And a mature logical response from you from the beginning would be to do the same to the OP, but you choose to belittle and ask if the poster was really that gullible based on your perception of Jones with no basis of fact to refute the story in question.
My we apply your logic to you?
You can do whatever you like
There is no "basis in fact" to prove the story, so I don't need to refute anything.
It's foolish to think any LEO would tell a FFL to be suspicous of s sale where someone didn't offer an ID, considering it's not possible to buy without one
