Somebody please elaborate on the pros and cons of this rifle. All I know is what I read on the 'net....never laid eyes on one. I have a Tikka T3 (actually it's my son's) that shoots exceptionally well, so why would I spend the $$$ on a 54 when I could buy my own Tikka, Kimber, Win 70 FN, etc. Is the Cooper 54 all it's cracked up to be? Thanks.
Sir,
A couple thought in regards to your questions above.
JG, from what I�ve read I�d bet you�re a guy that knows and uses quality gear. I continually say that I�m very sorry for going first class. Also, I always like to have an exit strategy. Nikon Monarchs and Sightron are good glass, but 5 to 10 years after you buy them, they don�t command the price that a comparable Leupold will. Kinda like a Harley vs. Susuki. I happen to think (JMHO, and its certainly not objective) that pre-enjoyed Coopers, if bought right are one of the best values going. Yes you can probably buy cheaper, but I learned a long time ago that of the four variables, price, availability, quality and service, it�s very hard to get the best of all four at once. I find that the memory of lesser quality lingers long after the joy of low price fades.
I�ve owned quite a few rifles over the last twenty years, including a dozen plus Coopers. I got started buying
Cooper�s years ago when all they made was single shot rifles. Seems they were worried about the �� at 100 yd. guarantee in conjunction with a bolt action. At that time the only way a fellow could have a 17 Ackley Hornet, a 17 HeBee, 20 Vartarg (20-221 fireball) or a Tactical 20 (20-223) was to have Bullberry, Virgin Valley or EA Brown to make you a barrel for your Contender or have a custom rifle built, unless he bought a
Cooper. At that time they had the model 36 rim-fire which was a repeater, and their model 21, 22, and 38, all single shots. All but one of my Coopers have been single shots. All but one were purchased for less than 13 Benjamins, and most for around $1,050. The model 52 (long action) came on the scene first. Then the model 54 (short action) and then the Model 56 (magnums).
I�d say that the pros were the quality of the wood, fit, finish, consistency and accuracy, balance, crisp adjustable trigger, and pride of ownership.
I own/have owned a number of synthetic stocked rifles, but I love the warmth of Wood.
IIRC I paid around $1,050 for this Model 22 Varmint Extreme, it was pre-enjoyed, but no where near shot out.
Here is how it shot, consistently
Here is the one repeater that I�ve owned. It is a model 52, Jackson Game, in 25-06.
Not a one holer, but better than a 1� shooter at 100. Picked it up for $1,250 with 5 boxes of premium Ammo.
A model 22 Varmint extreme in 308 Win.
Shoots like this
The most accurate 22 Hornet I�ve ever owned, would do better than �� at 100 with Lil Gun. This is a Model 38 Classic. Bought it way back paid 10 Benjamins for it with the scope.
[img]http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e129/glenn1221/Rifles/IMG_9015_zps7d93ec98.jpg[/img]Here�s a model 22 Montana Varminter in 6.5 x 284.
[img]http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e129/glenn1221/Rifles/mtv1_zps4b27c939.jpg[/img]Shooting the corners with the 6.5 x 284
[img]
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e129/glenn1221/DSCN5941.jpg[/img]
3 @ 100
[img]
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e129/glenn1221/DSCN5943.jpg[/img]
3 @ 200 My point of aim for this target was the top left hand corner of the intersection of orange. I was shooting the corners. This was one of my first load combinations for this rifle.
The con�s,
Not enough model 52�s and 54�s at the price I want to pay.
On the repeaters, unless they have changed you have to load the rounds into the magazine before you place the DM in the receiver. Cartridges cannot be fed through the receiver into the DM. I can live with that as I almost never need more than one round, and usually have time for a second shot if necessary.
For me, the Jackson hunter and the Classic are my favorite stock styles. However being a gun whore, if the price is right, I�ll slum a Varminter, Montana Varminter or a Varmint Extreme.
Best
GWB