|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,033 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,033 Likes: 1 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203 |
In the 'old days' magnum meant you had more powder and 'bigger' bullet to go farther and still have the killing power on 'big' game; todays technology and advancment in rounds (shell and bullet), have almost made the term magnum obsolete; cas in point: I own a gun in 7 mm. rem. mag.; it will kill anything on the planet; newer rounds like 7mm-08, or .308 win. use a shorter case that is actually wider towards the bottom that produces ballistics equal to what we used to call 'magnum'; the 7mm rem. mag. case was based on the perverbial 30-06 case, but was widened towards the top to get more powder in; The term MAGNUM doesn't really apply anymore with newer ammo;
Mike Walker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,074
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,074 |
In the 'old days' magnum meant you had more powder and 'bigger' bullet to go farther and still have the killing power on 'big' game; todays technology and advancment in rounds (shell and bullet), have almost made the term magnum obsolete; cas in point: I own a gun in 7 mm. rem. mag.; it will kill anything on the planet; newer rounds like 7mm-08, or .308 win. use a shorter case that is actually wider towards the bottom that produces ballistics equal to what we used to call 'magnum'; the 7mm rem. mag. case was based on the perverbial 30-06 case, but was widened towards the top to get more powder in; The term MAGNUM doesn't really apply anymore with newer ammo; I thought all belted magnums were based on the 300 H&H case (some exceptions though........the 378 Roy for example). The 7-08 and the 308 are based on the 30.06 case. The only thing the 7mm Rem Mag and the 30.06 have in common is that they can run out of the same action length. Correct me if I am wrong here!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121 Likes: 1
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121 Likes: 1 |
375 H&H beat it by over a dozen years and it weren't the first belted case.
"Dear Lord, save me from Your followers"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203 |
another case (subject) in point; remember the wwII BAR? was a 30-06 round; the military wanted a faster loading automatic round, and the 30-06 required a 'long' action to eject and load a new round; Too slow! they developed the 7.62 NATO round, which is the same .308 win case you use in many bolt action guns; they made the shell a little wider at the base, which allowed the round to be SHORTER, which allowed for faster reloading; virtually all of the newer offerings in .30 cal bullets use this case; they still use 'SOME' of the magnum monicer today, like the .xxx WSM (winchester short magnum); My personal opinion is that 'MAGNUM' would only apply to rounds like the 300 and 458 H&H guns that are special purpose guns for the African game;
Mike Walker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203 |
Also, I am only talking about 'non-belted' rounds;
Mike Walker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203 |
rember the old 7mm. express remington? was a 30-06 case; 7mm. rem. mag case was the same case AT THE BASE, but widened up the length of the case to allow for more powder; the ACTION length was the same, but the case diameter is different; you could put a 30-06 , or a 7mm. express remington in either gun, and also put either one into the breech of a 7 rem. mag (I wouldn't advise it for obvious reasons), but you can't push a 7 rem. mag. round into a 30-06 breech; won't fit;
Mike Walker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203 |
OK, guys, I stand corrected on one of my points; I will try to clear it up here;
I was wrong about shoving a 30-06 into a 7 mm. breech; 7 mm. express remington and .280 are interchangable; you can shoot them both out of the same gun; obvoiusly, a 30-06 is a .30 cal. bullet;
You can't put a 30-06 into a 7 mm. breech; BUT, a 7 mm. rem. MAGNUM case is the same BASE as a 30-06, but wider up the shell length; In other words, a 30-06 case with the same base will fit into a 7 mm. rem. magnum breech, but a 7 mm. rem. mag. case will not go into a 30-06 breech;
Am I making sense here?
Mike Walker
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,466 Likes: 4
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,466 Likes: 4 |
That's TOTAL nonsense! The .308 Winchester/7.62 Nato is based on the 30-06 case, only shorter. The WSM cases are based on the 404 Jeffery, only shortened by quite a bit and blown out! They are MUCH fatter than the .308 Win case and hold 35 - 40% more powder, depending on the load! The 7mm RM is based on a shortened and blown out 300/375H&H. It has nothing to do whatsoever with the 30-06 case. Actually, it is derived from a .458 case or .338WM case necked down or a .264WM case necked up. There's little comparison between a 7-08 and a 7mm Mag other than they shoot the same diameter bullets.
