Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by Starman
Originally Posted by goalie
Um, if people are informed of how it was fast tracked
and approved (and we do that) then, yeah. Some people
do the risk-reward calculations and come to a different
conclusion than me......
...All the people getting
it right now where I'm at WANT it.
Do you know of any medical staff that feel
so strongly about the Vax. that they refuse
to administer such?
Star: Not taking it yourself because of concerns about safety do not equate to a ethical need to deny the vaccine which might possibly work to adults who want to try it. We are Libertarians (some of us) and are pro-choice when it comes to a woman's (or man's) medical decisions. Should be left ultimately to the patient to decide. I'm leery of flu shots and shingles shots but if I was giving people shots and they wanted one, well roll up your sleeve or pull down your pants. It's the pro-choice way. Bad as I need cosmetic surgery I'm opting out but I wouldn't mind prepping you for it if that's your choice.


Yeah but HappyCamper is alluding to the vaccine being an almost guaranteed bad thing, beyond any sort of normal risk. If the vaccine had a known 99% risk of adverse side effects, and the patient still wanted it, would it still be administered? Where does a medical practioner draw the line?

Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.

That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.

Well?