about your alleged bone fides, it would be apparent..
You just don't come across as an experienced Hunter or specifically a Shooter to me
I love a good retard fight. You all know who you are, but that won't stop folks from "agreeing" with me, convinced that the "other" guy is who I am referring to.
These elk threads keep me motivated.
I agree with you in loving a good retard fight.
And nothing brings them out like even mentioning using a rifle/cartridge combo that they consider too small for the job....
Used to believe the gun counter drivel until I saw proof and had the revelation. Seen too many boiler rooms deconstructed by vastly different diameters and velocities of modern cartridges. Someone here is a total douche, but it isn't the old guy that recently hunted in the tumdra.
Beav’, don’t be talking about hard shiny objects on a bed around Tiny’.
Was it you that posted a video of slingshotting an elk?
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Originally Posted by T_Inman
I love a good retard fight. You all know who you are, but that won't stop folks from "agreeing" with me, convinced that the "other" guy is who I am referring to.
These elk threads keep me motivated.
Me 2...I’m stoked and ready to bust out the magnums. Might even dump all my 300 mag cartridges on the bed and roll on them.
Stoked, I tell ya...
😬🦫
Disco balls, laser pointers, and whip cream are all staples at Tiny’s slave cave.
Didn’t post an elk slaying with a slingshot video, but, I did find this.
It was a video of a retrieval of a cow that got catapulted. Pretty sure it was one of you PNW mafia members.
Been trying to find the video to show a friend.
And yes, you have Tiny figured out, but we won’t judge….Much.
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Originally Posted by SLM
Beav’, don’t be talking about hard shiny objects on a bed around Tiny’.
Was it you that posted a video of slingshotting an elk?
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Originally Posted by T_Inman
I love a good retard fight. You all know who you are, but that won't stop folks from "agreeing" with me, convinced that the "other" guy is who I am referring to.
These elk threads keep me motivated.
Me 2...I’m stoked and ready to bust out the magnums. Might even dump all my 300 mag cartridges on the bed and roll on them.
Stoked, I tell ya...
😬🦫
Disco balls, laser pointers, and whip cream are all staples at Tiny’s slave cave.
Didn’t post an elk slaying with a slingshot video, but, I did find this.
It was a video of a retrieval of a cow that got catapulted. Pretty sure it was one of you PNW mafia members.
Been trying to find the video to show a friend.
And yes, you have Tiny figured out, but we won’t judge….Much.
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Originally Posted by SLM
Beav’, don’t be talking about hard shiny objects on a bed around Tiny’.
Was it you that posted a video of slingshotting an elk?
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Originally Posted by T_Inman
I love a good retard fight. You all know who you are, but that won't stop folks from "agreeing" with me, convinced that the "other" guy is who I am referring to.
These elk threads keep me motivated.
Me 2...I’m stoked and ready to bust out the magnums. Might even dump all my 300 mag cartridges on the bed and roll on them.
Stoked, I tell ya...
😬🦫
Disco balls, laser pointers, and whip cream are all staples at Tiny’s slave cave.
Didn’t post an elk slaying with a slingshot video, but, I did find this.
🦫
You f♧cks have no clue.
What toys I keep in my basement, that is. I am resourceful and adaptive. Kinky too.
Has anyone else here other than Scenar Shooter, Ingwe, and myself actually used a 22 caliber on elk, or is everyone else just guessing? Funny that we ended up with dead elk, but I suppose the 24hourcampfire braintrust knows better than actual results.
When the three listed above and a few others speak, you should probably pay attention.
Or keep overcompensating.
Originally Posted by gssixgun
Just goes to show what an actual joke this sub-forum is
Supposed "Experts" seriously talking about how little their shooters are.. Total disgrace...
Seriously ??? Listen to three idiots promote 224 Caliber Elk Hunting, ??? What a crock of crap
How did this sub-forum become so twisted, a bunch of braggarts promoting Rat Shooters. pathetic unethical POS
Who was "promoting" it?
I shared that same thought. I think one could loosely interpret Prairie_Goat's first few posts here (maybe) to promote the use of .22 CF, but I can't see how those other two's posts could be interpreted that way, at all.
Maybe I am missing or misreading something, but doubt it.