"What shall it profit a man if he gain the whole world and lose his own soul" - Jesus
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 713
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 713 |
BUT, a 7 mm. rem. MAGNUM case is the same BASE as a 30-06, but wider up the shell length; In other words, a 30-06 case with the same base will fit into a 7 mm. rem. magnum breech, but a 7 mm. rem. mag. case will not go into a 30-06 breech;
Am I making sense here? No
"The beauty of the 2nd amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it" - Thomas Jefferson
Criminals prefer unarmed victims and dictators prefer unarmed citizens
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203 |
hey, cv550! you are absolutely correct; this is the 'REAL' Mike Walker speaking here; my 22 yr old son was on the site, and came and got me; He's a marine, so what do they know but 'straight ahead', and damn the bullets;
You are right in all aspects of your answer; Actually, winchester first developed the first belted magnums in .264, .338, and .458, all based on your afore mentioned rounds; the remington 7mm actually caused the .264 win. to go out of production; the 7mm. came out in 1962, same year as the 700 rifle;
will have to go back and see what else he said to see what else I need to correct;
I only shoot muzzle loaders anymore; much more fun;
Mike Walker
Mike Walker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 417
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 417 |
hey, cv550! you are absolutely correct; this is the 'REAL' Mike Walker speaking here; my 22 yr old son was on the site, and came and got me; He's a marine, so what do they know but 'straight ahead', and damn the bullets;
You are right in all aspects of your answer; Actually, winchester first developed the first belted magnums in .264, .338, and .458, all based on your afore mentioned rounds; the remington 7mm actually caused the .264 win. to go out of production; the 7mm. came out in 1962, same year as the 700 rifle;
will have to go back and see what else he said to see what else I need to correct;
I only shoot muzzle loaders anymore; much more fun;
Mike Walker Winchester did not develope the first belted magnums. I belive it was H & H in 1910 which was the .400/375 Velopx belted rimless, then in 1912 the more powerful .375 H&H magnum. I think WBY or remington was next then the 300 win magnum came along. I'm not sure about WBY and REmington but the H&H was first IIRC.
Last edited by jmt277; 12/24/08.
magnums the only way to shoot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203 |
I didn't mean to say that they developed the first 'belted' magnum; I was refering to when they ( FIRST WIN and THEN REM) decided to offer them as a commercially available load to the consumer in rounds other than those considered to be the 'ONLY MAGNUMS'
and that is exactly what happened; they figured out that they could market a 'belted' magnum round in smaller caliber than those 'lion and elephant' shooters of the old double barrel .264,.338,and.458 DOUBLE BARREL MAGNUMS;
HENCE, the single shot .264, the .338 came about;(winchester) (the 458 may exist as a single shot pariah,but did not catch on, due to its recoil that was evident as a single shot sporting gun);
Then, in 1962, REMINGTON came out with the 7mm. REMINGTON MAG., in conjunction with the new 700 bolt action rifle; The new 7mm. cartridge was an upgraded WIN .264; They did ballistics tests that showed a .280 round was more accurate than the .264 mag.
HENCE,the 7mm. rem. mag. survives today, and the 264 win. mag does not;
Mike Walker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 417
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 417 |
The 264 wim mag has not survived, I bet you get a response on that very quickly. The 264 win mag is a great round and a lot of guys on here are rather fond of it. There is a pretty strong following for it in some areas the southeast being one.
magnums the only way to shoot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900 |
I didn't mean to say that they developed the first 'belted' magnum; I was refering to when they ( FIRST WIN and THEN REM) decided to offer them as a commercially available load to the consumer in rounds other than those considered to be the 'ONLY MAGNUMS'
and that is exactly what happened; they figured out that they could market a 'belted' magnum round in smaller caliber than those 'lion and elephant' shooters of the old double barrel .264,.338,and.458 DOUBLE BARREL MAGNUMS;
HENCE, the single shot .264, the .338 came about;(winchester) (the 458 may exist as a single shot pariah,but did not catch on, due to its recoil that was evident as a single shot sporting gun);
Then, in 1962, REMINGTON came out with the 7mm. REMINGTON MAG., in conjunction with the new 700 bolt action rifle; The new 7mm. cartridge was an upgraded WIN .264; They did ballistics tests that showed a .280 round was more accurate than the .264 mag.
HENCE,the 7mm. rem. mag. survives today, and the 264 win. mag does not; Mike: I know you were involved with the development of the 7 Rem Mag with another guy from Remington; now what was his name... ................and of course,where was it you did much of the work on the cartridge? Help me out here,will ya?
The 280 Remington is overbore.
The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203 |
hey,jmt277, I'm not saying the .264 win. mag. did not survive; all good shooting guns survive if you can reload them; old traditions die hard; they asked me to turn in my M14 for a M16 in viet nam, and I said 'go to hell', I'll keep this thank you very much;
Only thing I am saying is that certain rounds die out in their AVAILIBILITY, not the popularity;
they wanted me to give up my M14, for a M16? No way;
but what about now? how many guys you see runnin around with M14's?
I have shot all of the guns in question (single bore(all belted,plus one not mentioned above(270 weatherby mag.)), and I can honestly tell you, that no matter what you like, it's marketing that dictates what you are going to get, unless you make the move to do it yourself ;
so lets say you go into a store and ask for .264 win. mag.? what you think your answer would be?
Mike Walker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203 |
Mike Walker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 417
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 417 |
It depends on the gun shop when it comes to the 264. I have one in a sendero I bought last year and it is the new Sendero SF II which is very accurate. I also have a 270 wby that you mentioned and it's a good shooter too and is awsome with 150 gr NP's.
magnums the only way to shoot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,608 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,608 Likes: 1 |
Why Does One Need a Magnum??? To satisfy one's desire for a magnum. Bruce
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,813
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,813 |
One doesn't need a "vette" but some have them....
laissez les bons temps rouler
|
|
|
|
573 members (1minute, 12344mag, 1badf350, 1Longbow, 1lesfox, 10gaugeman, 59 invisible),
2,348
guests, and
1,200
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,616
Posts18,511,798
Members74,008
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|