Yes it can be made to work, and relatively easily if you can shoot. But even for me-the stunt shooter- Id really prefer something else. Ive done it...twice...but both animals were previously wounded, the .223 is what I had in my hands at the time ( not hunting elk) and when you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with. And it IS legal in a few places, but still not recommended . My pard kiled a 5 point bull with a well placed shot from his .223 one evening after surgery when he was told not to shoot a recoiling heavy rifle. It worked just fine, but.......
Yes it can be made to work, and relatively easily if you can shoot. But even for me-the stunt shooter- Id really prefer something else. Ive done it...twice...but both animals were previously wounded, the .223 is what I had in my hands at the time ( not hunting elk) and when you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with. And it IS legal in a few places, but still not recommended . My pard kiled a 5 point bull with a well placed shot from his .223 one evening after surgery when he was told not to shoot a recoiling heavy rifle. It worked just fine, but.......
Not talking about the OP
I am talking about the "Experts" that are literally promoting it, pathetic POS
Oh and YOU that is defending them.
It is pretty obvious that a very few of you on here have pulled your logs around the fire and decided that you are going to steer the convos how you want It is also quite obvious that you don't have much real experience with ballistics because everyone of you has run to name calling and bashing to prove your "Superiority"
You 4-5 have also tried to change what I have been saying because for some odd reason you just don't want any K/E talk around your little campfire
Your defense of small rounds doesn't negate K/E it just qualifies it, but you "Experts" hate that for some reason, that shows me you either don't want to hear it or you don't understand it
Has anyone else here other than Scenar Shooter, Ingwe, and myself actually used a 22 caliber on elk, or is everyone else just guessing? Funny that we ended up with dead elk, but I suppose the 24hourcampfire braintrust knows better than actual results.
Odd how those who have never done it know how well, or badly, it works...
Has anyone else here other than Scenar Shooter, Ingwe, and myself actually used a 22 caliber on elk, or is everyone else just guessing? Funny that we ended up with dead elk, but I suppose the 24hourcampfire braintrust knows better than actual results.
Odd how those who have never done it know how well, or badly, it works...
ps:: This ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ See the "Expert" promoting it
Has anyone else here other than Scenar Shooter, Ingwe, and myself actually used a 22 caliber on elk, or is everyone else just guessing? Funny that we ended up with dead elk, but I suppose the 24hourcampfire braintrust knows better than actual results.
Odd how those who have never done it know how well, or badly, it works...
ps:: This ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ See the "Expert" promoting it
Yes it can be made to work, and relatively easily if you can shoot. But even for me-the stunt shooter- Id really prefer something else. Ive done it...twice...but both animals were previously wounded, the .223 is what I had in my hands at the time ( not hunting elk) and when you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with. And it IS legal in a few places, but still not recommended . My pard kiled a 5 point bull with a well placed shot from his .223 one evening after surgery when he was told not to shoot a recoiling heavy rifle. It worked just fine, but.......
Not talking about the OP
I am talking about the "Experts" that are literally promoting it, pathetic POS
Oh and YOU that is defending them.
It is pretty obvious that a very few of you on here have pulled your logs around the fire and decided that you are going to steer the convos how you want It is also quite obvious that you don't have much real experience with ballistics because everyone of you has run to name calling and bashing to prove your "Superiority"
You 4-5 have also tried to change what I have been saying because for some odd reason you just don't want any K/E talk around your little campfire
Your defense of small rounds doesn't negate K/E it just qualifies it, but you "Experts" hate that for some reason, that shows me you either don't want to hear it or you don't understand it
What is your reasoning for pushing KE so much? Do you feel bullet construction plays a part?
Are you saying that Ingwe is the OP? By OP you're referring to the original post(er) correct?
Honestly, without reading too deeply into this thread and only the last several posts, the only one name calling is you.
Yes it can be made to work, and relatively easily if you can shoot. But even for me-the stunt shooter- Id really prefer something else. Ive done it...twice...but both animals were previously wounded, the .223 is what I had in my hands at the time ( not hunting elk) and when you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with. And it IS legal in a few places, but still not recommended . My pard kiled a 5 point bull with a well placed shot from his .223 one evening after surgery when he was told not to shoot a recoiling heavy rifle. It worked just fine, but.......
Not talking about the OP
I am talking about the "Experts" that are literally promoting it, pathetic POS
Oh and YOU that is defending them.
It is pretty obvious that a very few of you on here have pulled your logs around the fire and decided that you are going to steer the convos how you want It is also quite obvious that you don't have much real experience with ballistics because everyone of you has run to name calling and bashing to prove your "Superiority"
You 4-5 have also tried to change what I have been saying because for some odd reason you just don't want any K/E talk around your little campfire
Your defense of small rounds doesn't negate K/E it just qualifies it, but you "Experts" hate that for some reason, that shows me you either don't want to hear it or you don't understand it
What is your reasoning for pushing KE so much? Do you feel bullet construction plays a part?
Are you saying that Ingwe is the OP? By OP you're referring to the original post(er) correct?
Honestly, without reading too deeply into this thread and only the last several posts, the only one name calling is you.
Did you learn that circle reasoning while watching CNN or the DNC ???
Just deny what you don't want to hear
Freaking amateurs, this sub-forum is full of you all, and the others have been bullied into silence..
I am hanging around now just to toss grenades into your BS, nothing to learn here as I had hoped for, just about 4-5 Forum "Orcs" that bully their little domain
I simply answered that a good STARTING point was to use the old adage of 1500 ft/lbs at RANGE and go from there
For that one sentence you little boys have relentlessly attacked
So FU,,,, I am now going to just keep tossing it out there,,, Don't like it don't believe it I don't care, it still works EVEN for this stupid thread, but ballistics are just beyond you guys so you keep arguing..
The adage has been taken up and down over the years as things progressed
1200 - 1500 - 2000
You can adjust that for yourself and the bullets you are using, we have way better bullet construction now and Cartridges the stretch the envelope.. Regardless it is still a good STARTING point, and the fact that you few, you proud, the "Orcs" of this sub-forum deny it shows just how bad this little fiefdom has become
Has anyone else here other than Scenar Shooter, Ingwe, and myself actually used a 22 caliber on elk, or is everyone else just guessing? Funny that we ended up with dead elk, but I suppose the 24hourcampfire braintrust knows better than actual results.
Odd how those who have never done it know how well, or badly, it works...
ps:: This ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ See the "Expert" promoting it
Not impressed, just a little gun braggart
Still don't see any "promotion".
Do you have a copy of Websters dictionary handy?
If no and since you are on the www then a trip to Google may help.
Idaho allows any centerfire for any big game animal. That's just saying its legal, not that it's smart.
These threads about how small of a caliber you can use always tell only half of it. They leave out the part about "I got an elk with my 22 Hornet and I only wounded 2 before 1 went down."
Has anyone else here other than Scenar Shooter, Ingwe, and myself actually used a 22 caliber on elk, or is everyone else just guessing? Funny that we ended up with dead elk, but I suppose the 24hourcampfire braintrust knows better than actual results.
Odd how those who have never done it know how well, or badly, it works...
ps:: This ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ See the "Expert" promoting it
Not impressed, just a little gun braggart
Still don't see any "promotion".
Do you have a copy of Websters dictionary handy?
If no and since you are on the www then a trip to Google may help.
Oooooooo What a blistering retort, I mean seriously how long did you have to think about that before you posted it.. Did ya strain you peewee brain on it ??
The Brain Trust of The Elk Hunting Forum at work LMFAO
When the three listed above and a few others speak, you should probably pay attention.
Or keep overcompensating.
Originally Posted by gssixgun
Just goes to show what an actual joke this sub-forum is
Supposed "Experts" seriously talking about how little their shooters are.. Total disgrace...
Seriously ??? Listen to three idiots promote 224 Caliber Elk Hunting, ??? What a crock of crap
How did this sub-forum become so twisted, a bunch of braggarts promoting Rat Shooters. pathetic unethical POS
Really, how about you post some game killed photos ?
You know, just so we know "how legitimate", you actually are !
Betting my wife's put more head of game animals in the freezer, than you have.
Oooooo another "Oracle" has spoken words of wisdom, come on seriously, your Canadian you guys can't even own guns can you ???
Honestly I have plenty of Canadian friends, and I love them dearly, but when it comes to "Gun Talk" I simply don't have the kind of patience to teach it to ya ... Just can't take any gun advice from people that gave up their gun rights seriously...
Seriously, why don't/won't you hang some photos of you & your game ?
Be nice to see.
Unless you're the standard, retarded, keyboard commando, or perhaps, even a trolling sock puppet !
Been called, ante up !
Dear Paul,
I don't rise to the baiting, as you did Fish I have noticed that you haven't joined into the Ballistics convo which obviously as a Canadian is above your head do you know what .224 even is ???
Paul knows, but I am beginning to wonder the same thing...
Come on man Respect your "Oracle" you are only a 'Bwana Let him answer himself don't help him out he jumped into a ballistics fight with both feet into the deep end.. Don't toss him a Floatie
edit: A ballistics fight that started as a damn joke, but has been turned into a CF by the supposed "experts" in this sub-forum
When the three listed above and a few others speak, you should probably pay attention.
Or keep overcompensating.
Originally Posted by gssixgun
Just goes to show what an actual joke this sub-forum is
Supposed "Experts" seriously talking about how little their shooters are.. Total disgrace...
Seriously ??? Listen to three idiots promote 224 Caliber Elk Hunting, ??? What a crock of crap
How did this sub-forum become so twisted, a bunch of braggarts promoting Rat Shooters. pathetic unethical POS
Who was "promoting" it?
I shared that same thought. I think one could loosely interpret Prairie_Goat's first few posts here (maybe) to promote the use of .22 CF, but I can't see how those other two's posts could be interpreted that way, at all.
Maybe I am missing or misreading something, but doubt it.
I was just relating my experience. Are there better options? Probably. But "better" isn't always the preferred option. It's sort of like using a traditional bow or 1990s compound compared to a fancy new compound during archery season, or open sighted lever gun chambered for an old/slow rimmed round compared to a scoped bolt gun firing high bc bullets. They all work fine when directed correctly, within their limits, and sometimes a guy just prefers to hunt with something different.
One excellent reason to use a suppressed 223 - it results in minimal herd disruption compared to even a larger case capacity suppressed rifle. Pop an elk out of the herd and watch the rest of the bunch mosey up over the hill. Recover your quarry in an expeditious manner, and the survivors may be right back in there the next day. As opposed to laying into them with a 300 Loudenboomer, and sending the herd into the next township to be shot by other hunters. Of course, things may play out just fine with a "normal" setup, but a quiet rifle sure seems to help.
When the three listed above and a few others speak, you should probably pay attention.
Or keep overcompensating.
Originally Posted by gssixgun
Just goes to show what an actual joke this sub-forum is
Supposed "Experts" seriously talking about how little their shooters are.. Total disgrace...
Seriously ??? Listen to three idiots promote 224 Caliber Elk Hunting, ??? What a crock of crap
How did this sub-forum become so twisted, a bunch of braggarts promoting Rat Shooters. pathetic unethical POS
Who was "promoting" it?
I shared that same thought. I think one could loosely interpret Prairie_Goat's first few posts here (maybe) to promote the use of .22 CF, but I can't see how those other two's posts could be interpreted that way, at all.
Maybe I am missing or misreading something, but doubt it.
I was just relating my experience. Are there better options? Probably. But "better" isn't always the preferred option. It's sort of like using a traditional bow or 1990s compound compared to a fancy new compound during archery season, or open sighted lever gun chambered for an old/slow rimmed round compared to a scoped bolt gun firing high bc bullets. They all work fine when directed correctly, within their limits, and sometimes a guy just prefers to hunt with something different.
One excellent reason to use a suppressed 223 - it results in minimal herd disruption compared to even a larger case capacity suppressed rifle. Pop an elk out of the herd and watch the rest of the bunch mosey up over the hill. Recover your quarry in an expeditious manner, and the survivors may be right back in there the next day. As opposed to laying into them with a 300 Loudenboomer, and sending the herd into the next township to be shot by other hunters. Of course, things may play out just fine with a "normal" setup, but a quiet rifle sure seems to help.
Great post. I've never attempted to kill a big game animal with a .223 and most likely never will, but as someone interested in what works and what doesn't, it's valuable information nonetheless. I have killed elk with big slow bullets that yield much less than the magical 1500 ft-lbs at the POI. Real world experience with the .223 is the other bookend that shows the fallacy of trusting numbers in a table rather than results on the ground.
Much more valuable that some hackneyed old "adage" that someone pulled out their arse back when Core Lokts were state of the art.
I'm still waiting for a dissertation from the keyboard cowboy on hydrostatic shock. That would be good for a few more pages.
Someone here is a total douche, but it isn't the old guy that recently hunted in the tumdra.
Ingwe hunted the tundra??
No that is a Toyota, we drive them, not hunt them, he hunted the Tumdra, don't you know anything ???
You wanna talk Hydrostatic shock, go for it, I personally am not a huge believer in it, and I am not at your beck and call to write a dissertation nor anything else.
But please feel free if you want, I will grade it for you after, and correct the mistakes that I am sure you will interject as truths.
I thought about asking him for a detailed explanation of the mechanics behind aerodynamic jump, and as a self-proclaimed ballistics expert with superior knowledge and experience he shouldn’t have any trouble laying it out clearly, but I realized that it would be a waste of my time to engage with him, and a waste of everyone else’s time reading his response.
Best to just ignore the trolls instead of feeding them.
I thought about asking him for a detailed explanation of the mechanics behind aerodynamic jump, and as a self-proclaimed ballistics expert with superior knowledge and experience he shouldn’t have any trouble laying it out clearly, but I realized that it would be a waste of my time to engage with him, and a waste of everyone else’s time reading his response.
Best to just ignore the trolls instead of feeding them.
I thought about asking him for a detailed explanation of the mechanics behind aerodynamic jump, and as a self-proclaimed ballistics expert with superior knowledge and experience he shouldn’t have any trouble laying it out clearly, but I realized that it would be a waste of my time to engage with him, and a waste of everyone else’s time reading his response.
Best to just ignore the trolls instead of feeding them.
Smart Move and good excuse
You ended up looking pretty stupid last time
BTW just like your buddy, I am under no obligation to write anything for anyone, especially you, you ain't anybody to me nor, am I looking for your admiration..
I never proclaimed jack [bleep], you did, but I am glad you realized that yes I do know a thing or two about ballistics.. See I didn't have to make big claims like you guys have, you knew it right off, you made them for me..
I thought about asking him for a detailed explanation of the mechanics behind aerodynamic jump, and as a self-proclaimed ballistics expert with superior knowledge and experience he shouldn’t have any trouble laying it out clearly, but I realized that it would be a waste of my time to engage with him, and a waste of everyone else’s time reading his response.
Best to just ignore the trolls instead of feeding them.
Smart Move and good excuse
You ended up looking pretty stupid last time
BTW just like your buddy, I am under no obligation to write anything for anyone, especially you, you ain't anybody to me nor, am I looking for your admiration..
I never proclaimed jack [bleep], you did, but I am glad you realized that yes I do know a thing or two about ballistics.. See I didn't have to make big claims like you guys have, you knew it right off, you made them for me..
Glen,
Good call to avoid saying anything about ballistics, which would certainly further expose you as a fraud.
I thought about asking him for a detailed explanation of the mechanics behind aerodynamic jump, and as a self-proclaimed ballistics expert with superior knowledge and experience he shouldn’t have any trouble laying it out clearly, but I realized that it would be a waste of my time to engage with him, and a waste of everyone else’s time reading his response.
Best to just ignore the trolls instead of feeding them.
Smart Move and good excuse
You ended up looking pretty stupid last time
BTW just like your buddy, I am under no obligation to write anything for anyone, especially you, you ain't anybody to me nor, am I looking for your admiration..
I never proclaimed jack [bleep], you did, but I am glad you realized that yes I do know a thing or two about ballistics.. See I didn't have to make big claims like you guys have, you knew it right off, you made them for me..
Glen,
Good call to avoid saying anything about ballistics, which would certainly further expose you as a fraud.
Dude seriously your amateurish attempt at baiting is laughable... I have nothing to prove to any of you, it seems that you already have recognized that I know much more than you, and I can see it bugs you Plus lets be serious here, nothing I write would convince you of crap, so why would I bother...
Don’t think anyone would think it ideal, but I bet you figure out how to make it work if forced to.
Originally Posted by T_Inman
For a few reasons I may have a legitimate reason to elk hunt this year with my .223 and 62 TSX.
I won't do that if I can reasonably avoid it, but we will see.
Defining "forced" I guess is in order.
My main elk rifle is here in AK with me and I am flying down to hunt in Idaho come Oct. I don't have a load worked up that I have any confidence in anyhow and with shelves bare along with most online distributors, I don't see me having the ability to get it up and going anytime soon unless I drop everything and totally concentrate on finding some suitable bullets. I keep rifles at my mom's place down there but they're all short range, open sight kind of deals. Other than that .223 Rem and a .270 Win that is........but the .270 is a pre-war retired safe queen these days and has a period correct scope which isn't the most waterproof option out there.
Don’t think anyone would think it ideal, but I bet you figure out how to make it work if forced to.
Originally Posted by T_Inman
For a few reasons I may have a legitimate reason to elk hunt this year with my .223 and 62 TSX.
I won't do that if I can reasonably avoid it, but we will see.
Defining "forced" I guess is in order.
My main elk rifle is here in AK with me and I am flying down to hunt in Idaho come Oct. I don't have a load worked up that I have any confidence in anyhow and with shelves bare along with most online distributors, I don't see me having the ability to get it up and going anytime soon unless I drop everything and totally concentrate on finding some suitable bullets. I keep rifles at my mom's place down there but they're all short range, open sight kind of deals. Other than that .223 Rem and a .270 Win that is........but the .270 is a pre-war retired safe queen these days and has a period correct scope which isn't the most waterproof option out there.
270’s barely need sights anyhow…. Just get them within line of site, they will do the rest of the work
Anything I’ve got you need, I can get it to you, but you have to stop texting me those raunchy selfies.
Originally Posted by T_Inman
Originally Posted by SLM
Don’t think anyone would think it ideal, but I bet you figure out how to make it work if forced to.
Originally Posted by T_Inman
For a few reasons I may have a legitimate reason to elk hunt this year with my .223 and 62 TSX.
I won't do that if I can reasonably avoid it, but we will see.
Defining "forced" I guess is in order.
My main elk rifle is here in AK with me and I am flying down to hunt in Idaho come Oct. I don't have a load worked up that I have any confidence in anyhow and with shelves bare along with most online distributors, I don't see me having the ability to get it up and going anytime soon unless I drop everything and totally concentrate on finding some suitable bullets. I keep rifles at my mom's place down there but they're all short range, open sight kind of deals. Other than that .223 Rem and a .270 Win that is........but the .270 is a pre-war retired safe queen these days and has a period correct scope which isn't the most waterproof option out there.
Anything I’ve got you need, I can get it to you, but you have to stop texting me those raunchy selfies.
Originally Posted by T_Inman
Originally Posted by SLM
Don’t think anyone would think it ideal, but I bet you figure out how to make it work if forced to.
Originally Posted by T_Inman
For a few reasons I may have a legitimate reason to elk hunt this year with my .223 and 62 TSX.
I won't do that if I can reasonably avoid it, but we will see.
Defining "forced" I guess is in order.
My main elk rifle is here in AK with me and I am flying down to hunt in Idaho come Oct. I don't have a load worked up that I have any confidence in anyhow and with shelves bare along with most online distributors, I don't see me having the ability to get it up and going anytime soon unless I drop everything and totally concentrate on finding some suitable bullets. I keep rifles at my mom's place down there but they're all short range, open sight kind of deals. Other than that .223 Rem and a .270 Win that is........but the .270 is a pre-war retired safe queen these days and has a period correct scope which isn't the most waterproof option out there.
Thanks but not sending the selfies isn't worth it.
It's what I do....and enjoy.
PS, I found a new pond/lake just a 1/2 mile off the haul road with true, wild Arctic Char. Never planted like most accessible char lakes are. His adipose fin was small and may have been clipped, though I couldn't tell for sure. He may have been gill netted and recoded a while back, but he's still wild. These char aren't nearly as colorful as they are during the fall spawn though.
Anything I’ve got you need, I can get it to you, but you have to stop texting me those raunchy selfies.
Originally Posted by T_Inman
Originally Posted by SLM
Don’t think anyone would think it ideal, but I bet you figure out how to make it work if forced to.
Originally Posted by T_Inman
For a few reasons I may have a legitimate reason to elk hunt this year with my .223 and 62 TSX.
I won't do that if I can reasonably avoid it, but we will see.
Defining "forced" I guess is in order.
My main elk rifle is here in AK with me and I am flying down to hunt in Idaho come Oct. I don't have a load worked up that I have any confidence in anyhow and with shelves bare along with most online distributors, I don't see me having the ability to get it up and going anytime soon unless I drop everything and totally concentrate on finding some suitable bullets. I keep rifles at my mom's place down there but they're all short range, open sight kind of deals. Other than that .223 Rem and a .270 Win that is........but the .270 is a pre-war retired safe queen these days and has a period correct scope which isn't the most waterproof option out there.
Thanks but not sending the selfies isn't worth it.
It's what I do....and enjoy.
PS, I found a new pond/lake just a 1/2 mile off the haul road with true, wild Arctic Char. Never planted like most accessible char lakes are. His adipose fin was small and may have been clipped, though I couldn't tell for sure. He may have been gill netted and recoded a while back, but he's still wild. These char aren't nearly as colorful as they are during the fall spawn though.
Not Mikey, We are having a very wet summer so far, went to town this morning for tractor parts, and had to pull over, it was raining so hard, same coming back, big puddles in our ranch roads. wish i could send some your way Ken, you can hear the grass growing here. Rio7
Just called in the ranch hands and told them to go home and stay home, lightning is real bad and the weather channel shows it's going to be a lot worse for the next couple of hours. it's lunch time any way. Rio7
Hey…….why don’t you jump off a 900 foot cliff……..so you can tell all us simpletons what it’s all about?
Better yet……drive your car around, blindfolded.
No….wait. You could actually damage something or someone else with your stupidity.
Don’t worry…….it’s the rest of the logically thinking world……..not you!
Originally Posted by prairie_goat
Has anyone else here other than Scenar Shooter, Ingwe, and myself actually used a 22 caliber on elk, or is everyone else just guessing? Funny that we ended up with dead elk, but I suppose the 24hourcampfire braintrust knows better than actual results.
Keep your dam clothes on and quit smoking the alfalfa.
Thought for a little while we were going to get a shower, nothing but wind.
Originally Posted by elkhunternm
Several rain dances are needed.
Without the alfalfa fumes.
They are saying we’re gonna hit a record @ 109* on Sunday.
🥵
🦫
You desert dwellers are used to heat...Yeah, I know, it’s a dry heat.
We start to hemorrhage when temps reach the mid 70’s around these parts.
When we’ve had heat this early, it has usually ruined archery season starting on August 28th. They’ll lose 1/2 a season, if not all of it, with fire closures.
Keep your dam clothes on and quit smoking the alfalfa.
Thought for a little while we were going to get a shower, nothing but wind.
Originally Posted by elkhunternm
Several rain dances are needed.
Without the alfalfa fumes.
They are saying we’re gonna hit a record @ 109* on Sunday.
🥵
🦫
You desert dwellers are used to heat...Yeah, I know, it’s a dry heat.
We start to hemorrhage when temps reach the mid 70’s around these parts.
When we’ve had heat this early, it has usually ruined archery season starting on August 28th. They’ll lose 1/2 a season, if not all of it, with fire closures.
Keep your dam clothes on and quit smoking the alfalfa.
Thought for a little while we were going to get a shower, nothing but wind.
Originally Posted by elkhunternm
Several rain dances are needed.
Without the alfalfa fumes.
They are saying we’re gonna hit a record @ 109* on Sunday.
🥵
🦫
You desert dwellers are used to heat...Yeah, I know, it’s a dry heat.
We start to hemorrhage when temps reach the mid 70’s around these parts.
When we’ve had heat this early, it has usually ruined archery season starting on August 28th. They’ll lose 1/2 a season, if not all of it, with fire closures.
Hope you all catch some good rain.
🦫
Can be in the valley, where temperatures can soar.
Me, on the coast, humidity is often pushed out by the marine layer.
Valley can be in the 90’s and I’m at 66* with low cloud cover and slight wind...Very comfortable.
Keep your dam clothes on and quit smoking the alfalfa.
Thought for a little while we were going to get a shower, nothing but wind.
Originally Posted by elkhunternm
Several rain dances are needed.
Without the alfalfa fumes.
They are saying we’re gonna hit a record @ 109* on Sunday.
🥵
🦫
You desert dwellers are used to heat...Yeah, I know, it’s a dry heat.
We start to hemorrhage when temps reach the mid 70’s around these parts.
When we’ve had heat this early, it has usually ruined archery season starting on August 28th. They’ll lose 1/2 a season, if not all of it, with fire closures.
Hope you all catch some good rain.
🦫
Can be in the valley, where temperatures can soar.
Me, on the coast, humidity is often pushed out by the marine layer.
Valley can be in the 90’s and I’m at 66* with low cloud cover and slight wind...Very comfortable.
Keep your dam clothes on and quit smoking the alfalfa.
Thought for a little while we were going to get a shower, nothing but wind.
Originally Posted by elkhunternm
Several rain dances are needed.
Without the alfalfa fumes.
I will do the rain dance at night with nothing but my slippers on!
Yup, we got a little shower Tuesday night. Come Monday the weathermen are predicting a 50% chance of rain here, so Sunday night I will dance outside in nothing at all!
Prostitutes are paid to make you feel good about yourself.
And?
Yes. There may be some blood and spooge on the walls. Maybe a dead hooker in the closet.
I hope you don't mind.
Dead enough to not be able to say "no".
It works.
Originally Posted by elkhunternm
Originally Posted by SLM
Keep your dam clothes on and quit smoking the alfalfa.
Thought for a little while we were going to get a shower, nothing but wind.
Originally Posted by elkhunternm
Several rain dances are needed.
Without the alfalfa fumes.
I will do the rain dance at night with nothing but my slippers on!
Yup, we got a little shower Tuesday night. Come Monday the weathermen are predicting a 50% chance of rain here, so Sunday night I will dance outside in nothing at all!
We do resent that statement......we have plenty of 5 cent deposit cans, for the best you have to offer.........donation for beaver, of course. Inflatables have a short satisfaction shelf life.
Originally Posted by T_Inman
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Originally Posted by SLM
Prostitutes are paid to make you feel good about yourself.
What’s the going rate for a hag hump in Billings, MT ?
Asking for Mikey
Laffin
🦫
He couldn't afford it, but as a FYI methheads give a guy more bang for their buck, because they're crazy anyhow. This is not a bad thing.
I hadn't looked at this Thread for quite a while, and just saw that it's up to 19 pages so I thought I'd get the latest on the .224/elk discussion. WRONG! I just read page 19 and not one mention of a .224 bullet or cartridge or even about elk.
I doubt that I would ever use my .22-250 or .223 Rem for elk, but I have several friends that have used their .22 centerfire rifles for elk for many years, including one who previously posted a lot on this Forum that probably killed more elk with his .220 Swift than most posters here have killed with any cartridge.
Here's the bull one of my friends shot a couple of years ago with his .22-250...
Friend of my buddy in Billings, has a grandma who lives on the Reservation... she's only ever owned one rifle, a 22.250...
She's about 4 ft 10 and weighs about 80 to 85 pounds... her husband has been gone a long time, but she still pretty much lves off of elk for meat, which she prefers over venison...and being an Indian on the reservation, she can get away with taking 3 or 4 a year.. when she is getting low on meat, she tells her grandkids, to get ready for her to call them over to take care of the one she just shot...
They are pretty much close enough she just head shoots them out one of the windows she can use for a rest...
I'd do it if I had to, but not having to, I'd chose something bigger in caliber...
But I am glad that it is legal for gals like Grandma here...
in today's world there are just too many hunters and too many 'college boys" made up regulations....and too much for licenses, and especially fines...
My grandfather who was born in 1907, I wonder if he ever bought ANY game license, and he lived on more game meat than store bought..... He passed in 1968, but I do know he shot game out of season when he was getting low on meat...venison...
He ate a lot of squirrel and rabbit... no one really cared that much about those....
I remember showing up at elk camp with a 7mm Remington Magnum, 175 grain Nosler Partitions...
And being told that I didn't have enough gun! A single 175 did just fine.
Fellow I know fed himself for a few years with his 30-30, right out the window of his place. He lived in an orchard and the elk gathered there. I never asked him if he had a license or tag, kinda doubt it.
No desire to try to shoot an elk with a 223 though.
In a perfect world there are many small caliber cartridges that will kill an elk. I will bet that even a 22 long rifle (undoubtedly the favorite of many here) will get the job done. If one has perfect conditions, presentation and the right shooter, its a slam dunk. But in reality that does not always happen and when it fails it's a lost animal. Many here have already posted that they have seen lots of elk lost too much larger and more powerful cartridges,. Thats true, but exponentially more elk hunters use a more powerful cartridge, hence lost game. Its' going to happen sooner or later. I have done it and so have my partners, but that still does not make the .243 a great elk cartridge. It's not, it is adequate in some instances but inadequate in far more. I once lost a deer shot at point blank range with a 45 caliber pistol, both shots hit well, but the buck managed to get up enough adrenaline and get away from me. Poor tracking conditions, hindered the recovery. If I had shot the same animal with my 45-70, (which I also had with me), it would have been DRT. I have a limited sampling of over 200 elk killed by myself and three others of my partners in 4 states and over 50 years. All with a 30;06 or greater. My best recollection is that 7 or 8 have been lost. Not because of bad shooting, but primarily because of conditions, which limited the retrieval.